Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in physics

On the Sufficiency of the Wavefunction

Roger Colbeck, Renato Renner

Published Jan 1, 2015• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-662-46422-9_4

Related papers

On the Reality of the Wavefunction

Martin Ringbauer

Springer theses•Jan 1, 2017•2 citations

The conditions on the one-matrix for three-body fermion wavefunctions with one-rank equal to six

Russell Borland, K Dennis

The necessary and sufficient conditions for a one-body reduced density matrix of rank 6 to be derivable from a three-body fermion wavefunction are presented. For this case it can be shown explicitly that the information content of the one-matrix is less than that of the wavefunction. The extension of these conditions to the cases of a three-body function of one-rank 7 and a four-body function of one-rank 8 are also discussed. The authors have obtained sufficient conditions for these two cases. Numerical studies reported in this paper lead us to believe that these conditions are the necessary and sufficient conditions.

Journal of Physics B Atomic and Molecular Physics•Jan 1, 1972•95 citations

When can an A-particle fermion wavefunction be written as a Slater determinant?

S. Rombouts, K. Heyde

A simple necessary and sufficient condition which tells when an A-particle fermion wavefunction can be written as a Slater determinant is proven.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•May 7, 1994•4 citations

On the Collapse of the Wave-Function

David Z. Albert

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics•Jan 1, 1990•5 citations

An example showing the non-uniqueness of a wavefunction given its position and momentum distributions

Mark S. Ashbaugh

The author presents an elementary example which shows that position and momentum distributions do not uniquely determine the wavefunction. In particular, the example shows that a wavefunction consisting of two gaussian wavepackets with momenta k 1 and k 2 has the same position and momentum distributions as the wavefunction obtained by interchanging k 1 and k 2 . This interpretation relies on viewing the wavefunction as that of a free particle but, of course, the abstract result is simply that for f in L 2 (R) knowledge of mod f(x) mod and mod f(k) mod is not always sufficient to determine f(x) (or f(k); here f denotes the Fourier transform of f). In addition, the bearing of the example presented here upon certain interesting questions raised by Vogt (1978) is discussed.

Inverse Problems•Nov 1, 1986•0 citations

Reinterpreting the Wavefunction

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Oct 24, 2021•0 citations
The necessary and sufficient conditions for a one-body reduced density matrix of rank 6 to be derivable from a three-body fermion wavefunction are presented. For this case it can be shown explicitly that the information content of the one-matrix is less than that of the wavefunction. The extension of these conditions to the cases of a three-body function of one-rank 7 and a four-body function of one-rank 8 are also discussed. The authors have obtained sufficient conditions for these two cases. Numerical studies reported in this paper lead us to believe that these conditions are the necessary and sufficient conditions.
The author presents an elementary example which shows that position and momentum distributions do not uniquely determine the wavefunction. In particular, the example shows that a wavefunction consisting of two gaussian wavepackets with momenta k 1 and k 2 has the same position and momentum distributions as the wavefunction obtained by interchanging k 1 and k 2 . This interpretation relies on viewing the wavefunction as that of a free particle but, of course, the abstract result is simply that for f in L 2 (R) knowledge of mod f(x) mod and mod f(k) mod is not always sufficient to determine f(x) (or f(k); here f denotes the Fourier transform of f). In addition, the bearing of the example presented here upon certain interesting questions raised by Vogt (1978) is discussed.