Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Metaphysics: A Synthesis of Ontological Possibilities and Non-Linear Reality

Noorolahi Siamak

Published Oct 19, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23476860

Related papers

Synthesis Point of Reality (SPR) Theory: Resolving the Absolute-Relative Paradoxical Loop and the Emergence of Actualized Reality

Ayyappan Manikantan Nair

Abstract The Synthesis Point of Reality (SPR) Theory presents a formal mathematical and metaphysical framework detailing the emergence, dynamic interaction, and empirical realization of Actualized Reality ($R_e$). Addressing the fundamental paradoxes of physicalist absolutism and ungrounded relativism, this paper examines how observable reality operates neither as an invariant external backdrop nor as a purely subjective construct. By introducing dynamically indexed operators ($A_n, -A_m$), the differential metric $x = |n - m|$, and systemic state quantification, SPR Theory examines the proposal that reality materializes at the Synthesis Point ($\mathcal{S}$)—a dynamic boundary where the Absolute Ground ($A_n$) and its mandatory Polar Constraints ($-A_m$) continuously integrate through ontological symmetry breaking. Evaluated across quantum, biological, and cognitive matrices—including clinical pharmacological response models—this work formalizes the Law of Mandatory Polar Existence, examining how actualized experience ($R_e$) requires non-zero polar friction ($m > 0$) to establish operational boundaries. Ultimately, the framework provides a unified, recursive model to evaluate how baseline invariants evolve across dynamic temporal states. Keywords: Synthesis Point of Reality (SPR), Absolute Ground ($A_n$), Polar Inverse Operator ($-A_m$), Differential Metric ($x$), Actualized Reality ($R_e$), Ontological Symmetry Breaking, Law of Mandatory Polar Existence, Quantified State Index, Recursive Baseline Evolution, Bhodhaanubhavam, Context-Driven Reality Generation.

•Sep 11, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Metaphysics

Howard Burton, ARTUR K. EKERT

Open Agenda Publishing eBooks•May 17, 2021•0 citations

Quantum Metaphysics

Open Agenda Publishing eBooks•Apr 14, 2021•0 citations

Heidegger's Quantum Ontology

François-Igor Pris

The article suggests that quantum mechanics is a science of a new type, which refutes the classical metaphysical concept of reality.The notion of a quantum concept is introduced.The possibility of a Wittgensteinian "dissolution" of the measurement problem with the help of the notion of a language game and the possibility of a metaphysical solution of this problem with the help of the Heideggerian notion of Dasein are considered.

•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

Quantum Ontologies: Metaphysics in Modern Physics

Menas C. Kafatos, Robert L. Nadeau

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Quantum metaphysical indeterminacy and the ontological foundations of orthodoxy

David Schroeren

This paper develops quantum state individualism, a fundamental ontology for what is usually known as 'orthodox quantum mechanics.' The central import of this ontology is that allows for a systematic evaluation of some of the main conclusions of the recent literature on quantum metaphysical indeterminacy. In particular, quantum state individualism supports the 'gappy' version of Jessica Wilson's determinable-based account of metaphysical indeterminacy; it implies that fundamental reality is perfectly precise; and third, it provides a non-disjunctive definition of determinables and thereby shields Wilson's account against the charge that it requires either a departure from classical logic or a revision of the quantum formalism.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A•Nov 2, 2021•24 citations
Abstract The Synthesis Point of Reality (SPR) Theory presents a formal mathematical and metaphysical framework detailing the emergence, dynamic interaction, and empirical realization of Actualized Reality (ReR_eRe​). Addressing the fundamental paradoxes of physicalist absolutism and ungrounded relativism, this paper examines how observable reality operates neither as an invariant external backdrop nor as a purely subjective construct. By introducing dynamically indexed operators (An,−AmA_n, -A_mAn​,−Am​), the differential metric x=∣n−m∣x = |n - m|x=∣n−m∣, and systemic state quantification, SPR Theory examines the proposal that reality materializes at the Synthesis Point (S\mathcal{S}S)—a dynamic boundary where the Absolute Ground (AnA_nAn​) and its mandatory Polar Constraints (−Am-A_m−Am​) continuously integrate through ontological symmetry breaking. Evaluated across quantum, biological, and cognitive matrices—including clinical pharmacological response models—this work formalizes the Law of Mandatory Polar Existence, examining how actualized experience (ReR_eRe​) requires non-zero polar friction (m>0m > 0m>0) to establish operational boundaries. Ultimately, the framework provides a unified, recursive model to evaluate how baseline invariants evolve across dynamic temporal states. Keywords: Synthesis Point of Reality (SPR), Absolute Ground (AnA_nAn​), Polar Inverse Operator (−Am-A_m−Am​), Differential Metric (xxx), Actualized Reality (ReR_eRe​), Ontological Symmetry Breaking, Law of Mandatory Polar Existence, Quantified State Index, Recursive Baseline Evolution, Bhodhaanubhavam, Context-Driven Reality Generation.
This paper develops quantum state individualism, a fundamental ontology for what is usually known as 'orthodox quantum mechanics.' The central import of this ontology is that allows for a systematic evaluation of some of the main conclusions of the recent literature on quantum metaphysical indeterminacy. In particular, quantum state individualism supports the 'gappy' version of Jessica Wilson's determinable-based account of metaphysical indeterminacy; it implies that fundamental reality is perfectly precise; and third, it provides a non-disjunctive definition of determinables and thereby shields Wilson's account against the charge that it requires either a departure from classical logic or a revision of the quantum formalism.