Schrodinger's cat is traditionally presented as a paradox highlighting the tension between quantum superposition and classical observation. Standard interpretations invoke either a fundamental wavefunction collapse, ontological branching of universes, or subjective Bayesian updating. In this paper, we propose a reinterpretation grounded in the Informational Observer Framework, according to which the paradox does not originate from an ontological superposition of macroscopic states, but from an unresolved informational configuration at the observer level. The cat itself is never simultaneously alive and dead; rather, the observer remains in a state of informational compression prior to interaction. Within this framework, wavefunction collapse is reinterpreted as an observer-level informational phase transition, not as a fundamental physical discontinuity. This approach preserves macroscopic realism, avoids ontological inflation, and reframes the measurement problem as an emergent informational phenomenon.
Abstract: For over a century, quantum mechanics has operated within an ontological void. While its mathematical formalism achieves unprecedented predictive success, the question of what actually exists remains unresolved. This paper proposes a radical ontological reformation: reality is not a singular spacetime continuum inhabited by particles, but rather an overlapping multiplicity of independent spatial manifolds—each carried by what we call an "observer" or material center. This single postulate, the Separated Universes Theory (SUT), dissolves three major philosophical crises in modern physics: the mystery of measurement, the paradox of non-locality, and the abandonment of determinism. By redefining locality within shared spatial manifolds, we demonstrate that Einstein’s core intuitions—realism and causality—can be fully reconciled with quantum phenomena without the need for "spooky action at a distance." This work seeks to provide the missing metaphysical foundation that physics has lacked since the Copenhagen capitulation, restoring the intelligibility of nature through a new geometric-energetic framework.
This accepted manuscript is structurally governed by THE META-INDEX (Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18169167) Modern quantum mechanics represents an unprecedented computational success in the history of physics, predicting the outcomes of subatomic processes with extraordinary accuracy. Despite this mathematical precision, however, the ontological status of quantum phenomena remains unresolved. This work argues that quantum mechanics correctly describes how systems behave, but fails to explain what quantum phenomena actually are. Concepts such as uncertainty, probability, and superposition are shown to be epistemic constructs—tools that describe incomplete transitions rather than fundamental properties of reality. Through a series of thought experiments and an A–B transition framework, this paper proposes that quantum phenomena should be understood as a constrained and harmonious transition regime between potentiality (A) and realized outcome (B). In this view, quantum is not a domain of indeterminacy, but the physics of becoming: a regulated ontological interval in which outcomes have not yet formed, rather than existing in an indeterminate state. This reinterpretation offers a coherent ontological foundation for quantum mechanics without invoking intrinsic randomness or observer-dependent reality.