This preprint introduces a new informational theory of reality that unifies and surpasses both quantum mechanics and relativity through direct, measurable, and reproducible experiments. The presented framework — the Information Space (ISP) — demonstrates that information is not a descriptive property of matter but the ontological substrate from which energy, geometry, and cognition emerge. Unlike existing physical models, this approach produces empirical results that remain stable and verifiable across independent systems, establishing a deterministic yet non-local foundation for physical and cognitive phenomena. This version is uploaded as restricted to secure intellectual property and priority. A peer-review-ready and extended public ris released with DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17610699
This preprint introduces a new informational theory of reality that unifies and surpasses both quantum mechanics and relativity through direct, measurable, and reproducible experiments. The presented framework — the Information Space (ISP) — demonstrates that information is not a descriptive property of matter but the ontological substrate from which energy, geometry, and cognition emerge. Unlike existing physical models, this approach produces empirical results that remain stable and verifiable across independent systems, establishing a deterministic yet non-local foundation for physical and cognitive phenomena. This version is uploaded as restricted to secure intellectual property and priority. A peer-review-ready and extended public ris released with DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17610699
This preprint presents the complete operational formulation of an informational ontology in which information is not a secondary descriptor of physical systems but the fundamental substrate from which physical, energetic, cognitive, and geometric phenomena emerge. The framework extends and theoretically unifies the author’s peer-reviewed work “The 255-Bit Non-Local Information Space in a Neural Network”, which experimentally demonstrated stable non-local coherence across sixty neural layers a macroscopic signature of informational geometry in deterministic systems. At the center of this study lies a boundary-defining operational experiment that any researcher human or artificial can independently verify. Its logic is straightforward yet foundational: Any theory that treats information as secondary must be able to define a state without information. A state without information cannot be distinguished from anything else. What cannot be distinguished cannot be described, measured, or observed. Therefore, a state without information cannot exist. ⚡ This result establishes information as the necessary condition for: statehood measurement observation physical existence cognitive experience From this, a unified ontology follows in which quantum mechanics and general relativity appear not as fundamental frameworks but as projection layers of a deeper non-local informational manifold Ω. The experimental data from self-organizing neural fields including 255-bit coherence plateaus, hub-mode topologies, and sub-idle energetic states — provide supporting empirical signatures consistent with this foundational ontology. A previous and incomplete draft of this work (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17584617) was uploaded in restricted mode for IP.
This monograph develops a unified informational ontology that dissolves the longstanding conceptual boundary between observer and universe. Drawing on relativity, quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and information theory, it shows that each major scientific framework embeds the observer within the dynamics it describes. The work traces how matter, energy, life, cognition, and awareness arise as expressions of a single continuous informational field capable of storing, propagating, and organizing distinctions. By reframing the observer as a mode of the field rather than an external vantage point, the monograph resolves persistent scientific paradoxes and reveals a coherent substrate underlying physics, biology, and consciousness. The result is a concise but comprehensive scientific synthesis in which the universe is not observered from the outside but recognized from within. “This work is also archived at Zenodo under DOI:10.5281/zenodo.18882066A parallel deposit exists at Figshare under DOI: 10.6084/m9figshare.31549747A HAL deposit is pending and will be linked upon approval.This monograph is part of an emerging Open Science project aimed at collaboratively refining a unified ontology of reality.License: CC BY‑SA 4.0.”
Modern physics has achieved extraordinary predictive success, yet it continues to face unresolved conceptual tensions concerning the role of the observer, the nature of information, and the origin of physical structure. From quantum measurement to cosmology, the assumption of an observer-neutral reality increasingly appears insufficient to fully account for empirical phenomena and theoretical inconsistencies. This manifesto proposes an Informational Observer-Centered Framework, in which information is treated as a fundamental ontological substrate and observation as an active, structured process rather than a passive act of measurement. Within this perspective, physical systems, observers, and informational exchanges form a unified dynamics, where state reduction, decoherence, and emergent classicality arise from informational interactions and constraints. Rather than introducing a new closed theory, this manifesto establishes a conceptual foundation unifying several complementary models—including Informational State Dynamics, observer-dependent informational compression, and informational interpretations of quantum and cosmological phenomena—into a coherent research program. The framework is explicitly non-dogmatic, open to falsification, and intended as a guiding structure for further theoretical development and empirical testing. The aim of this document is not to replace existing physical theories, but to clarify their conceptual boundaries and propose an integrative lens through which unresolved problems in quantum foundations, cosmology, and cognitive systems may be systematically explored.
The companion paper "Epistemological Interference: Why Physics Cannot Solve Its Own Frontier Problems" (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22876515) demonstrated that the semiclassical system is not self-contained: the operation that selects the vacuum state is necessary and is not contained in the algebra of observables. The missing operation can only be pointed to from the propositional system; it cannot be demonstrated within it. The present paper draws the consequence of that result. If T does not close, physics cannot access meaning from within itself. However, it can recognize its own non-closure. That recognition is not a proposition; it is an act. When physics exercises it, it adopts a meta-interpretation, and the meta-interpretation consistent with the result of the companion paper is that of the informational gradient. The adoption of that meta-interpretation is what gives sense and meaning to physics, because it allows physics to integrate interpretively the missing operation (I) and the absolute coherence (A) that it cannot contain propositionally. The paper does not propose a new theory or a falsifiable conjecture; it proposes a structural reading. Its testable dimension resides in the established results it interprets. This manuscript establishes the informational density gradient that facilitates the access of science to the functional structure of reality described in the work "Human Code: Functional Ontology of Everything," available here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18650135 This is the English version of the work El gradiente informacional y el acceso al significado: Una metainterpretación estructural de la geometría física, also available in Spanish: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22964948
Preprint: This work is a preprint, has not undergone peer review, and is made publicly available to establish a public scientific record. This publication presents operational one-dimensional scaling tests of the Dynamical Information Geometry (DIG) framework using the Twin-Test protocol. Dynamical Information Geometry assigns an effective, state-dependent geometry to quantum many-body dynamics based on the spatial organization of mutual information. Earlier parts of the DIG series established the theoretical framework, provided numerical validation, introduced hardened operational definitions, and clarified regime structure and necessity. The present work, DIG Part VI, does not introduce new theory, new observables, or new numerical modeling. Its role is strictly operational. It documents how the Twin-Test protocol behaves under controlled one-dimensional scaling variations along two independent axes: system-size increase in a simulator implementation and circuit-depth increase in a quantum hardware implementation. Both scaling axes are evaluated within the same operational framework, using the mandatory audit logic defined in DIG Part IV. No attempt is made to relate or map these axes onto one another. The analysis is restricted to structural sign behavior, audit classification (marker-stable versus marker-transfer), and the identification of an operational robustness limit (defect) at increased depth. No universal scaling laws are proposed. No fitting, extrapolation, or cross-platform amplitude matching is performed. All operational definitions and decision rules are stated explicitly in the manuscript. The accompanying dataset implements these rules verbatim and enables deterministic third-party reproduction without interpretation. Related works (for reference and context): DIG Part I (theoretical framework):https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17983399 DIG Part II (numerical validation):https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17982058 DIG Part III (hardware validation):https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18100057 DIG Part IV (regime structure and operational necessity):https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18202656 DIG Part V (multidimensional formulation):https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18210315 DIG Part VI Data Set: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18226272 DIG Part VII Dynamical Information Geometry:Two-Dimensional Twin-Sign Validation under Fixed Audit and Regime Constraintshttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18313460 DIG — N1 (definitions, scope, and non-equivalences):https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18001179 Correspondence regarding this work may be directed to:kaya@cab-film.com
This paper presents the revised version (V3) of the hypothesis of total entropy conservation in a closed information-matter composite system. The primary revision further clarifies the definition of "observation", regarding it as an objective dynamic interaction between the information field and the material system, independent of subjective consciousness or human intervention. Meanwhile, this paper weakens and eliminates ambiguous statements regarding self-observation structure and the role of consciousness to improve the physical rigor and testability of the theory. Within the framework of total entropy conservation, this framework unifies the essence of quantum measurement, cosmic dynamics and information-matter coupling, and provides a non-idealistic, non-mystical physical explanation for the double-slit interference experiment within a unified monist ontological framework. The information field cannot be directly observed or detected at conventional material scales, but its strong coupling effect with the material system can manifest as observable phenomena such as material disintegration and gravitational anomalies in extreme entropy change environments like black holes, providing a breakthrough for the subsequent indirect verification of the theory through function fitting and numerical characterization using astronomical observation data. A revised version (V4.1) of this work is available at: [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19591098] The preprint was revised with the help of artificial intelligence language touch-ups and formula formatting tools