A persistent conceptual puzzle in statistical mechanics is that the entropy S of a classical ideal gas depends on quantum mechanical quantities such as Planck's constant h and the factor 1/N!, which is commonly attributed to the indistinguishability of quantum particles. We resolve this puzzle by distinguishing entropy differences ΔS computed within the gas phase from those computed across a phase transition. For thermodynamic transformations within the gas phase, ΔS depends exclusively on classical macroscopic variables. In such processes, both h and 1/N! contribute only additive constants that cancel in ΔS, rendering them irrelevant for classical measurements. However, computing the latent heat released during a phase transition requires the entropy difference between two distinct phases with fundamentally different microscopic structures. Since the additive contributions do not cancel across phase transitions, a microscopic theory that correctly counts the states of each phase becomes essential, and quantum mechanics is required.
A persistent conceptual puzzle in statistical mechanics is that the entropy S of a classical ideal gas depends on quantum mechanical quantities such as Planck's constant h and the factor 1/N!, which is commonly attributed to the indistinguishability of quantum particles. We resolve this puzzle by distinguishing entropy differences ΔS computed within the gas phase from those computed across a phase transition. For thermodynamic transformations within the gas phase, ΔS depends exclusively on classical macroscopic variables. In such processes, both h and 1/N! contribute only additive constants that cancel in ΔS, rendering them irrelevant for classical measurements. However, computing the latent heat released during a phase transition requires the entropy difference between two distinct phases with fundamentally different microscopic structures. Since the additive contributions do not cancel across phase transitions, a microscopic theory that correctly counts the states of each phase becomes essential, and quantum mechanics is required.
The division by N! in the expression of statistical entropy is usually justified to students by the statement that classical particles should be counted as indistinguishable. Sometimes, quantum indistinguishability is invoked to explain it. In this paper, we try to clarify the issue starting from Clausius thermodynamical entropy and deriving from it Boltzmann statistical entropy for the ideal gas. This approach appears interesting for two reasons: Firstly, it provides a direct heuristic link between thermodynamical and statistical expressions of entropy that is missing in the usual approach. In second place, it explicitly reminds that also statistical entropy is defined with respect to a reference state, chosen to be the quantum-mechanical (T=0) ground state of the N-particles in a box. Both factors h3N and N! at the denominator of the statistical entropy are a consequence of the quantum nature of the reference state: in particular, the N! is not related to the particle identity, but to the identity of the boundary conditions on the quantum-mechanical ground-state momenta, and to a general statistical maximization principle. The introduction of a reference state also allows to reinterpret the standard case of two mixing gases.
I discuss ideal and interacting quantum gases obeying general fractional exclusion statistics. For systems with constant density of single-particle states, described in the mean field approximation, the entropy depends neither on the microscopic exclusion statistics, nor on the interaction. Such systems are called thermodynamically equivalent and I show that the microscopic reason for this equivalence is a one-to-one correspondence between the excited states of these systems. This provides a method, different from the bosonization technique, of transforming between systems of different exclusion statistics. In the last section the macroscopic aspects of this method are discussed. In appendix A, I calculate the fluctuation of the ground-state population of a condensed Bose gas in a grand-canonical ensemble and mean field approximation, while in appendix B I show a situation where although the system exhibits fractional exclusion properties on microscopic energy intervals, a rigorous calculation of the population of single-particle states reveals a condensation phenomenon. This also implies a malfunction of the usual and simplified calculation technique of the most probable statistical distributions.
In this work, improvements are introduced to the current models of the ideal Fermi gas and the ideal Bose gas by incorporating the quantum nature of phase space, which is directly linked to the uncertainty principle. These improved models build upon the recently developed concepts of quantum phase space (QPS) and the QPS representation of quantum mechanics. The Hamiltonian operator for a gas particle and its eigenstates are first determined, and quantum statistical mechanics is used to derive the thermodynamic properties of the ideal gas. Analytic expressions for thermodynamic quantities—including the grand canonical potential, particle number, internal energy, von Neumann entropy, and pressure—are derived, along with the corresponding thermodynamic equations of state for both bosons and fermions. These corrections are particularly significant at low temperatures and in confined volumes, where quantum effects related to system geometry, such as shape and size, become significant. The results also establish a direct link between thermodynamic functions and the quantum statistical variances of momentum. Importantly, the improved models recover well-known classical relations of the ideal gas in the high-temperature and large-volume limits, ensuring consistency with classical physics. By addressing quantum corrections and their thermodynamic implications, this work provides a foundation for further applications in nanoscale systems, quantum gases, low-temperature physics, ultracold physics, and astrophysics.
To understand in detail the relation between unitary quantum theory that describes our world at the microscopic scale and thermodynamics, which was long believed only to apply to macroscopic objects, is one of the most interesting and long-standing problems in physics. Recently, this problem has received renewed attention, in particular from the community of quantum information theory, but also from the field of statistical mechanics, inspired from stochastic thermodynamics. These results suggest that thermodynamics is also relevant for individual quantum systems, provided that they can be brought into contact with thermal baths. In this thesis, I use recently developed tools to provide new results both on fundamental questions, but also on questions which are of practical relevance for potential miniaturized thermal machines. In terms of fundamental questions, the results in this thesis contribute to understanding how the basic laws of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics can be understood directly from unitary quantum mechanics. In particular, I discuss and answer the following questions: i) How can we quantify the third law of thermodynamics using information theoretic methods? ii) How can we quantify the "thermodynamic value" of a state-transition in quantum systems? iii) How can we axiomatically characterize the non-equilibrium free energy and relative entropy? iv) How can we justify statistical ensembles from an operational perspective, without having to introduce either some probability measures or an information theoretic entropy measure? v) How can we understand the equilibration of closed quantum systems, how long does it take and how difficult is it to avoid? In the second part of the thesis I discuss in detail how experimental restrictions, which become important at the quantum scale, influence the ultimate thermodynamic bounds for thermal machines. In particular, the results in this thesis provide thermodynamic bounds on work-extraction and efficiencies of thermal machines in situations where 1.) an experimenter only has limited field strengths available, 2.) an experimenter cannot control the interactions between particles, but external fields arbitrarily well, and 3.) situations in which a small quantum system can only be strongly coupled to heat baths. These bounds are tight and I provide explicit examples illustrating the different behaviours. Finally, I come back to a classic problem in statistical physics: The emergence of spontaneous symmetry breaking. Here, I provide general and rigorous new results that show how symmetry-breaking stationary states emerge from fluctuations in order parameters in dissipative lattice models.
The study of quantum statistical mechanics begins with a review of the basic principles of quantum mechanics. Schrödinger’s equation is introduced and Eigenstates (or stationary states) are defined. Model probability for quantum statistics is assumed to have a uniform distribution in phases. Wave functions for many-body systems are defined. The density matrix is introduced. The Planck entropy and the microcanonical ensemble are defined. The differences between classical and quantum statistical mechanics are all based on the differing concepts of a microscopic ‘state’. While the classical microscopic state (specified by a point in phase space) determines the exact position and momentum of every particle, the quantum mechanical state determines neither; quantum states can only provide probability distributions for observable quantities.
Historically, thermodynamics was formulated for macroscopic systems followed by the development of statistical mechanics which provided microscopic formulations for quantities such as entropy. Entropy is traditionally linked to the ln of the number states available or to the Shannon’s form -k Sum over i P(ei) ln(P(ei)) where P(ei) is the probability for the quantity ei. In addition a variable T (linked to average kinetic energy) appears in both theories. Later the Schrodinger equation was developed to describe bound electron states in an atom etc. These states were characterized by a math object W(x) called the wavefunction and a set of discrete energy levels was calculated which matched data of emitted photons. In a previous note (1) we argued that the average energy En for a quantum bound state plays the same role of characterizing equilibrium as T in classical thermodynamics/statistical mechanics. We further argued that En is linked to parameters in the system. For example, for a particle in a box with infinite potential walls, En is linked to L as well as to n the energy level. One may change En by either changing n or L separately (or both). Holding L constant and changing n leads to a certain type of energy change. We argue this is similar to holding the volume of a gas constant and increasing T. Alternatively, one may leave n unchanged (a quantum adiabatic process) and change L i.e. a mechanical change or work. We argue that one may already consider the concept of the first law of thermodynamics at the quantum bound state level i.e. dE = dQ - dWork where Work is linked to a change in a physical parameter, such as L the length of the box, whereas dQ is linked to energy changes not involving a physical parameter e.g. a change in n the energy level. The Schrodinger equation yields solutions for W(x)=Sum over p a(p)exp(ipx) the wavefunction as well as En’s. We have argued in previous notes that W(x) is part of a conditional probability P(p/x)= a(p)exp(ipx)/W(x) and that En is constant at each point x just as T is constant at each x for classical statistical equilibrium (1). Thus a kind of statistical mechanics exists at the wavefunction level we argue. This statistical mechanics makes use of a free particle wavefunction exp(ipx) and weights a(p), but does not contain the usual P(x), P(p) picture of the classical world. We have shown in (2) that one may obtain P(x)=W*(x)W(x) and P(p)=a*(p)a(p) from the conditional probability. The essential physics we argue, however, is at the level of the wavefunction together with its own unique statistical scenario of exp(ipx)’s interacting with exp(ikx)’s from V(x)=Sum over Vkexp(ikx) (see (1)). Given that P(x) and P(p) exist for a quantum bound state, it may be convenient to use them in formulas because they are linked to a classical statistical picture. We argue that one may use P(x) and P(p) to construct an object S such that T dS does not change when one changes L, the size of box with infinite potential walls. We argue that such an object follows from properties of the Schrodinger equation together with various assumptions. We arrive at S=Sp+Sx where Sp=-k Integral dp a(p)a(p) ln{|a(p)a(p)}| and Sx= -k Integral dx W(x)W(x) ln(W(x)W(x)) for a given energy level. We do not use arguments related to taking ln of the number of states present or Shannon’s entropy. Rather we look for a solution which does not depend on L and is additive. We note, however, that for both W(x)W(x) and a(p)a(p) the solution found is mathematically consistent with the entropy form found by considering independent probabilities. This, however, applies to P(x) and P(p), but we argue that the physical situation is based on W(x) and a(p) as solutions of the Schrodinger equation. Nevertheless P(x) and P(p) are physical observables and not simply math constructs and so may think of them in a somewhat classical manner in terms of probability. Thus we argue that thermodynamics is already present at the level of a quantum bound state and that one may obtain Shannon’s entropy at this level using P(x) and P(p), but without considering the overall probability of independent probabilities as in information theory or numbers of states. Rather obtaining a function which is additive in Sp and Sx and eliminates L is the main consideration. We also argue that S=Sp+Sx carries over into mixed quantum state wavefunctions even though it is usually ignored. Thus we try to argue that it is the bound quantum state which gives rise to the notion of thermodynamics and entropy.