Existing mainstream quantum interpretations, such as the Copenhagen School's "wave function collapse" and Everett's many-worlds theory, respectively face ontological discontinuity difficulties and ontological redundancy questions. To break through this predicament, this paper presents a completely new quantum mechanics interpretation framework - the "mechanics network interpretation". The framework places "interaction" in ontological priority, arguing that the essence of physical reality is a holistic "mechanical network" composed of interactions. In this image, "particles" are the stable nodes in the network, "waves" are the coordinated dynamic responses of the network, and "information" is the material configuration that carries instructions for specific behavior. The core principle of this paper, the "Channel stability principle," states that quantum measurements are not mysterious collapses, but rather the dynamic results of observation arrangements (strong interactions) sifting out different dominant "channels" on the network: observations of "particleality," destroy coherent channels, while observations of "wave-like," protect or purify coherent channels. This framework provides a continuous, deterministic and physically intuitive explanation for the problems of quantum superposition, entanglement and measurement without the introduction of the "wave function collapse" postulate or an infinitely split universe. The paper applies this framework to key thought experiments (such as the EPR paradox, the Aspe experiment) and the latest empirical studies (such as the USTC optical tweezers atom experiment), showing that quantum nonlocality can be interpreted as an expression of the "overall structure" of the network rather than action at a distance; Quantum-classical transitions result from variations in the precision of network control. By comparing with systems of mainstream interpretations, this paper clarifies the unique value of the new framework in resolving conceptual dualism and returning to realism and continuity. As a "concept-first" research program, the value of this paper lies in providing a self-consistent worldview and a clear conceptual vocabulary, laying the necessary theoretical foundation for the future construction of a strict mathematical formal system and the derivation of novel physical prophecies.
Existing mainstream quantum interpretations, such as the Copenhagen School's "wave function collapse" and Everett's many-worlds theory, respectively face ontological discontinuity difficulties and ontological redundancy questions. To break through this predicament, this paper presents a completely new quantum mechanics interpretation framework - the "mechanics network interpretation". The framework places "interaction" in ontological priority, arguing that the essence of physical reality is a holistic "mechanical network" composed of interactions. In this image, "particles" are the stable nodes in the network, "waves" are the coordinated dynamic responses of the network, and "information" is the material configuration that carries instructions for specific behavior. The core principle of this paper, the "Channel stability principle," states that quantum measurements are not mysterious collapses, but rather the dynamic results of observation arrangements (strong interactions) sifting out different dominant "channels" on the network: observations of "particleality," destroy coherent channels, while observations of "wave-like," protect or purify coherent channels. This framework provides a continuous, deterministic and physically intuitive explanation for the problems of quantum superposition, entanglement and measurement without the introduction of the "wave function collapse" postulate or an infinitely split universe. The paper applies this framework to key thought experiments (such as the EPR paradox, the Aspe experiment) and the latest empirical studies (such as the USTC optical tweezers atom experiment), showing that quantum nonlocality can be interpreted as an expression of the "overall structure" of the network rather than action at a distance; Quantum-classical transitions result from variations in the precision of network control. By comparing with systems of mainstream interpretations, this paper clarifies the unique value of the new framework in resolving conceptual dualism and returning to realism and continuity. As a "concept-first" research program, the value of this paper lies in providing a self-consistent worldview and a clear conceptual vocabulary, laying the necessary theoretical foundation for the future construction of a strict mathematical formal system and the derivation of novel physical prophecies.
The standard Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics relies on a set of historically established, ad hoc postulates to describe particle-wave duality, measurement, and non-locality. In this paper, we propose a single foundational axiom that fully reproduces the standard mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics while eliminating the need for supplementary assumptions. From this singular postulate, we rigorously derive the fundamental origin of the wave function and the mathematical generator of the Schrödinger equation. Furthermore, we demonstrate via isomorfism that all seemingly inexplicable quantum phenomena—including wave-function collapse and quantum entanglement—are mathematically and conceptually reducible to the underlying dynamics of the double-slit experiment. By establishing a direct fundamental correlation between the double-slit interference mechanism and the Monty Hall phenomenon, we prove that these effects are distinct manifestations of the exact same principle. We framed the double-slit experiment as an interference of the space of possibilities affected by information and simetrys. Ultimately, by anchoring the existing quantum mathematical framework to this unique axiom, this work provides a coherent, paradox-free ontological foundation that resolves the interpretational crisis of quantum mechanics without altering its empirical predictive power.
This article surveys a selection of key conceptual and interpretational developments in quantum mechanics, tracing the theory from its foundational postulates to contemporary discussions of measurement, nonlocality, and the emergence of classicality. Beginning with the structure of Hilbert space and the postulates governing state evolution and measurement, the epistemic stance of the Copenhagen interpretation and its modern reformulations are examined. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument, Bell's theorem, and Hardy's paradox are then discussed as probes of locality and realism, alongside the deterministic but explicitly nonlocal de Broglie-Bohm theory. The measurement problem and the implications of contextuality are analyzed in relation to objective collapse models, which introduce new physical dynamics to account for definite outcomes. Finally, the role of decoherence in the suppression of interference and the emergence of classical behavior is explored, together with the interpretational frameworks of many-worlds and consistent histories. This material aims to provide a coherent introductory overview of how several of the most prominent interpretations address the central concern of what quantum mechanics tells us about the nature of physical reality.
This article surveys a selection of key conceptual and interpretational developments in quantum mechanics, tracing the theory from its foundational postulates to contemporary discussions of measurement, nonlocality, and the emergence of classicality. Beginning with the structure of Hilbert space and the postulates governing state evolution and measurement, the epistemic stance of the Copenhagen interpretation and its modern reformulations are examined. The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen argument, Bell’s theorem, and Hardy’s paradox are then discussed as probes of locality and realism, alongside the deterministic but explicitly nonlocal de Broglie–Bohm theory. The measurement problem and the implications of contextuality are analyzed in relation to objective collapse models, which introduce new physical dynamics to account for definite outcomes. Finally, the role of decoherence in the suppression of interference and the emergence of classical behavior is explored, together with the interpretational frameworks of many-worlds and consistent histories. This material aims to provide a coherent introductory overview of how several of the most prominent interpretations address the central concern of what quantum mechanics tells us about the nature of physical reality.
This work presents a rigorous derivation of quantum mechanics from purely a priori ontological principles, a result not previously achieved within a single self-contained framework. Beginning with the apodictically certain proposition "I am"—immune to all doubt through performative contradiction—we establish through necessary deduction the Principle of Ontological Continuity (POC): Being is continuous and cannot cease or arise ex nihilo. From this single ontological foundation, the complete mathematical structure of quantum mechanics emerges as necessary consequence. We demonstrate that any mathematical representation of ontological continuity must have Hilbert space structure, that ontological conservation necessarily implies unitary evolution, and that the Schrödinger equation follows via Stone's theorem as mathematical necessity, not empirical postulate. The Born rule is derived through three independent converging arguments (Gleason's theorem, direct conservation requirements, and Zurek's envariance), establishing quantum probability as ontological necessity rather than interpretative supplement. Classical foundational problems—wave function collapse, the measurement problem, Bell's non-locality—are resolved without additional assumptions. Collapse emerges as effective description of decoherence; the observer is reconceptualized as self-aware subsystem without ontological dualism; Bell violations confirm ontological unity rather than presenting paradox. Quantum phenomena—superposition as ontological potentiality, tunneling as manifestation of continuity, Pauli exclusion as consequence of ontological structure—are shown to be necessary rather than mysterious. The work establishes quantum mechanics with apodictic certainty mediated through deductive necessity, demonstrating that quantum reality could not have been otherwise. This monograph integrates foundational ontology, mathematical formalism, and resolution of interpretative problems within unified self-contained framework. It deliberately closes at non-relativistic quantum mechanics, establishing stable foundation for future extensions (quantum field theory, general relativity, quantum gravity, normative ethics).
This paper presents a foundational thought experiment and proposes a radical ontological framework for interpreting quantum mechanics and the nature of time. It moves beyond conventional interpretations by testing them against a novel scenario: a hypothetical "time machine" (device 𝒲) capable of passively reading the past state of a quantum system without interacting with it. The central testbed is the classic double-slit experiment. In Stage 1, performed at time T_0, the experiment is run without any path detection, yielding the standard interference pattern. In Stage 2, at a later time T_0 + ΔT, the device 𝒲 is used to retroactively "read" the precise state of the system at the moment the electron passed the slit plane. The pivotal question is: What information about the electron's path will 𝒲 find? The analysis demonstrates that established interpretations face significant paradoxes: The Copenhagen Interpretation risks falling into retrocausality, as the mere potential for future path-information readout could retroactively collapse the interference pattern. The Many-Worlds Interpretation leads to internal inconsistency, as the deterministic, single-path history observed within a given branch by 𝒲 contradicts the interference pattern observed in that same branch's past. The de Broglie-Bohm (dBB) Interpretation, while positing a hidden trajectory, struggles with the mechanism of how 𝒲 could read this information without interacting with the guiding pilot wave, which is essential for the interference effect. As a resolution, the paper proposes a new ontological model based on a geometric, discrete conception of reality. The core tenets are: Fundamental Entities: Reality is a dynamic network of "p-gluons," postulated as geometric quanta of spacetime. Discrete Frames: Observable reality is not continuous but consists of a sequential generation of discrete, global "frames" (K_i). Each frame is a complete geometric snapshot of the entire p-gluon network's configuration. The Axiom of Record Economy (AOZ): This is the central formal postulate. At each generative step, at most one frame from the space of locally possible states (ℋ_poss) is physically realized. A frame is generated if and only if it satisfies a condition of global consistency with the entire history, as determined by a fundamental "algorithm of reality" (𝒜). Crucially, states in ℋ_poss that are not selected for generation attain no ontological status whatsoever; they are abstract possibilities, not unrecorded facts. Emergent Time: Observable time is not a fundamental background parameter but an emergent measure of the rate (Ḳ) at which these global frames are generated. Within this Frame-Recording Ontology, the time-machine paradox finds an elegant and decisive solution: In the double-slit experiment without a detector, the only configuration consistent (via algorithm 𝒜) with the future observation of an interference pattern is a global superposed state. This state, describable as an extended pattern of geometric correlations in the p-gluon network encompassing both slits, is the one and only frame generated (K_T0). Deterministic "path" frames (electron at S_1 or S_2) are not generated; they remain unrealized abstractions. Therefore, when device 𝒲 reads the past, it accesses the sole ontological record: frame K_T0. It finds no geometric data corresponding to a classical path because such data was never physically recorded. The answer is not "the information is hidden" (epistemology), but "the corresponding fact was never generated" (ontology). The paper elaborates on the non-anthropomorphic, non-teleological nature of algorithm 𝒜, framing it as a constraining structure akin to a variational principle rather than a conscious selector. It discusses the model's implications for the measurement problem (reinterpreted as the generation of a "classical" frame), nonlocality, and its philosophical shift from epistemic to ontological indeterminacy. Methodology: The work is developed using the author's "Pencil Case Philosophy" or "Sonar Modeling" approach. This methodology begins by constructing minimal axiomatic building blocks (p-gluons, AOZ, 𝒜), activates the system, and rigorously traces its logical consequences without prior commitment to reproducing existing theoretical frameworks.
This work proposes a minimal ontological framework aimed at systematically resolving key conceptual paradoxes of contemporary physics. The central claim is that many foundational difficulties of twentieth- and twenty-first-century physics arise not from empirical anomalies or mathematical inconsistencies, but from a conflation of mathematical formalism with ontological interpretation. On the basis of a small set of minimal ontological axioms, the work addresses and resolves ten fundamental paradoxes, including wave–particle duality, the measurement problem and collapse, the arrow of time, irreversibility, quantization, the nature of gravity, cosmological origin, the finiteness of the Universe, the status of singularities, and the information paradox. The proposed framework introduces no new physical entities and does not modify existing physical equations. Instead, it imposes strict ontological constraints from which these phenomena follow as necessary consequences. The work does not present an alternative physical theory, but rather an ontological foundation explaining why modern physical theories are successful and why they encounter inherent explanatory limits.