Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A Balance-Based Systemic Framework for Wave Function Collapse and Quantum Entanglement

Angelito Enriquez Malicse

Published Jan 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum mechanics has been remarkably successful in predicting experimental outcomes, yet foundational questions—such as the nature of wave function collapse and the mechanism of quantum entanglement—remain unresolved. Standard interpretations invoke observer-dependence, intrinsic randomness, or non-local interactions, leading to conceptual difficulties. This work proposes a unifying explanation based on a universal balance-based system framework. Within this approach, quantum systems are treated as interconnected, defect-free systems whose behavior emerges through feedback mechanisms. Wave function collapse corresponds to the enforcement of systemic balance under new constraints, while entanglement arises from globally enforced balance across spatially separated nodes. This framework preserves empirical predictions of quantum mechanics, is consistent with relativistic causality, and provides a coherent conceptual foundation that links microscopic quantum phenomena to universal system dynamics.

DOI
10.17605/osf.io/u5sp7

Related papers

A Balance-Based Systemic Framework for Wave Function Collapse and Quantum Entanglement

Angelito Enriquez Malicse

Quantum mechanics has been remarkably successful in predicting experimental outcomes, yet foundational questions—such as the nature of wave function collapse and the mechanism of quantum entanglement—remain unresolved. Standard interpretations invoke observer-dependence, intrinsic randomness, or non-local interactions, leading to conceptual difficulties. This work proposes a unifying explanation based on a universal balance-based system framework. Within this approach, quantum systems are treated as interconnected, defect-free systems whose behavior emerges through feedback mechanisms. Wave function collapse corresponds to the enforcement of systemic balance under new constraints, while entanglement arises from globally enforced balance across spatially separated nodes. This framework preserves empirical predictions of quantum mechanics, is consistent with relativistic causality, and provides a coherent conceptual foundation that links microscopic quantum phenomena to universal system dynamics.

•Feb 4, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Field Theory and the Universal Law of Balance: A Systems-Level Interpretation for Scientific Outreach

Angelito Enriquez Malicse

Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is among the most successful theoretical frameworks in modern science, providing extremely accurate predictions for particle interactions and underpinning much of contemporary technology. Despite this success, QFT remains conceptually incomplete, relying on mathematical procedures such as renormalization and probabilistic interpretation without a unified explanatory foundation. This paper presents a systems-level interpretation of QFT using the Universal Formula, grounded in three natural laws: system integrity, balance, and feedback mechanisms. Rather than replacing QFT, this framework explains why QFT works and why its conceptual difficulties persist. The analysis reframes quantum phenomena as lawful processes of balance regulation within natural systems.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Field Theory and the Universal Law of Balance: A Systems-Level Interpretation for Scientific Outreach

Angelito Enriquez Malicse

Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is among the most successful theoretical frameworks in modern science, providing extremely accurate predictions for particle interactions and underpinning much of contemporary technology. Despite this success, QFT remains conceptually incomplete, relying on mathematical procedures such as renormalization and probabilistic interpretation without a unified explanatory foundation. This paper presents a systems-level interpretation of QFT using the Universal Formula, grounded in three natural laws: system integrity, balance, and feedback mechanisms. Rather than replacing QFT, this framework explains why QFT works and why its conceptual difficulties persist. The analysis reframes quantum phenomena as lawful processes of balance regulation within natural systems.

•Feb 4, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Tunneling as a System-Level Balance and Feedback Phenomenon

Angelito Enriquez Malicse

Quantum tunneling is conventionally described as a probabilistic consequence of wave mechanics. While this description is mathematically precise, it often lacks a clear physical interpretation and is frequently presented as evidence of intrinsic randomness or non-classical behavior. This paper proposes a system-level interpretation of quantum tunneling based on three physically grounded principles: system completeness, conservation of balance, and continuous feedback between interacting components. It is shown that tunneling arises naturally when a complete physical system redistributes localized imbalance under strict constraints, without violating causality or conservation laws. The proposed framework preserves all standard quantum-mechanical predictions while providing a more intuitive and physically transparent interpretation of tunneling phenomena.

•Feb 4, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Tunneling as a System-Level Balance and Feedback Phenomenon

Angelito Enriquez Malicse

Quantum tunneling is conventionally described as a probabilistic consequence of wave mechanics. While this description is mathematically precise, it often lacks a clear physical interpretation and is frequently presented as evidence of intrinsic randomness or non-classical behavior. This paper proposes a system-level interpretation of quantum tunneling based on three physically grounded principles: system completeness, conservation of balance, and continuous feedback between interacting components. It is shown that tunneling arises naturally when a complete physical system redistributes localized imbalance under strict constraints, without violating causality or conservation laws. The proposed framework preserves all standard quantum-mechanical predictions while providing a more intuitive and physically transparent interpretation of tunneling phenomena.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Manifesto for an Informational Observer-Centered Framework Toward a Unified Theory of Information, Observation, and Reality

Giuseppe Junior Greco

Modern physics has achieved extraordinary predictive success, yet it continues to face unresolved conceptual tensions concerning the role of the observer, the nature of information, and the origin of physical structure. From quantum measurement to cosmology, the assumption of an observer-neutral reality increasingly appears insufficient to fully account for empirical phenomena and theoretical inconsistencies. This manifesto proposes an Informational Observer-Centered Framework, in which information is treated as a fundamental ontological substrate and observation as an active, structured process rather than a passive act of measurement. Within this perspective, physical systems, observers, and informational exchanges form a unified dynamics, where state reduction, decoherence, and emergent classicality arise from informational interactions and constraints. Rather than introducing a new closed theory, this manifesto establishes a conceptual foundation unifying several complementary models—including Informational State Dynamics, observer-dependent informational compression, and informational interpretations of quantum and cosmological phenomena—into a coherent research program. The framework is explicitly non-dogmatic, open to falsification, and intended as a guiding structure for further theoretical development and empirical testing. The aim of this document is not to replace existing physical theories, but to clarify their conceptual boundaries and propose an integrative lens through which unresolved problems in quantum foundations, cosmology, and cognitive systems may be systematically explored.

•Dec 24, 2025•0 citations
Quantum mechanics has been remarkably successful in predicting experimental outcomes, yet foundational questions—such as the nature of wave function collapse and the mechanism of quantum entanglement—remain unresolved. Standard interpretations invoke observer-dependence, intrinsic randomness, or non-local interactions, leading to conceptual difficulties. This work proposes a unifying explanation based on a universal balance-based system framework. Within this approach, quantum systems are treated as interconnected, defect-free systems whose behavior emerges through feedback mechanisms. Wave function collapse corresponds to the enforcement of systemic balance under new constraints, while entanglement arises from globally enforced balance across spatially separated nodes. This framework preserves empirical predictions of quantum mechanics, is consistent with relativistic causality, and provides a coherent conceptual foundation that links microscopic quantum phenomena to universal system dynamics.
Quantum mechanics has been remarkably successful in predicting experimental outcomes, yet foundational questions—such as the nature of wave function collapse and the mechanism of quantum entanglement—remain unresolved. Standard interpretations invoke observer-dependence, intrinsic randomness, or non-local interactions, leading to conceptual difficulties. This work proposes a unifying explanation based on a universal balance-based system framework. Within this approach, quantum systems are treated as interconnected, defect-free systems whose behavior emerges through feedback mechanisms. Wave function collapse corresponds to the enforcement of systemic balance under new constraints, while entanglement arises from globally enforced balance across spatially separated nodes. This framework preserves empirical predictions of quantum mechanics, is consistent with relativistic causality, and provides a coherent conceptual foundation that links microscopic quantum phenomena to universal system dynamics.
Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is among the most successful theoretical frameworks in modern science, providing extremely accurate predictions for particle interactions and underpinning much of contemporary technology. Despite this success, QFT remains conceptually incomplete, relying on mathematical procedures such as renormalization and probabilistic interpretation without a unified explanatory foundation. This paper presents a systems-level interpretation of QFT using the Universal Formula, grounded in three natural laws: system integrity, balance, and feedback mechanisms. Rather than replacing QFT, this framework explains why QFT works and why its conceptual difficulties persist. The analysis reframes quantum phenomena as lawful processes of balance regulation within natural systems.
Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is among the most successful theoretical frameworks in modern science, providing extremely accurate predictions for particle interactions and underpinning much of contemporary technology. Despite this success, QFT remains conceptually incomplete, relying on mathematical procedures such as renormalization and probabilistic interpretation without a unified explanatory foundation. This paper presents a systems-level interpretation of QFT using the Universal Formula, grounded in three natural laws: system integrity, balance, and feedback mechanisms. Rather than replacing QFT, this framework explains why QFT works and why its conceptual difficulties persist. The analysis reframes quantum phenomena as lawful processes of balance regulation within natural systems.
Quantum tunneling is conventionally described as a probabilistic consequence of wave mechanics. While this description is mathematically precise, it often lacks a clear physical interpretation and is frequently presented as evidence of intrinsic randomness or non-classical behavior. This paper proposes a system-level interpretation of quantum tunneling based on three physically grounded principles: system completeness, conservation of balance, and continuous feedback between interacting components. It is shown that tunneling arises naturally when a complete physical system redistributes localized imbalance under strict constraints, without violating causality or conservation laws. The proposed framework preserves all standard quantum-mechanical predictions while providing a more intuitive and physically transparent interpretation of tunneling phenomena.
Quantum tunneling is conventionally described as a probabilistic consequence of wave mechanics. While this description is mathematically precise, it often lacks a clear physical interpretation and is frequently presented as evidence of intrinsic randomness or non-classical behavior. This paper proposes a system-level interpretation of quantum tunneling based on three physically grounded principles: system completeness, conservation of balance, and continuous feedback between interacting components. It is shown that tunneling arises naturally when a complete physical system redistributes localized imbalance under strict constraints, without violating causality or conservation laws. The proposed framework preserves all standard quantum-mechanical predictions while providing a more intuitive and physically transparent interpretation of tunneling phenomena.
Modern physics has achieved extraordinary predictive success, yet it continues to face unresolved conceptual tensions concerning the role of the observer, the nature of information, and the origin of physical structure. From quantum measurement to cosmology, the assumption of an observer-neutral reality increasingly appears insufficient to fully account for empirical phenomena and theoretical inconsistencies. This manifesto proposes an Informational Observer-Centered Framework, in which information is treated as a fundamental ontological substrate and observation as an active, structured process rather than a passive act of measurement. Within this perspective, physical systems, observers, and informational exchanges form a unified dynamics, where state reduction, decoherence, and emergent classicality arise from informational interactions and constraints. Rather than introducing a new closed theory, this manifesto establishes a conceptual foundation unifying several complementary models—including Informational State Dynamics, observer-dependent informational compression, and informational interpretations of quantum and cosmological phenomena—into a coherent research program. The framework is explicitly non-dogmatic, open to falsification, and intended as a guiding structure for further theoretical development and empirical testing. The aim of this document is not to replace existing physical theories, but to clarify their conceptual boundaries and propose an integrative lens through which unresolved problems in quantum foundations, cosmology, and cognitive systems may be systematically explored.