Near-term quantum processors operate in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) region, where it is impractical to implement fault-tolerant error correction. Quantum Error Mitigation (QEM) provides a practical alternative, but most existing approaches rely on computationally intensive classical resources which are impractical to implement in embedded or edge-controlled systems. This work presents an adaptive, hardware-aware QEM framework designed for resource-constrained classical processors, demonstrated using a Raspberry Pi 5 as an edge controller for IBM Quantum hardware. A deep neural network predicts circuit fidelity and entropy from circuit and hardware features, enabling an online fuzzy-logic policy selector to choose among no mitigation, dynamical decoupling, and zero-noise extrapolation. Using real hardware feedback, an adaptive bias mechanism update policy was developed. The system operates without full-state simulation or offline recalibration and is evaluated on both randomized and benchmark-referenced circuits. Results show stable mitigation behaviour across depth regimes, primarily preventing fidelity degradation and selectively improving output similarity where mitigation is effective. This work demonstrates the feasibility of adaptive QEM deployment on classical edge devices under strict resource constraints.
Near-term quantum processors operate in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) region, where it is impractical to implement fault-tolerant error correction. Quantum Error Mitigation (QEM) provides a practical alternative, but most existing approaches rely on computationally intensive classical resources which are impractical to implement in embedded or edge-controlled systems. This work presents an adaptive, hardware-aware QEM framework designed for resource-constrained classical processors, demonstrated using a Raspberry Pi 5 as an edge controller for IBM Quantum hardware. A deep neural network predicts circuit fidelity and entropy from circuit and hardware features, enabling an online fuzzy-logic policy selector to choose among no mitigation, dynamical decoupling, and zero-noise extrapolation. Using real hardware feedback, an adaptive bias mechanism update policy was developed. The system operates without full-state simulation or offline recalibration and is evaluated on both randomized and benchmark-referenced circuits. Results show stable mitigation behaviour across depth regimes, primarily preventing fidelity degradation and selectively improving output similarity where mitigation is effective. This work demonstrates the feasibility of adaptive QEM deployment on classical edge devices under strict resource constraints.
Quantum Reinforcement Learning (QRL) integrates reinforcement learning with parameterized quantum circuits and is a promising approach to combinatorial optimization. On Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, however, decoherence, gate imperfections, and measurement errors reduce policy quality and make learning less reliable. Existing error mitigation techniques are generally applied as fixed corrections that do not adapt to changing noise conditions or to the evolving state of training. This work presents Adaptive Policy-Guided Error Mitigation (APGEM) as a context-aware orchestration layer of the hybrid quantum-classical training loop that dynamically selects the most suitable mitigation strategy during QRL training. APGEM evaluates Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), Clifford Data Regression (CDR), and Readout Error Mitigation (REM) using policy-level indicators, including quantum-state fidelity, policy entropy, cumulative reward, and approximation ratio, and integrates the selected strategy directly into the reinforcement learning loop. The framework is evaluated on the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP), a representative NP-hard problem in urban logistics, under a range of NISQ noise models and noise levels. APGEM consistently outperforms conventional static mitigation methods, reaches approximately 94% of the utility of an oracle strategy, maintains higher quantum-state fidelity as noise increases, and produces more stable learning behaviour throughout training. Ablation studies show that the framework learns context-aware mitigation policies that adapt to different noise environments and circuit execution conditions. These findings demonstrate that integrating adaptive error mitigation into the learning process substantially improves the robustness and reliability of QRL on NISQ hardware.
Quantum computing on Noisy Intermediate-ScaleQuantum (NISQ) devices is fundamentally limited by noise, ne-cessitating effective error mitigation techniques. Existing methodssuch as Zero Noise Extrapolation (ZNE) including linear andRichardson extrapolation variants exhibit varying performanceacross circuits and noise regimes, with no single method univer-sally optimal. In this work, we propose a regime-aware adaptiveframework that leverages machine learning to dynamically selectthe most effective mitigation strategy for a given circuit and noisecondition. Two XGBoost regressors independently predict theexpected improvement of Linear ZNE and Richardson ZNE, andthe method with the higher predicted score is selected at runtime.The selector achieves 64.3% exact accuracy, representing an 11.9percentage point improvement over the strongest fixed-methodbaseline. The adaptive selector outperforms Richardson ZNEon all four benchmark circuits and matches or exceeds bothbaselines on structured, deeper circuits. These results highlightthe importance of data-driven, regime-aware mitigation selectionfor improving the reliability of near-term quantum computations.
Abstract Quantum computing has recently emerged as a novel paradigm for solving problems otherwise intractable on classical computers, yet the practical progress of quantum computers is severely impacted by noise, decoherence, and imperfect gate operations in Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Specific to IBM Quantum hardware, imperfections due to readout error, gate errors, and device drift, which depends on time, resolves limits for the accuracy of outputs from our algorithms. The mitigation strategies currently used, for example, Measurement Error Mitigation (MEM), Zero Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), and Clifford Data Regression (CDR), offer improvement over raw, unmitigated outputs, but they are static and not dynamic; the reduction of noise in within an NISQ device is temporal and can vary in patterns that are non-zero. In addition to this, using the conventional methods provides inconsistent and suboptimal results.This study will provide enhanced reliability with respect to performing quantum computation on IBM Quantum hardware with a unique mitigation framework that is adaptive and computationally efficient for a high-fidelity output. The problem taken on here is the failure of existing error mitigation strategies to provide adaptive noise compensation, as they assume a statically-distributed error, despite the performance-related characteristics already being documented in regards to calibration drift and variation over time.To achieve this, we propose a Hybrid Adaptive Error Mitigation (HAEM) approach that includes baseline measurement error mitigation and an additional correction layer that utilizes realtime calibration information, along with lightweight machine learning models. The approach can be broken down into three steps: (i) perform standard measurement error mitigation to reduce classical readout noise, (ii) execute compact calibration circuits, such as Bell states, GHZ states and Clifford benchmarks to capture then current error profile of the device, and (iii) use a lightweight machine learning model (having been trained on historical and newest calibration data) to dynamically change the mitigation weights applied for the target quantum algorithm. All implementation is done using Qiskit Runtime to ensure low-latency execution, and we completed experiments on both Qiskit Aer noisy simulators and IBM Quantum devices.Initial results suggest HAEM improved the outputs of quantum algorithms' fidelity compared to the unmitigated runs and the baseline measurement error mitigation (MEM) runs. On the noisy simulators, HAEM increased fidelity from a raw performance of 0.65 to 0.87, nearly a 34% improvement. In fairer hardware-like scenarios, fidelity-on-average was persistently 12% better than MEM, with nearly equal time duration for the additional adaptive measurements. The adaptive aspect of HAEM consistently supported subsequent calibration cycles of the device and was effective to continue providing fidelity improvements despite the static mitigation performance degrading.To sum up, the proposed HAEM framework is a modern and viable alternative for error mitigation which brings together the benefits of baseline approaches with corrections that are driven by fixed-function error-corrective, adaptive learning. As both learning-based and standard baseline approaches can only achieve fixed levels of performance, HAEM, through its use of noise mitigation both at execution time and through correlating it with standard data, provides a route towards reliable quantum computations on current IBM hardware. HAEM also presents a contribution to the NISQ error-resilient landscape, and however it is intended that it will continue to improve future applications of hybrid workflows of quantum and classical computation where error mitigation and resilience is important.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is typically viewed as a suite of practical techniques for today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, with limited relevance once fault-tolerant quantum computers become available. In this work, we challenge this conventional wisdom by showing that QEM can continue to provide substantial benefits in the era of quantum error correction (QEC), and in an even more efficient manner than it does on current devices. We introduce a framework for logical-level QEM that leverages soft information naturally produced by QEC decoders, requiring no additional data, hardware modifications, or runtime overhead beyond what QEC protocols already provide. Within this framework, we develop and analyze three logical-level QEM techniques: post-selection and runtime abort policies, probabilistic error cancellation, and zero-noise extrapolation. Our techniques reduce logical error rates by more than 100x while discarding fewer than 0.1% of shots; they also provide in situ characterization of logical channels for QEM protocols. As a proof of principle, we benchmark our approach using a surface-code architecture and two state-of-the-art decoders based on tensor-network contraction and minimum-weight perfect matching. We evaluate logical-level QEM on random Clifford circuits and molecular simulation algorithms and find that, compared to previous approaches relying on QEC only or QEC combined with QEM, we can achieve up to 87.4% spacetime overhead savings. Our results demonstrate that logical-level QEM with QEC decoder soft information can reliably improve logical performance, underscoring the efficiency and usefulness of QEM techniques for fault-tolerant quantum computers.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) bridges the gap between today's noisy NISQ hardware and fault-tolerant quantum computing by reducing the effect of hardware errors on expectation value estimates without the qubit overhead of full quantum error correction. This paper proposes the Quantum Error Mitigation Design (QEMD) framework, a systematic evaluation of six QEM techniques across four circuit families on IBM Quantum Eagle and IonQ Forte: Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), Clifford Data Regression (CDR), Symmetry Verification (SV), Dynamical Decoupling (DD), and a novel Adaptive Ensemble Mitigation (AEM) combining ZNE and CDR with context-aware technique selection. QEMD finds: ZNE 3-point Richardson provides the best cost-performance trade-off for QAOA and VQE circuits (4.8x overhead, 28.4pp error reduction); PEC provides the highest accuracy but at 48x shot overhead -- practical only for n <= 12; DD reduces coherence-limited errors by 18.4% on IonQ Forte at zero shot overhead; AEM outperforms all individual techniques by 6.4pp at 8.4x overhead. QEMD provides a decision guide mapping circuit type, qubit count, and shot budget to optimal QEM technique selection.
Quantum computing offers exponential advantages for problems in cryptography, optimization, and quantum simulation, yet the practicality of current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices is severely constrained by decoherence, gate imperfections, and measurement noise. Conventional quantum error correction (QEC) codes such as Steane and surface codes impose large qubit overheads and require high-fidelity logical operations, making them unsuitable for near-term hardware. To address this gap, this work introduces ML-QEM, an adaptive quantum error mitigation framework that employs machine learning to identify and correct dominant Pauli error patterns in real time using only 3–5 ancillary qubits. By integrating Qiskit Aer noise modeling with a lightweight TensorFlow-based classifier, ML-QEM learns device-specific noise characteristics and applies targeted recovery operations with minimal latency. Evaluations across depolarizing, amplitude damping, and thermal relaxation noise models demonstrate a 28.4% average fidelity improvement, 60–84% lower overhead than Steane and surface codes, and a classical processing delay of only 21.7 ms. ML-QEM thus provides an effective and resource-efficient pathway toward enhancing quantum computation fidelity in the NISQ era.