The reduced dynamics of an open quantum system obtained from an underlying microscopic Hamiltonian can in general only approximately be described by a time-local master equation. The quality of that approximation depends primarily on the coupling strength and the structure of the environment. Various such master equations have been proposed with different aims. Choosing the most suitable one for a specific system is not straightforward. By focusing on the accuracy of the reduced dynamics we provide a thorough assessment for a selection of methods (Redfield equation, quantum optical master equation, coarse-grained master equation, a related dynamical map approach, and a partial-secular approximation). We consider secondary, here, whether or not an approach guarantees positivity. We use two qubits coupled to a Lorentzian environment in a spin-boson-like fashion modeling a generic situation with various system and bath time scales. We see that, independent of the initial state, the simple Redfield equation with time-dependent coefficients is significantly more accurate than all other methods under consideration. We emphasize that positivity violation in the Redfield equation formalism becomes relevant only in a regime where any of the perturbative master equations considered here are rendered invalid anyway. This implies that the loss of positivity should in fact be welcomed as an important feature: it indicates the breakdown of the weak-coupling assumption. In addition we present the various approaches in a self-contained way and use the behavior of their errors to provide further insight into the range of validity of each method.
The reduced dynamics of an open quantum system obtained from an underlying microscopic Hamiltonian can in general only approximately be described by a time-local master equation. The quality of that approximation depends primarily on the coupling strength and the structure of the environment. Various such master equations have been proposed with different aims. Choosing the most suitable one for a specific system is not straightforward. By focusing on the accuracy of the reduced dynamics we provide a thorough assessment for a selection of methods (Redfield equation, quantum optical master equation, coarse-grained master equation, a related dynamical map approach, and a partial-secular approximation). We consider secondary, here, whether or not an approach guarantees positivity. We use two qubits coupled to a Lorentzian environment in a spin-boson-like fashion modeling a generic situation with various system and bath time scales. We see that, independent of the initial state, the simple Redfield equation with time-dependent coefficients is significantly more accurate than all other methods under consideration. We emphasize that positivity violation in the Redfield equation formalism becomes relevant only in a regime where any of the perturbative master equations considered here are rendered invalid anyway. This implies that the loss of positivity should in fact be welcomed as an important feature: it indicates the breakdown of the weak-coupling assumption. In addition we present the various approaches in a self-contained way and use the behavior of their errors to provide further insight into the range of validity of each method.
Quantum master equations are an invaluable and highly successful tool for the approximate, yet accurate, description of undriven open quantum systems weakly coupled to their environment. In contrast, results on the description of the equally important case of driven open quantum systems using quantum master equations remain scarce. Existing approaches typically impose restrictions on the driving protocol, including, for instance, Floquet master equations for periodic driving and adiabatic master equations for slow driving. However, no generally accepted formulation for arbitrary driving has yet been established. A promising candidate from which all existing approaches can be derived by approximations based on protocol constraints is the driven Redfield master equation. Strikingly, it has received very little attention so far. A main reason is that, in analogy to its undriven counterpart, the driven Redfield master equation notoriously violates complete positivity. In the undriven case, this problem can be successfully addressed using the rotating wave approximation (RWA). For approaches derived from the driven Redfield master equation for specific protocols, such as Floquet master equations and adiabatic master equations, a generalized form of the RWA can still be applied. However, a full generalization directly applicable to the driven Redfield master equation under arbitrary driving has not yet been developed. To address this issue, we propose a straightforward and natural generalization of the RWA based on the version of the RWA used for adiabatic master equations. We then apply the driven Redfield master equation to the paradigmatic, exactly solvable model of a driven quantum harmonic oscillator coupled to a bosonic bath and benchmark it against the exact solution. In particular, we compare the original driven Redfield master equation without an RWA to its generalized RWA version. We find that the driven Redfield master equation without an RWA exhibits excellent agreement with the exact solution across all driving speeds, while the violation of complete positivity shows no notable effect. By contrast, the RWA-based version of the driven Redfield master equation fails to reproduce the dynamics accurately beyond slow driving at short times. Additionally, we analyze known adiabatic master equations, both without and with an RWA. Remarkably, the non-RWA versions agree with the exact dynamics far beyond the strictly adiabatic regime, while the RWA-based versions already show noticeable deviations even for slow driving, contrasting previous observations in the literature. Taken together, these results indicate that the driven Redfield master equation and adiabatic master equations without RWA have been significantly underestimated in their practical usefulness, whereas RWA-based approaches in driven settings may have been overestimated. This strongly suggests that future work should focus on alternative approximation methods applied to the driven Redfield master equation that preserve its high numerical accuracy while restoring complete positivity.
Abstract Quantum master equations are widely used to describe the dynamics of open quantum systems. All these different master equations rely on specific approximations that may or may not be justified. Starting from a microscopic model, applying the standard Born and Markov approximations results in the Redfield equation that does not guarantee to preserve positivity. The latter is typically achieved by additionally applying the secular approximation resulting in a quantum master equation in Lindblad form. There are other ways to obtain an equation in Lindblad form, one of which is the recently proposed universal Lindblad equation (ULE). It has been shown that it is in the same equivalence class of approximations as the Redfield master equation although avoiding the heuristic secular approximation (Nathan and Rudner 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 115109). In this work, we prove that the solutions of the master equation obtained by applying the secular approximation are also obtained by an approximation of the same order as the one performed to obtain the Redfield equation. We hereby provide a mathematical justification for the secular approximation. We show that the result of applying the secular approximation is obtained naturally by applying a self-consistency argument. This shows that the resulting master equation is also in the same equivalence class of approximations as the Redfield master equation and the ULE. We furthermore give numerical considerations about the accuracy of the secular master equation compared to the ULE.
Master equations play a pivotal role in investigating open quantum systems. In particular, the Bloch-Redfield equation stands out due to its relation to a concrete physical environment. However, without further approximations it does not lead to a Lindblad master equation that guarantees that the density matrix stays completely positive, which has raised some concerns regarding its use. This study builds on previous efforts to transform the Bloch-Redfield framework into a mathematically robust Lindblad equation while fully preserving the effects that are lost within the secular approximation that is commonly used to guarantee positivity. These previous approaches introduced two potential deficiencies: The environment-induced energy shift can be non-Hermitian and some decay rates can be negative, violating the assumptions of Lindblad's theorem. Here we propose and evaluate straightforward solutions to both problems. Our approach offers an effective and general procedure for obtaining a Lindblad equation, derived from a concrete physical environment, while mitigating the unphysical dynamics present in the Bloch-Redfield equation.
The Redfield equation with time-dependent coefficients (or TCL2 equation) gives one of the simplest perturbative descriptions of open quantum system dynamics derived from a microscopic theory. Its status as an approximation is nevertheless subtle: while perturbation theory fixes the reduced dynamics order-by-order in the system-environment coupling, solving the Redfield equation yields a particular resummation that need not preserve complete positivity. Here we compare Redfield evolution with an exponentiated (Magnus) resummation of the same second-order perturbative map, which is completely positive and trace preserving (CPTP) for a broad class of physical conditions. We also construct a simple CPTP resolvent resummation, illustrating the non-uniqueness of resummations of the same perturbative map. The Redfield and Magnus prescriptions agree to second order but differ through time-ordering corrections at higher orders. We exhibit a weak-coupling criterion which guarantees that Redfield evolution, even when non-Markovian, remains close to a CPTP map. We illustrate the criterion in two examples, focusing on finite-dimensional (qubit) systems. Our results clarify when, and why, Redfield evolution can remain reliable even when it is highly non-Lindbladian.
Data of the numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation of a system containing one spin-1/2 particle interacting with a bath of up to 32 spin-1/2 particles is used to construct a Markovian quantum master equation describing the dynamics of the system spin. The procedure of obtaining this quantum master equation, which takes the form of a Bloch equation with time-independent coefficients, accounts for all non-Markovian effects inasmuch the general structure of the quantum master equation allows. Our simulation results show that, with a few rather exotic exceptions, the Bloch-type equation with time-independent coefficients provides a simple and accurate description of the dynamics of a spin-1/2 particle in contact with a thermal bath. A calculation of the coefficients that appear in the Redfield master equation in the Markovian limit shows that this perturbatively derived equation quantitatively differs from the numerically estimated Markovian master equation, the results of which agree very well with the solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.
We show how to recover complete positivity (and hence positivity) of the Redfield equation via a coarse-grained averaging technique. We derive general bounds for the coarse graining timescale above which the positivity of the Redfield equation is guaranteed. It turns out that a coarse grain timescale has strong impact on the characteristics of the Lamb shift term and implies, in general, noncommutation between the dissipating and the Hamiltonian components of the generator of the dynamical semigroup. Finally, we specify the analysis to a two-level system or a quantum harmonic oscillator coupled to a fermionic or bosonic thermal environment via dipolelike interaction.