Chapter 8 is devoted to the study of the dynamics of quantum systems, based on the formalism presented in Chapter 7 and previous chapters. The operator notation and its matrix representation are used without distinction, moving freely from one to the other as convenient. This allows us to study the evolution of the system from different perspectives, depending on the description adopted. The chapter includes a discussion of the statistical information contained in the quantum formalism, a formal derivation of the Heisenberg inequalities and a clarification of their physical meaning. A section is dedicated to quantum canonical and related transformations. More advanced topics, which provide a valuable complement, include Noether’s theorem on the relationship between the symmetry properties and the conserved dynamical variables of the system.
Chapter 8 is devoted to the study of the dynamics of quantum systems, based on the formalism presented in Chapter 7 and previous chapters. The operator notation and its matrix representation are used without distinction, moving freely from one to the other as convenient. This allows us to study the evolution of the system from different perspectives, depending on the description adopted. The chapter includes a discussion of the statistical information contained in the quantum formalism, a formal derivation of the Heisenberg inequalities and a clarification of their physical meaning. A section is dedicated to quantum canonical and related transformations. More advanced topics, which provide a valuable complement, include Noether’s theorem on the relationship between the symmetry properties and the conserved dynamical variables of the system.
This chapter, based on the background information of the previous chapter, will review the formalism of quantum mechanics – its fundamental mathematical structure (the basic contents of Hilbert space representation and operator algebra representation) and physical assumptions (kinematics, dynamics, and measurement theory). These are the premise and foundation for discussing the quantum histories interpretation. Then, in combination with the viewpoints of some literature in recent years, we will explore what is the interpretation of quantum mechanics, analyze the relationship between the theory of quantum mechanics and its interpretation, and declare the author’s basic stance on these two issues. These two are the primary issues that all interpretive work in the philosophy of physics will face (not limited to the interpretation of quantum mechanics), and the necessary clarification here is also conducive to the subsequent discussion. Three common terms – theory, formalism, and interpretation – are explicated and differentiated by offering the necessary definitions of their meanings, based on the works of Acuña and Ruetsche. The clarification will help to make the subsequent related discussions more precise.
Chapter 3 introduces the student to the matrix formulation of quantum mechanics, pioneered by Heisenberg in collaboration with Born and Jordan. It provides the basic formal elements of the Heisenberg description in terms of operators and their matrix representation, derives the Heisenberg inequality, and applies the formalism to the harmonic oscillator as a central and particularly simple quantum problem. It introduces the state vectors and their Hilbert space, and concludes with a brief discussion hinting at the physical significance of the replacement of classical continuous dynamical variables with operators as a manifestation of the coupling of the particle to the radiation field.
In this chapter we shall mainly present the basic formalism that was initially developed by Heisenberg, also known as matrix mechanics (see Subsec. 1.5.7). We will first introduce in Sec. 2.1 the concept of quantum observables. Then, the problem of discrete and continuous spectra will be discussed and the basic non-commutability of quantum-mechanical observables will be deduced. While in Sec. 2.1 we discuss observables on a general formal level, in Sec. 2.2 some basic quantum-mechanical observables will be defined, and then different representations discussed and commutation relations derived. In Sec. 2.3 a basic uncertainty relation is derived. In the same section the relationship between uncertainty, superposition, and complementarity will be discussed. Finally, in Sec. 2.4 complete subsets of commuting observables will be shown to be Boolean subalgebras pertaining to a quantum algebra which is not Boolean. BASIC FEATURES OF QUANTUM OBSERVABLES This section is devoted to a general and formal exposition of quantum observables. In Subsec. 2.1.1 we shall learn how one can mathematically represent quantum observables as Hermitian operators. In Subsec. 2.1.2 we shall see how to change a basis, while in Subsec. 2.1.3 we shall find the relationship between eigenvalues of the observables and probabilities and learn how to calculate mean values. In Subsec. 2.1.4 we shall deal with an operator diagonalization. Finally, in Subsec. 2.1.5, the basic non-commutability of quantum observables will be presented by means of an example.
In the first two chapters we have examined the basic principles – superposition (p. 18), complementarity (p. 19), quantization (p. 44), statistical algorithm (p. 57), and correspondence (p. 72) (see also Subsec. 2.3.4) – and the basic entities, observables and states, of quantum mechanics, as well as the main differences with respect to classical mechanics. While what we have discussed so far is rather a static picture of observables and states, in this chapter we shall deal with quantum dynamics, i.e. with the time evolution of quantum-mechanical systems. Historically, after Bohr had provided a quantized description of the atom (see Subsec. 1.5.4), Einstein showed the quantized nature of photons (see Subsec. 1.2.1), and de Broglie hypothized the wave-like nature of matter (see Subsec. 1.5.5), the first building block of quantum mechanics was provided by the commutation relations, proposed by Heisenberg in 1925, whose consequence is represented by the uncertainty relation (see Subsec. 2.2.7 and Sec. 2.3). This was the subject of the previous chapters. The dynamical part of the theory was proposed by Schrödinger in 1926, and is known as the Schrödinger equation. It is also known as wave mechanics (see Subsec. 1.5.7). In this chapter we shall show that Heisenberg's and Schrödinger's formulations are only two different aspects of the same theory. We shall also come back to this point in Sec. 8.1.1. Here, first we shall derive the fundamental equation which rules quantum dynamics (Sec. 3.1), and, in Sec. 3.2, we shall summarize the main properties of the Schrödinger equation.
This chapter gives a summary of the mathematical formalism used in quantum mechanics, with a short bibliography put directly at its end. It should be seen as a complement, to be used by readers who wish to know more than what has been recalled about the mathematical tools in the other chapters. Some results are given without explicit proofs; they can be found for instance in Chapters II and IV of [1] . Many quantum mechanics textbooks introduce its general formalism in a more complete way, for instance Chapter VII of [2] , Chapter 3 of [3] , or Chapter 2 of [4] . We first summarize the general formalism of quantum mechanics for any physical system (§11.1), with the Dirac notation; we then study how this formalism treats the grouping of several physical systems into one single quantum system (§11.2); finally, we study a few simple special cases (§11.3), for instance a single particle in an external potential, with or without spin; the reader who prefers wave functions to more abstract reasonings in spaces of states may begin with this section. General physical system The general formalism of quantum mechanics applies to all physical systems, whether they contain a single particle, many particles of various sorts, one or several fields, etc. Quantum space of states The physical state of a system at each time is defined in quantum mechanics by a state vector which, in Dirac notation, is written ∣ ψ 〈 – or ∣ ψ(t) 〈 if one wishes to make the time dependence explicit.
The language of statistical moments and covariance matrices we introduced in the previous chapter offers a compact and efficient formalism to deal with Gaussian states. A much more general approach may be taken to describe any quantum state in a setting which is reminiscent of classical phase space. This is the framework of quantum characteristic functions and quasi-probability distributions, which goes back to seminal work by Wigner on quantum corrections to classical statistical mechanics, and bloomed in the sixties with the rise of theoretical quantum optics and the emergence of a general unifying picture. Conceptually, the phase space description of quantum states hinges on the completeness of the set of displacement operators, which we shall prove in the form of the Fourier–Weyl relation between density matrices and characteristic functions. This relationship will constitute the bridge between phase space and Hilbert space descriptions, which will be useful in several applications in the context of quantum information. It will be convenient to handle most of the proofs and mathematical arguments concerning characteristic functions and quasi-probability distributions on a single mode of the system. Because displacement operators of multimode systems are just tensor products of local displacement operators, the extension of the formalism to systems with many degrees of freedom will be straightforward. Nevertheless, we shall always take care of explicitly linking the single-mode formulae which will appear in this chapter to the general multimode description adopted in the previous one.