Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum pseudo-weirdness : Disentangling myth from reality

Guillaume Attuel, Matthieu Kowalski

Published Feb 27, 2025• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

V3 preprint, synthetic introduction, complete demonstration, conclusion and discussion on consequences with personal view. More complete list of references.

Related papers

Fascination for quantum weirdness: from naïve questions to fundamental concepts and applications (Orale)

Alain Aspect

•Jun 15, 2013•0 citations

Approach to Physical Reality: a note on Poincare Group and the philosophy of Nagarjuna

David Vernette, Punam Tandan, Michele Caponigro

We argue about a possible scenario of physical reality based on the parallelism between Poincare group and the sunyata philosophy of Nagarjuna. The notion of "relational" is the common denominator of two views. We have approached the relational concept in third-person perspective (ontic level). It is possible to deduce different physical consequence and interpretation through first-person perspective approach. This relational interpretation leave open the questions: i)we must abandon the idea for a physical system the possibility to extract completeness information? ii)we must abandon the idea to infer a possible structure of physical reality?

arXiv:0704.1665•Apr 13, 2007•1 citation

Introduction to quantum behavior - a primer.:Chapter 2

Sam P. de Visser, Sam P. de Visser

•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Approach to Physical Reality: A Note on Poincare Group & the Philosophy of Nagarjuna

Michele Caponigro

We argue about a possible scenario of physical reality based on the parallelism between Poincar\'{e} group and the sunyata philosophy of Nagarjuna. The notion of "relational" is the common denominator of two views. We have approached the relational concept in third-person perspective (ontic level). It is possible to deduce different physical consequence and interpretation through first-person perspective approach. This relational interpretation leave open the questions: i)we must abandon the idea for a physical system the possibility to extract the completeness information? ii)we must abandon the idea to infer a possible structure of physical reality?

Prespacetime journal•Nov 18, 2017•0 citations

Prelude: The Modern Stance

Stig Stenholm

This chapter outlines the motivation for the work. It is argued that, acknowledging the remarkable progress of science, it is essential to dissect the modern world view from the aspects of physics. The physicist may be the outsider here, but he may also bring new light on a confusing situation. In order to combine the thinking in physics with that of philosophy, the lives and achievements of Bohr and Wittgenstein have been chosen and are discussed in some detail. The analysis is based on personal experiences; it thus remains a fiction: The Myth of Physics and the World.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Jun 30, 2011•0 citations

Compendium of Quantum Physics

Daniel M. Greenberger, Klaus Hentschel, Friedel Weinert

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2009•311 citations
We argue about a possible scenario of physical reality based on the parallelism between Poincare group and the sunyata philosophy of Nagarjuna. The notion of "relational" is the common denominator of two views. We have approached the relational concept in third-person perspective (ontic level). It is possible to deduce different physical consequence and interpretation through first-person perspective approach. This relational interpretation leave open the questions: i)we must abandon the idea for a physical system the possibility to extract completeness information? ii)we must abandon the idea to infer a possible structure of physical reality?
We argue about a possible scenario of physical reality based on the parallelism between Poincar\'{e} group and the sunyata philosophy of Nagarjuna. The notion of "relational" is the common denominator of two views. We have approached the relational concept in third-person perspective (ontic level). It is possible to deduce different physical consequence and interpretation through first-person perspective approach. This relational interpretation leave open the questions: i)we must abandon the idea for a physical system the possibility to extract the completeness information? ii)we must abandon the idea to infer a possible structure of physical reality?
This chapter outlines the motivation for the work. It is argued that, acknowledging the remarkable progress of science, it is essential to dissect the modern world view from the aspects of physics. The physicist may be the outsider here, but he may also bring new light on a confusing situation. In order to combine the thinking in physics with that of philosophy, the lives and achievements of Bohr and Wittgenstein have been chosen and are discussed in some detail. The analysis is based on personal experiences; it thus remains a fiction: The Myth of Physics and the World.