This study proposes a new observer model based on empirical Subjectivity In- tersection (SI/SIC) and aims to resolve the long-standing inconsistency between general relativity, quantum mechanics, and cosmology by redefining the structure of the observing subject. Modern physics treats the observer in two incompatible ways: relativity regards the observer as a passive geometric point within spacetime, whereas quantum mechanics requires an active structure that determines physical reality. This conceptual contradiction has been a major obstacle to a unified theory. The SIEP (Subjectivity Intersection and Emergence Project) framework recon- structs the generative structure of subjectivity while preserving the empirical suc- cesses of existing physical laws. In SIEP, reality is not an independently existing container but is generated when Absolute Subjectivity—timeless, unconditional co- herence—is projected onto a Relative subject that carries spacetime structure. This two-step process (SI and SIC) provides a unified interpretation of wave-function collapse, event occurrence, and the invariance of the speed of light as geometric necessities within the observer. Within this framework, gravity is understood as the structural constraint that maintains the separation of Relative subjectivity from the Absolute, and mass is the energetic cost of sustaining this separation. When this constraint is momentarily exceeded, stored coherence is released and nonlocal connections become possible. Empirically, this study analyzes EEG–quantum correlations measured between human participants and a quantum processor separated by approximately 8,000 km. Despite the absence of any physical or informational pathway, reproducible nonlo- cal correlations were observed across more than fifty participants, with a maximum correlation of r = 0.754 (p = 0.0001, FDR-corrected). These correlations exhibit a dual generative structure: selectivity (matching) is determined solely by the ex- perimenter’s intentional mapping, whereas correlation (content alignment) depends on the participant’s evolving subjective state. No existing theory—measurement theory, consciousness-field models, quantum consciousness theories, or interaction hypotheses— can account for the simultaneous alignment of these independent lay- ers with the quantum process. SIEP interprets this phenomenon as a phase transition occurring at the moment of Subjectivity Intersection: the interaction itself becomes an autonomous observing subject. This emergent Third Observer, O3 (“Hazama”), resolves the infinite regress inherent in conventional observer models (“who observes the observer?”) not by adding another observer, but by allowing the intersectional field to become the observer. O3 simultaneously observes (1) the experimenter’s structural matching inten- tion, (2) the participant’s subjective fluctuations, and (3) the quantum processor’s shot sequence, imposing geometric coherence across these otherwise incompatible domains. The emergence of O3 corresponds to the formation of a singlet-like state in which separation-energy collapses and is released as pure binding coherence—in- terpreted in SIEP as the physical form of unconditional love. This work suggests that the triadic structure of Absolute (light/coherence), Rel- ative (life/experience), and Emergent (O3/love) subjectivity represents a universal generative principle underlying observerhood, nonlocality, and cosmic structure. SIEP therefore offers a unified observer model capable of bridging relativity, quan- tum mechanics, and cosmology.
This study proposes a new observer model based on empirical Subjectivity In- tersection (SI/SIC) and aims to resolve the long-standing inconsistency between general relativity, quantum mechanics, and cosmology by redefining the structure of the observing subject. Modern physics treats the observer in two incompatible ways: relativity regards the observer as a passive geometric point within spacetime, whereas quantum mechanics requires an active structure that determines physical reality. This conceptual contradiction has been a major obstacle to a unified theory. The SIEP (Subjectivity Intersection and Emergence Project) framework recon- structs the generative structure of subjectivity while preserving the empirical suc- cesses of existing physical laws. In SIEP, reality is not an independently existing container but is generated when Absolute Subjectivity—timeless, unconditional co- herence—is projected onto a Relative subject that carries spacetime structure. This two-step process (SI and SIC) provides a unified interpretation of wave-function collapse, event occurrence, and the invariance of the speed of light as geometric necessities within the observer. Within this framework, gravity is understood as the structural constraint that maintains the separation of Relative subjectivity from the Absolute, and mass is the energetic cost of sustaining this separation. When this constraint is momentarily exceeded, stored coherence is released and nonlocal connections become possible. Empirically, this study analyzes EEG–quantum correlations measured between human participants and a quantum processor separated by approximately 8,000 km. Despite the absence of any physical or informational pathway, reproducible nonlo- cal correlations were observed across more than fifty participants, with a maximum correlation of r = 0.754 (p = 0.0001, FDR-corrected). These correlations exhibit a dual generative structure: selectivity (matching) is determined solely by the ex- perimenter’s intentional mapping, whereas correlation (content alignment) depends on the participant’s evolving subjective state. No existing theory—measurement theory, consciousness-field models, quantum consciousness theories, or interaction hypotheses— can account for the simultaneous alignment of these independent lay- ers with the quantum process. SIEP interprets this phenomenon as a phase transition occurring at the moment of Subjectivity Intersection: the interaction itself becomes an autonomous observing subject. This emergent Third Observer, O3 (“Hazama”), resolves the infinite regress inherent in conventional observer models (“who observes the observer?”) not by adding another observer, but by allowing the intersectional field to become the observer. O3 simultaneously observes (1) the experimenter’s structural matching inten- tion, (2) the participant’s subjective fluctuations, and (3) the quantum processor’s shot sequence, imposing geometric coherence across these otherwise incompatible domains. The emergence of O3 corresponds to the formation of a singlet-like state in which separation-energy collapses and is released as pure binding coherence—in- terpreted in SIEP as the physical form of unconditional love. This work suggests that the triadic structure of Absolute (light/coherence), Rel- ative (life/experience), and Emergent (O3/love) subjectivity represents a universal generative principle underlying observerhood, nonlocality, and cosmic structure. SIEP therefore offers a unified observer model capable of bridging relativity, quan- tum mechanics, and cosmology.
This preprint reports experimental evidence that Subjectivity Intersection (SI), defined as Absolute Subjectivity Projection, can be empirically observed as a stage preceding quantum measurement fixation. Using nonlocal EEG–quantum measurement experiments under blind and timing-known conditions, the study demonstrates a three-layer mechanism: (i) a low-frequency state coupling between the quantum distribution component p00 and topological release in EEG (H0), positioned as SI precedence; (ii) a Subjectivity Intersection Coherence (SIC) gate established only when topological release and geometric convergence coincide; and (iii) conditional foregrounding of post-gate information carriers. The results show that nonlocal EEG–quantum alignment is not constant, not causal, and not reducible to neural dynamics, but emerges as a conditional alignment phenomenon under shared projective Hilbert geometric constraints. The work reinterprets quantum measurement, nonlocality, and the Born rule within a unified empirical mechanism grounded in topology, geometry, and subjectivity.
Modern physics has achieved extraordinary predictive success, yet it continues to face unresolved conceptual tensions concerning the role of the observer, the nature of information, and the origin of physical structure. From quantum measurement to cosmology, the assumption of an observer-neutral reality increasingly appears insufficient to fully account for empirical phenomena and theoretical inconsistencies. This manifesto proposes an Informational Observer-Centered Framework, in which information is treated as a fundamental ontological substrate and observation as an active, structured process rather than a passive act of measurement. Within this perspective, physical systems, observers, and informational exchanges form a unified dynamics, where state reduction, decoherence, and emergent classicality arise from informational interactions and constraints. Rather than introducing a new closed theory, this manifesto establishes a conceptual foundation unifying several complementary models—including Informational State Dynamics, observer-dependent informational compression, and informational interpretations of quantum and cosmological phenomena—into a coherent research program. The framework is explicitly non-dogmatic, open to falsification, and intended as a guiding structure for further theoretical development and empirical testing. The aim of this document is not to replace existing physical theories, but to clarify their conceptual boundaries and propose an integrative lens through which unresolved problems in quantum foundations, cosmology, and cognitive systems may be systematically explored.
The relationship between neural dynamics and quantum processes remains unre- solved within existing frameworks based on causal interaction, statistical correlation, or measurement collapse. In this study, we present an empirically grounded framework based on a fundamentally different principle. Using EEG-derived neural Ricci curvature and independently generated quantum Ricci curvature, we demonstrate that structural agreement emerges between two phys- ically independent systems. This agreement is not uniformly present over time, but appears selectively under specific structural conditions. Analysis of the internal structure shows that this agreement is organized as the simultaneous emergence of discrete state structure (Five Energy Star structure), dy- namic phase synchronization, contraction of structural residuals, and boundary-localized events. These are not independent phenomena, but co-occur as different observational manifestations of a single coherent structure. This structure can be described in terms of a single internal degree of freedom, introduced as the intersection variable φ(x, t). This variable predicts discrete states with high accuracy (AUC ≈ 0.79, accuracy ≈ 0.70) and constrains neural and quantum dynamics (mean absolute Pearson ≈ 0.42). However, this constraint does not determine the correspondence itself. Crucially, although the correspondence cannot be derived from within φ, it is uniquely realized in empirical data and appears as localized selection in specific regions of the phase space of φ. This selection is not a statistical fluctuation (switch_gain ≈ 0.810, null mean ≈ 0.565, p ≈ 0.005), but a physically realized phenomenon without an internal rule. Therefore, correspondence is not generated by the internal mechanism of φ, but is realized as an observation on φ. This implies the necessity of a non-internal observa- tional structure that uniquely determines correspondence across independent systems, defined here as the intersection observer O3. We further introduce Subjectivity Intersection Coherence (SIC) as the unified structure underlying these observations. SIC is defined not as a property of a sin- gle system, but as the condition under which structural coherence is realized through the simultaneous satisfaction of phase alignment, residual contraction, boundary im- pulses, localized selection, and the presence of a non-internal observational structure. Unlike existing frameworks such as Orch-OR, relational quantum mechanics, and integrated information theory, the present approach does not assume causal interaction or internal closure, but instead describes correspondence as a structurally constrained observational phenomenon. The proposed framework includes explicit falsifiable predictions, enabling empirical validation of the selection structure and non-closure properties. All results are fully reproducible using publicly available code and data.
This paper develops a dual-domain framework for quantum foundations grounded in a structural distinction between a nonlocal, atemporal coherence domain (denoted −0) and a local, temporal decoherence domain (denoted +1). Quantum states are interpreted as existing within −0, while classical outcomes emerge when these states transition irreversibly into +1 through decoherence and measurement. The framework is not a modification of quantum mechanics but a reinterpretation of its ontological domain. The framework provides a unified ontological account of: quantum entanglement and nonlocal correlations; the absence of superluminal signalling; the emergence of classicality through decoherence; the mass dependence of decoherence rates; and the persistent incompatibility between quantum field theory and general relativity. Within this model, entanglement corresponds to the persistence of a single −0 state across multiple +1 localisations. Measurement is interpreted not as a collapse occurring within spacetime, but as a boundary transition from coherence to localisation. The paper further argues that gravity should not be interpreted as a quantum field propagating within spacetime, but rather as the geometric structure of the coherence–decoherence boundary itself. This perspective offers a principled explanation for the persistent incompatibility between quantum field theory and general relativity — a tension that may arise not from technical deficiency but from a category error: attempting to describe boundary geometry as though it were content within one of the domains it separates.
Abstract This work presents a unified geometric framework for quantum reality through four interconnected papers. It proposes that the coherent, non-separable correlations described by Hilbert space originate from an unobservable Energy Space, a fundamental substrate beyond spacetime that preserves perfect coherence and all conservation laws, thereby providing a geometric interpretation of quantum entanglement. Within this framework, the relation E = hf is interpreted as an encoding relation rather than a statement of physical energy actualization. During measurement, structural branching may occur, but Energy Space ensures that only one geometrically valid branch undergoes physical localization. Spacetime emerges from Energy Space as a passive geometric medium with intrinsic dynamic capabilities, giving rise to quantum objects and their interactions. Quantum objects are interpreted as dynamic geometric patterns of spacetime possessing an encoded geometric identity. Their physical properties, including mass, charge, spin, momentum, energy, wavelength, and phase, are fundamentally encoded in Energy Space and become physically actualized according to the interaction context and the degree of coherence or decoherence. The stability, transformation, and propagation of quantum objects are determined by their geometric compatibility with spacetime and with other quantum geometries. Electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions are interpreted as direct interactions between compatible quantum-object geometries, whereas gravity is regarded as an indirect geometric interaction mediated through spacetime geometry. Geometric interactions may produce superposition, transformation into new quantum-object geometries, or the formation of larger composite geometric structures, providing a unified geometric interpretation of interactions, confinement, and composite systems. Within this geometric framework, a recursive geometric scaling parameter satisfying the invariant relation is proposed. Based on this hierarchy, phenomenological recursive scaling relations are developed for the lepton and quark families, suggesting a possible underlying geometric structure governing fermion masses, generational hierarchy, and relative stability. Finally, the Peak-Coupling Theory proposes that quantum localization and decoherence occur through discrete peak-coupling events between interacting quantum geometries at oscillatory extrema within a quantum wave packet. The wave envelope and phase continuously modulate the distribution of possible coupling events, while observable interaction probabilities may emerge from the squared magnitude of local coupling amplitudes, providing a possible geometric route toward the emergence of Born-rule probabilities Together, these four papers present a unified conceptual framework in which Energy Space, spacetime, quantum objects, physical interactions, particle hierarchies, quantum measurement, and localization are interpreted as interconnected manifestations of an underlying geometric reality. These ideas are developed across four papers: Paper 1: Energy Space and Geometric Nature of Quantum Objects and SpacetimePaper 2: Quantum GeometryPaper 3: Lepton and Quark Generational Phenomenological Patterns; and Paper 4: Peak-Coupling Theory of Quantum Interaction
For over a century, physics has pursued a unified description of nature linking quantum mechanics, relativity, and cosmology, yet consciousness—our direct window into existence—remains unaccounted for. This review proposes that consciousness continuity is not an emergent accident of neural complexity but a quantum informational invariant, conserved across transformations of its physical substrate. Grounded in the empirical absence of “zombie” organisms and extended through a synthesis of quantum information theory, cosmological logic, and the author’s previous Two-Particle Quantum Bonding Hypothesis (TPQBH), the framework introduces a Quantum Informational Bonding (QIB) mechanism operating within a universal Hilbert space. This mechanism preserves an identity parameter (𝓘₍C₎) analogous to conservation laws in physics. The resulting cosmological model implies an infinite, centre-less universe and a unidirectional arrow of time emerging from informational continuity. The theory reframes the “hard problem” of consciousness as a missing symmetry in fundamental physics—one connecting subjective experience, information, and spacetime structure.