Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9508010 · Journal de Physique I

More about Tunnelling Times, the Dwell Time and the “Hartman Effect”

V. S. Olkhovsky, Erasmo Recami, Fabio Raciti, Aleksandr K. Zaichenko

Published Oct 1, 1995• 57 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In a recent review paper [{\em Phys. Reports} {\bf 214} (1992) 339] we proposed, within conventional quantum mechanics, new definitions for the sub-barrier tunnelling and reflection times. \ Aims of the present paper are: \ (i) presenting and analysing the results of various numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times $$, $$, during tunnelling {\em inside} a rectangular potential barrier, for various penetration depths $x_{\rm f}$; \ (ii) putting forth and discussing suitable definitions, besides of the mean values, also of the {\em variances} (or dispersions) ${\rm D} \, {τ_{\rm T}}$ and ${\rm D} \, {τ_{\, \rm R}}$ for the time durations of transmission and reflection processes; \ (iii) mentioning, moreover, that our definition $$ for the average transmission time results to constitute an {\em improvement} of the ordinary dwell--time ${\ove τ}^{\rm Dw}$ formula: \ (iv) commenting, at last, on the basis of our {\em new} numerical results, upon some recent criticism by C.R.Leavens. \ \ We stress that our numerical evaluations {\em confirm} that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of the {\em Hartman effect}: an effect that in these days (due to the theoretical connections between tunnelling and evanescent--wave propagation) is receiving ---at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Vienna--- indirect, but quite interesting, experimental verifications. \ Eventually, we briefly analyze some other definitions of tunnelling times.

DOI
10.1051/jp1:1995202

Related papers

Tunnelling times and the Hartman effect

V. S. Olkhovsky, Erasmo Recami, Aleksandr K. Zaichenko

In a recent review paper [Phys. Rpeorts 214 (1992) 339] we proposed, within conventional quantum mechanics, new definitions fot the subarrier tunnelling and reflection times. Aims of the present paper are: (i) presenting and analysing the results of various numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times $\\left \\langle tau_P_e_n \\right \\rangle $ , $\\left \\langle tau_R_e_t\\right \\rangle $ during tunnelling inside a rectangular potential barrier, for various penetration depths $x_f$ ; (ii) putting forth and discussing suitable definitions. Besides of the mean values, also of the variances (or dispersions)$D\\tau_T\\ $ and $ D\\tau_R\\ $ for the tima durations of trasmission and reflection processes; (iii) mentioning that our definition $\\left \\langle tau_T \\right \\rangle $ for the average transmission time results to constituite an improvemente of the ordinary dwell-time $ \\bar tau^D^W\\ $ formula: (iv) commenting upon some recent criticism by C.R. Leavens, on the basis of our new numerical results. We stress that our numerical evaluations confirm that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of the Hartman effect: an effect that in these days (due to the theoretical connections between tunnelling and evanescent-wave propagation) is receiving - at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Wien - indirect, but quite interesting, experimental verifications. At last we briefly analyze some other definitions of tunnelling times.

•Jan 1, 1995•0 citations

Tunneling Times and "Superluminal" Tunneling: A brief Review

V. S. Olkhovsky, Erasmo Recami

In the First Part of this paper [that was submitted for pub. in 1991 and appeared in print in Phys. Reports 214 (1992) 339] we critically review the main theoretical definitions and calculations of the sub-barrier tunnelling and reflection times. Moreover, within conventional QM, we propose a new definition of such durations, on the basis of a recent general formalism of ours. At last, we discuss a surprising result: that QM predicts tunnelling through opaque barriers to take place with Superluminal group-velocities. In the Second Part [that appeared in print later, in J. de Physique-I 5 (1995) 1351] we, e.g., present the results of some numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times during tunnelling INSIDE a rectangular potential barrier, and set forth suitable definitions also of the variances, or dispersions, for the transmission and reflection time-durations. The numerical evaluations confirm that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of Superluminal tunnelling (that we called "Hartman effect"): an effect that in these days is receiving --at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Vienna-- indirect, but interesting, experimental verifications. More detailed reviews of the same topics are in the LANL Archive cond-mat/9802126 (and in an Appendix to physics/9712051, where the data are summarized of the experiments that --in four different sectors of physics-- seem to indicate the existence of Superluminal motions).

arXiv:cond-mat/9802162•Feb 15, 1998•1 citation

Dwell times for transmission and reflection

Nikolay Leonidovich Chuprikov

As was shown in quant-ph/0405028, the state of a tunneling particle can be uniquely presented as a coherent superposition of two states to describe alternative sub-processes, transmission and reflection. In this paper, on the basis of the stationary wave functions for these sub-processes, we give new definitions of the dwell times for transmission and reflection. In the case of rectangular potential barriers the dwell times are obtained explicitly. In contrast with the well-known Büttiker's dwell-time, our dwell time for transmission increases exponentially, for the under-barrier tunneling, with increasing the barrier's width. By our approach the well-known Hartman effect is rather an artifact resulted from an improper interpretation of the wave-packet tunneling and experimental data, but not a real physical effect accompanying the tunneling phenomenon.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502073•Feb 14, 2005•2 citations

Some important aspects of the tunneling phenomenon through quantum structures

E. Polatdemir

Tunneling phenomenon is one of the wondrous events that take place particularly in quantum mechanics and it has no counterpart in classical physics. We focus on its two important implications : tunneling time and tunneling probability. There has been no consensus on tunneling times among the tunneling time community for last seven decades. So far, most of the attempts to calculate tunneling times have apparently been centered on a simple rectangular barrier example. We implement the tunneling times with the most widely accepted approach, which is using physical Larmor clock, into a nonsymmetrical barrier and a double barrier. It results in different and unique insights into the usual understanding of tunneling time. Three characteristics tunneling time expressions are thoroughly studied in these quantum structures. The difference between dwell time and phase-delay time is once again approved. The unique characteristics of the phase-delay time, which was thought to be exactly similar to dwell time when we assign higher energies to the particles, is also revealed in the nonsymmetrical barrier that it should actually be regarded as a distinct feature from the dwell time. The singularity of reflection time in rectangular barrier is no longer valid in nonsymmetrical barrier. The finiteness of reflection time fairly shows that different quantum structures might bear some taboo breaking results. Since a double barrier involves much more complicated features and calculations, the calculation of tunneling times under this barrier is praiseworthy. The dwell time is the most crucial, troublesome and distinctive tunneling time element to look into for a double barrier. Besides the dwell and phase-delay time, we also calculate the three characteristic times as well as the reflection time for a double barrier. Another area that we study within the context of tunneling phenomenon is the tunneling probability. Recently, there has been ground shaking attempts in modifying the conventional WKB formulae. We follow one of the modified versions of WKB formulae in order to be able to calculate the tunneling probability through different quantum structures where conventional WKB formulae fail. These generalized WKB connection formulae are applied to some complex quantum potentials by seeking aid from the Green's function and the path integral approach. One of the biggest problems in quantum mechanics (visualization) is partially overcome through implementing the method of diagrammatic representations that make the life easier in understanding the events happening in the quantum world when we attempt to calculate the transmission and reflection probabilities. This part therefore has a pedagogical sense too in terms of interpreting the results in a diagrammatic way with the help of the path integral approach.

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Resonant tunneling dynamics and the related tunneling time

Zhi Xiao, Hai Huang, Xiangxiang Lu

In close analogy with optical Fabry–Pérot (FP) interferometer, we rederive the transmission and reflection coefficients of tunneling through a rectangular double barrier (RDB). Based on the same analogy, we also get an analytic finesse formula for its filtering capability of matter waves, and with this formula, we reproduce the RDB transmission rate in exactly the same form as that of FP interferometer. Compared with the numerical results obtained from the original finesse definition, we find the formula works well. Next, we turn to the elusive time issue in tunneling, and show that the "generalized Hartman effect" can be regarded as an artifact of the opaque limit βl → ∞. In the thin barrier approximation, phase (or dwell) time does depend on the free inter-barrier distance d asymptotically. Further, the analysis of transmission rate in the neighborhood of resonance shows that, phase (or dwell) time could be a good estimate of the resonance lifetime. The numerical results from the uncertainty principle support this statement. This fact can be viewed as a support to the idea that, phase (or dwell) time is a measure of lifetime of energy stored beneath the barrier. To confirm this result, we shrink RDB to a double Dirac δ-barrier. The landscape of the phase (or dwell) time in k and d axes fits excellently well with the lifetime estimates near the resonance. As a supplementary check, we also apply phase (or dwell) time formula to the rectangular well, where no obstacle exists to the propagation of particle. However, due to the self-interference induced by the common cavity-like structure, phase (or dwell) time calculation leads to a counterintuitive "slowing down" effect, which can be explained appropriately by the lifetime assumptions.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•Jan 26, 2015•13 citations

On the generalized Hartman effect and transmission time for a particle tunneling through two identical rectangular potential barriers

Nikolay Leonidovich Chuprikov

We develop a new quantum-mechanical approach to scattering a particle on a one-dimensional (1D) system of two identical rectangular potential barriers, which implies modelling the dynamics of its subprocesses -- transmission and reflection -- at all stages of scattering. On its basis we define, for each subprocess, the dwell time as well as the local (exact) and asymptotic (extrapolated) group times. Our concept of the asymptotic transmission group time confirms the validity of the Wigner phase time in the opaque limit, as well as the existence of the usual and generalized Hartman effects predicted on its basis. On the energy scale, this concept is valid everywhere in the high energy region as well as in the low energy region, excepting resonance points and their neighborhoods. On the contrary, the Buttiker dwell time is valid, as the transmission time, just only at the resonance points. Our concept of the transmission dwell time predicts monotonous growth of the tunneling time when the distance between the opaque barriers increases. By our approach only this time scale yields the true time spent, on average, by transmitted particles in the region occupied by the system. We explain why the asymptotic and local transmission group times cannot play this role and why the concept of {\it transmission group} velocity lies beyond the scope of special relativity. And else, all the transmission times admit only indirect measurements. Hence the unambiguous interpretation of all tunneling-time experiments is impossible when the transmission dynamics at all stages of scattering is unknown.

arXiv:1005.1323•May 8, 2010•1 citation
In a recent review paper [{\em Phys. Reports} {\bf 214} (1992) 339] we proposed, within conventional quantum mechanics, new definitions for the sub-barrier tunnelling and reflection times. \ Aims of the present paper are: \ (i) presenting and analysing the results of various numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times ,, ,, during tunnelling {\em inside} a rectangular potential barrier, for various penetration depths xfx_{\rm f}xf​; \ (ii) putting forth and discussing suitable definitions, besides of the mean values, also of the {\em variances} (or dispersions) D τT{\rm D} \, {τ_{\rm T}}DτT​ and D τ R{\rm D} \, {τ_{\, \rm R}}DτR​ for the time durations of transmission and reflection processes; \ (iii) mentioning, moreover, that our definition $$ for the average transmission time results to constitute an {\em improvement} of the ordinary dwell--time \oveτDw{\ove τ}^{\rm Dw}\oveτDw formula: \ (iv) commenting, at last, on the basis of our {\em new} numerical results, upon some recent criticism by C.R.Leavens. \ \ We stress that our numerical evaluations {\em confirm} that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of the {\em Hartman effect}: an effect that in these days (due to the theoretical connections between tunnelling and evanescent--wave propagation) is receiving ---at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Vienna--- indirect, but quite interesting, experimental verifications. \ Eventually, we briefly analyze some other definitions of tunnelling times.
In a recent review paper [Phys. Rpeorts 214 (1992) 339] we proposed, within conventional quantum mechanics, new definitions fot the subarrier tunnelling and reflection times. Aims of the present paper are: (i) presenting and analysing the results of various numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times $\\left \\langle tau_P_e_n \\right \\rangle $ , $\\left \\langle tau_R_e_t\\right \\rangle $ during tunnelling inside a rectangular potential barrier, for various penetration depths xfx_fxf​ ; (ii) putting forth and discussing suitable definitions. Besides of the mean values, also of the variances (or dispersions)$D\\tau_T\\ $ and $ D\\tau_R\\ $ for the tima durations of trasmission and reflection processes; (iii) mentioning that our definition $\\left \\langle tau_T \\right \\rangle $ for the average transmission time results to constituite an improvemente of the ordinary dwell-time $ \\bar tau^D^W\\ $ formula: (iv) commenting upon some recent criticism by C.R. Leavens, on the basis of our new numerical results. We stress that our numerical evaluations confirm that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of the Hartman effect: an effect that in these days (due to the theoretical connections between tunnelling and evanescent-wave propagation) is receiving - at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Wien - indirect, but quite interesting, experimental verifications. At last we briefly analyze some other definitions of tunnelling times.
In the First Part of this paper [that was submitted for pub. in 1991 and appeared in print in Phys. Reports 214 (1992) 339] we critically review the main theoretical definitions and calculations of the sub-barrier tunnelling and reflection times. Moreover, within conventional QM, we propose a new definition of such durations, on the basis of a recent general formalism of ours. At last, we discuss a surprising result: that QM predicts tunnelling through opaque barriers to take place with Superluminal group-velocities. In the Second Part [that appeared in print later, in J. de Physique-I 5 (1995) 1351] we, e.g., present the results of some numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times during tunnelling INSIDE a rectangular potential barrier, and set forth suitable definitions also of the variances, or dispersions, for the transmission and reflection time-durations. The numerical evaluations confirm that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of Superluminal tunnelling (that we called "Hartman effect"): an effect that in these days is receiving --at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Vienna-- indirect, but interesting, experimental verifications. More detailed reviews of the same topics are in the LANL Archive cond-mat/9802126 (and in an Appendix to physics/9712051, where the data are summarized of the experiments that --in four different sectors of physics-- seem to indicate the existence of Superluminal motions).
As was shown in quant-ph/0405028, the state of a tunneling particle can be uniquely presented as a coherent superposition of two states to describe alternative sub-processes, transmission and reflection. In this paper, on the basis of the stationary wave functions for these sub-processes, we give new definitions of the dwell times for transmission and reflection. In the case of rectangular potential barriers the dwell times are obtained explicitly. In contrast with the well-known Büttiker's dwell-time, our dwell time for transmission increases exponentially, for the under-barrier tunneling, with increasing the barrier's width. By our approach the well-known Hartman effect is rather an artifact resulted from an improper interpretation of the wave-packet tunneling and experimental data, but not a real physical effect accompanying the tunneling phenomenon.
Tunneling phenomenon is one of the wondrous events that take place particularly in quantum mechanics and it has no counterpart in classical physics. We focus on its two important implications : tunneling time and tunneling probability. There has been no consensus on tunneling times among the tunneling time community for last seven decades. So far, most of the attempts to calculate tunneling times have apparently been centered on a simple rectangular barrier example. We implement the tunneling times with the most widely accepted approach, which is using physical Larmor clock, into a nonsymmetrical barrier and a double barrier. It results in different and unique insights into the usual understanding of tunneling time. Three characteristics tunneling time expressions are thoroughly studied in these quantum structures. The difference between dwell time and phase-delay time is once again approved. The unique characteristics of the phase-delay time, which was thought to be exactly similar to dwell time when we assign higher energies to the particles, is also revealed in the nonsymmetrical barrier that it should actually be regarded as a distinct feature from the dwell time. The singularity of reflection time in rectangular barrier is no longer valid in nonsymmetrical barrier. The finiteness of reflection time fairly shows that different quantum structures might bear some taboo breaking results. Since a double barrier involves much more complicated features and calculations, the calculation of tunneling times under this barrier is praiseworthy. The dwell time is the most crucial, troublesome and distinctive tunneling time element to look into for a double barrier. Besides the dwell and phase-delay time, we also calculate the three characteristic times as well as the reflection time for a double barrier. Another area that we study within the context of tunneling phenomenon is the tunneling probability. Recently, there has been ground shaking attempts in modifying the conventional WKB formulae. We follow one of the modified versions of WKB formulae in order to be able to calculate the tunneling probability through different quantum structures where conventional WKB formulae fail. These generalized WKB connection formulae are applied to some complex quantum potentials by seeking aid from the Green's function and the path integral approach. One of the biggest problems in quantum mechanics (visualization) is partially overcome through implementing the method of diagrammatic representations that make the life easier in understanding the events happening in the quantum world when we attempt to calculate the transmission and reflection probabilities. This part therefore has a pedagogical sense too in terms of interpreting the results in a diagrammatic way with the help of the path integral approach.
In close analogy with optical Fabry–Pérot (FP) interferometer, we rederive the transmission and reflection coefficients of tunneling through a rectangular double barrier (RDB). Based on the same analogy, we also get an analytic finesse formula for its filtering capability of matter waves, and with this formula, we reproduce the RDB transmission rate in exactly the same form as that of FP interferometer. Compared with the numerical results obtained from the original finesse definition, we find the formula works well. Next, we turn to the elusive time issue in tunneling, and show that the "generalized Hartman effect" can be regarded as an artifact of the opaque limit βl → ∞. In the thin barrier approximation, phase (or dwell) time does depend on the free inter-barrier distance d asymptotically. Further, the analysis of transmission rate in the neighborhood of resonance shows that, phase (or dwell) time could be a good estimate of the resonance lifetime. The numerical results from the uncertainty principle support this statement. This fact can be viewed as a support to the idea that, phase (or dwell) time is a measure of lifetime of energy stored beneath the barrier. To confirm this result, we shrink RDB to a double Dirac δ-barrier. The landscape of the phase (or dwell) time in k and d axes fits excellently well with the lifetime estimates near the resonance. As a supplementary check, we also apply phase (or dwell) time formula to the rectangular well, where no obstacle exists to the propagation of particle. However, due to the self-interference induced by the common cavity-like structure, phase (or dwell) time calculation leads to a counterintuitive "slowing down" effect, which can be explained appropriately by the lifetime assumptions.
We develop a new quantum-mechanical approach to scattering a particle on a one-dimensional (1D) system of two identical rectangular potential barriers, which implies modelling the dynamics of its subprocesses -- transmission and reflection -- at all stages of scattering. On its basis we define, for each subprocess, the dwell time as well as the local (exact) and asymptotic (extrapolated) group times. Our concept of the asymptotic transmission group time confirms the validity of the Wigner phase time in the opaque limit, as well as the existence of the usual and generalized Hartman effects predicted on its basis. On the energy scale, this concept is valid everywhere in the high energy region as well as in the low energy region, excepting resonance points and their neighborhoods. On the contrary, the Buttiker dwell time is valid, as the transmission time, just only at the resonance points. Our concept of the transmission dwell time predicts monotonous growth of the tunneling time when the distance between the opaque barriers increases. By our approach only this time scale yields the true time spent, on average, by transmitted particles in the region occupied by the system. We explain why the asymptotic and local transmission group times cannot play this role and why the concept of {\it transmission group} velocity lies beyond the scope of special relativity. And else, all the transmission times admit only indirect measurements. Hence the unambiguous interpretation of all tunneling-time experiments is impossible when the transmission dynamics at all stages of scattering is unknown.