The theory of Observational Relativity (OR) is a new theory in physics. For ease of understanding, the author reports the significant discoveries and new insights of OR to physicists and readers in the form of serial reports. Now, OR Serial Report 6 reports that, similar to relativistic effects, the quantum effects in the quantum mechanics based on Planck's quantum hypothesis, including wave-like nature and uncertainty, are also sorts of observational effects. But the difference is that relativistic phenomena are caused by the observational locality of observation agents, while quantum phenomena are caused by the observational perturbation of observation agents. The OR axiom system, taking the definition of OR time as the most basic premise or first principle, has not only deduced the theory of OR, including the inertial OR (IOR) and the gravitational OR (GOR), but also deduced the theory of observational quantum (OQ). The theory of ORQ is that of the general observation agent. The informons of observation agents with momentum and energy must perturb the observed object P, causing P to exhibit quantum effects. The theory of OQ has discovered that Planck's quantum theory is a theory of optical observation, i.e., a special case of the theory of OQ, in which the quantum effects, including wave-like nature and uncertainty, are observational effects caused by the perturbation of the informons (photons) of the optical agent, not the intrinsic nature of the physical world or P; the Planck constant h is not a cosmological constant, but rather the energy-frequency ratio of photons, representing the minimum scale or resolution for the optical agent to determine the mass, momentum and energy of P. Now, the whole theoretical system of ORQ has not only generalized and unified Newtonian mechanics and Einstein's theory of relativity, but also generalized and unified Einstein's formula E=mc2 and Planck's equation E=hf, marching towards the unification of relativity theory and quantum theory.
The theory of Observational Relativity (OR) is a new theory in physics. For ease of understanding, the author reports the significant discoveries and new insights of OR to physicists and readers in the form of serial reports. Now, OR Serial Report 6 reports that, similar to relativistic effects, the quantum effects in the quantum mechanics based on Planck's quantum hypothesis, including wave-like nature and uncertainty, are also sorts of observational effects. But the difference is that relativistic phenomena are caused by the observational locality of observation agents, while quantum phenomena are caused by the observational perturbation of observation agents. The OR axiom system, taking the definition of OR time as the most basic premise or first principle, has not only deduced the theory of OR, including the inertial OR (IOR) and the gravitational OR (GOR), but also deduced the theory of observational quantum (OQ). The theory of ORQ is that of the general observation agent. The informons of observation agents with momentum and energy must perturb the observed object P, causing P to exhibit quantum effects. The theory of OQ has discovered that Planck's quantum theory is a theory of optical observation, i.e., a special case of the theory of OQ, in which the quantum effects, including wave-like nature and uncertainty, are observational effects caused by the perturbation of the informons (photons) of the optical agent, not the intrinsic nature of the physical world or P; the Planck constant h is not a cosmological constant, but rather the energy-frequency ratio of photons, representing the minimum scale or resolution for the optical agent to determine the mass, momentum and energy of P. Now, the whole theoretical system of ORQ has not only generalized and unified Newtonian mechanics and Einstein's theory of relativity, but also generalized and unified Einstein's formula E=mc2 and Planck's equation E=hf, marching towards the unification of relativity theory and quantum theory.
It is established that special relativity and quantum mechanics are two very wide apart theories of measurements in modern physics in terms of determinism versus indeterminism. Modern physics accepts indeterminism against classical determinism. But it is remarkable that Einstein's special relativity in its present form alone contains the basic ingredients of quantum theory. Einstein's theory can give a simple theoretical proof of the Planck's quantum hypothesis and can explain the origin of mass out of zero rest mass of photon. This article at the first place shows how to proceed in this path from relativistic energy momentum relations and at the second place it shows the reason of energy and momentum indeterminacy from the framework of relativity. At the last phase the article puts a question on the sustainability of special relativity itself before oscillation of any kind. This paper deals with the matter to the extent special relativity containing quantum theory. Index Terms— Special relativity, simultaneity of events, Planck's quantum theory, energy momentum 4 vector, Heisenberg's indeterminacy principle, concept of mass, ensemble of photon. —————————— a —————————— 1 I NTRODUCTION t is a common belief that the jurisdiction of special relativi- ty and quantum theory are mutually exclusive. In 1900 Max Planck gave his famous quantum hypothesis of light together with the energy- frequency relation . Eh Q In 1905 Einstein gave special relativity. Both the regime went their own way and ultimately clashed each other with the arrival of Heisenberg's indeterminacy principle in 1926. Einstein con- ceded defeat to Bohr ultimately but still believed that quan- tum theory lacks something very serious. But modern physics points clearly to the triumph of Heisenberg's indeterminacy principle in every context. Nonetheless it is worthwhile to mention that the very genesis of quantum theory of light pre- scribed by Eh Q and the very essence of mass can be de- rived even in the frame work of special relativity. Even Ein- stein could get it using his own energy momentum relation. Planck's quantum relation of photon and the construction of mass from an ensemble of photons are indeed inbuilt in Ein- stein's theory. We can even reconcile Heisenberg's principle of indeterminacy with the framework built by Einstein.
The Theory of Temporal Relativity proposes a unified theoretical framework that extends Special and General Relativity into the complex domain, integrating aspects of Quantum Mechanics within a single geometrical structure. The theory introduces a generalized Hilbert-space geometry and interprets quantum states as observer-dependent, arising from complex temporal relations between reference frames. Theory of Temporal Relativity is a theoretical framework proposing a unified extension of Special and General Relativity into the complex domain, with the goal of incorporating aspects of Quantum Mechanics within a consistent geometrical model. The theory generalizes Hilbert-space geometry and relativistic invariance to complex coordinates, introducing observer-dependent descriptions of physical quantities and a reinterpretation of quantum states as complex-phase relations between reference frames. Within this model, fundamental constants such as c, G, and h are not strictly universal but can exhibit apparent local variations arising from the observer’s position in the complex spacetime manifold. These variations preserve global covariance and CPT symmetry while reconciling quantum non-locality with relativistic kinematics. The framework predicts experimentally testable effects, including measurable phase shifts in interferometric experiments, possible frequency modulations in non-inertial systems, and small local deviations of physical constants detectable in condensed-matter and gravitational contexts. The supplementary work, “Quantum Uncertainty, Planck’s Constant, and Ontological Insights from Complex Spacetime Geometry and Local Metric Deformations”, develops the principle of Temporal Relativity as a foundational element of the theory. It formalizes the connection between quantum uncertainty, metric deformations, and complex temporal structures, within an alternative logical framework (AU). This extension provides both an ontological interpretation of the wavefunction and a basis for the emergence of quantum indeterminacy from geometric causes. Together, these works present a coherent attempt to unify the relativistic and quantum domains under a single complex-geometric view of spacetime, maintaining mathematical rigor while providing clear experimental pathways for empirical validation.
Abstract In the opening chapter on relativity, C. V. Vishveshwara (Vishu) takes the reader through an excursion on how Einstein laid down the remarkable foundations of special relativity. The chapter begins with an early treatment of relativity, namely Galilean relativity, which while successful with classical mechanics was not tenable with electromagnetism. Working in the seclusion of a patent office, Einstein thought deeply and despairingly of relativity that would encompass electromagnetism. He realized that not only spatial measures but also time varied among inertial observers moving with constant relative velocities. Thus, Einstein’s special theory of relativity came to be, and along with it, his celebrated equation, E = mc2. The chapter then surveys bizarre, observable consequences of this special relativity and how they all beautifully fit into a mathematical framework created by Minkowski in which space and time become united. The chapter concludes by describing physicists’ reactions to this radical new theory and its role in different areas, such as elementary particle physics and astrophysics. In the opening chapter of quantum physics, Smitha describes the circuitous historic path taken by many a physicist explorer that led to the establishment of its mind-boggling fundamentals. This revolutionary branch of physics was seeded by puzzles posed in the late 1800s related to the behavior of light from radiating objects. The chapter begins by exploring the nature of light and the story of blackbody radiation that led to Planck introducing the notion of the quantum. It then surveys the photoelectric effect, which heralds the concept of the photon, and wave-particle duality, which applies both to light and matter. The excursion continues into Schrödinger’s description of matter acting as a wave and its consequences, including energy quantization and quantum tunneling. The chapter then explains Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle from multiple angles. Finally, it presents the quantum picture of the atom and how it resolved some of the deep puzzles, a crowning testament to quantum theory.
A fundamental error is identified in the foundations of current quantum theory. The error is shown to be the source of the various noncausal and unphysical aspects of the theory. When the error is corrected, a new theory arises, which is both local and deterministic, but which nonetheless does not conflict with Bell’s theorem. The new theory reproduces quantitatively all the predictions of current quantum mechanics, with the exception of double-delayed-choice Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) phenomena. A shortcoming in Aspect's experiment testing such phenomena is pointed out, and a definitive experiment is proposed. The EPR paradox is resolved. The uncertainty principle is derived on a causal, deterministic basis. The theory is “automatically ” relativistic; that is, the constancy of the velocity of light c relative to all observers follows as an immediate consequence of the new quantum theory, which constancy thus acquires a simple physical explanation. General relativity also acquires a simple, physical explanation. A pictorial interpretation of Feynman diagrams is obtained. The theory provides a clear physical explanation for the Aharonov–Bohm effect and suggests an explanation for the irreversibility of quantum statistical processes. Quantum statistics, Bose and Fermi, are explained in a simple, pictorial manner. Overall, it is shown that quantum and relativistic phenomena can be understood in an objective manner, in which facts are facts, causality is valid, and reality is real. The theory provides a single framework in which all known physical phenomena can be comprehended, thus accomplishing the objective of a unified field theory. Key words: quantum theory foundations, Bell’s theorem, delayed choice, special relativity, Feynman diagrams, Aharonov–Bohm effect, general relativity, unified theory, reality
This paper begins with a question concerning the physical meaning of 𝑚0𝑐2 as it appears in the relativistic energy relation 𝐸2 = 𝑝2𝑐2 + 𝑚02𝑐4. The numerical relations 𝐸 = 𝑚0𝑐2 and 𝐸 = 𝛥𝑚𝑐2 are supported by precise experiments, but the ontology to which these mathematical quantities are assigned is a separate issue. This question leads directly to a reconsideration of the standard relativistic picture in which the relativistic time and relativistic length introduced by Einstein in 1905, and later geometrized as spacetime after Minkowski, are attributed to the physical world itself. The same issue appears in quantum theory. The relativistic energy–momentum relation connects to relativistic quantum-wave structures and, in the nonrelativistic regime, to Schrödinger mechanics; however, it does not follow uniquely from the mathematics that the wave function, probability, and uncertainty must be interpreted as properties of reality itself. The present paper identifies a common root of these two problems in the identification of mathematically observed quantities with reality itself. The Nakaza New Relativity Theory (NNRT) places an invariant real spacetime, consisting of universal time and universal space, as its physical basis. It does not, however, assume an absolute rest frame or an ether, and it regards all inertial frames as physically equivalent. In contrast, time, distance, phase, frequency, wavenumber, arrival time, and related quantities constructed through actual measurement are separated as quantities of measurement spacetime. The logical boundary between observational agreement and ontological identification is formulated here as the Observational–Ontological Non-Uniqueness Proposition (OONP). Taking the phase–action correspondence 𝛩 = 𝑆⁄ℏ, 𝑘𝜇(𝛩) = 𝜕𝜇𝛩, and 𝑃𝜇(𝛷) = ℏ𝑘𝜇(𝛩) as a common bridge, the dispersion structure of a single Fourier mode is organized as relativistic observation, whereas the superposition of multiple modes and Fourier duality are organized as quantum observation. In this framework, 𝛥𝑥𝛥𝑝 ≥ ℏ⁄2 is first interpreted as a bandwidth–localization constraint of a phasebased observational representation, while the Born rule, Hilbert space, and unitary evolution are retained as standard quantum mathematics in the quantum-observational layer. Furthermore, 𝑚0𝑐2 is reconstructed as the phase-invariant base scale 𝐵𝛷 = ℏ√𝜔2 − 𝑐2𝑘2 = 𝑚0𝑐2. What this paper changes is neither established mathematics nor experimental values. NNRT explicitly rejects the physical definition according to which relativistic time, relativistic length, and relativistic spacetime are properties of real time and real space themselves. It therefore proposes that these concepts be removed from the foundational description of real spacetime and be confined to the mathematics of measurement and observation.
By expanding the research paradigm and reconciling the two binary oppositions of "relative and absolute" and "quantum and classical" in physics, a new theoretical framework that is compatible with relativity and quantum mechanics is proposed. Firstly, excavate and establish three universal axioms: Axiom 1 (consensus guarantees equal rights), Axiom 2 (objective existence independent of measurement), and Axiom 3 (universality of causality and dialectical logic), based on which to criticize the logical contradictions of existing theories. In the field of relativity, this article points out that there is a logical paradox in the explanation of "clock slowing down depends on relative motion" in special relativity (A clock is both faster and slower than B clock), and proposes a relative absolute spacetime view that "absolute motion leads to clock slowing down". By extending the Lorentz transformation, absolute motion and relative motion are unified, solving problems such as the twin paradox. At the same time, based on the prediction of the Dirac equation for negative mass matter, the "negative mass spacetime curvature paradox" is proposed, challenging Einstein's physical explanation of spacetime curvature and arguing that it is only a mathematical tool (the mathematical expression of gravity) rather than a physical reality. In the field of quantum mechanics, this article criticizes the Copenhagen interpretation for violating Axiom 2 (denying the independent eigenstates of microscopic particles). By modifying the Schrödinger equation twice (For the first time, electromagnetic potential energy was replaced with gravitational potential energy, and the Schrödinger-Tu equation was established to describe macroscopic objects such as the Earth's revolution; The second step is to convert potential energy into electromagnetic/gravitational force and derive the wave mechanics equation of classical mechanics laws, such as Newton's second law with force operator), proves that quantum and classical theories are compatible within the same mathematical framework. In the experiment, it was demonstrated through the "anti-interference electron diffraction experiment" that a strong magnetic field only changes the shape of diffraction fringes without causing them to disappear, denying the inevitability of quantum decoherence. The establishment of "generalized wave dynamics" and "relative absolute spacetime view" breaks the binary opposition of traditional theories and provides a new paradigm for the unity of relativity and quantum mechanics. The core value of these jobs lies in: In terms of theoretical innovation, reconstruct the space-time and quantum interpretation system, while retaining the original mathematical form system; In terms of experimental verification, design feasible schemes such as hollow glass disk Jones experiment and geometric optical velocimetry experiment; In terms of philosophical significance, replacing "mathematical symmetry" with "content unity" and returning to the objectivity of physical mechanisms. The research conclusion indicates that by expanding paradigms and axiomatic constraints, the contradiction between relativity and quantum mechanics can be transformed into a complementary relationship, laying the foundation for the great unity of physics theory