The bright dark stripe image of double slit interference is significantly different from the bright dark stripe image of single slit diffraction. At present, there is no research on how to transition from double slit interference to single slit diffraction for bright and dark stripe images. An experiment was proposed to observe the changes in bright and dark stripe images by gradually blocking the right slit of the double slit, transforming the double slit interference into single slit diffraction. A new discovery has been made, which cannot be explained by the wave theory of light, a bright stripe that cannot disappears. A new theory was proposed that after passing through the double slit mask, light move in a spiral elliptical shape, and photons are thrown out at the edge of the ellipse, which is also the center of the double slit mask, forming a bright stripe forward. And the residual light from the left slit creates a bright stripe that cannot disappears. Finally, software simulations using Python Turtle demonstrate that the new theory is correct.
The bright dark stripe image of double slit interference is significantly different from the bright dark stripe image of single slit diffraction. At present, there is no research on how to transition from double slit interference to single slit diffraction for bright and dark stripe images. An experiment was proposed to observe the changes in bright and dark stripe images by gradually blocking the right slit of the double slit, transforming the double slit interference into single slit diffraction. A new discovery has been made, which cannot be explained by the wave theory of light, a bright stripe that cannot disappears. A new theory was proposed that after passing through the double slit mask, light move in a spiral elliptical shape, and photons are thrown out at the edge of the ellipse, which is also the center of the double slit mask, forming a bright stripe forward. And the residual light from the left slit creates a bright stripe that cannot disappears. Finally, software simulations using Python Turtle demonstrate that the new theory is correct.
Abstract Since they were born before the physical achievements in question, light and matter waves, which have almost no physical properties, are abstract purely mathematical concepts rather than objects. The result of the double-slit test, a series of dark and bright streaks, was determined to be caused by interfering light waves. However, this plausible principle does not stand up to scientific scrutiny, and it is not difficult to find many flaws in the conclusion upon further study. Such as: (1) The principle of generating multiple regular dark stripes cannot be found in the mathematical model. (2) In the mathematical model, the location where the dark stripe should appear most is actually the spot with the highest brightness. (3) Since the quantum property must be expressed in the process of interference, the interference will not be triggered if all conditions are not met at the same time, and therefore the principle of interference will be rejected. (4) Since the light comes from the radiation of the electron transition, it is impossible to generate a light source in a slit that may be a vacuum. (5) Interfering light waves can be subdivided into multiple parts and proliferated greatly. (6) A headless wave of light left outside the screen after the head disappears can still induce a lot of interference. (7) There is no interference effect caused by reflected light waves. (8) The effect of polarization direction on interference is neglected and the interference condition is incomplete. (9) In the causality test, to verify the effect of collapse, the photon that has collapsed into a particle should be tested again with a double slit test. (10) Whether the phenomenon of "observation determines outcome" is tampered with by observation. (11) When the phase is shifted π or the signal is reversed, waves become negative waves capable of annihilating themselves, which is typical of antimatter. In this case, matter and antimatter are conjoined. (12) If the general law of waves is followed, not only the targeted light wave passes through the slit. (13) The original version of the double-slit test cannot be reproduced, and the test results are different from those presented by contemporary technology. (14) Waves must obey Fourier's principle, but light waves, quantum waves and matter waves do not. (15) The modulation effect that waves must produce is not present in optical fiber communication. (16) If the light from different slits must interfere with each other, a mask full of slits will cause the lithographer to fail. (17) Since the size is much smaller than the wavelength, the photon is only a sampling of the light wave, but the corresponding physical properties are not presented. (18) The fact that the two stars orbiting each other do not change color only proves that the phenomenon of redshift is impossible, but does not support the inference that the speed of light is constant. (19) The Michelson-Morley test process is not open and transparent enough, and pinhole diffraction and mechanical processing using broken lines instead of curves cannot be ruled out. In conclusion: Newton's particle model was wrong but neither was the light wave theory.
We know that bright fringes on the observation-screen is the Fourier transform of light intensity that passes through diffraction slit (aperture) and we know according to Parseval and Rayleigh Theorems the power or energy of a function before and after Fourier transform is not changed that means the total intensity of light emerging slits is equal to the total intensity of bright fringes on the observation screen, but on the other hand according to destructive and constructive interference of light, some portions of the light passing through the slits destructively interfere to constitute dark fringes which means the total light intensity of fringes should be less than the total intensity passing through the slit. This is a violation of the Fourier transform. On the other hand, this paper is augmented by some very new experiments which show there are no photons in the dark fringes. A diffraction experiment by sticking narrow and small width mirrors on the dark fringes that according to the classical interpretation after destructive interference on the dark fringes should be reflected and could be found by sensors at other directions (specially reflection angle) and another experiment that by making a 1mm hole in the middle of the first dark fringe, we expect that photons can be detected by the light detector after destructive interference (passing through one another) behind the observation plan but no photon is detected. Finally, this paper provides a complete physical model associated with mathematical analysis and formulation that is based on the Schrödinger equation. This model answers to single Photon (electron) double-slit experiment with a high degree of accuracy.
Abstract Since they were born before physical achievements in question, light and matter waves, which have almost no physical properties, are abstract purely mathematical concepts rather than objects. The result of the double-slit test, a series of dark and bright streaks, was determined to be caused by interfering light waves. However, this plausible principle does not stand up to scientific scrutiny, and it is not difficult to find many flaws in the conclusion upon further study. For example, (1) the principle of generating multiple regular dark stripes cannot be found in the mathematical model. (2) In the mathematical model, the location where the dark stripe should appear most is actually the spot with the highest brightness. (3) Since the quantum property must be expressed in the process of interference, interference will not be triggered if all conditions are not met at the same time, and therefore, the principle of interference will be rejected. (4) Since the light comes from the radiation of the electron transition, it is impossible to generate a light source in a slit that may be a vacuum. (5) Interfering light waves can be subdivided into multiple parts and proliferate greatly. (6) A headless wave of light left outside the screen after the head disappears can still induce much interference. (7) There is no interference effect caused by reflected light waves. (8) The effect of polarization direction on interference is neglected, and the interference condition is incomplete. (9) In the causality test, to verify the effect of collapse, the photon that has collapsed into a particle should be tested again with a double slit test. (10) Whether the phenomenon of "observation determines outcome" is tampered with by observation. (11) When the phase is shifted π or the signal is reversed, waves become negative waves capable of annihilating themselves, which is typical of antimatter. In this case, matter and antimatter are conjoined. (12) If the general law of waves is followed, not only the targeted light wave passes through the slit. (13) The original version of the double-slit test cannot be reproduced, and the test results are different from those presented by contemporary technology. (14) Waves must obey Fourier's principle, but light waves, quantum waves and matter waves do not. (15) The modulation effect that waves must produce is not present in optical fiber communication. (16) If the light from different slits must interfere with each other, a mask full of slits will cause the lithographer to fail. (17) Since the size is much smaller than the wavelength, the photon is only a sampling of the light wave, but the corresponding physical properties are not presented. (18) The fact that the two stars orbiting each other do not change color only proves that the phenomenon of redshift is impossible but does not support the inference that the speed of light is constant. (19) The Michelson-Morley test process is not open and transparent enough, and pinhole diffraction and mechanical processing using broken lines instead of curves cannot be ruled out. In conclusion, Newton's particle model was wrong, but neither was the light wave theory.
Abstract Since it was born before its physical achievements, light waves, which have almost no physical properties, are an abstract mathematical concept rather than an objective description. Beguiled by a series of dark and bright streaks, the results of the double-slit test were misjudged as interfering light waves, so this plausible principle implied disastrous flaws. For example, (1) by changing the distance between the device and the screen, the pattern is only scaled synchronously and not reconstructed, and the expected light-wave interference does not occur. (2) Interfering light waves can be subdivided into multiple parts and proliferate greatly. (3) A headless wave of light left outside the screen after the head disappears can still induce much interference. (4) There is no interference effect caused by reflected light waves. (5) The effect of polarization direction on interference is neglected, and the interference condition is incomplete. (6) In the mathematical model, the location where the dark stripe should appear most is actually the spot with the highest brightness. The principle of generating multiple regular dark stripes cannot be found in the mathematical model. (7) Since the quantum property must be expressed in the process of interference, interference will not be triggered if all conditions are not met at the same time, and therefore, the principle of interference will be rejected. (8) Since light comes only from the radiation of the electron transition, it is impossible to generate a light source in a slit that may be a vacuum. (9) In the causality test, to verify the effect of collapse, the photon that has collapsed into a particle should be tested again with a double slit test. (10) Whether the phenomenon of "observed tampering results" obtained by observation has been tampered with. (11) When the phase is shifted π or the signal is reversed, waves become negative waves capable of annihilating themselves, which is typical of antimatter. In this case, matter and antimatter are conjoined. (12) If the general law of waves is followed, not only the targeted light wave passes through the slit. (13) The original version of the double-slit test cannot be reproduced, and the test results are different from those presented by contemporary technology. (14) Waves must obey Fourier's principle, but light waves, quantum waves and matter waves do not. (15) The modulation effect that waves must produce is not present in optical fiber communication. (16) If the light from different slits must interfere with each other, a mask full of slits will cause the lithographer to fail. (17) Since the size is much smaller than the wavelength, the photon is only a sampling of the light wave, but the corresponding physical properties are not presented. (18) The fact that the two stars orbiting each other do not change color only proves that the phenomenon of redshift is impossible but does not support the inference that the speed of light is constant. (19) The Michelson-Morley test process is not open and transparent enough, and pinhole diffraction and mechanical processing using broken lines instead of curves cannot be ruled out. (20) Kepler's law can block Hubble's law and its derivatives, dark matter and dark energy. In conclusion, Newton's particle model was wrong, but neither was the light wave theory.
Abstract There is a huge difference between the result derived from the principle of light wave interference and the objective fact: (1) the farther the propagation distance is, the larger the light wave, so the larger the light spot should be. (2) Interference only occurs on the way from the double-slit device to the light target. If the distance is longer, there should be more interference points to make the pattern brighter. (3) The stripes along the road are continuously modified by interference, so the pattern obtained by moving the light target should change with the distance. (4) Because the principle is exactly the same, interference stripes should appear at the same time with a dispersive effect. (5) The products of light wave interference should be the new light waves that diffuse around the interference point as the center of the ball. They will not only trigger more interference, but also make the increment mode of light wave form an exponential infinite iterative cycle. This would create a singularity similar to Big Bang. (6) Dark stripes are generated not by sustainable interference but by one-off annihilation. (7) If the light source is replaced by another wave source, the corresponding results cannot be obtained by double-slit, Michelson–Morley and refraction tests. (8) Let alone a photon passing through two slits at once, since the stripes are much fainter than the source, it proves that light cannot pass through any untargeted slits. (9) It is impossible to generate anything from the interference point of size 0. (10) In the causality test, the light that has collapsed into particles should be reapplied to the double slit to verify whether it can produce stripes. (11) If "observation can tamper with results", then this phenomenon is also known through observation, which means that it has been tampered with. (12) As a feature unique to light but not to other forms of waves, the polarization absence interference condition is a major defect. (13) Refraction principle: Similar to driving, the light beam turns to the side that decelerates first. (14) The simplest fundamental principles of optics are reflection and focus, but they are followed by light rather than light waves. (15) The wavelet source principle applies only to water waves but not to light waves. (16) Because the direction of vibration and propagation is orthogonal, the s-wave cannot produce the Doppler effect. The absence of the Doppler effect in binary star systems orbiting each other is an objective astronomical phenomenon, which has been mistaken for hard evidence that the speed of light does not change. This phenomenon proves that the redshift must be a misunderstanding of other astronomical phenomena and that all celestial bodies cannot have direct evidence of the Doppler effect. The absorption spectrum of hydrogen is not radiation, and the redshift data are disputed. Redshift cannot turn light into circular magnetic lines. The gravity provided by dark matter will destroy the solar system. Hubble's law of the absence of redshift is wrong. (17) Secondary light source, barely make light in transparent medium propagation principle can be justified, but not for opaque medium.
Abstract If light wave interference is the cause of the double-slit test fringe, several conclusions deduced from this principle, which are far from the objective facts, are as follows: (1) The farther the propagation distance is, the larger the light wave, and therefore the larger the spot. (2) Interference only occurs on the way from the double-slit device to the light target. The longer the optical path is, the more interference points make the pattern brighter. (3) The stripes along the way are continuously modified by interference, and the interference in the whole interval creates the stripes. The pattern of the stripes of the moving light target should change with the distance. (4) Because the principle is exactly the same, interference should be able to cause dispersion. (5) The products of light wave interference should be the new light waves that diffuse around the interference point as the center of the ball. They will not only trigger more interference but also make the increment mode of the light wave form an exponential infinite iterative cycle. This would create a singularity similar to the Big Bang. (6) Dark stripes are generated not by sustainable interference but by one-off annihilation. (7) If the light source is replaced by another wave source, the corresponding results cannot be obtained by double-slit, Michelson–Morley and refraction tests. (8) Let alone a photon passing through two slits at once, since the fringe is much fainter than the source, it proves that unaimed light cannot pass through either slit. (9) It is impossible to generate anything from the interference point of size 0. (10) It is a good method to verify the collapse principle and achievement by a double-slit test with light that has collapsed into particles. (11) The fundamental properties of quantum will challenge the principle of interference. (12) For the phenomenon of "observation can tamper with results", because this phenomenon is also known through observation, it means that it has been tampered with. (13) Only light has the characteristic of polarization, and the absence of this unique characteristic in the interference condition is a fatal flaw. (14) Similar to driving a car, light is refracted by turning the beam toward the side that slows down first. (15) The principles of geometric optics, represented by reflection and focus, are observed only by photons and not by light waves. The principle of generating a wavelet source at the point of contact is a general law that waves obey but not that light waves obey. (16) The wavelet source principle applies only to water waves but not to light waves. (17) Because the direction of vibration and propagation is orthogonal, the s-wave cannot produce the Doppler effect. It is an objective astronomical phenomenon that the double star system orbiting each other does not produce a Doppler effect. This phenomenon cannot be regarded as evidence that the speed of light is constant but only as evidence that all celestial bodies cannot produce the Doppler effect; that is, redshift is a distortion of another astronomical phenomenon. The absorption spectrum of hydrogen is not radiation, and the redshift data are disputed. The redshift cannot turn light into circular magnetic lines. Dark matter provides gravity that could destroy the solar system. Hubble's law without the Doppler effect has no basis. (18) The principle that allows light to travel properly through transparent objects is opposed to opaque ones.