Accuracy of quantum master equations for rapidly driven open quantum systems

Abstract

Quantum master equations are an invaluable and highly successful tool for the approximate, yet accurate, description of undriven open quantum systems weakly coupled to their environment. In contrast, results on the description of the equally important case of driven open quantum systems using quantum master equations remain scarce. Existing approaches typically impose restrictions on the driving protocol, including, for instance, Floquet master equations for periodic driving and adiabatic master equations for slow driving. However, no generally accepted formulation for arbitrary driving has yet been established. A promising candidate from which all existing approaches can be derived by approximations based on protocol constraints is the driven Redfield master equation. Strikingly, it has received very little attention so far. A main reason is that, in analogy to its undriven counterpart, the driven Redfield master equation notoriously violates complete positivity. In the undriven case, this problem can be successfully addressed using the rotating wave approximation (RWA). For approaches derived from the driven Redfield master equation for specific protocols, such as Floquet master equations and adiabatic master equations, a generalized form of the RWA can still be applied. However, a full generalization directly applicable to the driven Redfield master equation under arbitrary driving has not yet been developed. To address this issue, we propose a straightforward and natural generalization of the RWA based on the version of the RWA used for adiabatic master equations. We then apply the driven Redfield master equation to the paradigmatic, exactly solvable model of a driven quantum harmonic oscillator coupled to a bosonic bath and benchmark it against the exact solution. In particular, we compare the original driven Redfield master equation without an RWA to its generalized RWA version. We find that the driven Redfield master equation without an RWA exhibits excellent agreement with the exact solution across all driving speeds, while the violation of complete positivity shows no notable effect. By contrast, the RWA-based version of the driven Redfield master equation fails to reproduce the dynamics accurately beyond slow driving at short times. Additionally, we analyze known adiabatic master equations, both without and with an RWA. Remarkably, the non-RWA versions agree with the exact dynamics far beyond the strictly adiabatic regime, while the RWA-based versions already show noticeable deviations even for slow driving, contrasting previous observations in the literature. Taken together, these results indicate that the driven Redfield master equation and adiabatic master equations without RWA have been significantly underestimated in their practical usefulness, whereas RWA-based approaches in driven settings may have been overestimated. This strongly suggests that future work should focus on alternative approximation methods applied to the driven Redfield master equation that preserve its high numerical accuracy while restoring complete positivity.