aqora

Revolutionary and Major Concepts in Quantum Mechanics that Synchronized with the Mahayana philosophy of Nagarjuna

Pattamawadee Sankheangaew, Manit Phuengpol

Jun 29, 20260 citations

การบรณาการทฤษฎกลศาสตรควอนตมกบพทธปรชญามหายาน: แนวทางขามศาสตรในการเขาใจความเปนจรงและความร INTEGRATING QUANTUM MECHANICS AND MAHAYANA BUDDHIST PHILOSOPHY: A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO CONSTRUCT NEW UNDERSTANDING FOR REALITY AND KNOWLEDGE ไดรบทนอดหนนการวจยจากมหาวทยาลยมหาจฬาลงกรณราชวทยาลย MCU ว. ๒๔๘/๒๕๖๙การบรณาการทฤษฎกลศาสตรควอนตมกบพทธปรชญามหายาน: แนวทางขามศาสตรในการเขาใจความเปนจรงและความร INTEGRATING QUANTUM MECHANICS AND MAHAYANA BUDDHIST PHILOSOPHY: A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO CONSTRUCT NEW UNDERSTANDING FOR REALITY AND KNOWLEDGE ไดรบทนอดหนนการวจยจากมหาวทยาลยมหาจฬาลงกรณราชวทยาลย MCU ว. ๒๔๘/๒๕๖๙

Pattamawadee Sankheangaew, Sorawit Wongsaard, Phra Charoenpong Dhammateepo +2 more

Sep 2, 20260 citations

Integrating Quantum Mechanics and Mahayana Buddhist Philosophy: A Cross-disciplinary Approach to Construct a New Understanding for Reality and Knowledge

Pattamawadee Sankheangaew, Sorawit Wongsaard, Thawash Homthuanlom +3 more

Jan 1, 20260 citations

Approach to Physical Reality: A Note on Poincare Group & the Philosophy of Nagarjuna

Michele Caponigro

We argue about a possible scenario of physical reality based on the parallelism between Poincar\'{e} group and the sunyata philosophy of Nagarjuna. The notion of "relational" is the common denominator of two views. We have approached the relational concept in third-person perspective (ontic level). It is possible to deduce different physical consequence and interpretation through first-person perspective approach. This relational interpretation leave open the questions: i)we must abandon the idea for a physical system the possibility to extract the completeness information? ii)we must abandon the idea to infer a possible structure of physical reality?We argue about a possible scenario of physical reality based on the parallelism between Poincar\'{e} group and the sunyata philosophy of Nagarjuna. The notion of "relational" is the common denominator of two views. We have approached the relational concept in third-person perspective (ontic level). It is possible to deduce different physical consequence and interpretation through first-person perspective approach. This relational interpretation leave open the questions: i)we must abandon the idea for a physical system the possibility to extract the completeness information? ii)we must abandon the idea to infer a possible structure of physical reality?

Prespacetime journalNov 18, 20170 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Some Hindu Perspectives

V. V. Raman

Routledge eBooksFeb 17, 20152 citations

Approach to Physical Reality: a note on Poincare Group and the philosophy of Nagarjuna

David Vernette, Punam Tandan, Michele Caponigro

We argue about a possible scenario of physical reality based on the parallelism between Poincare group and the sunyata philosophy of Nagarjuna. The notion of "relational" is the common denominator of two views. We have approached the relational concept in third-person perspective (ontic level). It is possible to deduce different physical consequence and interpretation through first-person perspective approach. This relational interpretation leave open the questions: i)we must abandon the idea for a physical system the possibility to extract completeness information? ii)we must abandon the idea to infer a possible structure of physical reality?We argue about a possible scenario of physical reality based on the parallelism between Poincare group and the sunyata philosophy of Nagarjuna. The notion of "relational" is the common denominator of two views. We have approached the relational concept in third-person perspective (ontic level). It is possible to deduce different physical consequence and interpretation through first-person perspective approach. This relational interpretation leave open the questions: i)we must abandon the idea for a physical system the possibility to extract completeness information? ii)we must abandon the idea to infer a possible structure of physical reality?

arXiv:0704.1665Apr 13, 20071 citation

Related papers

Related papers