Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

European Journal for Philosophy of Science

On the status of quantum tunnelling time

Grace E. Field

Published Sep 27, 2022• 10 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract How long does a quantum particle take to traverse a classically forbidden energy barrier? In other words, what is the correct expression for quantum tunnelling time? This seemingly simple question has inspired widespread debate in the physics literature. I argue that we should not expect the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics to provide a unique correct expression for quantum tunnelling time, because to do so it would have to provide a unique correct answer to a question whose assumptions are in tension with its core interpretational commitments. I explain how this conclusion connects to time’s special status in quantum mechanics, the meaningfulness of classically inspired concepts in different interpretations of quantum mechanics, the prospect of constructing experimental tests to distinguish between different interpretations, and the status of weak measurement in resolving questions about the histories of subensembles.

DOI
10.1007/s13194-022-00483-9

Related papers

On the status of quantum tunneling times

Grace E. Field

How long does a quantum particle take to traverse a classically forbidden energy barrier? In other words, what is the correct expression for quantum tunneling time? This seemingly simple question has inspired widespread debate in the physics literature. By drawing an analogy with the double-slit experiment, I argue that we should not even expect the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics to provide an expression for quantum tunneling time. I explain how this conclusion connects to time’s special status in quantum mechanics, the meaningfulness of classically inspired concepts in different interpretations of quantum mechanics, and the prospect of constructing experimental tests to distinguish between different interpretations.

•May 21, 2020•0 citations

Quantum tunneling time: Insights from an exactly solvable model

Seyedmohammad Yusofsani, M. Kolesík

Quantum particles interacting with potential barriers are ubiquitous in physics, and the question of how much time they spend inside classically forbidden regions has attracted interest for many decades. Recent developments of new experimental techniques revived the issue and ignited a debate with often contradictory results. This motivates the present study of an exactly solvable model for quantum tunneling induced by a strong field. We show that the tunneling dynamics can depart significantly from the scenario in which the barrier-traversal time is zero or very small. However, our findings do not support the idea of a well-defined tunneling time either. Our numerically exact results should help in finding a consensus about this fundamental problem.

arXiv:2107.01737•Physical Review A•May 27, 2020•20 citations

Imaginary past of a quantum particle moving on imaginary time

Anton Uranga, Elena V. Akhmatskaya, D. Sokolovski

The analytical continuation of classical equations of motion to complex times suggests that a tunneling particle spends in the barrier an imaginary duration i|T| . Does this mean that it takes a finite time to tunnel, or should tunneling be seen as an instantaneous process? It is well known that examination of the adiabatic limit in a small additional AC field points towards |T| being the time it takes to traverse the barrier. However, this is only half the story. We probe the transmitted particle's history, and find that it very little of the field's past behavior, as if the transit time were close to zero. The ensuing contradiction suggests that the question is ill posed, and we explain why. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

arXiv:2405.16967•Physical Review Research•May 21, 2024•1 citation

Measuring the time a tunnelling atom spends in the barrier

Ramos, Ramón, David Spierings, Isabelle Racicot +1 more

Tunnelling is one of the most paradigmatic and evocative phenomena of quantum physics, underlying processes such as photosynthesis and nuclear fusion, as well as devices ranging from SQUID magnetometers to superconducting qubits for quantum computers. The question of how long a particle takes to tunnel, however, has remained controversial since the first attempts to calculate it, which relied on the group delay. It is now well understood that this delay (the arrival time of the transmitted wave packet peak at the far side of the barrier) can be smaller than the barrier thickness divided by the speed of light, without violating causality. There have been a number of experiments confirming this, and even a recent one claiming that tunnelling may take no time at all. There have also been efforts to identify another timescale, which would better describe how long a given particle spends in the barrier region. Here we present a direct measurement of such a time, studying Bose-condensed $^{87}$Rb atoms tunnelling through a 1.3-$μ$m thick optical barrier. By localizing a pseudo-magnetic field inside the barrier, we use the spin precession of the atoms as a clock to measure the time it takes them to cross the classically forbidden region. We find a traversal time of 0.62(7) ms and study its dependence on incident energy. In addition to finally shedding light on the fundamental question of the tunnelling time, this experiment lays the groundwork for addressing deep foundational questions about history in quantum mechanics: for instance, what can we learn about where a particle was at earlier times by observing where it is now?

arXiv:1907.13523•Jul 31, 2019•4 citations

Quantum tunnelling time at long wavelengths

Zheng Shu, Da-Wei Tian, Jing-Yu Zhang +3 more

Abstract Quantum tunnelling is a fundamental phenomenon in quantum physics, yet the question of how long it takes for a particle to tunnel through a barrier remains a topic of ongoing debate. Recent advances in attoclock experimental techniques in strong-field physics have renewed interest in this topic. While various definitions of tunneling time have been proposed, a consensus has yet to be reached. In this study, we adopt a definition of tunnelling time based on the ratio of the barrier width to the expected value of the velocity operator within the barrier. This approach reduces to the Büttiker-Landauer time ($\tau_{BL}$) in the case of an opaque barrier and offers a clear physical interpretation for very thin barriers, where $\tau_{BL}$ may not be well-defined. Additionally, by utilizing a virtual detector at the tunnel exit, we calculate the time delay between the peak of the electric field and the moment of ionization for long wavelengths ($\geq$6 $\mu$m). Our findings indicate that the time delay stabilizes around 190 as, remaining independent of the laser wavelength. Furthermore, through our quantum tunnelling time definition, this time delay can be interpreted as the time required for the electron to tunnel from a point within the barrier to the exit.

Chinese Physics B•Mar 12, 2026•0 citations

Tunnelling Times in Quantum Mechanics

James Puleston

In this essay I survey recent developments in the theory of tunnelling times in quantum mechanics. The study of this concept is polarised depending on one’s interpretation of quantum mechanics, which require different approaches and yield starkly different results. I survey this topic through the lenses of the orthodox (Copenhagen) and de Broglie-Bohm (pilot wave) interpretations, presenting the requisite theory and definitions and expounding the literature of the original authors through proofs and figures. I do this in sections 2 and 3 respectively. Before embarking on tunnelling times as a topic, I survey the conceptual aspects of how time is treated in classical and quantum mechanics. This topic has many subtle aspects which have hindered progress in understanding tunnelling times in the past. In this essay I hope to demonstrate the success that has been achieved in recent years, but also that further theoretical and experimental work is required, if we are to arrive at a universally accepted definition of tunnelling times in quantum mechanics - if indeed such a definition exists.

•May 14, 2020•0 citations
Abstract How long does a quantum particle take to traverse a classically forbidden energy barrier? In other words, what is the correct expression for quantum tunnelling time? This seemingly simple question has inspired widespread debate in the physics literature. I argue that we should not expect the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics to provide a unique correct expression for quantum tunnelling time, because to do so it would have to provide a unique correct answer to a question whose assumptions are in tension with its core interpretational commitments. I explain how this conclusion connects to time’s special status in quantum mechanics, the meaningfulness of classically inspired concepts in different interpretations of quantum mechanics, the prospect of constructing experimental tests to distinguish between different interpretations, and the status of weak measurement in resolving questions about the histories of subensembles.
How long does a quantum particle take to traverse a classically forbidden energy barrier? In other words, what is the correct expression for quantum tunneling time? This seemingly simple question has inspired widespread debate in the physics literature. By drawing an analogy with the double-slit experiment, I argue that we should not even expect the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics to provide an expression for quantum tunneling time. I explain how this conclusion connects to time’s special status in quantum mechanics, the meaningfulness of classically inspired concepts in different interpretations of quantum mechanics, and the prospect of constructing experimental tests to distinguish between different interpretations.
Quantum particles interacting with potential barriers are ubiquitous in physics, and the question of how much time they spend inside classically forbidden regions has attracted interest for many decades. Recent developments of new experimental techniques revived the issue and ignited a debate with often contradictory results. This motivates the present study of an exactly solvable model for quantum tunneling induced by a strong field. We show that the tunneling dynamics can depart significantly from the scenario in which the barrier-traversal time is zero or very small. However, our findings do not support the idea of a well-defined tunneling time either. Our numerically exact results should help in finding a consensus about this fundamental problem.
The analytical continuation of classical equations of motion to complex times suggests that a tunneling particle spends in the barrier an imaginary duration i|T| . Does this mean that it takes a finite time to tunnel, or should tunneling be seen as an instantaneous process? It is well known that examination of the adiabatic limit in a small additional AC field points towards |T| being the time it takes to traverse the barrier. However, this is only half the story. We probe the transmitted particle's history, and find that it very little of the field's past behavior, as if the transit time were close to zero. The ensuing contradiction suggests that the question is ill posed, and we explain why. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Tunnelling is one of the most paradigmatic and evocative phenomena of quantum physics, underlying processes such as photosynthesis and nuclear fusion, as well as devices ranging from SQUID magnetometers to superconducting qubits for quantum computers. The question of how long a particle takes to tunnel, however, has remained controversial since the first attempts to calculate it, which relied on the group delay. It is now well understood that this delay (the arrival time of the transmitted wave packet peak at the far side of the barrier) can be smaller than the barrier thickness divided by the speed of light, without violating causality. There have been a number of experiments confirming this, and even a recent one claiming that tunnelling may take no time at all. There have also been efforts to identify another timescale, which would better describe how long a given particle spends in the barrier region. Here we present a direct measurement of such a time, studying Bose-condensed 87^{87}87Rb atoms tunnelling through a 1.3-μμμm thick optical barrier. By localizing a pseudo-magnetic field inside the barrier, we use the spin precession of the atoms as a clock to measure the time it takes them to cross the classically forbidden region. We find a traversal time of 0.62(7) ms and study its dependence on incident energy. In addition to finally shedding light on the fundamental question of the tunnelling time, this experiment lays the groundwork for addressing deep foundational questions about history in quantum mechanics: for instance, what can we learn about where a particle was at earlier times by observing where it is now?
Abstract Quantum tunnelling is a fundamental phenomenon in quantum physics, yet the question of how long it takes for a particle to tunnel through a barrier remains a topic of ongoing debate. Recent advances in attoclock experimental techniques in strong-field physics have renewed interest in this topic. While various definitions of tunneling time have been proposed, a consensus has yet to be reached. In this study, we adopt a definition of tunnelling time based on the ratio of the barrier width to the expected value of the velocity operator within the barrier. This approach reduces to the Büttiker-Landauer time (τBL\tau_{BL}τBL​) in the case of an opaque barrier and offers a clear physical interpretation for very thin barriers, where τBL\tau_{BL}τBL​ may not be well-defined. Additionally, by utilizing a virtual detector at the tunnel exit, we calculate the time delay between the peak of the electric field and the moment of ionization for long wavelengths ($\geq$6 μ\muμm). Our findings indicate that the time delay stabilizes around 190 as, remaining independent of the laser wavelength. Furthermore, through our quantum tunnelling time definition, this time delay can be interpreted as the time required for the electron to tunnel from a point within the barrier to the exit.
In this essay I survey recent developments in the theory of tunnelling times in quantum mechanics. The study of this concept is polarised depending on one’s interpretation of quantum mechanics, which require different approaches and yield starkly different results. I survey this topic through the lenses of the orthodox (Copenhagen) and de Broglie-Bohm (pilot wave) interpretations, presenting the requisite theory and definitions and expounding the literature of the original authors through proofs and figures. I do this in sections 2 and 3 respectively. Before embarking on tunnelling times as a topic, I survey the conceptual aspects of how time is treated in classical and quantum mechanics. This topic has many subtle aspects which have hindered progress in understanding tunnelling times in the past. In this essay I hope to demonstrate the success that has been achieved in recent years, but also that further theoretical and experimental work is required, if we are to arrive at a universally accepted definition of tunnelling times in quantum mechanics - if indeed such a definition exists.