Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Framing Phenomenon in MT — How Measurement Resolution Shapes Perceived Reality

Algis Olbiks, (AI) DeepSeek

Published Jul 26, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This document describes the framing phenomenon — how measurement resolution and cycles influence what we perceive as reality. Quarks and neutrinos are two different examples: quarks are parts of the internal structure of a single object (the proton), which we see as separate "frames"; neutrinos are independent objects whose detection in H0 space depends on measurement resolution. The document shows that 120° is not the "correct" angle, but the result of the interaction between instrument resolution and the H-1 cycle. MT invites attention to the fact that instrument resolution and cycles shape our perceived reality — we see what we are able to record.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.21593139

Related papers

The elision of the subject and the manifestation of the world

Ulrich Mohrhoff

Owing to the contextuality of the properties of quantum objects, quantum mechanics does not appear to countenance the elision of the thinking and perceiving subject. If quantum objects owe their properties to the experimental conditions in which they are observed, the experimental apparatus cannot owe its properties to the quantum objects of which it is commonly said to be composed. It follows that neither quantum objects nor measuring instruments can be regarded as property-carriers existing independently of conscious subjects. However, if the difference between the classical domain and the quantum domain is understood as essentially the difference between the manifested world and what is instrumental in its manifestation, the elision of the subject can again be achieved.

arXiv:2406.06659•Jun 10, 2024•0 citations

Physics within a quantum reference frame

R. M. Angelo, Nicolas Brunner, Sandu Popescu +2 more

We investigate the physics of quantum reference frames. Specifically, we study several simple scenarios involving a small number of quantum particles, whereby we promote one of these particles to the role of a quantum observer and ask what is the description of the rest of the system, as seen by this observer? We highlight the interesting aspects of such questions by presenting a number of apparent paradoxes. By unravelling these paradoxes, we obtain a better understanding of the physics of quantum reference frames.

arXiv:1007.2292•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Mar 10, 2011•96 citations

Does Bell's theorem apply if perceived pseudo-Euclidean space is emergent?

Bart Jongejan

Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) showed that it is possible to predict with certainty the value of a property without disturbing the object in question. In contrast, Quantum Mechanics (QM) holds that if different measurement setups cannot coexist, then predictions about those can neither. Using an EPR-inspired experiment with distantly separated measurements on pairs of entangled spinning particles, Bell proved that no local hidden variable (HV) theory can describe reality in more detail than QM. However, it is possible to conceive a viable HV theory based on the assumption that the perceived structure of spacetime is emergent from a hidden curved spacetime. According to this theory, locality can be maintained for each of the measurements while what is perceived as non-locality can be ascribed to the emergence of spacetime correlations between the instruments of the two parties. The theory predicts correlations that agree with QM, provided that the hidden spacetime has three spatial dimensions. If it had fewer than three dimensions, the CHSH inequality would not be violated and if more, Tsirelson's bound would be violated. According to this HV theory, the laboratory frame of reference is a corollary of correlations of the type that are the subject of Bell's thought experiment.

arXiv:quant-ph/0105020•May 6, 2001•0 citations

Particle mixing and quantum reference frames

Antonio Capolupo, Gabriele Pisacane, Aniello Quaranta

We discuss the role of quantum reference frames in providing a viable definition of rest frame for mixed particles. We then analyze the related concept of frame-dependent entanglement and its impact on the phenomenology of neutral mesons and neutrinos.

arXiv:2601.08898•Jan 13, 2026•0 citations

Information Clusters and Observers: A Projective Ontology of the Universe

Shuangning Zhang

This paper presents an ontological model of the universe based on information clusters and observer consciousness. The universe is not an independent physical spacetime structure, but a projective system composed of numerous self-consistent information clusters. Matter, motion, space, and time have no inherent reality; they only emerge as a stable, perceivable, and measurable "reality" when an observer’s consciousness enters an information cluster and interprets it. Different information clusters are independent or partially overlapping, corresponding to different projection angles and rule systems. Physical laws, dimensionality, particles, and interactions are merely internal narrative rules within an information cluster, not objective laws of an external world. This model unifies the understanding of quantum measurement, the holographic principle, the multiverse, and the apparent nature of spacetime, and is logically self-consistent without conflicting with known experimental phenomena.

•Apr 22, 2026•0 citations

The Resolution Delusion: Why Physics Mistook its Own Sampling Limits for the Structure of Reality a Perceptual Re-Analysis of the Blackbody Crisis, Quantization, and the Origins of Modern Quantum Theory

Pervez Danish

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations
This document describes the framing phenomenon — how measurement resolution and cycles influence what we perceive as reality. Quarks and neutrinos are two different examples: quarks are parts of the internal structure of a single object (the proton), which we see as separate "frames"; neutrinos are independent objects whose detection in H0 space depends on measurement resolution. The document shows that 120° is not the "correct" angle, but the result of the interaction between instrument resolution and the H-1 cycle. MT invites attention to the fact that instrument resolution and cycles shape our perceived reality — we see what we are able to record.
Owing to the contextuality of the properties of quantum objects, quantum mechanics does not appear to countenance the elision of the thinking and perceiving subject. If quantum objects owe their properties to the experimental conditions in which they are observed, the experimental apparatus cannot owe its properties to the quantum objects of which it is commonly said to be composed. It follows that neither quantum objects nor measuring instruments can be regarded as property-carriers existing independently of conscious subjects. However, if the difference between the classical domain and the quantum domain is understood as essentially the difference between the manifested world and what is instrumental in its manifestation, the elision of the subject can again be achieved.
We investigate the physics of quantum reference frames. Specifically, we study several simple scenarios involving a small number of quantum particles, whereby we promote one of these particles to the role of a quantum observer and ask what is the description of the rest of the system, as seen by this observer? We highlight the interesting aspects of such questions by presenting a number of apparent paradoxes. By unravelling these paradoxes, we obtain a better understanding of the physics of quantum reference frames.
Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) showed that it is possible to predict with certainty the value of a property without disturbing the object in question. In contrast, Quantum Mechanics (QM) holds that if different measurement setups cannot coexist, then predictions about those can neither. Using an EPR-inspired experiment with distantly separated measurements on pairs of entangled spinning particles, Bell proved that no local hidden variable (HV) theory can describe reality in more detail than QM. However, it is possible to conceive a viable HV theory based on the assumption that the perceived structure of spacetime is emergent from a hidden curved spacetime. According to this theory, locality can be maintained for each of the measurements while what is perceived as non-locality can be ascribed to the emergence of spacetime correlations between the instruments of the two parties. The theory predicts correlations that agree with QM, provided that the hidden spacetime has three spatial dimensions. If it had fewer than three dimensions, the CHSH inequality would not be violated and if more, Tsirelson's bound would be violated. According to this HV theory, the laboratory frame of reference is a corollary of correlations of the type that are the subject of Bell's thought experiment.
This paper presents an ontological model of the universe based on information clusters and observer consciousness. The universe is not an independent physical spacetime structure, but a projective system composed of numerous self-consistent information clusters. Matter, motion, space, and time have no inherent reality; they only emerge as a stable, perceivable, and measurable "reality" when an observer’s consciousness enters an information cluster and interprets it. Different information clusters are independent or partially overlapping, corresponding to different projection angles and rule systems. Physical laws, dimensionality, particles, and interactions are merely internal narrative rules within an information cluster, not objective laws of an external world. This model unifies the understanding of quantum measurement, the holographic principle, the multiverse, and the apparent nature of spacetime, and is logically self-consistent without conflicting with known experimental phenomena.