Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review E

Apparent superluminality and the generalized Hartman effect in double-barrier tunneling

Herbert G. Winful

Published Oct 18, 2005• 33 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Recent papers suggest that tunneling wave packets traverse the region of allowed propagation between two potential barriers with superluminal group velocity and in a time independent of barrier separation. This phenomenon has been termed the "generalized Hartman effect" and extended to multiple barriers. Here we show that this delay time is not a transit time but a cavity lifetime. It does not imply superluminal velocity. Reported experimental verifications of this effect are reinterpreted.

DOI
10.1103/physreve.72.046608

Related papers

Superluminal traversal time and interference between multiple finite wave packets

Xi Chen, Chun-Fang Li

The mechanism of superluminal traversal time is investigated from the viewpoint of interference between multiple finite wave packets, due to the multiple reflections inside the well or barrier. In the case of potential well traveling that is classically allowed, each of the successively transmitted constituents is delayed by a subluminal time. When the thickness of the well is much smaller in comparison with a characteristic length of the incident wave packet, the reshaped wave packet with superluminal traversal time in transmission maintains the pro. le of the incident wave packet. In the case of potential barrier tunneling that is classically forbidden, though each of the successively transmitted constituents is delayed by a time that is independent of the barrier thickness, the interference between multiple transmitted constituents explains the barrier thickness dependence of the traversal time for thin barriers and its barrier thickness independence for thick barriers. This manifests the nature of the Hartman effect. Copyright (c) EPLA, 2008.

arXiv:quant-ph/0611154•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Apr 21, 2008•13 citations

Superluminal tunneling through two successive barriers

V. S. Olkhovsky, Erasmo Recami, Giovanni Salesi

We study the phenomenon of one-dimensional non-resonant tunneling through two successive (opaque) potential barriers, separated by an intermediate free region , by analyzing the relevant solutions to the Schroedinger equation. We find that the total traversal time does not depend not only on the barrier widths (the so-called "Hartman effect"), but also on the width: so that the effective velocity in the region , between the two barriers, can be regarded as practically infinite. This agrees with the results known from the corresponding waveguide experiments, which simulated the tunneling experiment herein considered due to the known formal identity between the Schroedinger and the Helmholtz equation.

arXiv:quant-ph/0002022•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Mar 1, 2002•118 citations

Do single photons tunnel faster than light?

Herbert G. Winful

Experiments done with single photons in the early 1990's produced a surprising result: that single photons pass through a photonic tunnel barrier with a group velocity faster than the vacuum speed of light. This result has stimulated intense discussions related to causality, the speed of information transfer, the nature of barrier tunneling and the meaning of group velocity. The superluminality of tunneling photons is now textbook material, although the authors note that controversy still remains. Another paradoxical result, known as the Hartman effect, is that the tunneling time of the photons becomes independent of barrier length in the limit of opaque barriers. In this paper we examine the meaning of group velocity in the context of barrier tunneling. We ask whether a single tunneling photon can be described by a group velocity and whether the short group delays imply superluminal group velocity. We resolve the paradox of the Hartman effect and show that the predicted and measured group delays are not transit times but photon lifetimes.

arXiv:0708.3889•Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Aug 26, 2007•4 citations

Superluminal tunnelling through successive barriers: Does QM predict infinite group-velocities?

Erasmo Recami

The phenomenon of one-dimensional non-resonant tunnelling is analyzed through two or more successive (opaque) potential barriers, separated by intermediate free regions R, just by exploiting the relevant solutions to the Schroedinger equation. The total traversal time has been shown by us to be independent not only of the barrier widths (the so-called ‘Hartman effect’), but also of the R-widths: so that the effective group velocity in the regions R, between two successive barriers, can be regarded as practically infinite. Such a prediction has been theoretically confirmed and generalized (as well as interpreted in terms of ‘super-oscillations’) by Aharonov et al. A recent experiment by Longhi et al. supported the predictions by considering two successive gratings in an optical fibre, that is, by having recourse to two ‘classical barriers’ (which allow simulating the tunnelling, due to the known formal identity between the Schrödinger and the Helmholtz equation).

Journal of Modern Optics•Apr 1, 2004•34 citations

Energy storage in superluminal barrier tunneling: Origin of the Hartman effect

Herbert G. Winful

We show that the anomalously short delay times observed in barrier tunneling have their origin in energy storage and its subsequent release. The observed group delay is proportional to the energy stored. This delay is not a propagation delay and should not be linked to a velocity since evanescent waves do not propagate. The "Hartman effect", in which the group delay becomes independent of thickness for opaque barriers, is shown to be a consequence of the saturation of stored energy with barrier length.

Optics Express•Dec 16, 2002•74 citations

Physical mechanism for apparent superluminality in barrier tunneling

Herbert G. Winful

Tunneling without distortion is not a propagation phenomenon but a quasistatic process in which the slowly varying envelope of the input pulse modulates the amplitude of a standing wave in the barrier. Because the envelope has a bandwidth that is small compared to the cutoff frequency of the barrier it does not propagate; it merely stands and waves. The envelope of the reflected and transmitted fields can adiabatically follow the envelope of the input pulse with only a small delay proportional to the energy stored in the barrier. The Hartman effect, in which the delay becomes independent of barrier length, is explained on the basis of saturation of stored energy with increasing length. Because the delay is not a propagation delay, it should not be linked to a velocity of propagation. True evanescent waves have zero speed and not infinite velocity as often asserted.

IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics•Jan 1, 2003•22 citations
Recent papers suggest that tunneling wave packets traverse the region of allowed propagation between two potential barriers with superluminal group velocity and in a time independent of barrier separation. This phenomenon has been termed the "generalized Hartman effect" and extended to multiple barriers. Here we show that this delay time is not a transit time but a cavity lifetime. It does not imply superluminal velocity. Reported experimental verifications of this effect are reinterpreted.
The mechanism of superluminal traversal time is investigated from the viewpoint of interference between multiple finite wave packets, due to the multiple reflections inside the well or barrier. In the case of potential well traveling that is classically allowed, each of the successively transmitted constituents is delayed by a subluminal time. When the thickness of the well is much smaller in comparison with a characteristic length of the incident wave packet, the reshaped wave packet with superluminal traversal time in transmission maintains the pro. le of the incident wave packet. In the case of potential barrier tunneling that is classically forbidden, though each of the successively transmitted constituents is delayed by a time that is independent of the barrier thickness, the interference between multiple transmitted constituents explains the barrier thickness dependence of the traversal time for thin barriers and its barrier thickness independence for thick barriers. This manifests the nature of the Hartman effect. Copyright (c) EPLA, 2008.
We study the phenomenon of one-dimensional non-resonant tunneling through two successive (opaque) potential barriers, separated by an intermediate free region , by analyzing the relevant solutions to the Schroedinger equation. We find that the total traversal time does not depend not only on the barrier widths (the so-called "Hartman effect"), but also on the width: so that the effective velocity in the region , between the two barriers, can be regarded as practically infinite. This agrees with the results known from the corresponding waveguide experiments, which simulated the tunneling experiment herein considered due to the known formal identity between the Schroedinger and the Helmholtz equation.
Experiments done with single photons in the early 1990's produced a surprising result: that single photons pass through a photonic tunnel barrier with a group velocity faster than the vacuum speed of light. This result has stimulated intense discussions related to causality, the speed of information transfer, the nature of barrier tunneling and the meaning of group velocity. The superluminality of tunneling photons is now textbook material, although the authors note that controversy still remains. Another paradoxical result, known as the Hartman effect, is that the tunneling time of the photons becomes independent of barrier length in the limit of opaque barriers. In this paper we examine the meaning of group velocity in the context of barrier tunneling. We ask whether a single tunneling photon can be described by a group velocity and whether the short group delays imply superluminal group velocity. We resolve the paradox of the Hartman effect and show that the predicted and measured group delays are not transit times but photon lifetimes.
The phenomenon of one-dimensional non-resonant tunnelling is analyzed through two or more successive (opaque) potential barriers, separated by intermediate free regions R, just by exploiting the relevant solutions to the Schroedinger equation. The total traversal time has been shown by us to be independent not only of the barrier widths (the so-called ‘Hartman effect’), but also of the R-widths: so that the effective group velocity in the regions R, between two successive barriers, can be regarded as practically infinite. Such a prediction has been theoretically confirmed and generalized (as well as interpreted in terms of ‘super-oscillations’) by Aharonov et al. A recent experiment by Longhi et al. supported the predictions by considering two successive gratings in an optical fibre, that is, by having recourse to two ‘classical barriers’ (which allow simulating the tunnelling, due to the known formal identity between the Schrödinger and the Helmholtz equation).
We show that the anomalously short delay times observed in barrier tunneling have their origin in energy storage and its subsequent release. The observed group delay is proportional to the energy stored. This delay is not a propagation delay and should not be linked to a velocity since evanescent waves do not propagate. The "Hartman effect", in which the group delay becomes independent of thickness for opaque barriers, is shown to be a consequence of the saturation of stored energy with barrier length.
Tunneling without distortion is not a propagation phenomenon but a quasistatic process in which the slowly varying envelope of the input pulse modulates the amplitude of a standing wave in the barrier. Because the envelope has a bandwidth that is small compared to the cutoff frequency of the barrier it does not propagate; it merely stands and waves. The envelope of the reflected and transmitted fields can adiabatically follow the envelope of the input pulse with only a small delay proportional to the energy stored in the barrier. The Hartman effect, in which the delay becomes independent of barrier length, is explained on the basis of saturation of stored energy with increasing length. Because the delay is not a propagation delay, it should not be linked to a velocity of propagation. True evanescent waves have zero speed and not infinite velocity as often asserted.