Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Computational Complexity Analysis of Quantum Algorithms using Random Matrix Theory

Jincheng Zhang

Published Sep 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This paper investigates the application of Random Matrix Theory (RMT) to the analytical complexity assessment of quantum algorithms. Traditional methods for estimating the computational complexity of quantum algorithms often rely on heuristics and approximations, frequently leading to overly pessimistic or overly optimistic results. We propose a novel approach utilizing RMT to model the statistical behavior of quantum circuits. Specifically, we leverage the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of random matrices to characterize the evolution of quantum states under arbitrary quantum circuits. This allows for a more precise estimation of the number of quantum gates (operations) required to achieve a desired level of accuracy in solving a given problem. We demonstrate, through illustrative examples, how RMT can provide tighter and more accurate bounds on the computational complexity compared to conventional techniques. The core claim of this work is that RMT offers a fundamentally new perspective on complexity analysis, promising to reveal deeper insights into the performance characteristics of quantum algorithms and potentially guide the design of more efficient quantum solutions.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22220217

Related papers

Computational Complexity Analysis of Quantum Algorithms using Randomized Benchmarking

Jincheng Zhang

The accurate determination of the computational complexity of quantum algorithms is a fundamental problem in quantum information science. Theoretical analysis often struggles to capture the subtle effects of noise and limited coherence, leading to inaccurate predictions. This work presents a rigorous methodology for assessing the complexity of quantum algorithms using randomized benchmarking (RB). RB provides a statistical framework for measuring the fidelity of quantum computations, allowing us to empirically estimate the number of gates, circuit depth, and other resource requirements. The approach avoids the pitfalls of purely theoretical models by directly observing the performance of a quantum circuit on a physical system. We demonstrate the application of this technique to several simplified quantum algorithms, illustrating the method's ability to provide more realistic estimates of complexity compared to traditional analytical approaches. The results highlight the importance of experimental validation in understanding the true resource demands of quantum computations.

•Aug 31, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Coherence-Based Computational Complexity Analysis

Jincheng Zhang

This paper presents a novel approach to analyzing the computational complexity of quantum algorithms by leveraging the concept of quantum coherence. Traditional methods for assessing quantum complexity often rely on circuit depth, qubit count, or gate complexity, which can be insufficient in capturing the nuances of quantum computation. We introduce a framework that explicitly incorporates the calculation of quantum coherence, recognizing it as a fundamental resource in quantum computation. The core idea is that the precision and duration of quantum coherence directly correlate with the computational effort required. We define a mathematical model that quantifies coherence decay and its impact on algorithm execution time. This model allows us to derive tighter bounds on the complexity of quantum algorithms, particularly those that rely heavily on sustained coherence. Furthermore, we explore the implications of coherence limitations on the feasibility of certain quantum algorithms and suggest potential strategies for mitigating these effects. This work contributes a new perspective on quantum complexity analysis, providing a more accurate and potentially more scalable method for evaluating quantum algorithms.

•Sep 3, 2026•0 citations

Computational Complexity Analysis of Quantum Algorithms using Information Theory

Jincheng Zhang

This paper explores the application of information theory to analyze the computational complexity of quantum algorithms. Traditional approaches to complexity analysis often rely on circuit models and gate complexity, which can be insufficient for fully characterizing the resource requirements of quantum computation. We propose utilizing information-theoretic concepts, specifically quantum entropy and mutual information, to provide a more nuanced understanding of how quantum circuits process information. This approach allows us to quantify the information-theoretic limits of quantum algorithms, providing insights into the number of qubits and gates necessary for efficient execution. We examine several key aspects, including the role of entanglement, the impact of measurement, and the relationship between quantum entropy and algorithmic complexity. The goal is to establish a framework for assessing quantum algorithms based on their fundamental information-processing capabilities, moving beyond purely circuit-based evaluations. This work contributes to a deeper theoretical understanding of quantum computation and its potential limitations.

•Sep 2, 2026•0 citations

Computational Complexity Analysis of Quantum Algorithms using Category Theory

Jincheng Zhang

Traditional methods for analyzing the computational complexity of algorithms, predominantly rooted in classical computer models, struggle to accurately characterize the potential advantages offered by quantum computation. This work proposes a novel approach utilizing category theory to provide a more fundamental and abstract framework for assessing the complexity of quantum algorithms. Instead of focusing on the specifics of quantum hardware, we examine the underlying categorical structures that define the computational processes inherent in these algorithms. This allows us to identify and analyze complexity properties that are independent of the physical implementation. We define key concepts like quantum states as objects and quantum gates as morphisms, establishing a formal connection between quantum computation and category theory. This framework facilitates a more rigorous and generalized understanding of quantum complexity, potentially revealing new insights and providing a basis for comparing different quantum algorithms. The core claim is that traditional complexity analysis is inadequate, and the mechanism is the application of category theory for a more abstract and generalized framework.

•Sep 7, 2026•0 citations

Information Theory Under Non-Linear Random Matrix Quantum Simulation

Jincheng Zhang

This paper explores the potential of information theory to guide the design of a novel quantum simulation technique. We propose a method based on non-linear random matrices, leveraging quantum entanglement to achieve precise state measurements and analysis. The core claim is that this approach overcomes limitations of traditional classical simulation methods, particularly in modeling complex quantum systems, by exploiting the unique properties of entanglement. This research will investigate the mathematical framework for this simulation, focusing on the role of entanglement in generating and manipulating quantum states. The paper presents a conceptual outline of the algorithm and discusses its potential applications in various quantum computing and simulation contexts.

•Aug 29, 2026•0 citations

Core Claim: Design a dynamic matrix calculation validation method applied to quantum computers, leveraging the dynamic properties of matrices to enhance computational efficiency.

Jincheng Zhang

The development of quantum algorithms requires rigorous validation to ensure their correctness and stability. Static matrix representations often present challenges in efficiently verifying complex quantum circuits. This paper introduces a novel dynamic matrix calculation validation method specifically tailored for quantum computing, aiming to improve computational efficiency by dynamically adapting matrix properties during the verification process. We propose a mechanism that converts linear algebra calculations into quantum operations, optimizing the algorithm's execution flow. This approach offers a significant improvement over existing methods by dynamically adjusting matrix characteristics, reducing computational complexity and improving the overall accuracy of quantum algorithm validation. The paper details the design of the dynamic matrix validation framework, its implementation using a quantum simulator, and the resulting performance gains compared to traditional validation techniques. Furthermore, we discuss the potential benefits and limitations of this approach in the context of quantum computing.

•Sep 7, 2026•0 citations
This paper investigates the application of Random Matrix Theory (RMT) to the analytical complexity assessment of quantum algorithms. Traditional methods for estimating the computational complexity of quantum algorithms often rely on heuristics and approximations, frequently leading to overly pessimistic or overly optimistic results. We propose a novel approach utilizing RMT to model the statistical behavior of quantum circuits. Specifically, we leverage the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of random matrices to characterize the evolution of quantum states under arbitrary quantum circuits. This allows for a more precise estimation of the number of quantum gates (operations) required to achieve a desired level of accuracy in solving a given problem. We demonstrate, through illustrative examples, how RMT can provide tighter and more accurate bounds on the computational complexity compared to conventional techniques. The core claim of this work is that RMT offers a fundamentally new perspective on complexity analysis, promising to reveal deeper insights into the performance characteristics of quantum algorithms and potentially guide the design of more efficient quantum solutions.
The accurate determination of the computational complexity of quantum algorithms is a fundamental problem in quantum information science. Theoretical analysis often struggles to capture the subtle effects of noise and limited coherence, leading to inaccurate predictions. This work presents a rigorous methodology for assessing the complexity of quantum algorithms using randomized benchmarking (RB). RB provides a statistical framework for measuring the fidelity of quantum computations, allowing us to empirically estimate the number of gates, circuit depth, and other resource requirements. The approach avoids the pitfalls of purely theoretical models by directly observing the performance of a quantum circuit on a physical system. We demonstrate the application of this technique to several simplified quantum algorithms, illustrating the method's ability to provide more realistic estimates of complexity compared to traditional analytical approaches. The results highlight the importance of experimental validation in understanding the true resource demands of quantum computations.
This paper presents a novel approach to analyzing the computational complexity of quantum algorithms by leveraging the concept of quantum coherence. Traditional methods for assessing quantum complexity often rely on circuit depth, qubit count, or gate complexity, which can be insufficient in capturing the nuances of quantum computation. We introduce a framework that explicitly incorporates the calculation of quantum coherence, recognizing it as a fundamental resource in quantum computation. The core idea is that the precision and duration of quantum coherence directly correlate with the computational effort required. We define a mathematical model that quantifies coherence decay and its impact on algorithm execution time. This model allows us to derive tighter bounds on the complexity of quantum algorithms, particularly those that rely heavily on sustained coherence. Furthermore, we explore the implications of coherence limitations on the feasibility of certain quantum algorithms and suggest potential strategies for mitigating these effects. This work contributes a new perspective on quantum complexity analysis, providing a more accurate and potentially more scalable method for evaluating quantum algorithms.
This paper explores the application of information theory to analyze the computational complexity of quantum algorithms. Traditional approaches to complexity analysis often rely on circuit models and gate complexity, which can be insufficient for fully characterizing the resource requirements of quantum computation. We propose utilizing information-theoretic concepts, specifically quantum entropy and mutual information, to provide a more nuanced understanding of how quantum circuits process information. This approach allows us to quantify the information-theoretic limits of quantum algorithms, providing insights into the number of qubits and gates necessary for efficient execution. We examine several key aspects, including the role of entanglement, the impact of measurement, and the relationship between quantum entropy and algorithmic complexity. The goal is to establish a framework for assessing quantum algorithms based on their fundamental information-processing capabilities, moving beyond purely circuit-based evaluations. This work contributes to a deeper theoretical understanding of quantum computation and its potential limitations.
Traditional methods for analyzing the computational complexity of algorithms, predominantly rooted in classical computer models, struggle to accurately characterize the potential advantages offered by quantum computation. This work proposes a novel approach utilizing category theory to provide a more fundamental and abstract framework for assessing the complexity of quantum algorithms. Instead of focusing on the specifics of quantum hardware, we examine the underlying categorical structures that define the computational processes inherent in these algorithms. This allows us to identify and analyze complexity properties that are independent of the physical implementation. We define key concepts like quantum states as objects and quantum gates as morphisms, establishing a formal connection between quantum computation and category theory. This framework facilitates a more rigorous and generalized understanding of quantum complexity, potentially revealing new insights and providing a basis for comparing different quantum algorithms. The core claim is that traditional complexity analysis is inadequate, and the mechanism is the application of category theory for a more abstract and generalized framework.
This paper explores the potential of information theory to guide the design of a novel quantum simulation technique. We propose a method based on non-linear random matrices, leveraging quantum entanglement to achieve precise state measurements and analysis. The core claim is that this approach overcomes limitations of traditional classical simulation methods, particularly in modeling complex quantum systems, by exploiting the unique properties of entanglement. This research will investigate the mathematical framework for this simulation, focusing on the role of entanglement in generating and manipulating quantum states. The paper presents a conceptual outline of the algorithm and discusses its potential applications in various quantum computing and simulation contexts.
The development of quantum algorithms requires rigorous validation to ensure their correctness and stability. Static matrix representations often present challenges in efficiently verifying complex quantum circuits. This paper introduces a novel dynamic matrix calculation validation method specifically tailored for quantum computing, aiming to improve computational efficiency by dynamically adapting matrix properties during the verification process. We propose a mechanism that converts linear algebra calculations into quantum operations, optimizing the algorithm's execution flow. This approach offers a significant improvement over existing methods by dynamically adjusting matrix characteristics, reducing computational complexity and improving the overall accuracy of quantum algorithm validation. The paper details the design of the dynamic matrix validation framework, its implementation using a quantum simulator, and the resulting performance gains compared to traditional validation techniques. Furthermore, we discuss the potential benefits and limitations of this approach in the context of quantum computing.