As the third paper in the *Monistic Ontology* series, this work strictly adheres to the ontological axiom system established in the first paper of the series, *Monistic Ontology* (hereinafter referred to as the "General Outline"), without introducing any new ad hoc assumptions. Taking the intrinsic fundamental frequency of the global unified field fj = 2.2687318315 × 1023 Hz, endogenously calibrated in the second paper of the series, as the sole quantitative anchor, this paper presents a unified, self-consistent realist ontological interpretation of the core phenomena of quantum mechanics based on the "local resonant standing wave" particle ontology model, aiming to resolve the long-standing interpretation dilemma of quantum mechanics. This paper clarifies that the apparent "counter-intuitive" characteristics of quantum phenomena are the natural manifestation ofthe inherent properties of the fundamental frequency vibration of the global unified field at the microscale. There is no "quantum superposition state" independent of the unified field ontology, nor is it necessary to introduce the non-local "action at a distance" hypothesis. With no additional axioms, no ad hoc assumptions, and no free fitting parameters, this paper endogenously derives the quantitative formula for the coherence length of quantum entanglement, and the calculated results are in good agreement with the experimental data of the thousand-kilometer scale satellite-ground entanglement from China’s Micius Satellite. This work attempts to realize the underlying ontological unification of quantum mechanics and relativity, provides a quantum theoretical basis for the subsequent unified interpretation of the four fundamental interactions, and completes the logical connection from the quantitative anchor to the quantum ontology of the series research.
As the third paper in the Monistic Ontology series, this work strictly adheres to the ontological axiom system established in the first paper of the series, Monistic Ontology (hereinafter referred to as the "General Outline"), without introducing any new ad hoc assumptions. Taking the intrinsic fundamental frequency of the global unified field fj = 2.2687318315 × 1023 Hz, endogenously calibrated in the second paper of the series, as the sole quantitative anchor, this paper presents a unified, self-consistent realist ontological interpretation of the core phenomena of quantum mechanics based on the "local resonant standing wave" particle ontology model, aiming to resolve the long-standing interpretation dilemma of quantum mechanics. This paper clarifies that the apparent "counter-intuitive" characteristics of quantum phenomena are the natural manifestation ofthe inherent properties of the fundamental frequency vibration of the global unified field at the microscale. There is no "quantum superposition state" independent of the unified field ontology, nor is it necessary to introduce the non-local "action at a distance" hypothesis. With no additional axioms, no ad hoc assumptions, and no free fitting parameters, this paper endogenously derives the quantitative formula for the coherence length of quantum entanglement, and the calculated results are in good agreement with the experimental data of the thousand-kilometer scale satellite-ground entanglement from China’s Micius Satellite. This work attempts to realize the underlying ontological unification of quantum mechanics and relativity, provides a quantum theoretical basis for the subsequent unified interpretation of the four fundamental interactions, and completes the logical connection from the quantitative anchor to the quantum ontology of the series research.
英文摘要 The dilemma of the "particle" concept in quantum mechanics stems from the profound contradiction between its point-like ontology and wave-like phenomena. This paper proposes a novel ontological solution: the fundamental constituent of the universe is the "soft energy packet"—a non-rigid, localized excitation of the universal unified energy field. Based on the author's proposed Bian's Unified Field Formula (BUFF) (Note: Its core quantitative form is the F_q formula, see Reference 5), we establish the mathematical framework of this ontology, where the "softness" (dispersion) and "shaping" (localization) of energy packets are governed by the global constraints of the field potential. This ontology provides a consistent physical explanation for phenomena such as double-slit interference, quantum tunneling, and entanglement swapping. Reanalysis of CERN double-slit experiment data and "Micius" satellite entanglement data shows that the ontology's prediction error ≤ 2%. More importantly, it derives two unique, testable new effects: the wave packet width-dependent tunneling probability, and the constraint gradient-dependent entanglement fidelity. This work achieves a leap from "phenomenon description" to "ontological construction," providing a clear, self-consistent, and operable physical foundation for quantum mechanics. 中文摘要 量子力学中“粒子”概念的困境源于其点本体与波现象之间的深刻矛盾。本文提出一种新的本体论解决方案:宇宙的基本构成单元是“软能量包”——一种非刚性的、局域化的宇宙统一能量场激发。基于作者提出的卞氏统一场公式(BUFF)(注:其核心定量形式为F_q公式,参见参考文献5),我们建立了该本体论的数学框架,其中能量包的“软性”(弥散性)与“定形”(局域化)受场势能的全局约束支配。该本体论为双缝干涉、量子隧穿、纠缠交换等现象提供了一致的物理解释。重新分析欧洲核子研究组织(CERN)双缝实验与“墨子号”卫星纠缠实验数据,结果显示本体论预测误差≤2%。更重要的是,其推导出两个独特的可检验新效应:波包宽度依赖的隧穿概率、约束梯度依赖的纠缠保真度。本文实现了从“现象描述”到“本体构建”的跨越,为量子力学提供了清晰、自洽且可操作的物理基础。
The mainstream interpretation of quantum entanglement and its derivative phenomena has long relied on concepts such as non-locality and superposition, leading to a lack of dynamical mechanism description for wave function collapse and creating profound conflicts with physical causality. This paper, based on the "Great Tao Model" and its "Existence Field Theory," proposes a systematic and unified interpretation of quantum entanglement phenomena, exemplified by the experiments recognized by the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics. First, it analyzes the erroneous presuppositions in the derivation of Bell's inequality based on Existence Field Theory and establishes a general classical interpretation framework grounded in "static initial correlations" and "local interactions." Subsequently, through a classical physical reconstruction of milestone experiments such as Aspect's, it demonstrates that this framework is sufficient to explain all observed phenomena self-consistently, without introducing "non-local superluminal action." Building on this, the paper successfully extends this interpretative framework to core quantum phenomena such as quantum decoherence, teleportation, and many-body entanglement, revealing that they also originate from classical conservation law constraints and local field interactions. Furthermore, this paper compares the Great Tao Model with hidden variable theories, finding that although both belong to the classical realism camp and oppose non-locality, the Great Tao Model requires no introduction of any hidden variables. Instead, it explains phenomena directly based on the specific physical properties (charge, mass) of elementary particles and the local dynamics of their existence fields, thus providing a more physically realistic and unified theoretical framework. This study offers a unified, causality-compliant classical explanation for a series of quantum phenomena claimed to exhibit "non-locality," fundamentally challenging the conceptual foundation of related quantum information technologies and providing a new path for physics to return to a theoretical paradigm based on realism, locality, and clear dynamical mechanisms.
Existing mainstream quantum interpretations, such as the Copenhagen School's "wave function collapse" and Everett's many-worlds theory, respectively face ontological discontinuity difficulties and ontological redundancy questions. To break through this predicament, this paper presents a completely new quantum mechanics interpretation framework - the "mechanics network interpretation". The framework places "interaction" in ontological priority, arguing that the essence of physical reality is a holistic "mechanical network" composed of interactions. In this image, "particles" are the stable nodes in the network, "waves" are the coordinated dynamic responses of the network, and "information" is the material configuration that carries instructions for specific behavior. The core principle of this paper, the "Channel stability principle," states that quantum measurements are not mysterious collapses, but rather the dynamic results of observation arrangements (strong interactions) sifting out different dominant "channels" on the network: observations of "particleality," destroy coherent channels, while observations of "wave-like," protect or purify coherent channels. This framework provides a continuous, deterministic and physically intuitive explanation for the problems of quantum superposition, entanglement and measurement without the introduction of the "wave function collapse" postulate or an infinitely split universe. The paper applies this framework to key thought experiments (such as the EPR paradox, the Aspe experiment) and the latest empirical studies (such as the USTC optical tweezers atom experiment), showing that quantum nonlocality can be interpreted as an expression of the "overall structure" of the network rather than action at a distance; Quantum-classical transitions result from variations in the precision of network control. By comparing with systems of mainstream interpretations, this paper clarifies the unique value of the new framework in resolving conceptual dualism and returning to realism and continuity. As a "concept-first" research program, the value of this paper lies in providing a self-consistent worldview and a clear conceptual vocabulary, laying the necessary theoretical foundation for the future construction of a strict mathematical formal system and the derivation of novel physical prophecies.
Addressing the fundamental metaphysical question of the origin of Being, this paper takes de Broglie’s classical wave mechanics (1924) as its scientific foundation and constructs a self‑consistent interpretive framework of information ontology. It establishes three core axioms: information as the primordial ground, relations prior to entities, and global conservation of information. On this basis, the paper further derives the origin of spatiotemporal dimensions from the laws of information interaction: each basic flip configuration of information corresponds to the generation of a spatial dimension; after three‑dimensional topological closure is completed, the inevitably produced “pending redundant information” that cannot be synchronously and self‑consistently integrated gives rise to the dimension of time within its queuing sequence. Spacetime is therefore not an a priori container but the first compensatory stratum of structure through which information moves toward self‑consistent expression. Subsequently, by means of de Broglie’s phase field, the paper deduces the entire evolutionary chain from pure information distinctions and primordial phase oscillation to the emergence of material hierarchies and quantum‑observation interactions. It argues that quantum measurement and wave‑function collapse are essentially topological remappings and information‑coupling consolidations of heterogeneous phase fields; gravitation and cosmic expansion can be reduced to macroscopic effects of phase gradients. Throughout the text, physical references are strictly limited to de Broglie’s classical wave mechanics, without introducing non‑standard physical models. This study supplements fundamental physical philosophy with a relational‑ontology approach and provides a unified information‑theoretic metaphysical interpretation for foundational problems such as wave–particle duality, the origin of spacetime, and the nature of gravity.
This paper constructs Consciousness Quantum Ontology (CQO), a monistic theoretical framework that takes consciousness as fundamental ontology. Starting from core axioms, the work explains the internal relation between individual consciousness, collective subconscious consciousness field and quantum field, elaborates the cosmic generation mechanism triggered by primitive awareness, the holographic correspondence between individual "self" and collective "big self", and the mutual influence logic of fate and reality. The paper puts forward quantifiable mathematical models and repeatable experimental verification schemes, tries to unify quantum collapse, gravitational effect and cosmic evolution rules, and compares the theoretical differences with existing mainstream quantum consciousness hypotheses. Relevant recent frontier international experiments show preliminary echo effects for core assumptions of CQO. This manuscript is an integrated preprint compiling serial research contents finished from December 2025 to August 2026, for open academic discussion and original priority confirmation.
This article is the first part of a three-part series developing Ontological Field Theory (OFT), a unified framework grounding quantum mechanics in foundational ontological principles. The trilogy is structured as follows: Part I — Conceptual Necessity:Why Quantum Mechanics Is Inevitable: Ontological Continuity and the Necessity of Quantum Dynamics establishes that quantum mechanics follows necessarily from minimal requirements on coherent being, independently of specific physical postulates. Part II — Technical Realization:Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Ontological Field Theory provides the explicit field-theoretic derivation showing how the Schrödinger equation emerges as the non-relativistic limit of a covariant ontological field. Part III — Critical Context:Why Classical Physics Is an Approximation: Decoherence, Coarse-Graining, and the Limits of Determinism explains why classical determinism and trajectories arise only as emergent, approximate descriptions of fundamentally quantum and relational dynamics. Each article is logically self-contained, but the full argument is distributed across the three contributions. The conceptual analysis motivates the mathematics; the mathematics grounds the physics; and the critical examination situates classical intuition as a limiting case rather than a foundation. The papers are intended to be read as a coherent whole. We argue that quantum mechanics is not an arbitrary empirical framework but an inevitable consequence of minimal ontological requirements. Assuming only that being must exist necessarily, remain consistent, be relational, and admit self-reference, we show that classical deterministic physics is structurally insufficient. Quantum dynamics emerges as the unique low-energy realization of coherent ontological continuity. This work complements explicit field-theoretic derivations by clarifying why quantum mechanics could not have been otherwise.