Within the sealed-records program developed in Part I, we derive the structures of particle statistics and gauge theory as outputs rather than inputs. The results hold at stated scope and are accompanied by machine receipts. First, univalence superselection is derived within the stated record class: the silence of the relative sign is established by exhaustive verification within that class, so the term "derived" carries exactly that scope. The silent-seam axiom then excludes superpositions across the double cover, making the (-1)^F grading central. Second, spin quantization, 2m in Z, follows from the (1,3) signature together with the belt-trick identification, with record anyons confined to genuinely two-dimensional screens. Third, under the named framed-transport premise, namely that exchange is transport of the fiber with its frame, sealed positivity on the exchange collar forces the exchange phase (-1)^{2m}: wrong-statistics sectors carry strictly negative weights, and Pauli exclusion appears as an exact zero. Fourth, parastatistics is excluded at pair-exchange level: the transport commutant on V tensor V is exactly span{1, P}, and the +/-1 options are excluded by the ledger. The full n-strand Doplicher-Haag-Roberts parastatistics question is explicitly scoped. Fifth, the internal symmetry group of the fiber is reconstructed as the commutant of record exchange. Once the ledger forces the statistics, classical Schur-Weyl duality, imported with no novelty claim, delivers the full unitary group of the fiber: U(3) for three-strand fibers, with an implementation check 165 = 165 and the determinant slot included, and U(2) for the weak fiber, with checks 10 = 10 and 20 = 20. This is in the direction of Doplicher-Roberts reconstruction: group as output of statistics. What is delivered here is the global symmetry group; promotion to a local gauge symmetry with connection and dynamics is an additional step, graded as input where Part III uses it. Color receipts include exact Pauli exclusion for color, ||A_4|| = 0, and uniqueness of the baryon singlet. We state the paper's two named premises, framed transport and collar presentability, and the scope of each result. The matter-content selection built on these structures, together with its falsifiable consequences, appears in Part III.
Within the sealed-records program developed in Part I, we derive the structures of particle statistics and gauge theory as outputs rather than inputs. The results hold at stated scope and are accompanied by machine receipts. First, univalence superselection is derived within the stated record class: the silence of the relative sign is established by exhaustive verification within that class, so the term "derived" carries exactly that scope. The silent-seam axiom then excludes superpositions across the double cover, making the (-1)^F grading central. Second, spin quantization, 2m in Z, follows from the (1,3) signature together with the belt-trick identification, with record anyons confined to genuinely two-dimensional screens. Third, under the named framed-transport premise, namely that exchange is transport of the fiber with its frame, sealed positivity on the exchange collar forces the exchange phase (-1)^{2m}: wrong-statistics sectors carry strictly negative weights, and Pauli exclusion appears as an exact zero. Fourth, parastatistics is excluded at pair-exchange level: the transport commutant on V tensor V is exactly span{1, P}, and the +/-1 options are excluded by the ledger. The full n-strand Doplicher-Haag-Roberts parastatistics question is explicitly scoped. Fifth, the internal symmetry group of the fiber is reconstructed as the commutant of record exchange. Once the ledger forces the statistics, classical Schur-Weyl duality, imported with no novelty claim, delivers the full unitary group of the fiber: U(3) for three-strand fibers, with an implementation check 165 = 165 and the determinant slot included, and U(2) for the weak fiber, with checks 10 = 10 and 20 = 20. This is in the direction of Doplicher-Roberts reconstruction: group as output of statistics. What is delivered here is the global symmetry group; promotion to a local gauge symmetry with connection and dynamics is an additional step, graded as input where Part III uses it. Color receipts include exact Pauli exclusion for color, ||A_4|| = 0, and uniqueness of the baryon singlet. We state the paper's two named premises, framed transport and collar presentability, and the scope of each result. The matter-content selection built on these structures, together with its falsifiable consequences, appears in Part III.
We present the foundational layer of a research program that derives quantum-mechanical, relativistic, and thermodynamic structure from a single ontology: a ledger of sealed records. The ledger is governed by three axioms: R, laws are laws of whole sealed histories; S, no distinction without a record; and C, couplings are fixed by self-consistency under refinement. The program builds on the stochastic-quantum correspondence of Barandes' indivisible processes, replacing configuration trajectories by committed records as the primitive. The main results, each at stated scope and with machine-verified receipts, are as follows. First, the Born layer: record weights compose through square roots, and tame-class reconstruction recovers the Weyl algebra and the Schrodinger representation, via Stone-von Neumann, from record towers, with ladder operators, selection rules, and exact continuum targets approached at machine precision. Second, Lorentz signature: the commitment structure of records forces a Lorentzian (1,d) split with derived orientation classes. The spatial dimension d = 3 is selected by a minimality principle graded as input in the text, not derived. The operational identification lapse = local clock rate is verified to 3.7 x 10^{-8} in curved record geometries as a model-internal consistency receipt, with first 3+1-dimensional cosmological checks presented qualitatively and no cosmological number claimed in this batch. Third, the arrow of time: reflection positivity is a theorem for eventless sectors with finite primitive Markov presentations, the entropy-production functional is the path-measure relative entropy sigma = D(P_AB || P_BA), the classical identity of stochastic thermodynamics in record-pair form, and the presentation hypothesis is sharp. An explicit reversible, valid, finite-rank process, the "record clock", fails reflection positivity, separating record laws from general reversible processes. Fourth, thermality: horizon temperature T = kappa / 2 pi is recovered in exact lattice constructions, presented in full in the companion horizon paper and cited here only as a consistency credential. We state precisely what is axiom, what is theorem, what is named identification, and what is imported mathematics; the full dependency audit is part of the paper. We also delimit the program's frontier: the tame class, the regularity stratum of the emergent continuum, and continuous sector families.
A finitist, relational axiomatization of physics: quantum theory and a relativity sector derived from four axioms about group-valued relations and closure. Contributions to the foundations of quantum mechanics (Born rule derivation, quantum reconstruction, local tomography, complex field selection), the emergence of time and causal structure in discrete networks, discrete Noether theorems, lattice gauge structure, and the Schrödinger equation derived by two independent routes. Every claim is graded in a Claim Ledger; every numerical claim is machine-verified with archived scripts; negative results are reported at full strength. What this paper does The universe is taken to be constituted by relations rather than objects. Stable relations form closures (self-consistent cycles) whose holonomies carry the physical content. Four axioms — primacy of relations (group-valued, edge-borne), closure stability, chirality from order, and observation as bidirectional group exchange — yield, at explicitly graded and conditional levels: Quantum sector Exchange-completeness theorems for finite label groups: abelian at all cycle ranks; non-abelian on the single cycle (Wilson readouts plus class-sum convolutions generate the full matrix algebra); the multi-cycle non-abelian case on the operational-equivalence quotient, with the obstruction completely characterized via class-preserving outer automorphisms — and the quotient's necessity now stratified by the source of word blindness (see New in Version 24.0). The Born rule, proved for finite abelian networks from a strictly weaker relational readout premise (statistics of realizable effects depend only on relational content); non-contextuality has this single source; additivity is basis-relative and declared as such. The Schrödinger equation by two routes of unequal premise grade, maintained side by side: a spectral route — the action operator is a weighted Cayley-graph Laplacian in the Pontryagin dual basis, the derived Gibbs state's unique canonical (modular) flow yields the Schrödinger equation with Hamiltonian equal to the action operator, no continuum limit, zero conjectures consumed, the single non-theorem step one flagged identification; and a Madelung route — physical and mechanism-rich (probability density derived from constraint gaps), valid exactly on the domain of the pseudo-continuity conjecture, with its full premise bill stated (continuity equation, Wallstrom circulation condition, m, V). A dedicated comparison subsection gives the line-by-line premise accounting and the machine-measured agreement region. Complex field selection: ℂ selected over ℝ and ℍ within the GPT comparison class in the covered sectors, with a second independent route from chirality (Frobenius–Schur dichotomy, quaternionic double exclusion); "uniquely selected" expressly not claimed. Positivity as pairing: all five in-text positive-semidefiniteness theorems traced to one mechanism (M = B†B with native factor); the Kraus form and complete positivity derived rather than assumed. The Noether sector on Noether's two theorems exactly: Noether I recovered on the holonomy action (compact Lie realization); Noether II identified as present (Bianchi as horn-filling, Schläfli as its Regge form); selection rules recovered for finite groups; the GNS bridge proved non-vacuously on the full exchange algebra; the sole potential extension — conservation as the kernel of exchange — isolated as a registered conjecture, consumed nowhere. A local–global representation theorem: six generative quantities (closure invariant, flux quantization, Weyl phase, non-abelian Stokes, orientation visibility, terminal normalization) are evaluations of cohomology classes against closed chains — one syntax, six exact machine probes. The gatekeeper no-go theorems registered and discharged: Kochen–Specker (the framework posits no global valuation — outcomes are resolutions of constraint gaps, and basis-relative additivity blocks state-independent variants), Pusey–Barrett–Rudolph (the statistical envelope is over resolutions yet to happen, not values already held; machine witness: identical configuration ensembles with opposite relative phase have opposite statistics), Wallstrom (registered as an explicit input, structurally discharged in the finite-abelian sector), Hegerfeldt (the Lieb–Robinson exponential tail identified as the only claimable front form for the continuum limit), Frauchiger–Renner (cross-agent certainty transfer presupposes kernel-free record transport, exactly what exchange-incompleteness excludes), and no-cloning (inherited in the covered sectors); Conway–Kochen and Colbeck–Renner noted as concordant. Relativity sector Time from finite capacity plus genuine randomness: the staging theorem (Θ(d) dependency depth, unbounded chains via the Moore bound; the quantitative failure law conditionalized on measure-level independence with exact minimal witnesses); the temporal quantum defined combinatorially, no Hamiltonian input. The speed of light grounded in an exact discrete dependency cone (combinatorial, no quantum input), the Lieb–Robinson bound consumed at cross-check grade only; a boost no-go theorem reducing Lorentz invariance to named statistical conditions, with the Collins fine-tuning objection recorded as a gate. The trace-descent theorem group: the growth-history measure forced onto the Mazurkiewicz trace quotient; chain reflection positivity at every depth with completely explicit spectrum. An equation sector of nine verification families (Schrödinger, Dirac, Maxwell/U(1), canonical commutator, Yang–Mills SU(2), Regge calculus, Klein–Gordon, Noether loop, Cartan curvature), where every machine-precision claim is the shadow of a proved backbone lemma — including the factor ½ of H = ½L + V, identified as the Wilson Fourier coefficient fixed by the action theorem. Four experimentally testable predictions, including a discriminating flat-versus-sigmoid visibility protocol. The Standard Model gauge group, ħ, and G remain open, with attack routes registered. How to read Three entry paths are marked in the document. Path A (derivational core): axioms → group structure → Noether sector → least action → Born rule → positivity. Path B (physical mechanisms): constraint propagation → time as determination → wave function as gap envelope → fields. Path C (scope and limits): the Claim Ledger, then Discussion and Open Problems — for the reader who wants to know what is claimed and what is not before reading anything else. The Claim Ledger is the single authoritative register of claim status; wherever body text sounds stronger, the Ledger governs. New in Version 24.0 (Version 23.0 is the immediately preceding public release; this version supersedes the internal V12–V15 and V17–V19 series, whose numbers are not used externally.) Version 24.0 resolves the structure of the multi-cycle non-abelian obstruction — the sector's longest-standing open front — following an external research exchange with three rounds of independent re-verification (fourteen core figures, three commutant instruments implemented independently, exact integer arithmetic on the obstruction side) and two rounds of counter-review that corrected one quantifier on each side: A dichotomy of the multi-cycle obstruction (new remark). Word blindness on multi-cycle networks has two identified sources, jointly covering every tested case, with opposite behaviour as cycle rank grows. Type I (global; graded): a class-preserving outer automorphism yields a commutant element by an argument free of cycle-rank reference; its non-triviality holds at theorem grade for b₁ ≥ d(G) via generating tuples, is monotone in b₁, and the threshold is measured at b_σ = 2 on the tested Wall group (at b₁ = 1 the permutation is the identity — no universal claim is made, and the existence of groups with threshold above 2 is registered open). Type II (local; measured): Out_c trivial but fusion fails on a proper subgroup, the blind pairs sitting in non-generating sectors — the same mechanism that defeats Wilson generation; this blindness heals: on every verified group (A₄, SL(2,3), A₄×ℤ₂) the full commutant collapses to trivial at b₁ = 3 by exact computation on two independently implemented instruments, although word readouts remain blind — the shift primitives separate, above a threshold, and the natural explanation (tuples becoming generating) is refuted by the persistence of blind blocks. Three boundaries at full strength: no exhaustiveness proof (a third source is not excluded); no general healing theorem (the verified groups all heal at 3, cause unidentified); the verified Type II sample is narrow. The quotient proposition restated in stratified form. The operational-equivalence quotient's necessity is now part of the proposition's own statement, in three strata: necessary where Out_c ≠ 1 at every b₁ ≥ b_σ(G), with b_σ ≤ d(G) at theorem grade; one-dimensional at b₁ = 2 on the fusion-type groups (verified cases); trivial at b₁ ≥ 3 on every verified fusion-type group and at every tested b₁ for word-separation-complete groups (a fourteen-group scan of orders ≤ 31 found no third source). Pre-registered validation preceded the restatement: a stratification-exhaustiveness scan (pass), a new-witness search (no new witness in range, downgrade clause applied as pre-registered), and a zero-conflict audit of the three strata against all archived data. The residual open problem is now precisely located. What remains of multi-cycle completeness: the rare Out_c ≠ 1 groups (54 in the exhaustive range through order 96) above their measured thresholds, the low-b₁ fusion stratum, a general healing theorem, and whether a threshold above 2 occurs. The multiplicity-freeness conjecture's mechanism sentence is corrected with the two regimes stated separately (at b₁ = 2 the shifts do not separate — the blind-pair transposition commutes with every primitive, integer-exact — and reduce the commutant to
This record deposits, as one versioned set, three companion documents of the Non-Separable Fiber Program. 1. A Non-Separable Propensity Model of Quantum Correlations (v5.2). A constructive stochastic hidden-structure model of two-photon polarization correlations. The model distinguishes kinematic locality (no superluminal signaling) from statistical separability, and discards only the second: each entangled pair bears one token fiber state with two bearers — a definite point on the Poincaré sphere, an affine (Malus) propensity coupling, a measurement-triggered update rule, and, at the pair level, a presentation structure identifying how the point stamped at one wing is consulted at the other. The model reproduces the full quantum joint distribution for every two-qubit pure state exactly, in both actualization orders, with no-signaling resolved into two named, contingent conditions (the complementarity identity of the coupling; matched fiber equilibrium). Two theorems locate the quantum/super-quantum boundary — the same architecture reaches the Popescu–Rohrlich maximum under a threshold coupling, and the update dynamics identifies the quantum correlations with the harmonic purity of the local coupling — and the cos² coupling itself is derived from stated premises by non-contextual normalization, with Busch- and Wright–Weigert-type completions and a named residue. The presentation structure is identified explicitly as the quantum steering identity realized as token structure, and the paper states, in Bell/Jarrett vocabulary, exactly which locality conditions the model concedes at the hidden level and which it preserves operationally. 2. Three Screens: Why the Foliation Is Hidden (v1.4). The companion synthesis. On the paper's preferred (conditional) reading, the actualization order is supplied by a real foliation; this document explains that structure's empirical concealment as the joint consequence of three contingent, parameterized identities — exact Lorentz invariance (the Mansouri–Sexl α̂ bound), the complementarity identity (derived within the model), and matched fiber equilibrium — each with a named breaking parameter that experiment constrains, addressing the Balashov–Janssen "unexplained conspiracy" objection. 3. Why Decomposition-Independence: The Dispositional Case for P4-mix (v1.3). The companion essay on the derivation's load-bearing premise: its exact statement, the positive dispositional case, a stress-test against the strongest objections, and an analysis showing the premise is experimentally enforced for all realized devices within the model's propensity ontology, with the residual scope stated exactly. The three documents cross-reference by section and are deposited together as one record; this is version 1. The framework was developed with AI assistance under the disclosed-provenance practice described in the paper's Author's Note and Acknowledgments; its mathematics has been verified independently by multiple methods, including hostile cross-model review, as documented there. Full development transcripts, referenced in the Acknowledgments as the authoritative attribution record, are available from the author on request; archival deposit of the transcripts is planned to follow.Each document is provided as PDF and as its Markdown source.
STATUS (18 October 2026). The physics programme that motivated this work was concluded in October 2026 and its claim of a unified derivation withdrawn. The results in this paper do not depend on that programme and stand as stated. NOTE ON SCOPE (18 October 2026). Where this paper says that the Standard Model's matter content, charges or gauge structure are derived from, forced by or emerge from the eight-bit error-correcting cell, read encoded in or assigned to. The finite results themselves stand: the code, its constraints and the anomaly arithmetic are exact. But two things are premises of the framework, not consequences: the identification of codewords with particles, and the choice of the eight-bit [8,4,4] cell. In particular, the step from read/write balance to a single CSS code is not derived [R22]. The author's October 2026 review of the programme concluded that the framework's Standard-Model content is assigned rather than derived. No observation currently distinguishes the framework's account from the Standard Model itself. This revised note argues that, within the accepted complex quantum-error-correcting record substrate, the quadratic Born form arises from linear record writing, orthogonality of record sectors, and isometric normalization before any probability measure is introduced. Conditional uniqueness is treated separately through Gleason-type and refinement-stable record-sector routes. The 30 August 2026 additivity-audit revision cites Jiaxuan Zhang's analysis of five Born-rule derivations (arXiv:2603.06211) and makes the premise accounting explicit: a Gleason frame function includes orthogonal additivity, while Marko Lela's route begins with a non-negative extensive valuation on disjoint continuation bundles. The closed-record-pair route assumes neither measure-level object, but establishes the quadratic form rather than a standalone uniqueness theorem. The resulting open frontier is to obtain both form and uniqueness without importing measure-level additivity. The paper also records the minimal [8,4,4] record cell and the bare monitored service rate alpha_0 = 1/137, while retaining the deeper reconstruction question as open.
From one requirement — that existence is mutual validation, and validation is transmitted in finite time — the classical sector is recovered: the Lorentz factor from interception geometry, gravitational time dilation without fitting, the full light deflection as a sum of two contributions rather than a fitted coefficient, and Mercury's perihelion by a composition law the data selected over its rival. Novelty lies in the grounding, not the numbers. The quantum sector is then developed from named premises rather than offered as an interpretation. Time is the counted distinction between a lock's two states, so the correlation entering any Bell test is a count, E = 1 − 2D − s; the Born value follows as D = sin²(θ/2), its square the half-angle of the projection that makes the correlation a cosine; and the indivisibility of the act yields complementarity, the Zeno effect, and the ineliminability — not the value — of single-shot randomness. The Tsirelson bound follows from one axiom we name and do not derive: the settings of a single undivided act are unconstrained unit vectors of a real inner-product space, not pointwise ±1 records carried apart. The parallelogram law is not the load, since a local hidden-variable model satisfies it too. The same axiom excludes Popescu–Rohrlich boxes, which no-signalling alone does not. Spin and statistics follow from the twist a closed mode's held ties can trap. A massless excitation, whose links are renewed at every step, holds none: the picture supplies no fermionic option for it, and forbids what standard theory permits. Undischarged and named: the vector axiom; the isomorphism on which the general Born rule depends; the three-dimensional soliton Finkelstein–Rubinstein requires. The predictions are given with their weakness stated — the picture fixes the form of its residuals and not their scale, so a null result tightens a bound rather than breaking the theory. All simulation code, including four withdrawn arguments, is openly available; the state accompanying this paper is archived at 10.5281/zenodo.21266573.
This is the Technical Supplement — the proof-dense companion and the canonical formal record for the paper's claims. The main paper argues; the supplement proves. Every load-bearing claim traces to a named check function in the APF verification engine, and the supplement is the document a referee should audit first. The supplement is self-contained for Paper 14: every definition, proof, and grade the paper rests on appears in this one document — the substrate primitives and the marginal admissibility floor, proved; the locality and cost-uniqueness lemmas; the Δ calculus with both fences' witnesses written out; the Boolean-defender bridge with its five certified physical hypotheses and the 3-4-5 worked witness computed on the page; the gate pipeline with a gate-by-axiom comparison to the operational-reconstruction literature (Hardy; Chiribella–D'Ariano–Perinotti; Masanes–Müller; Barnum–Wilce; Spekkens; Abramsky–Brandenburger); the native correlation family constructed explicitly, rung by rung; the resolution triad set against standard thermodynamics (Landauer, erasure, environment-assisted recovery); a consolidated readings register listing every claim below [P] with its falsifier and status; a glossary mapping the framework's vocabulary onto standard quantum-information terms; and a worked end-to-end instance — device to interrogation normal form to exact feasibility certificate to priced ledger, with every tolerance explicit. A reproducibility appendix pins every claim to the APF theorem bank at a named GitHub commit and the archived Engine release (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18529115); the certificates reproduce deterministically in exact rational arithmetic. About the series. Admissibility Physics is a structural realist reconstruction program built on a single commitment: any bounded region of the world can hold only finitely many distinctions. A principle of least enforcement cost then selects, among all the ways those distinctions might be arranged, the configurations a finite world can sustain. From this the content of physics is reconstructed rather than postulated: the Standard Model's gauge group and matter content, the Hilbert-space and Born-rule architecture of quantum mechanics, the geometry and field equations of general relativity, the four laws of thermodynamics, and the large-scale budget of cosmology emerge as different readings of one finite-capacity ledger. The unification is quantitative as well as conceptual: the framework's dimensionless constants appear not as free parameters but as counts read off that ledger — among them the dark-energy fraction ΩΛ = 42/61 and the weak mixing angle sin2θW = 3/13 — fixed, in the strongest cases, to within current measurement. The core derivation runs Papers 0–11; the extension papers carry the individual sectors. Each paper's main text and Technical Supplement is deposited separately; every quantitative claim traces to a named, executable check in the public theorem bank (over 3,800 bank-registered theorems, 48 quantitative predictions); and each result is carried at an explicit, graded level of confidence — from analytically forced to structurally grounded — with the measurements that would refute it named. Admissibility Physics is offered as a candidate, not a finished theory. If the program holds, the laws of physics could not have been otherwise: they are what a finite world permits. Website: admissibilityphysics.com. Engine and theorem bank: https://github.com/Ethan-Brooke/APF-Engine. Full series and latest deposits: Zenodo community admissibility_physics. The Engine — Admissibility Physics: An Executable Constraint Framework and Constants Map — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18529115. Paper 0 — What Physics Permits: A Constraint-First Framework for Physics — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18439523 Paper 1 — The Enforceability of Distinction — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18439200 Paper 2 — Finite Admissibility and the Failure of Global Description — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18439274 Paper 3 — Entropy, Time, and Accumulated Cost — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18439363 Paper 4 — Admissibility Constraints and Structural Saturation — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18439397 Paper 5 — Quantum Structure from Finite Enforceability — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18439433 Paper 6 — Dynamics and Geometry as Optimal Admissible Reallocation — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18439445 Paper 7 — A Minimal Quantum of Action from Finite Admissibility — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18439513 Paper 8 — The Admissibility-Capacity Ledger — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19721384 Paper 9 — The Geometric Substrate as Cost Structure of Comparison Continuations — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20041675 Paper 10 — The Calculus of Finite Continuability — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20041680 Paper 11 — Forced Universality from Capacity-Bounded Admissibility — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20684198 Paper 12 — The Gauge Sector of Admissibility Physics — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21212521 Paper 13 — The Minimal Admissibility Core — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18361446 Paper 14 — The Quantum Story — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21212188 Paper 16 — Markov Breakdown and the Hard Problems — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20684207 Paper 18 — The Electroweak Sector as a Capacity Equilibrium — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20684209 Paper 19 — Large-Angle CMB Suppression as a Finite-Continuability Constraint — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21199218 Paper 20 — The Enforcement Crystal — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18531732 Paper 23 — Magnetically Dark Winding-Class Quantum Processors — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21199220 Paper 24 — The Recruitment-Radius Extension — Foundations — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20684211 Paper 25 — The Recruitment-Radius Extension: Applications — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21199222 Paper 28 — Absolute Mass Scales from Electroweak Capacity Saturation — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20684215 Paper 29 — Plaquette Representation Dominance and Confinement — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20684218 Paper 30 — A Tube Mechanism for the Lattice Mass Gap — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20684220 Paper 31 — Osterwalder–Schrader Structure of Lattice Yang–Mills — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20684222 Paper 32 — Quark Anchors as APF Trace Masses — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21199226 Paper 33 — Trace-to-Scheme Export Architecture — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20684224 Paper 35 — The Dark Sector as a Two-Role Capacity Decomposition — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20684228 Paper 36 — The Missing Floor — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21199228 Paper 37 — Collapse as Realignment — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21199231 Paper 38 — Unification as Ledger — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21199233 Paper 39 — Coherent Phase Regimes in the APF Interface Engine — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21199235 Paper 40 — The Thermodynamics of Finite Distinction (Between Symmetry and the Void) — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20684235 Paper 41 — The Horizon as a Continuation Ledger — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20684241 Paper 42 — The Weak Mixing Angle Is Not Free — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20684245 Paper 43 — The Neutrino Sector — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21194191 Paper 44 — What a Finite Theory Owes the Continuum — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21195874 Paper 45 — What the Vacuum Can Keep — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21194195 Paper 46 — The Strong CP Angle Is Not Free — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21194197 Paper 47 — The Confinement Antecedent Is Not Forced — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21194199 Paper 48 — The Light-Bending Weight Is Not Free — DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21199627 Technical Supplements cross-link to their main paper via isSupplementTo and to the engine via isDocumentedBy. Concept DOIs above resolve to the latest version.