Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/9709275 · Physical review. B, Condensed matter

Violation of particle number conservation in the GW approximation

Arno Schindlmayr

Published Aug 15, 1997• 45 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We present a nontrivial model system of interacting electrons that can be solved analytically in the $\mathrm{GW}$ approximation. We obtain the particle number from the $\mathrm{GW}$ Green's function strictly analytically, and prove that there is a genuine violation of particle number conservation if the self-energy is calculated non-self-consistently from a zeroth order Green's function, as done in virtually all practical implementations. We also show that a simple shift of the self-energy that partially restores self-consistency reduces the numerical deviation significantly.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.56.3528

Related papers

Partial self-consistency and analyticity in many-body perturbation theory: Particle number conservation and a generalized sum rule

Daniel Karlsson, Robert van Leeuwen

We consider a general class of approximations which guarantees the conservation of particle number in many-body perturbation theory. To do this we extend the concept of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}$ derivability for the self-energy $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}$ to a larger class of diagrammatic terms in which only some of the Green's function lines contain the fully dressed Green's function $G$. We call the corresponding approximations for $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}$ partially $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}$ derivable. A special subclass of such approximations, which are gauge invariant, is obtained by dressing loops in the diagrammatic expansion of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}$ consistently with $G$. These approximations are number conserving but do not have to fulfill other conservation laws, such as the conservation of energy and momentum. From our formalism we can easily deduce whether commonly used approximations will fulfill the continuity equation, which implies particle number conservation. We further show how the concept of partial $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}$ derivability plays an important role in the derivation of a generalized sum rule for the particle number, which reduces to the Luttinger-Ward theorem in the case of a homogeneous electron gas, and the Friedel sum rule in the case of the Anderson model. To do this we need to ensure that the Green's function has certain complex analytic properties, which can be guaranteed if the spectral function is positive-semidefinite. The latter property can be ensured for a subset of partially $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}$-derivable approximations for the self-energy, namely those that can be constructed from squares of so-called half diagrams. For the case in which the analytic requirements are not fulfilled we highlight a number of subtle issues related to branch cuts, pole structure, and multivaluedness. We also show that various schemes of computing the particle number are consistent for particle number conserving approximations.

arXiv:1606.07486•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Sep 13, 2016•14 citations

Diagrammatic self-energy approximations and the total particle number

Arno Schindlmayr, Pablo García‐González, Rex W. Godby

There is increasing interest in many-body perturbation theory as a practical tool for the calculation of ground-state properties. As a consequence, unambiguous sum rules such as the conservation of particle number under the influence of the Coulomb interaction have acquired an importance that did not exist for calculations of excited-state properties. In this paper we obtain a rigorous, simple relation whose fulfilment guarantees particle-number conservation in a given diagrammatic self-energy approximation. Hedin's ${G}_{0}{W}_{0}$ approximation does not satisfy this relation and hence violates the particle-number sum rule. Very precise calculations for the homogeneous electron gas and a model inhomogeneous electron system allow the extent of the nonconservation to be estimated.

arXiv:cond-mat/0110435•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Nov 19, 2001•38 citations

Self-consistent density-functional approach to the correlated ground states and an unrestricted many-body perturbation theory

Behnam Farid

We introduce a scheme through which the ground-state electronic density n and total energy Ev [n] of inhomogeneous interacting systems can be determined in a self-consistent (SC) way. It is based on a SC perturbation expansion for the single-particle Green function G. Our employed expansion is argued to be valid under all conditions provided that the ground-state charge density of the interacting system is pure-state non-interacting v representable. The formalism discussed in this paper has been applied to a quasi-one-dimensional periodic system. It has even been possible to carry out SC calculations with the dynamically screened exchange diagram (the so-called GW diagram, where W is the dynamically screened electron-electron interaction function) for the self-energy operator Σ. A coherent mode of interpretation of a number of our results entails that the overwhelming success of the GW framework in relatively accurately reproducing the experimental energy gaps of a number of semiconductors and insulators may be a direct consequence of non-self-consistency effects; whereas a non-self-consistent calculation in our tests increases the value of the local-density approximation (LDA) gap in the range of 40–65% of the ‘experimental’ gaps, self-consistency effects reduce this range to 14–17%. The same line of argument leads us to conclude that, in our model, 26–35% of the LDA error in the gap energies is due to the absence of a well known discontinuity in the LDA exchange-correlation potential, and the remaining part is due to the Kohn-Sham eigenvalues not being identifiable with one-particle excitation energies. A natural conclusion that may be drawn from these observations is that a correct description of excitation energies (e.g. of the gap energy) cannot be achieved without including, at least approximately, the vertex part of Σ, which is entirely absent in the GW scheme.

Philosophical Magazine B•Aug 1, 1997•18 citations

The RPA and the GW approximation for the self-energy

Richard M. Martin, Lucia Reining, David M. Ceperley

Besides the proof of a modified Luttinger–Ward–Klein variational principle and a related self-consistency idea, there is not much new in principle in this paper. L. Hedin, Phys. Rev . 139, A796–823 (1965) Summary In this chapter a set of equations is formulated that determine the self-energy and the one-body Green's function in terms of the screened Coulomb interaction between classical charges. The equations contain a correction to the classical picture in terms of a vertex function. The physical meaning of the various contributions is discussed. The simplest approximation for the vertex yields the random phase approximation for the polarizability and the GW approximation for the self-energy. Various aspects of the GWA are analyzed, with a focus on the physics that is added beyond Hartree– Fock. A brief summary of model cases illustrates the domain of validity and the limits of the GWA. In this chapter we elaborate in more detail on the question of how to calculate the onebody Green's function from a Dyson equation with a self-energy kernel. In the previous chapter a scheme was introduced to design approximations to the self-energy. However, the question of where to stop, which pieces of physics to include and which to neglect, is not yet settled. Of course, there is no unique answer, besides the exact solution, but different strategies can be more or less advantageous in practice. In a system with a few electrons, for example, different aspects will be important than in a system with many electrons. Here we are mostly interested in solids, or more generally in extended systems. In such systems, screening plays an essential role: the interaction between two charges is strongly modified, in general reduced, by the rearrangement of all the other charges. It is therefore most convenient to reformulate the equations such that screening appears explicitly. Some steps in this direction can be found in earlier chapters, in particular in Sec. 8.3, the formulation of the Ψ [ G , W ]-functional of the screened interaction W instead of the Ф[ G , v c ]-functional of the bare v c . In Sec. 10.5 the screened interaction approximation for the self-energy is derived, with the self-energy as a product of the one-body Green's function and the screened interaction W .

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 31, 2016•0 citations

A “moment-conserving” reformulation of GW theory

Charles J. C. Scott, Oliver J. Backhouse, George H. Booth

We show how to construct an effective Hamiltonian whose dimension scales linearly with system size, and whose eigenvalues systematically approximate the excitation energies of GW theory. This is achieved by rigorously expanding the self-energy in order to exactly conserve a desired number of frequency-independent moments of the self-energy dynamics. Recasting GW in this way admits a low-scaling O[N4] approach to build and solve this Hamiltonian, with a proposal to reduce this further to O[N3]. This relies on exposing a novel recursive framework for the density response moments of the random phase approximation, where the efficient calculation of its starting point mirrors the low-scaling approaches to compute RPA correlation energies. The frequency integration of GW, which distinguishes so many different GW variants, can be performed without approximation directly in this moment representation. Furthermore, the solution to the Dyson equation can be performed exactly, avoiding analytic continuation, diagonal approximations, or iterative solutions to the quasiparticle equation, with the full-frequency spectrum obtained from the complete solution of this effective static Hamiltonian. We show how this approach converges rapidly with respect to the order of the conserved self-energy moments and is applied across the GW100 benchmark dataset to obtain accurate GW spectra in comparison to traditional implementations. We also show the ability to systematically converge all-electron full-frequency spectra and high-energy features beyond frontier excitations, as well as avoiding discontinuities in the spectrum, which afflict many other GW approaches.

arXiv:2301.09107•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Mar 2, 2023•28 citations

The GW approximation: content, successes and limitations

Lucia Reining

Many observables such as the density, total energy, or electric current, can be expressed explicitly in terms of the one‐body Green's function, which describes electron addition or removal to or from a system. An efficient way to determine such a Green's function is to introduce a self‐energy, which is a nonlocal and dynamic effective potential that influences the propagation of particles in an interacting system. The state‐of‐the art approximation for the self‐energy is the GW approximation, where the system to (or from) which the electron is added (or removed) is described as a polarizable, screening, medium. This is expressed by the name of the approximation: ‘GW’ stands for the one‐body Green's function G and for W , the dynamically screened Coulomb interaction. The GW approximation is very popular for the calculation of band structures in solids, and increasingly used also to describe nanostructures, clusters, and molecules. As compared to static mean‐field approximations for the effective potential, the dynamical screening of the Coulomb interaction in GW leads to a renormalization of energies, to broadening and/or to the observation of additional excitations. An analysis of the approximations that lead to the GW self‐energy, and of the underlying picture, explains the successes and the limitations of the approach. This article is categorized under: Electronic Structure Theory > Density Functional Theory Electronic Structure Theory > Ab Initio Electronic Structure Methods Theoretical and Physical Chemistry > Spectroscopy Structure and Mechanism > Computational Materials Science

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science•Dec 27, 2017•286 citations
We present a nontrivial model system of interacting electrons that can be solved analytically in the GW\mathrm{GW}GW approximation. We obtain the particle number from the GW\mathrm{GW}GW Green's function strictly analytically, and prove that there is a genuine violation of particle number conservation if the self-energy is calculated non-self-consistently from a zeroth order Green's function, as done in virtually all practical implementations. We also show that a simple shift of the self-energy that partially restores self-consistency reduces the numerical deviation significantly.
We consider a general class of approximations which guarantees the conservation of particle number in many-body perturbation theory. To do this we extend the concept of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}$ derivability for the self-energy $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}$ to a larger class of diagrammatic terms in which only some of the Green's function lines contain the fully dressed Green's function GGG. We call the corresponding approximations for $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}$ partially $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}$ derivable. A special subclass of such approximations, which are gauge invariant, is obtained by dressing loops in the diagrammatic expansion of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}$ consistently with GGG. These approximations are number conserving but do not have to fulfill other conservation laws, such as the conservation of energy and momentum. From our formalism we can easily deduce whether commonly used approximations will fulfill the continuity equation, which implies particle number conservation. We further show how the concept of partial $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}$ derivability plays an important role in the derivation of a generalized sum rule for the particle number, which reduces to the Luttinger-Ward theorem in the case of a homogeneous electron gas, and the Friedel sum rule in the case of the Anderson model. To do this we need to ensure that the Green's function has certain complex analytic properties, which can be guaranteed if the spectral function is positive-semidefinite. The latter property can be ensured for a subset of partially $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}$-derivable approximations for the self-energy, namely those that can be constructed from squares of so-called half diagrams. For the case in which the analytic requirements are not fulfilled we highlight a number of subtle issues related to branch cuts, pole structure, and multivaluedness. We also show that various schemes of computing the particle number are consistent for particle number conserving approximations.
There is increasing interest in many-body perturbation theory as a practical tool for the calculation of ground-state properties. As a consequence, unambiguous sum rules such as the conservation of particle number under the influence of the Coulomb interaction have acquired an importance that did not exist for calculations of excited-state properties. In this paper we obtain a rigorous, simple relation whose fulfilment guarantees particle-number conservation in a given diagrammatic self-energy approximation. Hedin's G0W0{G}_{0}{W}_{0}G0​W0​ approximation does not satisfy this relation and hence violates the particle-number sum rule. Very precise calculations for the homogeneous electron gas and a model inhomogeneous electron system allow the extent of the nonconservation to be estimated.
We introduce a scheme through which the ground-state electronic density n and total energy Ev [n] of inhomogeneous interacting systems can be determined in a self-consistent (SC) way. It is based on a SC perturbation expansion for the single-particle Green function G. Our employed expansion is argued to be valid under all conditions provided that the ground-state charge density of the interacting system is pure-state non-interacting v representable. The formalism discussed in this paper has been applied to a quasi-one-dimensional periodic system. It has even been possible to carry out SC calculations with the dynamically screened exchange diagram (the so-called GW diagram, where W is the dynamically screened electron-electron interaction function) for the self-energy operator Σ. A coherent mode of interpretation of a number of our results entails that the overwhelming success of the GW framework in relatively accurately reproducing the experimental energy gaps of a number of semiconductors and insulators may be a direct consequence of non-self-consistency effects; whereas a non-self-consistent calculation in our tests increases the value of the local-density approximation (LDA) gap in the range of 40–65% of the ‘experimental’ gaps, self-consistency effects reduce this range to 14–17%. The same line of argument leads us to conclude that, in our model, 26–35% of the LDA error in the gap energies is due to the absence of a well known discontinuity in the LDA exchange-correlation potential, and the remaining part is due to the Kohn-Sham eigenvalues not being identifiable with one-particle excitation energies. A natural conclusion that may be drawn from these observations is that a correct description of excitation energies (e.g. of the gap energy) cannot be achieved without including, at least approximately, the vertex part of Σ, which is entirely absent in the GW scheme.
Besides the proof of a modified Luttinger–Ward–Klein variational principle and a related self-consistency idea, there is not much new in principle in this paper. L. Hedin, Phys. Rev . 139, A796–823 (1965) Summary In this chapter a set of equations is formulated that determine the self-energy and the one-body Green's function in terms of the screened Coulomb interaction between classical charges. The equations contain a correction to the classical picture in terms of a vertex function. The physical meaning of the various contributions is discussed. The simplest approximation for the vertex yields the random phase approximation for the polarizability and the GW approximation for the self-energy. Various aspects of the GWA are analyzed, with a focus on the physics that is added beyond Hartree– Fock. A brief summary of model cases illustrates the domain of validity and the limits of the GWA. In this chapter we elaborate in more detail on the question of how to calculate the onebody Green's function from a Dyson equation with a self-energy kernel. In the previous chapter a scheme was introduced to design approximations to the self-energy. However, the question of where to stop, which pieces of physics to include and which to neglect, is not yet settled. Of course, there is no unique answer, besides the exact solution, but different strategies can be more or less advantageous in practice. In a system with a few electrons, for example, different aspects will be important than in a system with many electrons. Here we are mostly interested in solids, or more generally in extended systems. In such systems, screening plays an essential role: the interaction between two charges is strongly modified, in general reduced, by the rearrangement of all the other charges. It is therefore most convenient to reformulate the equations such that screening appears explicitly. Some steps in this direction can be found in earlier chapters, in particular in Sec. 8.3, the formulation of the Ψ [ G , W ]-functional of the screened interaction W instead of the Ф[ G , v c ]-functional of the bare v c . In Sec. 10.5 the screened interaction approximation for the self-energy is derived, with the self-energy as a product of the one-body Green's function and the screened interaction W .
We show how to construct an effective Hamiltonian whose dimension scales linearly with system size, and whose eigenvalues systematically approximate the excitation energies of GW theory. This is achieved by rigorously expanding the self-energy in order to exactly conserve a desired number of frequency-independent moments of the self-energy dynamics. Recasting GW in this way admits a low-scaling O[N4] approach to build and solve this Hamiltonian, with a proposal to reduce this further to O[N3]. This relies on exposing a novel recursive framework for the density response moments of the random phase approximation, where the efficient calculation of its starting point mirrors the low-scaling approaches to compute RPA correlation energies. The frequency integration of GW, which distinguishes so many different GW variants, can be performed without approximation directly in this moment representation. Furthermore, the solution to the Dyson equation can be performed exactly, avoiding analytic continuation, diagonal approximations, or iterative solutions to the quasiparticle equation, with the full-frequency spectrum obtained from the complete solution of this effective static Hamiltonian. We show how this approach converges rapidly with respect to the order of the conserved self-energy moments and is applied across the GW100 benchmark dataset to obtain accurate GW spectra in comparison to traditional implementations. We also show the ability to systematically converge all-electron full-frequency spectra and high-energy features beyond frontier excitations, as well as avoiding discontinuities in the spectrum, which afflict many other GW approaches.
Many observables such as the density, total energy, or electric current, can be expressed explicitly in terms of the one‐body Green's function, which describes electron addition or removal to or from a system. An efficient way to determine such a Green's function is to introduce a self‐energy, which is a nonlocal and dynamic effective potential that influences the propagation of particles in an interacting system. The state‐of‐the art approximation for the self‐energy is the GW approximation, where the system to (or from) which the electron is added (or removed) is described as a polarizable, screening, medium. This is expressed by the name of the approximation: ‘GW’ stands for the one‐body Green's function G and for W , the dynamically screened Coulomb interaction. The GW approximation is very popular for the calculation of band structures in solids, and increasingly used also to describe nanostructures, clusters, and molecules. As compared to static mean‐field approximations for the effective potential, the dynamical screening of the Coulomb interaction in GW leads to a renormalization of energies, to broadening and/or to the observation of additional excitations. An analysis of the approximations that lead to the GW self‐energy, and of the underlying picture, explains the successes and the limitations of the approach. This article is categorized under: Electronic Structure Theory > Density Functional Theory Electronic Structure Theory > Ab Initio Electronic Structure Methods Theoretical and Physical Chemistry > Spectroscopy Structure and Mechanism > Computational Materials Science