Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Inverse Problems

An example showing the non-uniqueness of a wavefunction given its position and momentum distributions

Mark S. Ashbaugh

Published Nov 1, 1986• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The author presents an elementary example which shows that position and momentum distributions do not uniquely determine the wavefunction. In particular, the example shows that a wavefunction consisting of two gaussian wavepackets with momenta k 1 and k 2 has the same position and momentum distributions as the wavefunction obtained by interchanging k 1 and k 2 . This interpretation relies on viewing the wavefunction as that of a free particle but, of course, the abstract result is simply that for f in L 2 (R) knowledge of mod f(x) mod and mod f(k) mod is not always sufficient to determine f(x) (or f(k); here f denotes the Fourier transform of f). In addition, the bearing of the example presented here upon certain interesting questions raised by Vogt (1978) is discussed.

DOI
10.1088/0266-5611/2/4/002

Related papers

Wavefunctions

Gary E. Bowman

This chapter focuses on a basic but systematic treatment of wavefunctions. By comparison with a spin 1/2 system, the concept of a wavefunction as a collection of coefficients is developed, followed by discussions of eigenstates, operators, and representations in the context of wavefunctions. Transformation from position to momentum representation is effected by a Fourier transform. This is developed next, and illustrated for a Gaussian. The discussion of phases and time evolution in earlier chapters is now applied to wavefunctions, and the time evolution of a free particle discussed. The concept of a wavepacket and its suitability for representing particles follows. A topic of some subtlety — and one which is discussed in detail — is the use of bra-ket (Dirac) notation for wavefunctions. The chapter closes with a short epilogue.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Nov 1, 2007•0 citations

On the temporal wavefunction in quantum physics - a short note

Martine Chevrollier, Marcos Oriá

Experiments involving single or few elementary particles are completely described by Quantum Mechanics. Notwithstanding the success of that quantitative description, various aspects of observations, as nonlocality and the statistical randomness of results, remain as mysterious properties apart from the quantum theory, and they are attributed to the strangeness of the microscopic world. Here we restart from the fundamental relations of uncertainty to reformulate the probability law of Born including the temporal variable. Considering that both the spatial and the temporal variables play a symmetric role in the wave-function Ψ(x,t) , a temporal wavepacket is built and analysed. The probability density is written as p(x,t) = | Ψ(x,t) |^2, where the probabilistic interpretation for the temporal wavepacket is equivalent to Born's law for the spatial variable, x. For the convenience of the discussion of the role of the temporal variable, we write p(x_0,t) = | Ψ(x_0,t) |^2 for a free particle, expressing only the temporal wavepacket, then we discuss its spread. In the light of the evolution of this temporal wavepacket we analyse basic processes of matter-wave interaction, involving single and entangled entities. Nonlocality appears then as a consequence of the spread of the temporal wavepacket; and the position of each detected event in two-slits interferometry as due to the independent phases of the spatial and temporal wavepackets.

arXiv:1602.07206•Feb 21, 2016•0 citations

Identical Particles

S. Rajasekar, R. Velusamy

In quantum mechanics the situation is different because the uncertainty principle does not allow us to know the initial positions and momenta of the particles with desired accuracy. The individual particle is described by a wave packet. Since the wave packet is localized and spreading with time, it is impossible to distinguish two identical particles as their wave functions always overlap at any point in space. Quantum theory describes any object at energies below its excitation threshold with four degrees of freedom. The wave functions of all the states of a given system of identical particles must have the same symmetry; otherwise, the wave function of a state formally a superposition of states of different symmetry would be neither symmetrical nor antisymmetrical. Hence, for a system of identical particles, at high energies and low concentration, probable number of particles per quantum state will be very small. Wave functions of the particles are well separated.

CRC Press eBooks•Sep 29, 2022•0 citations

The Vector-Model Wavefunction: spatial description and wavepacket formation of quantum-mechanical angular momenta

Theodore Peter Rakitzis, Michail E. Koutrakis, George E. Katsoprinakis

In quantum mechanics, spatial wavefunctions describe distributions of a particle's position or momentum, but not of angular momentum $j$. In contrast, here we show that a spatial wavefunction, $j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)=~e^{i m ϕ} δ(θ- θ_m) ~e^{i(j+1/2)χ}$, which treats $j$ in the $|jm>$ state as a three-dimensional entity, is an asymptotic eigenfunction of angular-momentum operators; $ϕ$, $θ$, $χ$ are the Euler angles, and $cos θ_m=(m/|j|)$ is the Vector-Model polar angle. The $j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)$ gives a computationally simple description of particle and orbital-angular-momentum wavepackets (constructed from Gaussian distributions in $j$ and $m$) which predicts the effective wavepacket angular uncertainty relations for $Δm Δϕ$, $Δj Δχ$, and $ΔϕΔθ$, and the position of the particle-wavepacket angular motion on the orbital plane. The particle-wavepacket rotation can be experimentally probed through continuous and non-destructive $j$-rotation measurements. We also use the $j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)$ to determine well-known asymptotic expressions for Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, Wigner d-functions, the gyromagnetic ratio of elementary particles, $g=2$, and the m-state-correlation matrix elements, $$. Interestingly, for low j, even down to $j=1/2$, these expressions are either exact (the last two) or excellent approximations (the first two), showing that $j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)$ gives a useful spatial description of quantum-mechanical angular momentum, and provides a smooth connection with classical angular momentum.

arXiv:2305.11456•May 19, 2023•0 citations

Does the wavefunction describe individual systems?

Antonio Di Lorenzo

We analyze the issue of the interpretation of the wavefunction, namely whether it should be interpreted as describing individual systems or ensembles of identically prepared systems. We propose an experiment which can decide the issue, based on the simultaneous measurement of the same observable with different detectors, and we discuss the theoretical implications of the possible experimental outcomes.

arXiv:quant-ph/0603001•Feb 28, 2006•0 citations

Conjugate position- and momentum-space electronic density distributions, quantum information theoretic insights on the spherically compressed He atom

Koustav D. Chakladar, Santanu Mondal, Jayanta K. Saha

Abstract Despite extensive studies on the position-space electronic distributions for the ground state of the He atom trapped in an impenetrable spherical cavity, the corresponding momentum-space analysis has received little attention. The present article tries to bridge this gap by adopting an even-powered expansion of correlated coordinates in a Hylleraas basis consistent with the Dirichlet boundary condition. The corresponding momentum-space wavefunction is determined by the 3D Fourier transform of the explicitly correlated position-space wavefunctions. The analytic expression of the momentum-space wavefunction, and thereby the electronic density, allows us to examine the asymptotic limits of the same. With increased compression, the two-particle density distribution changes, and in the high compression regime, a crystalline-like structure in the contour map starts to appear. The corresponding topological complexity varies w.r.t. the cavity radius by maintaining symmetry along the equal momenta line. As a consequence, the one-particle momentum-space density and the derived Compton profile show oscillatory structure in the high-momentum regime. The evaluation of Shannon entropy provides further insights into the problem from the quantum information theoretic point of view. The estimation of position and momentum entanglement entropy measures is carried out here for the first time to exhibit the complete picture of the momentum correlation. Our investigation yields that despite showing all the contrasting differences in various density distributions and statistical information measures of the conjugate position and momentum spaces, the quantum correlation measure in terms of entanglement entropy remains invariant. Additionally, the Compton profiles are theoretically evaluated and subsequently compared with available theoretical and experimental results, demonstrating overall good agreement and consistency.

Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Jul 24, 2026•0 citations
The author presents an elementary example which shows that position and momentum distributions do not uniquely determine the wavefunction. In particular, the example shows that a wavefunction consisting of two gaussian wavepackets with momenta k 1 and k 2 has the same position and momentum distributions as the wavefunction obtained by interchanging k 1 and k 2 . This interpretation relies on viewing the wavefunction as that of a free particle but, of course, the abstract result is simply that for f in L 2 (R) knowledge of mod f(x) mod and mod f(k) mod is not always sufficient to determine f(x) (or f(k); here f denotes the Fourier transform of f). In addition, the bearing of the example presented here upon certain interesting questions raised by Vogt (1978) is discussed.
This chapter focuses on a basic but systematic treatment of wavefunctions. By comparison with a spin 1/2 system, the concept of a wavefunction as a collection of coefficients is developed, followed by discussions of eigenstates, operators, and representations in the context of wavefunctions. Transformation from position to momentum representation is effected by a Fourier transform. This is developed next, and illustrated for a Gaussian. The discussion of phases and time evolution in earlier chapters is now applied to wavefunctions, and the time evolution of a free particle discussed. The concept of a wavepacket and its suitability for representing particles follows. A topic of some subtlety — and one which is discussed in detail — is the use of bra-ket (Dirac) notation for wavefunctions. The chapter closes with a short epilogue.
Experiments involving single or few elementary particles are completely described by Quantum Mechanics. Notwithstanding the success of that quantitative description, various aspects of observations, as nonlocality and the statistical randomness of results, remain as mysterious properties apart from the quantum theory, and they are attributed to the strangeness of the microscopic world. Here we restart from the fundamental relations of uncertainty to reformulate the probability law of Born including the temporal variable. Considering that both the spatial and the temporal variables play a symmetric role in the wave-function Ψ(x,t) , a temporal wavepacket is built and analysed. The probability density is written as p(x,t) = | Ψ(x,t) |^2, where the probabilistic interpretation for the temporal wavepacket is equivalent to Born's law for the spatial variable, x. For the convenience of the discussion of the role of the temporal variable, we write p(x_0,t) = | Ψ(x_0,t) |^2 for a free particle, expressing only the temporal wavepacket, then we discuss its spread. In the light of the evolution of this temporal wavepacket we analyse basic processes of matter-wave interaction, involving single and entangled entities. Nonlocality appears then as a consequence of the spread of the temporal wavepacket; and the position of each detected event in two-slits interferometry as due to the independent phases of the spatial and temporal wavepackets.
In quantum mechanics the situation is different because the uncertainty principle does not allow us to know the initial positions and momenta of the particles with desired accuracy. The individual particle is described by a wave packet. Since the wave packet is localized and spreading with time, it is impossible to distinguish two identical particles as their wave functions always overlap at any point in space. Quantum theory describes any object at energies below its excitation threshold with four degrees of freedom. The wave functions of all the states of a given system of identical particles must have the same symmetry; otherwise, the wave function of a state formally a superposition of states of different symmetry would be neither symmetrical nor antisymmetrical. Hence, for a system of identical particles, at high energies and low concentration, probable number of particles per quantum state will be very small. Wave functions of the particles are well separated.
In quantum mechanics, spatial wavefunctions describe distributions of a particle's position or momentum, but not of angular momentum jjj. In contrast, here we show that a spatial wavefunction, jm(ϕ,θ,χ)= eimϕδ(θ−θm) ei(j+1/2)χj_m (ϕ,θ,χ)=~e^{i m ϕ} δ(θ- θ_m) ~e^{i(j+1/2)χ}jm​(ϕ,θ,χ)= eimϕδ(θ−θm​) ei(j+1/2)χ, which treats jjj in the ∣jm>|jm>∣jm> state as a three-dimensional entity, is an asymptotic eigenfunction of angular-momentum operators; ϕϕϕ, θθθ, χχχ are the Euler angles, and cosθm=(m/∣j∣)cos θ_m=(m/|j|)cosθm​=(m/∣j∣) is the Vector-Model polar angle. The jm(ϕ,θ,χ)j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)jm​(ϕ,θ,χ) gives a computationally simple description of particle and orbital-angular-momentum wavepackets (constructed from Gaussian distributions in jjj and mmm) which predicts the effective wavepacket angular uncertainty relations for ΔmΔϕΔm ΔϕΔmΔϕ, ΔjΔχΔj ΔχΔjΔχ, and ΔϕΔθΔϕΔθΔϕΔθ, and the position of the particle-wavepacket angular motion on the orbital plane. The particle-wavepacket rotation can be experimentally probed through continuous and non-destructive jjj-rotation measurements. We also use the jm(ϕ,θ,χ)j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)jm​(ϕ,θ,χ) to determine well-known asymptotic expressions for Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, Wigner d-functions, the gyromagnetic ratio of elementary particles, g=2g=2g=2, and the m-state-correlation matrix elements, $$. Interestingly, for low j, even down to j=1/2j=1/2j=1/2, these expressions are either exact (the last two) or excellent approximations (the first two), showing that jm(ϕ,θ,χ)j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)jm​(ϕ,θ,χ) gives a useful spatial description of quantum-mechanical angular momentum, and provides a smooth connection with classical angular momentum.
Abstract Despite extensive studies on the position-space electronic distributions for the ground state of the He atom trapped in an impenetrable spherical cavity, the corresponding momentum-space analysis has received little attention. The present article tries to bridge this gap by adopting an even-powered expansion of correlated coordinates in a Hylleraas basis consistent with the Dirichlet boundary condition. The corresponding momentum-space wavefunction is determined by the 3D Fourier transform of the explicitly correlated position-space wavefunctions. The analytic expression of the momentum-space wavefunction, and thereby the electronic density, allows us to examine the asymptotic limits of the same. With increased compression, the two-particle density distribution changes, and in the high compression regime, a crystalline-like structure in the contour map starts to appear. The corresponding topological complexity varies w.r.t. the cavity radius by maintaining symmetry along the equal momenta line. As a consequence, the one-particle momentum-space density and the derived Compton profile show oscillatory structure in the high-momentum regime. The evaluation of Shannon entropy provides further insights into the problem from the quantum information theoretic point of view. The estimation of position and momentum entanglement entropy measures is carried out here for the first time to exhibit the complete picture of the momentum correlation. Our investigation yields that despite showing all the contrasting differences in various density distributions and statistical information measures of the conjugate position and momentum spaces, the quantum correlation measure in terms of entanglement entropy remains invariant. Additionally, the Compton profiles are theoretically evaluated and subsequently compared with available theoretical and experimental results, demonstrating overall good agreement and consistency.