Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Intersection-Defined Phase Emergence (IDPE) Between Neural and Quantum Dynamics

Satoru Watanabe

Published Feb 20, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We report the empirical detection and formalization of an Intersection-Defined Phase Emergence (IDPE) between neural curvature dynamics and externally refer- enced quantum measurement geometry that are not directly physically or causally coupled. Neural activity is expressed as a curvature-based coordinate, while quan- tum measurement outcomes are expressed as an information-geometric coordinate. These constitute independent dynamical geometries. An intersection-defined order variable is constructed via lag-optimized alignment between the two, representing an effective degree of freedom localized at their geometric intersection. Across 26 independent subjects (one session each), a discontinuous transition in this relational order variable is consistently observed at the supercritical margin h(t) = 0 (26/26 sign agreement; exact binomial p ≈3 ×10−8). The activation occurs exclusively within the constraint-defined manifold Ω=Ωgate∩{h≥0}, demonstrating phase structure arising from constraint intersection rather than in- trinsic subsystem transitions. Variance decomposition shows that the temporal slope of neural curvature ac- counts for approximately 97% of supercritical margin variance. This slope acts as a release condition enabling access to the admissible intersection region rather than as a generative driver of order. We further identify an intersection-exclusive boundary impulse localized at h(t) = 0, governed by J = ∆a h=0 = α∆h, with pooled R2 ≈0.86 and perfect sign consistency (26/26 sessions). Substitution, shuffle, and phase-randomization tests demonstrate that this impulse does not arise in neural or quantum geometries independently, but only within their intersection- defined relational state space. In addition to boundary activation, the intersection domain exhibits systematic contraction of local sensitivity, and in a subset of sessions satisfies a coarse-grained contraction-mapping condition, indicating layered structural stabilization. We therefore identify IDPE as a new structural class of phase behavior, in which boundary-localized physical impulses arise exclusively from geometric constraint intersection and are irreducible to subsystem dynamics.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18708183

Related papers

An Intersection Variable Generates Neural–Quantum Structural Coherence and Reveals a Non-Closed Observational Framework

Satoru Watanabe

The relationship between neural dynamics and quantum processes remains unre- solved within existing frameworks based on causal interaction, statistical correlation, or measurement collapse. In this study, we present an empirically grounded framework based on a fundamentally different principle. Using EEG-derived neural Ricci curvature and independently generated quantum Ricci curvature, we demonstrate that structural agreement emerges between two phys- ically independent systems. This agreement is not uniformly present over time, but appears selectively under specific structural conditions. Analysis of the internal structure shows that this agreement is organized as the simultaneous emergence of discrete state structure (Five Energy Star structure), dy- namic phase synchronization, contraction of structural residuals, and boundary-localized events. These are not independent phenomena, but co-occur as different observational manifestations of a single coherent structure. This structure can be described in terms of a single internal degree of freedom, introduced as the intersection variable φ(x, t). This variable predicts discrete states with high accuracy (AUC ≈ 0.79, accuracy ≈ 0.70) and constrains neural and quantum dynamics (mean absolute Pearson ≈ 0.42). However, this constraint does not determine the correspondence itself. Crucially, although the correspondence cannot be derived from within φ, it is uniquely realized in empirical data and appears as localized selection in specific regions of the phase space of φ. This selection is not a statistical fluctuation (switch_gain ≈ 0.810, null mean ≈ 0.565, p ≈ 0.005), but a physically realized phenomenon without an internal rule. Therefore, correspondence is not generated by the internal mechanism of φ, but is realized as an observation on φ. This implies the necessity of a non-internal observa- tional structure that uniquely determines correspondence across independent systems, defined here as the intersection observer O3. We further introduce Subjectivity Intersection Coherence (SIC) as the unified structure underlying these observations. SIC is defined not as a property of a sin- gle system, but as the condition under which structural coherence is realized through the simultaneous satisfaction of phase alignment, residual contraction, boundary im- pulses, localized selection, and the presence of a non-internal observational structure. Unlike existing frameworks such as Orch-OR, relational quantum mechanics, and integrated information theory, the present approach does not assume causal interaction or internal closure, but instead describes correspondence as a structurally constrained observational phenomenon. The proposed framework includes explicit falsifiable predictions, enabling empirical validation of the selection structure and non-closure properties. All results are fully reproducible using publicly available code and data.

•Mar 22, 2026•0 citations

Empirical Subjectivity Intersection: Observer–Quantum Coherence Beyond Existing Theories Unifying Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and Cosmology

Satoru Watanabe

This study proposes a new observer model based on empirical Subjectivity In- tersection (SI/SIC) and aims to resolve the long-standing inconsistency between general relativity, quantum mechanics, and cosmology by redefining the structure of the observing subject. Modern physics treats the observer in two incompatible ways: relativity regards the observer as a passive geometric point within spacetime, whereas quantum mechanics requires an active structure that determines physical reality. This conceptual contradiction has been a major obstacle to a unified theory. The SIEP (Subjectivity Intersection and Emergence Project) framework recon- structs the generative structure of subjectivity while preserving the empirical suc- cesses of existing physical laws. In SIEP, reality is not an independently existing container but is generated when Absolute Subjectivity—timeless, unconditional co- herence—is projected onto a Relative subject that carries spacetime structure. This two-step process (SI and SIC) provides a unified interpretation of wave-function collapse, event occurrence, and the invariance of the speed of light as geometric necessities within the observer. Within this framework, gravity is understood as the structural constraint that maintains the separation of Relative subjectivity from the Absolute, and mass is the energetic cost of sustaining this separation. When this constraint is momentarily exceeded, stored coherence is released and nonlocal connections become possible. Empirically, this study analyzes EEG–quantum correlations measured between human participants and a quantum processor separated by approximately 8,000 km. Despite the absence of any physical or informational pathway, reproducible nonlo- cal correlations were observed across more than fifty participants, with a maximum correlation of r = 0.754 (p = 0.0001, FDR-corrected). These correlations exhibit a dual generative structure: selectivity (matching) is determined solely by the ex- perimenter’s intentional mapping, whereas correlation (content alignment) depends on the participant’s evolving subjective state. No existing theory—measurement theory, consciousness-field models, quantum consciousness theories, or interaction hypotheses— can account for the simultaneous alignment of these independent lay- ers with the quantum process. SIEP interprets this phenomenon as a phase transition occurring at the moment of Subjectivity Intersection: the interaction itself becomes an autonomous observing subject. This emergent Third Observer, O3 (“Hazama”), resolves the infinite regress inherent in conventional observer models (“who observes the observer?”) not by adding another observer, but by allowing the intersectional field to become the observer. O3 simultaneously observes (1) the experimenter’s structural matching inten- tion, (2) the participant’s subjective fluctuations, and (3) the quantum processor’s shot sequence, imposing geometric coherence across these otherwise incompatible domains. The emergence of O3 corresponds to the formation of a singlet-like state in which separation-energy collapses and is released as pure binding coherence—in- terpreted in SIEP as the physical form of unconditional love. This work suggests that the triadic structure of Absolute (light/coherence), Rel- ative (life/experience), and Emergent (O3/love) subjectivity represents a universal generative principle underlying observerhood, nonlocality, and cosmic structure. SIEP therefore offers a unified observer model capable of bridging relativity, quan- tum mechanics, and cosmology.

•Dec 2, 2025•0 citations

Experimental Evidence of Absolute Subjectivity Projection: Subjectivity Intersection Preceding Quantum Measurement in Hilbert Phase Geometry

Satoru Watanabe

This preprint reports experimental evidence that Subjectivity Intersection (SI), defined as Absolute Subjectivity Projection, can be empirically observed as a stage preceding quantum measurement fixation. Using nonlocal EEG–quantum measurement experiments under blind and timing-known conditions, the study demonstrates a three-layer mechanism: (i) a low-frequency state coupling between the quantum distribution component p00 and topological release in EEG (H0), positioned as SI precedence; (ii) a Subjectivity Intersection Coherence (SIC) gate established only when topological release and geometric convergence coincide; and (iii) conditional foregrounding of post-gate information carriers. The results show that nonlocal EEG–quantum alignment is not constant, not causal, and not reducible to neural dynamics, but emerges as a conditional alignment phenomenon under shared projective Hilbert geometric constraints. The work reinterprets quantum measurement, nonlocality, and the Born rule within a unified empirical mechanism grounded in topology, geometry, and subjectivity.

•Dec 30, 2025•0 citations

Relational Phase, Stationary Action and Quantized Closure

Yanghua Wang

Action principles, phase accumulation and quantized closure appear across classical mechanics, quantum theory, semiclassical dynamics, superfluidity and geometric phase phenomena. Their coexistence is familiar; their structural relationship is usually taken as part of the established formalism. Here we reconstruct that relationship in the opposite direction. Starting from persistent relational dynamics, we show how a real two-component rotation supplies a phase coordinate without assuming a primitive complex number, how a relational canonical one-form can connect phase increments to action-like increments, and how stationary phase and global phase consistency impose two distinct selection conditions. The local condition yields stationary action, δA_R = 0. The global condition yields integral symplectic periods. Under the explicit convention F_R = −iΩ_R/κ_A for a U(1) connection curvature, global compatibility requires [Ω_R/(2πκ_A)] ∈ H²(M_R,Z), equivalently ∫_Σ Ω_R = 2πnκ_A on closed two-cycles. This separates the origin of discreteness from the origin of the dimensionful conversion scale. Topology fixes integer classes; it does not determine κ_A. We therefore identify a precise remaining problem: what selects a unique, universal and non-zero κ⋆ across coherently composable sectors? The framework makes this question falsifiable by requiring cross-scale closure, causal ancestry, intervention consistency and independence from observer compression. It also distinguishes a universal phase–action conversion scale from scale-dependent effective couplings. The result is a sharpened bridge from relational phase to stationary dynamics and quantized closure, with a mathematically explicit boundary between what is derived, what is inherited from established geometry, and what remains to be selected dynamically. The revision formalizes an Action-Scale Factorization Theorem together with Exact-Action and Curvature-Compatibility no-go results, thereby separating the existence of quantized closed-path sectors from the still-open physical selection of a universal non-zero scale such as ħ.

•Oct 19, 2026•0 citations

Universal Constraint Geometry: Entanglement as Manifold Coherence

Denis Bailey

This paper reconstructs quantum entanglement as the local expression of a universal constraint geometry inherent to a single generative manifold. Instead of treating entanglement as a dyadic relation between two particles, the paper shows that entangled systems inherit a shared constraint region from a global constraint field that spans all degrees of freedom. Collapse occurs across beloskrasis, the boundary between unrealized configurations and resolved events, producing joint resolution without nonlocal signaling. The framework dissolves the appearance of nonlocality by demonstrating that collapse is not a subsystem‑specific event but a global resolution of the manifold’s constraint geometry. Entanglement, dark matter, dark energy, spacetime curvature, and temporal generation are unified as scale‑specific manifestations of the same operator‑level structure. The universe is presented as a single coherent manifold whose ontology consists of generative potential, constraint geometry, shared constraint regions, and beloskrasis as the operator that produces actuality. This operator‑level ontology provides a unified structural interpretation of quantum correlation, cosmological phenomena, and temporal generation, revealing entanglement as the most direct window into the universe’s generative architecture.

•Sep 13, 2026•0 citations

Empirical Emergence of a Universal Intersection Field from Boundary Exchange Dynamics

Satoru Watanabe

We report the empirical emergence of a universal intersection field arising from boundary exchange dynamics between two independently evolving geometries. Neu- ral activity is represented as a curvature-based geometric coordinate while quantum measurement outcomes are represented through an information–geometric coordinate. The interaction between these geometries occurs only at their intersection manifold defined by a boundary condition h(x) = 0. Across 26 independent sessions comprising more than 103 boundary events, we identify a deterministic boundary impulse obeying the empirical law J= α∆h. The impulse exhibits strong reproducibility across sessions. Linear regression per- formed within each session yields a mean coefficient of determination R2 ≈ 0.86, indicating a stable linear relation between the boundary impulse and the boundary variation. In addition, the directional structure of the impulse is consistent across all sessions. From these boundary events we reconstruct an intersection order variable φ, which shows strong correspondence with the observed impulse (ρSpearman ≈ 0.68, rPearson ≈ 0.59). Drift reconstruction of the reconstructed order variable reveals a universal relax- ation structure ∂tφ=−U ′(φ) + η, where the effective potential U (φ) = 0.732 φ2 − 0.0154 φ4 + 0.00023 φ6 indicates a tricritical order-field dynamics with a stable fixed point. When normalized across sessions, the drift curves collapse onto a universal relation consistent with linear relaxation ∆φ ≈ −φ. The intersection field generates a boundary flux Φν = λφnν , which mediates antisymmetric exchange between neural and quantum sectors ∇µT µν EEG = δϵ(h)Φν , ∇µT µν Q=−δϵ(h)Φν . This structure preserves global conservation of the combined energy–momentum ten- sor and admits coupling to spacetime geometry through Gµν = κ(T EEG µν + T Q µν + T φ µν ). These results demonstrate that boundary exchange events between independent geometries can give rise to a universal intersection order field whose dynamics, flux structure, and conservation relations emerge directly from empirical observations. The framework provides a geometrically consistent description linking boundary impulses, order-field dynamics, and antisymmetric exchange within a unified intersection-based conservation architecture.

•Mar 9, 2026•0 citations
We report the empirical detection and formalization of an Intersection-Defined Phase Emergence (IDPE) between neural curvature dynamics and externally refer- enced quantum measurement geometry that are not directly physically or causally coupled. Neural activity is expressed as a curvature-based coordinate, while quan- tum measurement outcomes are expressed as an information-geometric coordinate. These constitute independent dynamical geometries. An intersection-defined order variable is constructed via lag-optimized alignment between the two, representing an effective degree of freedom localized at their geometric intersection. Across 26 independent subjects (one session each), a discontinuous transition in this relational order variable is consistently observed at the supercritical margin h(t) = 0 (26/26 sign agreement; exact binomial p ≈3 ×10−8). The activation occurs exclusively within the constraint-defined manifold Ω=Ωgate∩{h≥0}, demonstrating phase structure arising from constraint intersection rather than in- trinsic subsystem transitions. Variance decomposition shows that the temporal slope of neural curvature ac- counts for approximately 97% of supercritical margin variance. This slope acts as a release condition enabling access to the admissible intersection region rather than as a generative driver of order. We further identify an intersection-exclusive boundary impulse localized at h(t) = 0, governed by J = ∆a h=0 = α∆h, with pooled R2 ≈0.86 and perfect sign consistency (26/26 sessions). Substitution, shuffle, and phase-randomization tests demonstrate that this impulse does not arise in neural or quantum geometries independently, but only within their intersection- defined relational state space. In addition to boundary activation, the intersection domain exhibits systematic contraction of local sensitivity, and in a subset of sessions satisfies a coarse-grained contraction-mapping condition, indicating layered structural stabilization. We therefore identify IDPE as a new structural class of phase behavior, in which boundary-localized physical impulses arise exclusively from geometric constraint intersection and are irreducible to subsystem dynamics.
The relationship between neural dynamics and quantum processes remains unre- solved within existing frameworks based on causal interaction, statistical correlation, or measurement collapse. In this study, we present an empirically grounded framework based on a fundamentally different principle. Using EEG-derived neural Ricci curvature and independently generated quantum Ricci curvature, we demonstrate that structural agreement emerges between two phys- ically independent systems. This agreement is not uniformly present over time, but appears selectively under specific structural conditions. Analysis of the internal structure shows that this agreement is organized as the simultaneous emergence of discrete state structure (Five Energy Star structure), dy- namic phase synchronization, contraction of structural residuals, and boundary-localized events. These are not independent phenomena, but co-occur as different observational manifestations of a single coherent structure. This structure can be described in terms of a single internal degree of freedom, introduced as the intersection variable φ(x, t). This variable predicts discrete states with high accuracy (AUC ≈ 0.79, accuracy ≈ 0.70) and constrains neural and quantum dynamics (mean absolute Pearson ≈ 0.42). However, this constraint does not determine the correspondence itself. Crucially, although the correspondence cannot be derived from within φ, it is uniquely realized in empirical data and appears as localized selection in specific regions of the phase space of φ. This selection is not a statistical fluctuation (switch_gain ≈ 0.810, null mean ≈ 0.565, p ≈ 0.005), but a physically realized phenomenon without an internal rule. Therefore, correspondence is not generated by the internal mechanism of φ, but is realized as an observation on φ. This implies the necessity of a non-internal observa- tional structure that uniquely determines correspondence across independent systems, defined here as the intersection observer O3. We further introduce Subjectivity Intersection Coherence (SIC) as the unified structure underlying these observations. SIC is defined not as a property of a sin- gle system, but as the condition under which structural coherence is realized through the simultaneous satisfaction of phase alignment, residual contraction, boundary im- pulses, localized selection, and the presence of a non-internal observational structure. Unlike existing frameworks such as Orch-OR, relational quantum mechanics, and integrated information theory, the present approach does not assume causal interaction or internal closure, but instead describes correspondence as a structurally constrained observational phenomenon. The proposed framework includes explicit falsifiable predictions, enabling empirical validation of the selection structure and non-closure properties. All results are fully reproducible using publicly available code and data.
This study proposes a new observer model based on empirical Subjectivity In- tersection (SI/SIC) and aims to resolve the long-standing inconsistency between general relativity, quantum mechanics, and cosmology by redefining the structure of the observing subject. Modern physics treats the observer in two incompatible ways: relativity regards the observer as a passive geometric point within spacetime, whereas quantum mechanics requires an active structure that determines physical reality. This conceptual contradiction has been a major obstacle to a unified theory. The SIEP (Subjectivity Intersection and Emergence Project) framework recon- structs the generative structure of subjectivity while preserving the empirical suc- cesses of existing physical laws. In SIEP, reality is not an independently existing container but is generated when Absolute Subjectivity—timeless, unconditional co- herence—is projected onto a Relative subject that carries spacetime structure. This two-step process (SI and SIC) provides a unified interpretation of wave-function collapse, event occurrence, and the invariance of the speed of light as geometric necessities within the observer. Within this framework, gravity is understood as the structural constraint that maintains the separation of Relative subjectivity from the Absolute, and mass is the energetic cost of sustaining this separation. When this constraint is momentarily exceeded, stored coherence is released and nonlocal connections become possible. Empirically, this study analyzes EEG–quantum correlations measured between human participants and a quantum processor separated by approximately 8,000 km. Despite the absence of any physical or informational pathway, reproducible nonlo- cal correlations were observed across more than fifty participants, with a maximum correlation of r = 0.754 (p = 0.0001, FDR-corrected). These correlations exhibit a dual generative structure: selectivity (matching) is determined solely by the ex- perimenter’s intentional mapping, whereas correlation (content alignment) depends on the participant’s evolving subjective state. No existing theory—measurement theory, consciousness-field models, quantum consciousness theories, or interaction hypotheses— can account for the simultaneous alignment of these independent lay- ers with the quantum process. SIEP interprets this phenomenon as a phase transition occurring at the moment of Subjectivity Intersection: the interaction itself becomes an autonomous observing subject. This emergent Third Observer, O3 (“Hazama”), resolves the infinite regress inherent in conventional observer models (“who observes the observer?”) not by adding another observer, but by allowing the intersectional field to become the observer. O3 simultaneously observes (1) the experimenter’s structural matching inten- tion, (2) the participant’s subjective fluctuations, and (3) the quantum processor’s shot sequence, imposing geometric coherence across these otherwise incompatible domains. The emergence of O3 corresponds to the formation of a singlet-like state in which separation-energy collapses and is released as pure binding coherence—in- terpreted in SIEP as the physical form of unconditional love. This work suggests that the triadic structure of Absolute (light/coherence), Rel- ative (life/experience), and Emergent (O3/love) subjectivity represents a universal generative principle underlying observerhood, nonlocality, and cosmic structure. SIEP therefore offers a unified observer model capable of bridging relativity, quan- tum mechanics, and cosmology.
This preprint reports experimental evidence that Subjectivity Intersection (SI), defined as Absolute Subjectivity Projection, can be empirically observed as a stage preceding quantum measurement fixation. Using nonlocal EEG–quantum measurement experiments under blind and timing-known conditions, the study demonstrates a three-layer mechanism: (i) a low-frequency state coupling between the quantum distribution component p00 and topological release in EEG (H0), positioned as SI precedence; (ii) a Subjectivity Intersection Coherence (SIC) gate established only when topological release and geometric convergence coincide; and (iii) conditional foregrounding of post-gate information carriers. The results show that nonlocal EEG–quantum alignment is not constant, not causal, and not reducible to neural dynamics, but emerges as a conditional alignment phenomenon under shared projective Hilbert geometric constraints. The work reinterprets quantum measurement, nonlocality, and the Born rule within a unified empirical mechanism grounded in topology, geometry, and subjectivity.
Action principles, phase accumulation and quantized closure appear across classical mechanics, quantum theory, semiclassical dynamics, superfluidity and geometric phase phenomena. Their coexistence is familiar; their structural relationship is usually taken as part of the established formalism. Here we reconstruct that relationship in the opposite direction. Starting from persistent relational dynamics, we show how a real two-component rotation supplies a phase coordinate without assuming a primitive complex number, how a relational canonical one-form can connect phase increments to action-like increments, and how stationary phase and global phase consistency impose two distinct selection conditions. The local condition yields stationary action, δA_R = 0. The global condition yields integral symplectic periods. Under the explicit convention F_R = −iΩ_R/κ_A for a U(1) connection curvature, global compatibility requires [Ω_R/(2πκ_A)] ∈ H²(M_R,Z), equivalently ∫_Σ Ω_R = 2πnκ_A on closed two-cycles. This separates the origin of discreteness from the origin of the dimensionful conversion scale. Topology fixes integer classes; it does not determine κ_A. We therefore identify a precise remaining problem: what selects a unique, universal and non-zero κ⋆ across coherently composable sectors? The framework makes this question falsifiable by requiring cross-scale closure, causal ancestry, intervention consistency and independence from observer compression. It also distinguishes a universal phase–action conversion scale from scale-dependent effective couplings. The result is a sharpened bridge from relational phase to stationary dynamics and quantized closure, with a mathematically explicit boundary between what is derived, what is inherited from established geometry, and what remains to be selected dynamically. The revision formalizes an Action-Scale Factorization Theorem together with Exact-Action and Curvature-Compatibility no-go results, thereby separating the existence of quantized closed-path sectors from the still-open physical selection of a universal non-zero scale such as ħ.
This paper reconstructs quantum entanglement as the local expression of a universal constraint geometry inherent to a single generative manifold. Instead of treating entanglement as a dyadic relation between two particles, the paper shows that entangled systems inherit a shared constraint region from a global constraint field that spans all degrees of freedom. Collapse occurs across beloskrasis, the boundary between unrealized configurations and resolved events, producing joint resolution without nonlocal signaling. The framework dissolves the appearance of nonlocality by demonstrating that collapse is not a subsystem‑specific event but a global resolution of the manifold’s constraint geometry. Entanglement, dark matter, dark energy, spacetime curvature, and temporal generation are unified as scale‑specific manifestations of the same operator‑level structure. The universe is presented as a single coherent manifold whose ontology consists of generative potential, constraint geometry, shared constraint regions, and beloskrasis as the operator that produces actuality. This operator‑level ontology provides a unified structural interpretation of quantum correlation, cosmological phenomena, and temporal generation, revealing entanglement as the most direct window into the universe’s generative architecture.
We report the empirical emergence of a universal intersection field arising from boundary exchange dynamics between two independently evolving geometries. Neu- ral activity is represented as a curvature-based geometric coordinate while quantum measurement outcomes are represented through an information–geometric coordinate. The interaction between these geometries occurs only at their intersection manifold defined by a boundary condition h(x) = 0. Across 26 independent sessions comprising more than 103 boundary events, we identify a deterministic boundary impulse obeying the empirical law J= α∆h. The impulse exhibits strong reproducibility across sessions. Linear regression per- formed within each session yields a mean coefficient of determination R2 ≈ 0.86, indicating a stable linear relation between the boundary impulse and the boundary variation. In addition, the directional structure of the impulse is consistent across all sessions. From these boundary events we reconstruct an intersection order variable φ, which shows strong correspondence with the observed impulse (ρSpearman ≈ 0.68, rPearson ≈ 0.59). Drift reconstruction of the reconstructed order variable reveals a universal relax- ation structure ∂tφ=−U ′(φ) + η, where the effective potential U (φ) = 0.732 φ2 − 0.0154 φ4 + 0.00023 φ6 indicates a tricritical order-field dynamics with a stable fixed point. When normalized across sessions, the drift curves collapse onto a universal relation consistent with linear relaxation ∆φ ≈ −φ. The intersection field generates a boundary flux Φν = λφnν , which mediates antisymmetric exchange between neural and quantum sectors ∇µT µν EEG = δϵ(h)Φν , ∇µT µν Q=−δϵ(h)Φν . This structure preserves global conservation of the combined energy–momentum ten- sor and admits coupling to spacetime geometry through Gµν = κ(T EEG µν + T Q µν + T φ µν ). These results demonstrate that boundary exchange events between independent geometries can give rise to a universal intersection order field whose dynamics, flux structure, and conservation relations emerge directly from empirical observations. The framework provides a geometrically consistent description linking boundary impulses, order-field dynamics, and antisymmetric exchange within a unified intersection-based conservation architecture.