Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Reply to Ballentine’s comment [Am. J. Phys. 54, 947 (1986)]

John G. Loeser

Published Oct 1, 1986• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1119/1.14800

Related papers

Braunstein, Buceta, and Giovambattista Reply:

Lidia A. Braunstein, R. C. Buceta, Nicolás Giovambattista

Reply to ``Comment on [Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 630 (1998)]''

arXiv:cond-mat/9908346•Physical Review Letters•Feb 8, 1999•4 citations

Reply to comments by L E Ballentine

Delbert A. Greenwood

Proceedings of the Physical Society•Nov 1, 1966•0 citations

Comment on ‘‘Probability theory in quantum mechanics’’ [L.E. Ballentine, Am. J. Phys. 5 4, 883 (1986)]

Lazar Mayants

American Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 1987•3 citations

Hove and Sudbø Reply:

J. Hove, Asle Sudbø

A short Reply to the Comment of Prokof'ev and Svistunov, cond-mat/0504008, is given.

arXiv:cond-mat/0506023•Physical Review Letters•Jun 1, 2006•3 citations

Reply to Ballentine's Comments

Henry Pierce Stapp

American Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1974•0 citations

Meyer Replies:

DAVID A. MEYER

A Reply to the Comment by S. J. van Enk.Received 18 March 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.790©2000 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jan 24, 2000•15 citations