Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chinese Physics B

Quantum tunnelling time at long wavelengths

Zheng Shu, Da-Wei Tian, Jing-Yu Zhang, Wei-Dong Li, Jing Chen, Xiao-Lei Hao

Published Mar 12, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract Quantum tunnelling is a fundamental phenomenon in quantum physics, yet the question of how long it takes for a particle to tunnel through a barrier remains a topic of ongoing debate. Recent advances in attoclock experimental techniques in strong-field physics have renewed interest in this topic. While various definitions of tunneling time have been proposed, a consensus has yet to be reached. In this study, we adopt a definition of tunnelling time based on the ratio of the barrier width to the expected value of the velocity operator within the barrier. This approach reduces to the Büttiker-Landauer time ($\tau_{BL}$) in the case of an opaque barrier and offers a clear physical interpretation for very thin barriers, where $\tau_{BL}$ may not be well-defined. Additionally, by utilizing a virtual detector at the tunnel exit, we calculate the time delay between the peak of the electric field and the moment of ionization for long wavelengths ($\geq$6 $\mu$m). Our findings indicate that the time delay stabilizes around 190 as, remaining independent of the laser wavelength. Furthermore, through our quantum tunnelling time definition, this time delay can be interpreted as the time required for the electron to tunnel from a point within the barrier to the exit.

DOI
10.1088/1674-1056/ae50e1

Related papers

Wavelength Dependent Tunneling Delay Time

Xiaolei Hao, Zheng Shu, Weidong Li +1 more

A clear consensus on how long it takes a particle to tunnel through a potential barrier has never been so urgently required, since the electron dynamics in strong-field ionization can be resolved on attosecond time-scale in experiment and the exact nature of the tunneling process is the key to trigger subsequent attosecond techniques. Here a general picture of tunneling time is suggested by introducing a quantum travel time, which is defined as the ratio of the travel distance to the expected value of the velocity operator under the barrier. Specially, if applied to rectangular barrier tunneling, it can retrieve the Büttiker-Landauer time $τ_{BL}$ in the case of an opaque barrier, and has a clear physical meaning in the case of a very thin barrier wherein $τ_{BL}$ can not be well defined. In the case of strong-field tunneling process, with the help of the newly defined time, the tunneling delay time measured by attoclock experiment can be interpreted as a travel time spent by the electron to tunnel from a point under the barrier to the tunnel exit. In addition, a peculiar oscillation structure in the wavelength dependence of tunneling delay time in deep tunneling regime is observed, which is beyond the scope of adiabatic tunneling picture. This oscillation structure can be attributed to the interference between the ground state tunneling channel and the excited states tunneling channels.

arXiv:1903.06897•Mar 16, 2019•0 citations

General way to define tunneling time*

Zheng Shu, Xiaolei Hao, Weidong Li +1 more

Abstract With the development of attosecond science, tunneling time can now be measured experimentally with the attoclock technique. However, there are many different theoretical definitions of tunneling time and no consensus has been achieved. Here, we bridge the relationship between different definitions of tunneling time based on a quantum travel time in one-dimensional rectangular barrier tunneling problem. We find that the real quantum travel time t Re is equal to the Bohmian time t Bohmian, which is related to the resonance lifetime of a bound state. The total quantum travel time τ t can perfectly retrieve the transversal time t x and the Büttiker–Landauer time τ BL in two opposite limits, regardless of the particle energy.

Chinese Physics B•May 1, 2019•5 citations

Tunneling Time and Weak Measurement in Strong Field Ionization

Tomáš Zimmermann, Siddhartha Mishra, Brent Doran +2 more

Tunneling delays represent a hotly debated topic, with many conflicting definitions and little consensus on when and if such definitions accurately describe the physical observables. Here, we relate these different definitions to distinct experimental observables in strong field ionization, finding that two definitions, Larmor time and Bohmian time, are compatible with the attoclock observable and the resonance lifetime of a bound state, respectively. Both of these definitions are closely connected to the theory of weak measurement, with Larmor time being the weak measurement value of tunneling time and Bohmian trajectory corresponding to the average particle trajectory, which has been recently reconstructed using weak measurement in a two-slit experiment [S. Kocsis, B. Braverman, S. Ravets, M. J. Stevens, R. P. Mirin, L. K. Shalm, and A. M. Steinberg, Science 332, 1170 (2011)]. We demonstrate a big discrepancy in strong field ionization between the Bohmian and weak measurement values of tunneling time, and we suggest this arises because the tunneling time is calculated for a small probability postselected ensemble of electrons. Our results have important implications for the interpretation of experiments in attosecond science, suggesting that tunneling is unlikely to be an instantaneous process.

Physical Review Letters•Jun 10, 2016•113 citations

Model studies of tunneling time

Z.-H. Huang, Paul H. Cutler, T. E. Feuchtwang +3 more

The precise definition and physical interpretation of a tunneling time is a fundamental problem in quantum mechanics. The lack of a well-defined time operator in quantum theory precludes the calculation of time in terms of an expectation value. Consequently, model calculations and simulation studies have been proposed and used to determine the time for a particle to traverse a quantum-mechanical barrier. The results offer both qualitatively and quantitatively, disparate predictions. One of the more commonly used approaches is the phase method, which we have applied to several one-dimensional model potentials to show that the tunneling time is characterized by the ratio of the typical decay length in the barrier to the incident velocity, τ∼(1/κ)/v0. We also show that the phase and the spin precession methods are equivalent when the magnetic field is applied throughout the space containing the particle wave function and the tunneling barrier. In principle, the spin precession method can be regarded as an operational definition of the tunneling time. It also has been shown that a tunneling time can be defined operationally for a time-dependent barrier, for which the model calculations predict a tunneling time given by the mean barrier width divided by the magnitude of the imaginary velocity of the particle in the barrier, τ∼d/‖v‖. This pseudokinematic result has been inferred by magnetic field dependent tunneling through heterostructures and computer simulation of wave packet tunneling through one-dimensional square barriers. Other tunneling time theories predict one or the other of the above mentioned characteristic times; several theories predict both. We interpret these different results for τ to mean that a tunneling time is not uniquely defined as a function of particle energy and the barrier shape unless the process in which the tunneling is involved is also specified. That is, the tunneling time is a meaningful and unique concept only for particular tunneling processes or definite operational procedures.

Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films•Jan 1, 1990•12 citations

Role of reflections in the generation of a time delay in strong-field ionization

Daniel Bakucz Canário, Michael Klaiber, Karen Z. Hatsagortsyan +1 more

The problem of time delay in tunneling ionization is revisited. The origin of time delay at the tunnel exit is analyzed, underlining the two faces of the concept of the tunneling time delay: the time delay around the tunnel exit and the asymptotic time delay at a detector. We show that the former time delay, in the sense of a delay in the peak of the wave function, exists as a matter of principle and arises due to the sub-barrier interference of the reflected and transmitted components of the tunneling electronic wave packet. We exemplify this by describing the tunneling ionization of an electron bound by a short-range potential within the strong-field approximation in a ``deep tunneling'' regime. If sub-barrier reflections are extracted from this wave function, then the time delay of the peak is shown to vanish. Thus, we assert that the disturbance of the tunneling wave packet by the reflection from the surface of the barrier causes a time delay in the neighborhood of the tunnel exit.

arXiv:2101.08096•Physical Review A•Sep 7, 2021•7 citations

Quantum tunneling time: Insights from an exactly solvable model

Seyedmohammad Yusofsani, M. Kolesík

Quantum particles interacting with potential barriers are ubiquitous in physics, and the question of how much time they spend inside classically forbidden regions has attracted interest for many decades. Recent developments of new experimental techniques revived the issue and ignited a debate with often contradictory results. This motivates the present study of an exactly solvable model for quantum tunneling induced by a strong field. We show that the tunneling dynamics can depart significantly from the scenario in which the barrier-traversal time is zero or very small. However, our findings do not support the idea of a well-defined tunneling time either. Our numerically exact results should help in finding a consensus about this fundamental problem.

arXiv:2107.01737•Physical Review A•May 27, 2020•20 citations
Abstract Quantum tunnelling is a fundamental phenomenon in quantum physics, yet the question of how long it takes for a particle to tunnel through a barrier remains a topic of ongoing debate. Recent advances in attoclock experimental techniques in strong-field physics have renewed interest in this topic. While various definitions of tunneling time have been proposed, a consensus has yet to be reached. In this study, we adopt a definition of tunnelling time based on the ratio of the barrier width to the expected value of the velocity operator within the barrier. This approach reduces to the Büttiker-Landauer time (τBL\tau_{BL}τBL​) in the case of an opaque barrier and offers a clear physical interpretation for very thin barriers, where τBL\tau_{BL}τBL​ may not be well-defined. Additionally, by utilizing a virtual detector at the tunnel exit, we calculate the time delay between the peak of the electric field and the moment of ionization for long wavelengths (≥\geq≥6 μ\muμm). Our findings indicate that the time delay stabilizes around 190 as, remaining independent of the laser wavelength. Furthermore, through our quantum tunnelling time definition, this time delay can be interpreted as the time required for the electron to tunnel from a point within the barrier to the exit.
A clear consensus on how long it takes a particle to tunnel through a potential barrier has never been so urgently required, since the electron dynamics in strong-field ionization can be resolved on attosecond time-scale in experiment and the exact nature of the tunneling process is the key to trigger subsequent attosecond techniques. Here a general picture of tunneling time is suggested by introducing a quantum travel time, which is defined as the ratio of the travel distance to the expected value of the velocity operator under the barrier. Specially, if applied to rectangular barrier tunneling, it can retrieve the Büttiker-Landauer time τBLτ_{BL}τBL​ in the case of an opaque barrier, and has a clear physical meaning in the case of a very thin barrier wherein τBLτ_{BL}τBL​ can not be well defined. In the case of strong-field tunneling process, with the help of the newly defined time, the tunneling delay time measured by attoclock experiment can be interpreted as a travel time spent by the electron to tunnel from a point under the barrier to the tunnel exit. In addition, a peculiar oscillation structure in the wavelength dependence of tunneling delay time in deep tunneling regime is observed, which is beyond the scope of adiabatic tunneling picture. This oscillation structure can be attributed to the interference between the ground state tunneling channel and the excited states tunneling channels.
Abstract With the development of attosecond science, tunneling time can now be measured experimentally with the attoclock technique. However, there are many different theoretical definitions of tunneling time and no consensus has been achieved. Here, we bridge the relationship between different definitions of tunneling time based on a quantum travel time in one-dimensional rectangular barrier tunneling problem. We find that the real quantum travel time t Re is equal to the Bohmian time t Bohmian, which is related to the resonance lifetime of a bound state. The total quantum travel time τ t can perfectly retrieve the transversal time t x and the Büttiker–Landauer time τ BL in two opposite limits, regardless of the particle energy.
Tunneling delays represent a hotly debated topic, with many conflicting definitions and little consensus on when and if such definitions accurately describe the physical observables. Here, we relate these different definitions to distinct experimental observables in strong field ionization, finding that two definitions, Larmor time and Bohmian time, are compatible with the attoclock observable and the resonance lifetime of a bound state, respectively. Both of these definitions are closely connected to the theory of weak measurement, with Larmor time being the weak measurement value of tunneling time and Bohmian trajectory corresponding to the average particle trajectory, which has been recently reconstructed using weak measurement in a two-slit experiment [S. Kocsis, B. Braverman, S. Ravets, M. J. Stevens, R. P. Mirin, L. K. Shalm, and A. M. Steinberg, Science 332, 1170 (2011)]. We demonstrate a big discrepancy in strong field ionization between the Bohmian and weak measurement values of tunneling time, and we suggest this arises because the tunneling time is calculated for a small probability postselected ensemble of electrons. Our results have important implications for the interpretation of experiments in attosecond science, suggesting that tunneling is unlikely to be an instantaneous process.
The precise definition and physical interpretation of a tunneling time is a fundamental problem in quantum mechanics. The lack of a well-defined time operator in quantum theory precludes the calculation of time in terms of an expectation value. Consequently, model calculations and simulation studies have been proposed and used to determine the time for a particle to traverse a quantum-mechanical barrier. The results offer both qualitatively and quantitatively, disparate predictions. One of the more commonly used approaches is the phase method, which we have applied to several one-dimensional model potentials to show that the tunneling time is characterized by the ratio of the typical decay length in the barrier to the incident velocity, τ∼(1/κ)/v0. We also show that the phase and the spin precession methods are equivalent when the magnetic field is applied throughout the space containing the particle wave function and the tunneling barrier. In principle, the spin precession method can be regarded as an operational definition of the tunneling time. It also has been shown that a tunneling time can be defined operationally for a time-dependent barrier, for which the model calculations predict a tunneling time given by the mean barrier width divided by the magnitude of the imaginary velocity of the particle in the barrier, τ∼d/‖v‖. This pseudokinematic result has been inferred by magnetic field dependent tunneling through heterostructures and computer simulation of wave packet tunneling through one-dimensional square barriers. Other tunneling time theories predict one or the other of the above mentioned characteristic times; several theories predict both. We interpret these different results for τ to mean that a tunneling time is not uniquely defined as a function of particle energy and the barrier shape unless the process in which the tunneling is involved is also specified. That is, the tunneling time is a meaningful and unique concept only for particular tunneling processes or definite operational procedures.
The problem of time delay in tunneling ionization is revisited. The origin of time delay at the tunnel exit is analyzed, underlining the two faces of the concept of the tunneling time delay: the time delay around the tunnel exit and the asymptotic time delay at a detector. We show that the former time delay, in the sense of a delay in the peak of the wave function, exists as a matter of principle and arises due to the sub-barrier interference of the reflected and transmitted components of the tunneling electronic wave packet. We exemplify this by describing the tunneling ionization of an electron bound by a short-range potential within the strong-field approximation in a ``deep tunneling'' regime. If sub-barrier reflections are extracted from this wave function, then the time delay of the peak is shown to vanish. Thus, we assert that the disturbance of the tunneling wave packet by the reflection from the surface of the barrier causes a time delay in the neighborhood of the tunnel exit.
Quantum particles interacting with potential barriers are ubiquitous in physics, and the question of how much time they spend inside classically forbidden regions has attracted interest for many decades. Recent developments of new experimental techniques revived the issue and ignited a debate with often contradictory results. This motivates the present study of an exactly solvable model for quantum tunneling induced by a strong field. We show that the tunneling dynamics can depart significantly from the scenario in which the barrier-traversal time is zero or very small. However, our findings do not support the idea of a well-defined tunneling time either. Our numerically exact results should help in finding a consensus about this fundamental problem.