Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Computational Complexity Analysis of Quantum Algorithms using Category Theory

Jincheng Zhang

Published Sep 7, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Traditional methods for analyzing the computational complexity of algorithms, predominantly rooted in classical computer models, struggle to accurately characterize the potential advantages offered by quantum computation. This work proposes a novel approach utilizing category theory to provide a more fundamental and abstract framework for assessing the complexity of quantum algorithms. Instead of focusing on the specifics of quantum hardware, we examine the underlying categorical structures that define the computational processes inherent in these algorithms. This allows us to identify and analyze complexity properties that are independent of the physical implementation. We define key concepts like quantum states as objects and quantum gates as morphisms, establishing a formal connection between quantum computation and category theory. This framework facilitates a more rigorous and generalized understanding of quantum complexity, potentially revealing new insights and providing a basis for comparing different quantum algorithms. The core claim is that traditional complexity analysis is inadequate, and the mechanism is the application of category theory for a more abstract and generalized framework.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22636571

Related papers

Computational Complexity Analysis of Quantum Algorithms using Information Theory

Jincheng Zhang

This paper explores the application of information theory to analyze the computational complexity of quantum algorithms. Traditional approaches to complexity analysis often rely on circuit models and gate complexity, which can be insufficient for fully characterizing the resource requirements of quantum computation. We propose utilizing information-theoretic concepts, specifically quantum entropy and mutual information, to provide a more nuanced understanding of how quantum circuits process information. This approach allows us to quantify the information-theoretic limits of quantum algorithms, providing insights into the number of qubits and gates necessary for efficient execution. We examine several key aspects, including the role of entanglement, the impact of measurement, and the relationship between quantum entropy and algorithmic complexity. The goal is to establish a framework for assessing quantum algorithms based on their fundamental information-processing capabilities, moving beyond purely circuit-based evaluations. This work contributes to a deeper theoretical understanding of quantum computation and its potential limitations.

•Sep 2, 2026•0 citations

基于量子信息熵的算法复杂度分析

Jincheng Zhang

This paper investigates the application of quantum information entropy as a novel approach to analyzing algorithm complexity. Traditional methods often rely on classical computational models and may not fully capture the resource demands inherent in quantum algorithms. We propose a framework where algorithms are translated into quantum information processing steps, and quantum information entropy is utilized to quantify the complexity of these processes. The core claim is that this approach offers a more accurate assessment of computational resource requirements, ultimately guiding the design and optimization of algorithms. We present a theoretical framework and explore potential applications, highlighting the unique insights gained through the lens of quantum information entropy. The analysis focuses on identifying key metrics related to entanglement, coherence, and quantum state manipulation, which directly influence the entropy values. We demonstrate how variations in these metrics can significantly impact the overall complexity of an algorithm. Furthermore, we discuss the limitations of this approach and suggest future research directions.

•Sep 5, 2026•0 citations

Computational Complexity Theory for Quantum Neural Networks

Jincheng Zhang

This paper investigates the computational complexity of quantum neural network (QNN) algorithms. It aims to provide a theoretical framework for assessing the potential advantages and limitations of QNNs compared to classical neural networks. The core methodology involves applying complexity theory to analyze the resource requirements, including the number of qubits and gate operations, inherent in QNN computations. Specifically, we explore how quantum phenomena, such as superposition and entanglement, can be leveraged to achieve computational speedups. We examine various QNN architectures, including Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE)-based networks and Quantum Associative Memory (QAM) approaches, from a complexity perspective. The analysis identifies key bottlenecks and suggests directions for future research to optimize QNN designs for practical quantum hardware. The ultimate goal is to establish a rigorous understanding of the computational limits and potential breakthroughs offered by QNNs.

•Sep 6, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Coherence-Based Computational Complexity Analysis

Jincheng Zhang

This paper presents a novel approach to analyzing the computational complexity of quantum algorithms by leveraging the concept of quantum coherence. Traditional methods for assessing quantum complexity often rely on circuit depth, qubit count, or gate complexity, which can be insufficient in capturing the nuances of quantum computation. We introduce a framework that explicitly incorporates the calculation of quantum coherence, recognizing it as a fundamental resource in quantum computation. The core idea is that the precision and duration of quantum coherence directly correlate with the computational effort required. We define a mathematical model that quantifies coherence decay and its impact on algorithm execution time. This model allows us to derive tighter bounds on the complexity of quantum algorithms, particularly those that rely heavily on sustained coherence. Furthermore, we explore the implications of coherence limitations on the feasibility of certain quantum algorithms and suggest potential strategies for mitigating these effects. This work contributes a new perspective on quantum complexity analysis, providing a more accurate and potentially more scalable method for evaluating quantum algorithms.

•Sep 3, 2026•0 citations

Quantum-Inspired Geometry for Computational Complexity

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum-inspired geometry proposes a novel framework for quantifying computational complexity by leveraging the properties of quantum phenomena. This paper explores the concept of a "Quantum Complexity Metric" – a quantifiable measure derived from the inherent characteristics of quantum states and entanglement – to provide an alternative to traditional complexity measures. We delve into the potential benefits of this approach, emphasizing its ability to identify patterns and bottlenecks in algorithm performance. The research focuses on establishing a rigorous mathematical foundation for this metric, outlining its operational principles and demonstrating its potential to enhance our understanding of computational limitations. Specifically, we will address the challenges of quantifying entanglement and its connection to computational cost, and we will present preliminary results utilizing a simplified, yet illustrative, model. Ultimately, this work aims to advance the field by suggesting a fundamentally new approach to analyzing complexity, potentially leading to more efficient algorithms and deeper insights into the boundaries of computation.

•Aug 31, 2026•0 citations

Title: Quantum Complexity Theory for Constraint Programming

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum Complexity Theory (QCT) offers a promising avenue for enhancing constraint programming by leveraging the unique capabilities of quantum computation. This paper explores the potential of QCT to provide a more robust and nuanced understanding of problem complexity, specifically focusing on the identification of crucial quantum algorithms and their corresponding impact on constraint programming. We propose a novel approach centered around a fundamental relationship between problem complexity and quantum computational resources, aiming to move beyond traditional complexity measures and demonstrate a deeper connection between the problem and the underlying quantum hardware. This work presents a framework for analyzing constraint programming problems using quantum algorithms, ultimately leading to a significant improvement in understanding the limitations and potential of constraint programming. The core mechanism involves a systematic investigation of quantum algorithms applicable to complex constraint programming scenarios, aiming to identify key factors driving complexity.

•Aug 31, 2026•0 citations
Traditional methods for analyzing the computational complexity of algorithms, predominantly rooted in classical computer models, struggle to accurately characterize the potential advantages offered by quantum computation. This work proposes a novel approach utilizing category theory to provide a more fundamental and abstract framework for assessing the complexity of quantum algorithms. Instead of focusing on the specifics of quantum hardware, we examine the underlying categorical structures that define the computational processes inherent in these algorithms. This allows us to identify and analyze complexity properties that are independent of the physical implementation. We define key concepts like quantum states as objects and quantum gates as morphisms, establishing a formal connection between quantum computation and category theory. This framework facilitates a more rigorous and generalized understanding of quantum complexity, potentially revealing new insights and providing a basis for comparing different quantum algorithms. The core claim is that traditional complexity analysis is inadequate, and the mechanism is the application of category theory for a more abstract and generalized framework.
This paper explores the application of information theory to analyze the computational complexity of quantum algorithms. Traditional approaches to complexity analysis often rely on circuit models and gate complexity, which can be insufficient for fully characterizing the resource requirements of quantum computation. We propose utilizing information-theoretic concepts, specifically quantum entropy and mutual information, to provide a more nuanced understanding of how quantum circuits process information. This approach allows us to quantify the information-theoretic limits of quantum algorithms, providing insights into the number of qubits and gates necessary for efficient execution. We examine several key aspects, including the role of entanglement, the impact of measurement, and the relationship between quantum entropy and algorithmic complexity. The goal is to establish a framework for assessing quantum algorithms based on their fundamental information-processing capabilities, moving beyond purely circuit-based evaluations. This work contributes to a deeper theoretical understanding of quantum computation and its potential limitations.
This paper investigates the application of quantum information entropy as a novel approach to analyzing algorithm complexity. Traditional methods often rely on classical computational models and may not fully capture the resource demands inherent in quantum algorithms. We propose a framework where algorithms are translated into quantum information processing steps, and quantum information entropy is utilized to quantify the complexity of these processes. The core claim is that this approach offers a more accurate assessment of computational resource requirements, ultimately guiding the design and optimization of algorithms. We present a theoretical framework and explore potential applications, highlighting the unique insights gained through the lens of quantum information entropy. The analysis focuses on identifying key metrics related to entanglement, coherence, and quantum state manipulation, which directly influence the entropy values. We demonstrate how variations in these metrics can significantly impact the overall complexity of an algorithm. Furthermore, we discuss the limitations of this approach and suggest future research directions.
This paper investigates the computational complexity of quantum neural network (QNN) algorithms. It aims to provide a theoretical framework for assessing the potential advantages and limitations of QNNs compared to classical neural networks. The core methodology involves applying complexity theory to analyze the resource requirements, including the number of qubits and gate operations, inherent in QNN computations. Specifically, we explore how quantum phenomena, such as superposition and entanglement, can be leveraged to achieve computational speedups. We examine various QNN architectures, including Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE)-based networks and Quantum Associative Memory (QAM) approaches, from a complexity perspective. The analysis identifies key bottlenecks and suggests directions for future research to optimize QNN designs for practical quantum hardware. The ultimate goal is to establish a rigorous understanding of the computational limits and potential breakthroughs offered by QNNs.
This paper presents a novel approach to analyzing the computational complexity of quantum algorithms by leveraging the concept of quantum coherence. Traditional methods for assessing quantum complexity often rely on circuit depth, qubit count, or gate complexity, which can be insufficient in capturing the nuances of quantum computation. We introduce a framework that explicitly incorporates the calculation of quantum coherence, recognizing it as a fundamental resource in quantum computation. The core idea is that the precision and duration of quantum coherence directly correlate with the computational effort required. We define a mathematical model that quantifies coherence decay and its impact on algorithm execution time. This model allows us to derive tighter bounds on the complexity of quantum algorithms, particularly those that rely heavily on sustained coherence. Furthermore, we explore the implications of coherence limitations on the feasibility of certain quantum algorithms and suggest potential strategies for mitigating these effects. This work contributes a new perspective on quantum complexity analysis, providing a more accurate and potentially more scalable method for evaluating quantum algorithms.
Quantum-inspired geometry proposes a novel framework for quantifying computational complexity by leveraging the properties of quantum phenomena. This paper explores the concept of a "Quantum Complexity Metric" – a quantifiable measure derived from the inherent characteristics of quantum states and entanglement – to provide an alternative to traditional complexity measures. We delve into the potential benefits of this approach, emphasizing its ability to identify patterns and bottlenecks in algorithm performance. The research focuses on establishing a rigorous mathematical foundation for this metric, outlining its operational principles and demonstrating its potential to enhance our understanding of computational limitations. Specifically, we will address the challenges of quantifying entanglement and its connection to computational cost, and we will present preliminary results utilizing a simplified, yet illustrative, model. Ultimately, this work aims to advance the field by suggesting a fundamentally new approach to analyzing complexity, potentially leading to more efficient algorithms and deeper insights into the boundaries of computation.
Quantum Complexity Theory (QCT) offers a promising avenue for enhancing constraint programming by leveraging the unique capabilities of quantum computation. This paper explores the potential of QCT to provide a more robust and nuanced understanding of problem complexity, specifically focusing on the identification of crucial quantum algorithms and their corresponding impact on constraint programming. We propose a novel approach centered around a fundamental relationship between problem complexity and quantum computational resources, aiming to move beyond traditional complexity measures and demonstrate a deeper connection between the problem and the underlying quantum hardware. This work presents a framework for analyzing constraint programming problems using quantum algorithms, ultimately leading to a significant improvement in understanding the limitations and potential of constraint programming. The core mechanism involves a systematic investigation of quantum algorithms applicable to complex constraint programming scenarios, aiming to identify key factors driving complexity.