Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1006.0499 · Foundations of Physics

Von Neumann’s ‘No Hidden Variables’ Proof: A Re-Appraisal

Jeffrey Bub

Published Jun 10, 2010• 62 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-010-9480-9

Related papers

Challenging the Gospel: Grete Hermann on von Neumann’s No-Hidden-Variables Proof

M. P. Seevinck

Studies in history and philosophy of science•Jan 1, 2016•50 citations

von Neumann’s theorem and hidden-variable models

Vincenzo Capasso, Donato Fortunato, F. Selleri

Rivista Del Nuovo Cimento•Apr 1, 1970•23 citations

Von Neumann's Informal Hidden-Variable Argument

John F. Clauser

This document was prepared as an account of

American Journal of Physics•Sep 1, 1971•72 citations

The Impossible Causality: The No Hidden Variables Theorem of John von Neumann

Roberto Giuntini, Federico Laudisa

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2001•5 citations

Must hidden variables theories be contextual? Kochen & Specker meet von Neumann and Gleason

Pablo Acuña

European Journal for Philosophy of Science•Apr 17, 2021•7 citations

Hidden Variables: Rehabilitation of von Neumann's Analysis, and Pauli's Uncashable Check

Robert Golub, S. K. Lamoreaux

In his book \textit{The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics}, published in 1932, J. von Neumann performed an analysis of the consequences of introducing hidden parameters (hidden variables) into quantum mechanics. He showed that hidden variables cannot be incorporated into the existing theory of quantum mechanics without major modifications, and concluded that if they did exist, the theory would have already failed in situations where it has been successfully applied. von Neumann left open the possibility that the theory is not complete, and his analysis for internal consistency is the best that can be done for a self-referenced logical system (Gödel's theorem). This analysis had been taken as an ``incorrect proof" against the existence of hidden variables. von Neumann's so-called proof isn't even wrong as such a proof does not exist. One of the earliest attempts at a hidden variable theory was by D. Bohm, and because there were no experimental consequences, W. Pauli referred to it as an ``uncashable check." To our knowledge, a successful hidden variable extension to quantum mechanics with testable consequences has not yet been produced, suggesting that von Neumann's analysis is worthy of rehabilitation, which we attempt to provide in a straightforward manner.

arXiv:2401.04002•Jan 8, 2024•0 citations
In his book \textit{The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics}, published in 1932, J. von Neumann performed an analysis of the consequences of introducing hidden parameters (hidden variables) into quantum mechanics. He showed that hidden variables cannot be incorporated into the existing theory of quantum mechanics without major modifications, and concluded that if they did exist, the theory would have already failed in situations where it has been successfully applied. von Neumann left open the possibility that the theory is not complete, and his analysis for internal consistency is the best that can be done for a self-referenced logical system (Gödel's theorem). This analysis had been taken as an ``incorrect proof" against the existence of hidden variables. von Neumann's so-called proof isn't even wrong as such a proof does not exist. One of the earliest attempts at a hidden variable theory was by D. Bohm, and because there were no experimental consequences, W. Pauli referred to it as an ``uncashable check." To our knowledge, a successful hidden variable extension to quantum mechanics with testable consequences has not yet been produced, suggesting that von Neumann's analysis is worthy of rehabilitation, which we attempt to provide in a straightforward manner.