Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

The Impossible Causality: The No Hidden Variables Theorem of John von Neumann

Roberto Giuntini, Federico Laudisa

Published Jan 1, 2001• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-017-2012-0_11

Related papers

von Neumann’s theorem and hidden-variable models

Vincenzo Capasso, Donato Fortunato, F. Selleri

Rivista Del Nuovo Cimento•Apr 1, 1970•23 citations

Von Neumann’s Theorem on the Impossibility of Introducing Hidden Parameters in Quantum Mechanics

N. A. Dmitriev

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 2005•6 citations

Von Neumann’s ‘No Hidden Variables’ Proof: A Re-Appraisal

Jeffrey Bub

arXiv:1006.0499•Foundations of Physics•Jun 10, 2010•62 citations

Von Neumann's Informal Hidden-Variable Argument

John F. Clauser

This document was prepared as an account of

American Journal of Physics•Sep 1, 1971•72 citations

Establishing J. von Neumann’s result of the incompatibility between hidden variables and quantum mechanics

C. S. Unnikrishnan

The impossibility of making quantum mechanics deterministic by adding ‘hidden variables’ was discussed by J. von Neumann in 1932. His proof of the impossibility of dispersion-free ensembles was criticized as being logically circular, by Grete Hermann soon after, and as fundamentally flawed, by John Bell in 1964. Bell’s severe criticism and an explicit counter-example are generally considered as the definitive demonstration that J. von Neumann’s proof is inadequate. I show, without using the formalism of quantum mechanics, that J. von Neumann’s central assumption of the linear additivity of the expectation values, even for incompatible (noncommuting) observables, is a necessary consequence that follows directly from the fundamental conservation laws of physical quantities, applicable universally. With this result, J. von Neumann’s result is fully resurrected. I identify the physical reason why dispersion-free ensembles cannot exist. After discussing the conflict of Bell’s counter-example with the factual mechanics, I highlight the result that the local hidden variable theories, for which the Bell’s inequalities were derived, are grossly incompatible with the fundamental conservation laws. In a scrutiny of the vital difference between the ‘causal incompleteness’ of quantum mechanics, discussed by J. von Neumann, and the ‘representational incompleteness’ discussed by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, I prove the striking demarcating result that a multi-particle system that is considered causally completed can remain EPR-incomplete. I identify the wave nature of the action as the reason behind the irreducible quantum dispersion and the impossibility of dispersion-free ensembles.

Academia quantum.•Apr 23, 2025•2 citations

VON NEUMANN'S CLAIM OF IMPOSSIBILITY OF HIDDEN-VARIABLES THEORIES

Frederik Jozef Belinfante

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1973•1 citation
The impossibility of making quantum mechanics deterministic by adding ‘hidden variables’ was discussed by J. von Neumann in 1932. His proof of the impossibility of dispersion-free ensembles was criticized as being logically circular, by Grete Hermann soon after, and as fundamentally flawed, by John Bell in 1964. Bell’s severe criticism and an explicit counter-example are generally considered as the definitive demonstration that J. von Neumann’s proof is inadequate. I show, without using the formalism of quantum mechanics, that J. von Neumann’s central assumption of the linear additivity of the expectation values, even for incompatible (noncommuting) observables, is a necessary consequence that follows directly from the fundamental conservation laws of physical quantities, applicable universally. With this result, J. von Neumann’s result is fully resurrected. I identify the physical reason why dispersion-free ensembles cannot exist. After discussing the conflict of Bell’s counter-example with the factual mechanics, I highlight the result that the local hidden variable theories, for which the Bell’s inequalities were derived, are grossly incompatible with the fundamental conservation laws. In a scrutiny of the vital difference between the ‘causal incompleteness’ of quantum mechanics, discussed by J. von Neumann, and the ‘representational incompleteness’ discussed by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, I prove the striking demarcating result that a multi-particle system that is considered causally completed can remain EPR-incomplete. I identify the wave nature of the action as the reason behind the irreducible quantum dispersion and the impossibility of dispersion-free ensembles.