Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2107.01737 · Physical Review A

Quantum tunneling time: Insights from an exactly solvable model

Seyedmohammad Yusofsani, M. Kolesík

Published May 27, 2020• 20 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum particles interacting with potential barriers are ubiquitous in physics, and the question of how much time they spend inside classically forbidden regions has attracted interest for many decades. Recent developments of new experimental techniques revived the issue and ignited a debate with often contradictory results. This motivates the present study of an exactly solvable model for quantum tunneling induced by a strong field. We show that the tunneling dynamics can depart significantly from the scenario in which the barrier-traversal time is zero or very small. However, our findings do not support the idea of a well-defined tunneling time either. Our numerically exact results should help in finding a consensus about this fundamental problem.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.101.052121

Related papers

Tunneling times

Partha Ghose

Introduction In classical physics it is meaningful to ask the question, ‘How much time does a particle take to pass through a given region?’ The interesting question in quantum mechanics is: does a particle take a definite time to tunnel through a classically forbidden region? The question has been debated ever since the idea that there was such a time in quantum theory was first put forward by MacColl way back in 1932 [253]. A plethora of times has since then been proposed, and the answer seems to depend on the interpretation of quantum mechanics one uses. A reliable answer is clearly of great importance for the design of high-frequency quantum devices, tunnelling phenomena (as, for example, in scanning tunneling microscopy), nuclear and chemical reactions and, of course, for purely conceptual reasons. Most of the controversies centre around simple and intuitive notions in idealized one-dimensional models in a scattering configuration in which a particle (usually represented by a wave packet) is incident on a potential barrier localized in the interval [ a, b ]. Three kinds of time have been defined in this context. One, called the transmission time τ T ( a, b ), is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually transmitted. Similarly, the reflection time τ R ( a, b ) is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually reflected.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 29, 1999•0 citations

On the status of quantum tunnelling time

Grace E. Field

Abstract How long does a quantum particle take to traverse a classically forbidden energy barrier? In other words, what is the correct expression for quantum tunnelling time? This seemingly simple question has inspired widespread debate in the physics literature. I argue that we should not expect the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics to provide a unique correct expression for quantum tunnelling time, because to do so it would have to provide a unique correct answer to a question whose assumptions are in tension with its core interpretational commitments. I explain how this conclusion connects to time’s special status in quantum mechanics, the meaningfulness of classically inspired concepts in different interpretations of quantum mechanics, the prospect of constructing experimental tests to distinguish between different interpretations, and the status of weak measurement in resolving questions about the histories of subensembles.

European Journal for Philosophy of Science•Sep 27, 2022•10 citations

On the status of quantum tunneling times

Grace E. Field

How long does a quantum particle take to traverse a classically forbidden energy barrier? In other words, what is the correct expression for quantum tunneling time? This seemingly simple question has inspired widespread debate in the physics literature. By drawing an analogy with the double-slit experiment, I argue that we should not even expect the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics to provide an expression for quantum tunneling time. I explain how this conclusion connects to time’s special status in quantum mechanics, the meaningfulness of classically inspired concepts in different interpretations of quantum mechanics, and the prospect of constructing experimental tests to distinguish between different interpretations.

•May 21, 2020•0 citations

Semiclassical traversal time analysis of superluminal tunneling

D. Sokolovski, Y. Liu

In the limit $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\ensuremath{\Elzxh}}0,$ a tunneling particle can be shown to follow classical trajectories which experience in the classically forbidden region a deep well rather than a potential barrier and, therefore, spend a very small amount of time there. Such trajectories interfere destructively. While the tunneling rate is small, the tunneling itself is very fast.

Physical Review A•Dec 12, 2000•10 citations

Imaginary past of a quantum particle moving on imaginary time

Anton Uranga, Elena V. Akhmatskaya, D. Sokolovski

The analytical continuation of classical equations of motion to complex times suggests that a tunneling particle spends in the barrier an imaginary duration i|T| . Does this mean that it takes a finite time to tunnel, or should tunneling be seen as an instantaneous process? It is well known that examination of the adiabatic limit in a small additional AC field points towards |T| being the time it takes to traverse the barrier. However, this is only half the story. We probe the transmitted particle's history, and find that it very little of the field's past behavior, as if the transit time were close to zero. The ensuing contradiction suggests that the question is ill posed, and we explain why. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

arXiv:2405.16967•Physical Review Research•May 21, 2024•1 citation

Quantum tunnelling time at long wavelengths

Zheng Shu, Da-Wei Tian, Jing-Yu Zhang +3 more

Abstract Quantum tunnelling is a fundamental phenomenon in quantum physics, yet the question of how long it takes for a particle to tunnel through a barrier remains a topic of ongoing debate. Recent advances in attoclock experimental techniques in strong-field physics have renewed interest in this topic. While various definitions of tunneling time have been proposed, a consensus has yet to be reached. In this study, we adopt a definition of tunnelling time based on the ratio of the barrier width to the expected value of the velocity operator within the barrier. This approach reduces to the Büttiker-Landauer time ($\tau_{BL}$) in the case of an opaque barrier and offers a clear physical interpretation for very thin barriers, where $\tau_{BL}$ may not be well-defined. Additionally, by utilizing a virtual detector at the tunnel exit, we calculate the time delay between the peak of the electric field and the moment of ionization for long wavelengths ($\geq$6 $\mu$m). Our findings indicate that the time delay stabilizes around 190 as, remaining independent of the laser wavelength. Furthermore, through our quantum tunnelling time definition, this time delay can be interpreted as the time required for the electron to tunnel from a point within the barrier to the exit.

Chinese Physics B•Mar 12, 2026•0 citations
Quantum particles interacting with potential barriers are ubiquitous in physics, and the question of how much time they spend inside classically forbidden regions has attracted interest for many decades. Recent developments of new experimental techniques revived the issue and ignited a debate with often contradictory results. This motivates the present study of an exactly solvable model for quantum tunneling induced by a strong field. We show that the tunneling dynamics can depart significantly from the scenario in which the barrier-traversal time is zero or very small. However, our findings do not support the idea of a well-defined tunneling time either. Our numerically exact results should help in finding a consensus about this fundamental problem.
Introduction In classical physics it is meaningful to ask the question, ‘How much time does a particle take to pass through a given region?’ The interesting question in quantum mechanics is: does a particle take a definite time to tunnel through a classically forbidden region? The question has been debated ever since the idea that there was such a time in quantum theory was first put forward by MacColl way back in 1932 [253]. A plethora of times has since then been proposed, and the answer seems to depend on the interpretation of quantum mechanics one uses. A reliable answer is clearly of great importance for the design of high-frequency quantum devices, tunnelling phenomena (as, for example, in scanning tunneling microscopy), nuclear and chemical reactions and, of course, for purely conceptual reasons. Most of the controversies centre around simple and intuitive notions in idealized one-dimensional models in a scattering configuration in which a particle (usually represented by a wave packet) is incident on a potential barrier localized in the interval [ a, b ]. Three kinds of time have been defined in this context. One, called the transmission time τ T ( a, b ), is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually transmitted. Similarly, the reflection time τ R ( a, b ) is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually reflected.
Abstract How long does a quantum particle take to traverse a classically forbidden energy barrier? In other words, what is the correct expression for quantum tunnelling time? This seemingly simple question has inspired widespread debate in the physics literature. I argue that we should not expect the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics to provide a unique correct expression for quantum tunnelling time, because to do so it would have to provide a unique correct answer to a question whose assumptions are in tension with its core interpretational commitments. I explain how this conclusion connects to time’s special status in quantum mechanics, the meaningfulness of classically inspired concepts in different interpretations of quantum mechanics, the prospect of constructing experimental tests to distinguish between different interpretations, and the status of weak measurement in resolving questions about the histories of subensembles.
How long does a quantum particle take to traverse a classically forbidden energy barrier? In other words, what is the correct expression for quantum tunneling time? This seemingly simple question has inspired widespread debate in the physics literature. By drawing an analogy with the double-slit experiment, I argue that we should not even expect the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics to provide an expression for quantum tunneling time. I explain how this conclusion connects to time’s special status in quantum mechanics, the meaningfulness of classically inspired concepts in different interpretations of quantum mechanics, and the prospect of constructing experimental tests to distinguish between different interpretations.
The analytical continuation of classical equations of motion to complex times suggests that a tunneling particle spends in the barrier an imaginary duration i|T| . Does this mean that it takes a finite time to tunnel, or should tunneling be seen as an instantaneous process? It is well known that examination of the adiabatic limit in a small additional AC field points towards |T| being the time it takes to traverse the barrier. However, this is only half the story. We probe the transmitted particle's history, and find that it very little of the field's past behavior, as if the transit time were close to zero. The ensuing contradiction suggests that the question is ill posed, and we explain why. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Abstract Quantum tunnelling is a fundamental phenomenon in quantum physics, yet the question of how long it takes for a particle to tunnel through a barrier remains a topic of ongoing debate. Recent advances in attoclock experimental techniques in strong-field physics have renewed interest in this topic. While various definitions of tunneling time have been proposed, a consensus has yet to be reached. In this study, we adopt a definition of tunnelling time based on the ratio of the barrier width to the expected value of the velocity operator within the barrier. This approach reduces to the Büttiker-Landauer time (τBL\tau_{BL}τBL​) in the case of an opaque barrier and offers a clear physical interpretation for very thin barriers, where τBL\tau_{BL}τBL​ may not be well-defined. Additionally, by utilizing a virtual detector at the tunnel exit, we calculate the time delay between the peak of the electric field and the moment of ionization for long wavelengths ($\geq$6 μ\muμm). Our findings indicate that the time delay stabilizes around 190 as, remaining independent of the laser wavelength. Furthermore, through our quantum tunnelling time definition, this time delay can be interpreted as the time required for the electron to tunnel from a point within the barrier to the exit.