Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Informational Gradient and the Access to Meaning: A Structural Meta-Interpretation of Physical Geometry

Mario Martinez Correas

Published Sep 25, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The companion paper "Epistemological Interference: Why Physics Cannot Solve Its Own Frontier Problems" (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22876515) demonstrated that the semiclassical system is not self-contained: the operation that selects the vacuum state is necessary and is not contained in the algebra of observables. The missing operation can only be pointed to from the propositional system; it cannot be demonstrated within it. The present paper draws the consequence of that result. If T does not close, physics cannot access meaning from within itself. However, it can recognize its own non-closure. That recognition is not a proposition; it is an act. When physics exercises it, it adopts a meta-interpretation, and the meta-interpretation consistent with the result of the companion paper is that of the informational gradient. The adoption of that meta-interpretation is what gives sense and meaning to physics, because it allows physics to integrate interpretively the missing operation (I) and the absolute coherence (A) that it cannot contain propositionally. The paper does not propose a new theory or a falsifiable conjecture; it proposes a structural reading. Its testable dimension resides in the established results it interprets. This manuscript establishes the informational density gradient that facilitates the access of science to the functional structure of reality described in the work "Human Code: Functional Ontology of Everything," available here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18650135 This is the English version of the work El gradiente informacional y el acceso al significado: Una metainterpretación estructural de la geometría física, also available in Spanish: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22964948

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22964742

Related papers

El gradiente informacional y el acceso al significado: Una metainterpretación estructural de la geometría física

Mario Martinez Correas

El artículo compañero «La interferencia epistemológica: por qué la física no puede resolver sus propios problemas de frontera» (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22876848) demostró que el sistema semiclásico no es autocontenido: la operación que selecciona el estado de vacío es necesaria y no está contenida en el álgebra de observables. La operación ausente solo puede señalarse desde el sistema proposicional; no puede demostrarse dentro de él. El presente artículo extrae la consecuencia de ese resultado. Si T no se cierra, la física no puede acceder al significado desde dentro de sí misma. Sin embargo, puede reconocer su propia no-clausura. Ese reconocimiento no es una proposición; es un acto. Cuando la física lo ejerce, adopta una metainterpretación, y la metainterpretación coherente con el resultado del artículo compañero es la del gradiente informacional. La adopción de esa metainterpretación es lo que da sentido y significado a la física, porque le permite integrar interpretativamente la operación ausente (I) y la coherencia absoluta (A) que no puede contener proposicionalmente. El artículo no propone una teoría nueva ni una conjetura falsable; propone una lectura estructural. Su dimensión contrastable reside en los resultados establecidos que interpreta. Este manuscrito establece el gradiente de densidad informacional que facilita el acceso de la ciencia a la estructura funcional de la realidad descrita en el trabajo «Código Humano: Ontología Funcional del Todo», disponible aquí: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18648185 Esta es la versión en español del trabajo The Informational Gradient and the Access to Meaning: A Structural Meta-Interpretation of Physical Geometry, también disponible en inglés: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22964742

•Sep 25, 2026•0 citations

Ontology of ZEBTS: The Structure of the Possible and the Grammar of Reality

Anatolii Mukha

This monograph presents the philosophical foundation of the ZEBTS framework — the Zero‑Entropy Topological Background and its χ‑Spectral reconstruction of reality. While earlier works introduced the operator‑geometric and spectral‑topological structure of χ‑Reality, this volume establishes the philosophical architecture that enables ZEBTS as a unified theory of the world. ZEBTS is developed as a comprehensive ontology of χ‑Reality, grounded in spectral geometry, operator physics, boundary‑driven emergence, and zero‑structure ontology. It interprets reality not as objects or substances but as a hierarchy of χ‑acts: admissibility, collapse, projection, meaning, existence, and world‑formation. The world appears as a χ‑spectral projection of the Absolute, structured by the Boundary, stabilized by collapse, and interpreted through meaning. Human existence functions as an ontological operator within this architecture. This monograph provides the philosophical justification for ZEBTS as formulated in the author’s previous works: Mukha, A. (2026). χ‑Spectral Reality: Foundations of the Operator‑Geometric Universe. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21937654 Mukha, A. (2026). ZEBTS — Zero‑Entropy Topological Background: χ‑Reality The Theory of Everything — SUPER 10 plus Version. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21921468 These publications establish the mathematical and operator‑geometric basis of χ‑Reality. The present monograph complements them by constructing the philosophical and conceptual foundation required for a complete understanding of ZEBTS. Thus, the monograph is the essential philosophical core of ZEBTS — the conceptual architecture showing why χ‑Reality, χ‑Spectral Geometry, χ‑Collapse, χ‑Boundary, and χ‑World are necessary ontological structures of existence.

•Aug 19, 2026•0 citations

Metric-Independent Phase Invariance: Resolving Quantum Non-Locality without Superluminal Signaling

Mario Martinez Correas

[EXPLORATORY DRAFT NOTICE] This record corresponds to a preliminary draft/approach within the conceptual development of this project. The rigorous, revised, and definitive mathematical formulation derived from this research is published in the main work: The Epistemological Interference: Why Physics Cannot Solve Its Own Frontier Problems Available in its most recent version here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22876515

•Sep 16, 2026•0 citations

The Informational Arrow of Time: Deriving Thermodynamic Irreversibility from Lindblad Phase Relaxation

Mario Martinez Correas

[EXPLORATORY DRAFT NOTICE] This record corresponds to a preliminary draft/approach within the conceptual development of this project. The rigorous, revised, and definitive mathematical formulation derived from this research is published in the main work: The Epistemological Interference: Why Physics Cannot Solve Its Own Frontier Problems Available in its most recent version here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22876515

•Sep 16, 2026•0 citations

Continuous Subsystem Decoherence and Deterministic Outcome Selection in Quantum Measurement

Mario Martinez Correas

[EXPLORATORY DRAFT NOTICE] This record corresponds to a preliminary draft/approach within the conceptual development of this project. The rigorous, revised, and definitive mathematical formulation derived from this research is published in the main work: The Epistemological Interference: Why Physics Cannot Solve Its Own Frontier Problems Available in its most recent version here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22876515

•Sep 15, 2026•0 citations

The Convergence Map: What Physics and Mathematics Jointly Say About the Nature of Reality

Mark E. Mala

This paper surveys the strongest established results across five major fields — quantum foundations, quantum gravity, mathematical logic, information theory, and thermodynamics — and maps where independently developed results converge on the same structural conclusions about the nature of reality. Over sixty landmark results are cited. The paper then performs an operation not previously attempted: it converges the convergences through iterative meta-convergence, yielding the Self-Referential Relational Principle (SRRP). Companion papers in this programme: The Infinite Ground (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19479968) Generative Coupling (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19479970) The Deeper Ground (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19488612) Infinitography (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19494555) Mathematical Foundations (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19520692) Toward a Theory of Everything (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19520923)

•Apr 10, 2026•0 citations
The companion paper "Epistemological Interference: Why Physics Cannot Solve Its Own Frontier Problems" (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22876515) demonstrated that the semiclassical system is not self-contained: the operation that selects the vacuum state is necessary and is not contained in the algebra of observables. The missing operation can only be pointed to from the propositional system; it cannot be demonstrated within it. The present paper draws the consequence of that result. If T does not close, physics cannot access meaning from within itself. However, it can recognize its own non-closure. That recognition is not a proposition; it is an act. When physics exercises it, it adopts a meta-interpretation, and the meta-interpretation consistent with the result of the companion paper is that of the informational gradient. The adoption of that meta-interpretation is what gives sense and meaning to physics, because it allows physics to integrate interpretively the missing operation (I) and the absolute coherence (A) that it cannot contain propositionally. The paper does not propose a new theory or a falsifiable conjecture; it proposes a structural reading. Its testable dimension resides in the established results it interprets. This manuscript establishes the informational density gradient that facilitates the access of science to the functional structure of reality described in the work "Human Code: Functional Ontology of Everything," available here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18650135 This is the English version of the work El gradiente informacional y el acceso al significado: Una metainterpretación estructural de la geometría física, also available in Spanish: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22964948
El artículo compañero «La interferencia epistemológica: por qué la física no puede resolver sus propios problemas de frontera» (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22876848) demostró que el sistema semiclásico no es autocontenido: la operación que selecciona el estado de vacío es necesaria y no está contenida en el álgebra de observables. La operación ausente solo puede señalarse desde el sistema proposicional; no puede demostrarse dentro de él. El presente artículo extrae la consecuencia de ese resultado. Si T no se cierra, la física no puede acceder al significado desde dentro de sí misma. Sin embargo, puede reconocer su propia no-clausura. Ese reconocimiento no es una proposición; es un acto. Cuando la física lo ejerce, adopta una metainterpretación, y la metainterpretación coherente con el resultado del artículo compañero es la del gradiente informacional. La adopción de esa metainterpretación es lo que da sentido y significado a la física, porque le permite integrar interpretativamente la operación ausente (I) y la coherencia absoluta (A) que no puede contener proposicionalmente. El artículo no propone una teoría nueva ni una conjetura falsable; propone una lectura estructural. Su dimensión contrastable reside en los resultados establecidos que interpreta. Este manuscrito establece el gradiente de densidad informacional que facilita el acceso de la ciencia a la estructura funcional de la realidad descrita en el trabajo «Código Humano: Ontología Funcional del Todo», disponible aquí: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18648185 Esta es la versión en español del trabajo The Informational Gradient and the Access to Meaning: A Structural Meta-Interpretation of Physical Geometry, también disponible en inglés: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22964742
This monograph presents the philosophical foundation of the ZEBTS framework — the Zero‑Entropy Topological Background and its χ‑Spectral reconstruction of reality. While earlier works introduced the operator‑geometric and spectral‑topological structure of χ‑Reality, this volume establishes the philosophical architecture that enables ZEBTS as a unified theory of the world. ZEBTS is developed as a comprehensive ontology of χ‑Reality, grounded in spectral geometry, operator physics, boundary‑driven emergence, and zero‑structure ontology. It interprets reality not as objects or substances but as a hierarchy of χ‑acts: admissibility, collapse, projection, meaning, existence, and world‑formation. The world appears as a χ‑spectral projection of the Absolute, structured by the Boundary, stabilized by collapse, and interpreted through meaning. Human existence functions as an ontological operator within this architecture. This monograph provides the philosophical justification for ZEBTS as formulated in the author’s previous works: Mukha, A. (2026). χ‑Spectral Reality: Foundations of the Operator‑Geometric Universe. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21937654 Mukha, A. (2026). ZEBTS — Zero‑Entropy Topological Background: χ‑Reality The Theory of Everything — SUPER 10 plus Version. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21921468 These publications establish the mathematical and operator‑geometric basis of χ‑Reality. The present monograph complements them by constructing the philosophical and conceptual foundation required for a complete understanding of ZEBTS. Thus, the monograph is the essential philosophical core of ZEBTS — the conceptual architecture showing why χ‑Reality, χ‑Spectral Geometry, χ‑Collapse, χ‑Boundary, and χ‑World are necessary ontological structures of existence.
This paper surveys the strongest established results across five major fields — quantum foundations, quantum gravity, mathematical logic, information theory, and thermodynamics — and maps where independently developed results converge on the same structural conclusions about the nature of reality. Over sixty landmark results are cited. The paper then performs an operation not previously attempted: it converges the convergences through iterative meta-convergence, yielding the Self-Referential Relational Principle (SRRP). Companion papers in this programme: The Infinite Ground (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19479968) Generative Coupling (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19479970) The Deeper Ground (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19488612) Infinitography (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19494555) Mathematical Foundations (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19520692) Toward a Theory of Everything (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19520923)