Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/9802162

Tunneling Times and "Superluminal" Tunneling: A brief Review

V. S. Olkhovsky, Erasmo Recami

Published Feb 15, 1998• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In the First Part of this paper [that was submitted for pub. in 1991 and appeared in print in Phys. Reports 214 (1992) 339] we critically review the main theoretical definitions and calculations of the sub-barrier tunnelling and reflection times. Moreover, within conventional QM, we propose a new definition of such durations, on the basis of a recent general formalism of ours. At last, we discuss a surprising result: that QM predicts tunnelling through opaque barriers to take place with Superluminal group-velocities. In the Second Part [that appeared in print later, in J. de Physique-I 5 (1995) 1351] we, e.g., present the results of some numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times during tunnelling INSIDE a rectangular potential barrier, and set forth suitable definitions also of the variances, or dispersions, for the transmission and reflection time-durations. The numerical evaluations confirm that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of Superluminal tunnelling (that we called "Hartman effect"): an effect that in these days is receiving --at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Vienna-- indirect, but interesting, experimental verifications. More detailed reviews of the same topics are in the LANL Archive cond-mat/9802126 (and in an Appendix to physics/9712051, where the data are summarized of the experiments that --in four different sectors of physics-- seem to indicate the existence of Superluminal motions).

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/9802162

Related papers

Tunnelling times and the Hartman effect

V. S. Olkhovsky, Erasmo Recami, Aleksandr K. Zaichenko

In a recent review paper [Phys. Rpeorts 214 (1992) 339] we proposed, within conventional quantum mechanics, new definitions fot the subarrier tunnelling and reflection times. Aims of the present paper are: (i) presenting and analysing the results of various numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times $\\left \\langle tau_P_e_n \\right \\rangle $ , $\\left \\langle tau_R_e_t\\right \\rangle $ during tunnelling inside a rectangular potential barrier, for various penetration depths $x_f$ ; (ii) putting forth and discussing suitable definitions. Besides of the mean values, also of the variances (or dispersions)$D\\tau_T\\ $ and $ D\\tau_R\\ $ for the tima durations of trasmission and reflection processes; (iii) mentioning that our definition $\\left \\langle tau_T \\right \\rangle $ for the average transmission time results to constituite an improvemente of the ordinary dwell-time $ \\bar tau^D^W\\ $ formula: (iv) commenting upon some recent criticism by C.R. Leavens, on the basis of our new numerical results. We stress that our numerical evaluations confirm that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of the Hartman effect: an effect that in these days (due to the theoretical connections between tunnelling and evanescent-wave propagation) is receiving - at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Wien - indirect, but quite interesting, experimental verifications. At last we briefly analyze some other definitions of tunnelling times.

•Jan 1, 1995•0 citations

More about Tunnelling Times, the Dwell Time and the “Hartman Effect”

V. S. Olkhovsky, Erasmo Recami, Fabio Raciti +1 more

In a recent review paper [{\em Phys. Reports} {\bf 214} (1992) 339] we proposed, within conventional quantum mechanics, new definitions for the sub-barrier tunnelling and reflection times. \ Aims of the present paper are: \ (i) presenting and analysing the results of various numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times $$, $$, during tunnelling {\em inside} a rectangular potential barrier, for various penetration depths $x_{\rm f}$; \ (ii) putting forth and discussing suitable definitions, besides of the mean values, also of the {\em variances} (or dispersions) ${\rm D} \, {τ_{\rm T}}$ and ${\rm D} \, {τ_{\, \rm R}}$ for the time durations of transmission and reflection processes; \ (iii) mentioning, moreover, that our definition $$ for the average transmission time results to constitute an {\em improvement} of the ordinary dwell--time ${\ove τ}^{\rm Dw}$ formula: \ (iv) commenting, at last, on the basis of our {\em new} numerical results, upon some recent criticism by C.R.Leavens. \ \ We stress that our numerical evaluations {\em confirm} that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of the {\em Hartman effect}: an effect that in these days (due to the theoretical connections between tunnelling and evanescent--wave propagation) is receiving ---at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Vienna--- indirect, but quite interesting, experimental verifications. \ Eventually, we briefly analyze some other definitions of tunnelling times.

arXiv:quant-ph/9508010•Journal de Physique I•Oct 1, 1995•57 citations

Tempi di Tunnelling (Tunneling Times)

Giuseppe Privitera, Erasmo Recami, V. S. Olkhovsky

In this review (in Italian) we critically and detaily examine various definitions existing in the literature for the tunnelling times: namely, the phase-time; the centroid-based times; the Buttiker and Landauer times; the Larmor times; the complex (path-integral and Bohm) times; the dwell time, and the generalized (Olkhovsky and Recami) dwell time, with some numerical evaluations. Then, we pass to examine the equivalence between quantum tunnelling and "photon tunnelling" (evanescent waves propagation), with particular attention to tunnellings with Superluminal group-velocities ("Hartman effect"). At last, the main (Cologne, Berkeley, Florence, Vienna) experimental data about Superluminal evanescent wave propagation are briefly reviewed.

arXiv:cond-mat/9802126•Feb 11, 1998•0 citations

Tunnelling times: An elementary introduction

Giuseppe Privitera, Giovanni Salesi, V. S. Olkhovsky +1 more

In this paper we examine critically and in detail some existing definitions for the tunnelling times, namely: the phase-time; the centroid-based times; the Buttiker and Landauer times; the Larmor times; the complex (path-integral and Bohm) times; the dwell time, and finally the generalized (Olkhovsky and Recami) dwell time, by adding also some numerical evaluations. Then, we pass to examine the equivalence between quantum tunnelling and "photon tunnelling" (evanescent waves propagation), with particular attention to tunnelling with Superluminal group-velocities ("Hartman effect"). At last, in an Appendix, we add a bird-eye view of all the experimental sectors of physics in which Superluminal motions seem to appear.

arXiv:quant-ph/0412146•Rivista Del Nuovo Cimento•Dec 19, 2004•27 citations

Superluminal tunnelling through successive barriers: Does QM predict infinite group-velocities?

Erasmo Recami

The phenomenon of one-dimensional non-resonant tunnelling is analyzed through two or more successive (opaque) potential barriers, separated by intermediate free regions R, just by exploiting the relevant solutions to the Schroedinger equation. The total traversal time has been shown by us to be independent not only of the barrier widths (the so-called ‘Hartman effect’), but also of the R-widths: so that the effective group velocity in the regions R, between two successive barriers, can be regarded as practically infinite. Such a prediction has been theoretically confirmed and generalized (as well as interpreted in terms of ‘super-oscillations’) by Aharonov et al. A recent experiment by Longhi et al. supported the predictions by considering two successive gratings in an optical fibre, that is, by having recourse to two ‘classical barriers’ (which allow simulating the tunnelling, due to the known formal identity between the Schrödinger and the Helmholtz equation).

Journal of Modern Optics•Apr 1, 2004•34 citations

Apparent superluminality and the generalized Hartman effect in double-barrier tunneling

Herbert G. Winful

Recent papers suggest that tunneling wave packets traverse the region of allowed propagation between two potential barriers with superluminal group velocity and in a time independent of barrier separation. This phenomenon has been termed the "generalized Hartman effect" and extended to multiple barriers. Here we show that this delay time is not a transit time but a cavity lifetime. It does not imply superluminal velocity. Reported experimental verifications of this effect are reinterpreted.

Physical Review E•Oct 18, 2005•33 citations
In the First Part of this paper [that was submitted for pub. in 1991 and appeared in print in Phys. Reports 214 (1992) 339] we critically review the main theoretical definitions and calculations of the sub-barrier tunnelling and reflection times. Moreover, within conventional QM, we propose a new definition of such durations, on the basis of a recent general formalism of ours. At last, we discuss a surprising result: that QM predicts tunnelling through opaque barriers to take place with Superluminal group-velocities. In the Second Part [that appeared in print later, in J. de Physique-I 5 (1995) 1351] we, e.g., present the results of some numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times during tunnelling INSIDE a rectangular potential barrier, and set forth suitable definitions also of the variances, or dispersions, for the transmission and reflection time-durations. The numerical evaluations confirm that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of Superluminal tunnelling (that we called "Hartman effect"): an effect that in these days is receiving --at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Vienna-- indirect, but interesting, experimental verifications. More detailed reviews of the same topics are in the LANL Archive cond-mat/9802126 (and in an Appendix to physics/9712051, where the data are summarized of the experiments that --in four different sectors of physics-- seem to indicate the existence of Superluminal motions).
In a recent review paper [Phys. Rpeorts 214 (1992) 339] we proposed, within conventional quantum mechanics, new definitions fot the subarrier tunnelling and reflection times. Aims of the present paper are: (i) presenting and analysing the results of various numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times $\\left \\langle tau_P_e_n \\right \\rangle $ , $\\left \\langle tau_R_e_t\\right \\rangle $ during tunnelling inside a rectangular potential barrier, for various penetration depths xfx_fxf​ ; (ii) putting forth and discussing suitable definitions. Besides of the mean values, also of the variances (or dispersions)$D\\tau_T\\ $ and $ D\\tau_R\\ $ for the tima durations of trasmission and reflection processes; (iii) mentioning that our definition $\\left \\langle tau_T \\right \\rangle $ for the average transmission time results to constituite an improvemente of the ordinary dwell-time $ \\bar tau^D^W\\ $ formula: (iv) commenting upon some recent criticism by C.R. Leavens, on the basis of our new numerical results. We stress that our numerical evaluations confirm that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of the Hartman effect: an effect that in these days (due to the theoretical connections between tunnelling and evanescent-wave propagation) is receiving - at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Wien - indirect, but quite interesting, experimental verifications. At last we briefly analyze some other definitions of tunnelling times.
In a recent review paper [{\em Phys. Reports} {\bf 214} (1992) 339] we proposed, within conventional quantum mechanics, new definitions for the sub-barrier tunnelling and reflection times. \ Aims of the present paper are: \ (i) presenting and analysing the results of various numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times ,, ,, during tunnelling {\em inside} a rectangular potential barrier, for various penetration depths xfx_{\rm f}xf​; \ (ii) putting forth and discussing suitable definitions, besides of the mean values, also of the {\em variances} (or dispersions) D τT{\rm D} \, {τ_{\rm T}}DτT​ and D τ R{\rm D} \, {τ_{\, \rm R}}DτR​ for the time durations of transmission and reflection processes; \ (iii) mentioning, moreover, that our definition $$ for the average transmission time results to constitute an {\em improvement} of the ordinary dwell--time ${\ove τ}^{\rm Dw}$ formula: \ (iv) commenting, at last, on the basis of our {\em new} numerical results, upon some recent criticism by C.R.Leavens. \ \ We stress that our numerical evaluations {\em confirm} that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of the {\em Hartman effect}: an effect that in these days (due to the theoretical connections between tunnelling and evanescent--wave propagation) is receiving ---at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Vienna--- indirect, but quite interesting, experimental verifications. \ Eventually, we briefly analyze some other definitions of tunnelling times.
In this review (in Italian) we critically and detaily examine various definitions existing in the literature for the tunnelling times: namely, the phase-time; the centroid-based times; the Buttiker and Landauer times; the Larmor times; the complex (path-integral and Bohm) times; the dwell time, and the generalized (Olkhovsky and Recami) dwell time, with some numerical evaluations. Then, we pass to examine the equivalence between quantum tunnelling and "photon tunnelling" (evanescent waves propagation), with particular attention to tunnellings with Superluminal group-velocities ("Hartman effect"). At last, the main (Cologne, Berkeley, Florence, Vienna) experimental data about Superluminal evanescent wave propagation are briefly reviewed.
In this paper we examine critically and in detail some existing definitions for the tunnelling times, namely: the phase-time; the centroid-based times; the Buttiker and Landauer times; the Larmor times; the complex (path-integral and Bohm) times; the dwell time, and finally the generalized (Olkhovsky and Recami) dwell time, by adding also some numerical evaluations. Then, we pass to examine the equivalence between quantum tunnelling and "photon tunnelling" (evanescent waves propagation), with particular attention to tunnelling with Superluminal group-velocities ("Hartman effect"). At last, in an Appendix, we add a bird-eye view of all the experimental sectors of physics in which Superluminal motions seem to appear.
The phenomenon of one-dimensional non-resonant tunnelling is analyzed through two or more successive (opaque) potential barriers, separated by intermediate free regions R, just by exploiting the relevant solutions to the Schroedinger equation. The total traversal time has been shown by us to be independent not only of the barrier widths (the so-called ‘Hartman effect’), but also of the R-widths: so that the effective group velocity in the regions R, between two successive barriers, can be regarded as practically infinite. Such a prediction has been theoretically confirmed and generalized (as well as interpreted in terms of ‘super-oscillations’) by Aharonov et al. A recent experiment by Longhi et al. supported the predictions by considering two successive gratings in an optical fibre, that is, by having recourse to two ‘classical barriers’ (which allow simulating the tunnelling, due to the known formal identity between the Schrödinger and the Helmholtz equation).
Recent papers suggest that tunneling wave packets traverse the region of allowed propagation between two potential barriers with superluminal group velocity and in a time independent of barrier separation. This phenomenon has been termed the "generalized Hartman effect" and extended to multiple barriers. Here we show that this delay time is not a transit time but a cavity lifetime. It does not imply superluminal velocity. Reported experimental verifications of this effect are reinterpreted.