Abstract If light wave interference is the cause of the double-slit test fringe, several conclusions deduced from this principle, which are far from the objective facts, are as follows: (1) The farther the propagation distance is, the larger the light wave, and therefore the larger the spot. (2) Interference only occurs on the way from the double-slit device to the light target. The longer the optical path is, the more interference points make the pattern brighter. (3) The stripes along the way are continuously modified by interference, and the interference in the whole interval creates the stripes. The pattern of the stripes of the moving light target should change with the distance. (4) Because the principle is exactly the same, interference should be able to cause dispersion. (5) The products of light wave interference should be the new light waves that diffuse around the interference point as the center of the ball. They will not only trigger more interference but also make the increment mode of the light wave form an exponential infinite iterative cycle. This would create a singularity similar to the Big Bang. (6) Dark stripes are generated not by sustainable interference but by one-off annihilation. (7) If the light source is replaced by another wave source, the corresponding results cannot be obtained by double-slit, Michelson–Morley and refraction tests. (8) Let alone a photon passing through two slits at once, since the fringe is much fainter than the source, it proves that unaimed light cannot pass through either slit. (9) It is impossible to generate anything from the interference point of size 0. (10) It is a good method to verify the collapse principle and achievement by a double-slit test with light that has collapsed into particles. (11) The fundamental properties of quantum will challenge the principle of interference. (12) For the phenomenon of "observation can tamper with results", because this phenomenon is also known through observation, it means that it has been tampered with. (13) Only light has the characteristic of polarization, and the absence of this unique characteristic in the interference condition is a fatal flaw. (14) Similar to driving a car, light is refracted by turning the beam toward the side that slows down first. (15) The principles of geometric optics, represented by reflection and focus, are observed only by photons and not by light waves. The principle of generating a wavelet source at the point of contact is a general law that waves obey but not that light waves obey. (16) The wavelet source principle applies only to water waves but not to light waves. (17) Because the direction of vibration and propagation is orthogonal, the s-wave cannot produce the Doppler effect. It is an objective astronomical phenomenon that the double star system orbiting each other does not produce a Doppler effect. This phenomenon cannot be regarded as evidence that the speed of light is constant but only as evidence that all celestial bodies cannot produce the Doppler effect; that is, redshift is a distortion of another astronomical phenomenon. The absorption spectrum of hydrogen is not radiation, and the redshift data are disputed. The redshift cannot turn light into circular magnetic lines. Dark matter provides gravity that could destroy the solar system. Hubble's law without the Doppler effect has no basis. (18) The principle that allows light to travel properly through transparent objects is opposed to opaque ones.
Abstract If light wave interference is the cause of the double-slit test fringe, several conclusions deduced from this principle, which are far from the objective facts, are as follows: (1) The farther the propagation distance is, the larger the light wave, and therefore the larger the spot. (2) Interference only occurs on the way from the double-slit device to the light target. The longer the optical path is, the more interference points make the pattern brighter. (3) The stripes along the way are continuously modified by interference, and the interference in the whole interval creates the stripes. The pattern of the stripes of the moving light target should change with the distance. (4) Because the principle is exactly the same, interference should be able to cause dispersion. (5) The products of light wave interference should be the new light waves that diffuse around the interference point as the center of the ball. They will not only trigger more interference but also make the increment mode of the light wave form an exponential infinite iterative cycle. This would create a singularity similar to the Big Bang. (6) Dark stripes are generated not by sustainable interference but by one-off annihilation. (7) If the light source is replaced by another wave source, the corresponding results cannot be obtained by double-slit, Michelson–Morley and refraction tests. (8) Let alone a photon passing through two slits at once, since the fringe is much fainter than the source, it proves that unaimed light cannot pass through either slit. (9) It is impossible to generate anything from the interference point of size 0. (10) It is a good method to verify the collapse principle and achievement by a double-slit test with light that has collapsed into particles. (11) The fundamental properties of quantum will challenge the principle of interference. (12) For the phenomenon of "observation can tamper with results", because this phenomenon is also known through observation, it means that it has been tampered with. (13) Only light has the characteristic of polarization, and the absence of this unique characteristic in the interference condition is a fatal flaw. (14) Similar to driving a car, light is refracted by turning the beam toward the side that slows down first. (15) The principles of geometric optics, represented by reflection and focus, are observed only by photons and not by light waves. The principle of generating a wavelet source at the point of contact is a general law that waves obey but not that light waves obey. (16) The wavelet source principle applies only to water waves but not to light waves. (17) Because the direction of vibration and propagation is orthogonal, the s-wave cannot produce the Doppler effect. It is an objective astronomical phenomenon that the double star system orbiting each other does not produce a Doppler effect. This phenomenon cannot be regarded as evidence that the speed of light is constant but only as evidence that all celestial bodies cannot produce the Doppler effect; that is, redshift is a distortion of another astronomical phenomenon. The absorption spectrum of hydrogen is not radiation, and the redshift data are disputed. The redshift cannot turn light into circular magnetic lines. Dark matter provides gravity that could destroy the solar system. Hubble's law without the Doppler effect has no basis. (18) The principle that allows light to travel properly through transparent objects is opposed to opaque ones.
Abstract There is a huge difference between the result derived from the principle of light wave interference and the objective fact: (1) the farther the propagation distance is, the larger the light wave, so the larger the light spot should be. (2) Interference only occurs on the way from the double-slit device to the light target. If the distance is longer, there should be more interference points to make the pattern brighter. (3) The stripes along the road are continuously modified by interference, so the pattern obtained by moving the light target should change with the distance. (4) Because the principle is exactly the same, interference stripes should appear at the same time with a dispersive effect. (5) The products of light wave interference should be the new light waves that diffuse around the interference point as the center of the ball. They will not only trigger more interference, but also make the increment mode of light wave form an exponential infinite iterative cycle. This would create a singularity similar to Big Bang. (6) Dark stripes are generated not by sustainable interference but by one-off annihilation. (7) If the light source is replaced by another wave source, the corresponding results cannot be obtained by double-slit, Michelson–Morley and refraction tests. (8) Let alone a photon passing through two slits at once, since the stripes are much fainter than the source, it proves that light cannot pass through any untargeted slits. (9) It is impossible to generate anything from the interference point of size 0. (10) In the causality test, the light that has collapsed into particles should be reapplied to the double slit to verify whether it can produce stripes. (11) If "observation can tamper with results", then this phenomenon is also known through observation, which means that it has been tampered with. (12) As a feature unique to light but not to other forms of waves, the polarization absence interference condition is a major defect. (13) Refraction principle: Similar to driving, the light beam turns to the side that decelerates first. (14) The simplest fundamental principles of optics are reflection and focus, but they are followed by light rather than light waves. (15) The wavelet source principle applies only to water waves but not to light waves. (16) Because the direction of vibration and propagation is orthogonal, the s-wave cannot produce the Doppler effect. The absence of the Doppler effect in binary star systems orbiting each other is an objective astronomical phenomenon, which has been mistaken for hard evidence that the speed of light does not change. This phenomenon proves that the redshift must be a misunderstanding of other astronomical phenomena and that all celestial bodies cannot have direct evidence of the Doppler effect. The absorption spectrum of hydrogen is not radiation, and the redshift data are disputed. Redshift cannot turn light into circular magnetic lines. The gravity provided by dark matter will destroy the solar system. Hubble's law of the absence of redshift is wrong. (17) Secondary light source, barely make light in transparent medium propagation principle can be justified, but not for opaque medium.
Abstract Since it was born before its physical achievements, light waves, which have almost no physical properties, are an abstract mathematical concept rather than an objective description. Confused by a set of dark and light streaks and a sketchy schematic that had little to do with the actual result, the double-slit test was misjudged as being caused by interfering light waves, so this plausible principle implied disastrous flaws. For example, (1) Just after passing through the double-slit device, the pattern is generated by light early or before interference. By changing the distance between the device and the screen, the pattern is only scaled synchronously without being reconstructed by interference, and imagined light-wave interference does not occur. (2) Interfering light waves can be subdivided into multiple parts and proliferate greatly. (3) A headless wave of light left outside the screen after the head disappears can still induce much interference. (4) There is no interference effect caused by reflected light waves. (5) The effect of polarization direction on interference is neglected, and the interference condition is incomplete. (6) In the mathematical model, not only are the spots with the highest brightness in the position where dark stripes should appear most, but the principle of generating multiple regular dark stripes cannot be found. (7) Since the quantum property must be carried out in the process of interference, if all conditions are not met at the same time, interference will not be triggered, and therefore, the principle of interference will be rejected. (8) Since light comes only from the radiation of the electron transition, it is impossible to generate a light source in a slit that may be a vacuum. (9) In the causality test, to verify the effect of collapse, the photon that has collapsed into a particle should be tested again with a double slit test. (10) Whether the phenomenon of "observed tampering results" obtained by observation has been tampered with. (11) When the phase is shifted π or the signal is reversed, waves become negative waves capable of annihilating themselves, which is typical of antimatter. In this case, matter and antimatter are conjoined. (12) If the general law of waves is followed, not only the targeted light wave passes through the slit. (13) The original version of the double-slit test cannot be reproduced, and the test results are different from those presented by contemporary technology. (14) Waves must obey Fourier's principle, but light waves, quantum waves and matter waves do not. (15) The modulation effect that waves must produce is not present in optical fiber communication. (16) If the light from different slits must interfere with each other, a mask full of slits will cause the lithographer to fail. (17) Since the size is much smaller than the wavelength, the photon is only a sampling of the light wave, but the corresponding physical properties are not presented. (18) The fact that the two stars orbiting each other do not change color only proves that the phenomenon of redshift is impossible but does not support the inference that the speed of light is constant. (19) The Michelson-Morley test process is not open and transparent enough, and pinhole diffraction and mechanical processing using broken lines instead of curves cannot be ruled out. (20) Kepler's law can block Hubble's law and its derivatives, dark matter and dark energy. In conclusion, Newton's particle model was wrong, but neither was the light wave theory.
Abstract A double-slit test with "light that has collapsed into particles" could bring Schrodinger's cat back to life. Because the direction of vibration and propagation is orthogonal, s-wave cannot produce Doppler effect. The constant speed of light is mutually exclusive with the Doppler effect. The gravity provided by dark matter will destroy the solar system. The following abnormal conclusions can be deduced by tying the stripes of the double-slit test with the interference of light wave: (1) the farther the propagation distance is, the larger the light wave, and therefore the larger the spot. (2) Interference only occurs in the space between the double-slit device and the target. The longer the optical path, the more interference should be generated to make the pattern brighter. (3) Along the whole interference interval, the fringe is constantly reshaped by interference, and its style should change with the distance of the target. (4) Since the principle is exactly the same, interference and dispersion should be initiated simultaneously. (5) Because interference generates stripe, the product of light wave interference should be a new light wave that spreads around the interference point as the center of the ball. It will trigger more interference in all directions, which makes the light wave form a value-added mode of exponential infinite iteration cycle. This would create a singularity similar to the Big Bang. (6) Dark streaks are generated not by sustainable interference but by one-off annihilation. (7) The results of double slit, Michelson–Morley and refraction tests cannot be obtained by using other wave sources instead of light sources. (8) Let alone a photon passing through two slits at once, since the stripes are so much fainter than the source, it proves that unaimed light cannot pass through either slit. (9) It is impossible to generate anything from the interference point of size 0. Interference to generate stripes is impractical. (10) Quantum indivisibility is mutually exclusive with the principle of interference. (11) The polarization characteristic unique to light cannot be absent in interference conditions. (12) The phenomenon of "observation can tamper with results" is known through observation, which means that this phenomenon is tampered with by observation. (13) Similar to driving a car, light is refracted by turning the beam toward the side that slows down first. (14) The generation of a wavelet source at the point of contact is a general and fundamental law of waves, which is categorically rejected by light waves. (15) It is an objective astronomical phenomenon that binary star systems orbiting each other do not produce Doppler effect. This phenomenon cannot prove that the speed of light is constant, but can only be regarded as evidence that all celestial bodies cannot produce Doppler effect, that is, redshift is a distortion of another astronomical phenomenon. The absorption spectrum of hydrogen is not radiation, and the redshift data are disputed. The redshift cannot turn light into circular magnetic lines. Hubble's law without the Doppler effect has no basis. (16) The principle that allows light to travel properly through transparent objects is opposed to opaque ones.
Abstract The constant speed of light is mutually exclusive with the Doppler effect. The gravity provided by dark matter destroys the solar system. If light wave interference produces double-slit test stripes, it will inevitably result in the following anti-conventional conclusions, which are mutually incompatible with this principle: (1) The farther the propagation distance is, the larger the cross section of the light wave, and therefore the larger the spot. (2) Interference only occurs in the space between the double-slit device and the target. The longer the optical path is, the more interference should be generated to make the pattern brighter. (3) Along the whole interference interval, the stripes are constantly reshaped by interference, and their style should change with the distance of the target. (4) Because the principle of interference has strict requirements on frequency and phase, interference and dispersion should be initiated simultaneously. (5) Because interference generates stripes, the product of light wave interference should be a new light wave that spreads around the interference point as the center of the ball. This will trigger more interference in all directions, which makes the light wave form a value-added mode of exponential infinite iteration cycle. This would create a singularity similar to the Big Bang. (6) Dark stripes are generated not by sustainable interference but by one-off annihilation. (7) The results of double-slit, Michelson–Morley and refraction tests cannot be obtained by using other wave sources instead of light sources. (8) Let alone a photon passing through two slits at once, since the stripes are so much fainter than the source, it proves that unaimed light cannot pass through either slit. (9) It is impossible to generate anything from the interference point of size 0. Interference to generate stripes is impractical. (10) Quantum indivisibility is mutually exclusive with the principle of interference. (11) The polarization characteristic unique to light cannot be absent in interference conditions. (12) The stripes are polarized and do not conform to the interference principle of light waves. (13) The phenomenon of "observation can tamper with results" is known through observation, which means that this phenomenon is tampered with by observation. (14) Similar to driving a car, light is refracted by turning the beam toward the side that slows down first. (15) The generation of a wavelet source at the point of contact is a general and fundamental law of waves, which is categorically rejected by light waves. (16) It is an objective astronomical phenomenon that binary star systems orbiting each other do not produce the Doppler effect. This phenomenon cannot prove that the speed of light is constant but can only be regarded as evidence that all celestial bodies cannot produce the Doppler effect; that is, redshift is a distortion of another astronomical phenomenon. The absorption spectrum of hydrogen is not radiation but a filtering feature, and it is impossible to produce the Doppler effect. The redshift cannot turn light into circular magnetic lines. Hubble's law without the Doppler effect has no basis. (17) The principle that allows light to travel properly through transparent objects is opposed to opaque ones. (18) A double-slit test with "lights that have collapsed into particles" could bring Schrodinger's cat back to life.
Abstract Because the polarization (vibration) vector and the propagation vector are orthogonal, light wave (s-wave) cannot produce a Doppler effect. The constant speed of light is mutually exclusive with the Doppler effect. The gravity provided by dark matter will destroy the solar system. If light wave interference produces double-slit test stripes, it will inevitably deduce the following anti-conventional conclusions which are mutually incompatible with this principle: (1) the farther the propagation distance is, the larger the cross section of the light wave, and therefore the larger the spot. (2) Interference only occurs in the space between the double-slit device and the target. The longer the optical path, the more interference should be generated to make the pattern brighter. (3) Along the whole interference interval, the stripes are constantly reshaped by interference, and their style should change with the distance of the target. (4) Since the principle is exactly the same, interference and dispersion should be initiated simultaneously. (5) Because interference generates stripes, the product of light wave interference should be a new light wave that spreads around the interference point as the center of the ball. It will trigger more interference in all directions, which makes the light wave form a value-added mode of exponential infinite iteration cycle. This would create a singularity similar to the Big Bang. (6) Dark stripes are generated not by sustainable interference but by one-off annihilation. (7) The results of double-slit, Michelson–Morley and refraction tests cannot be obtained by using other wave sources instead of light sources. (8) Let alone a photon passing through two slits at once, since the stripes are so much fainter than the source, it proves that unaimed light cannot pass through either slit. (9) It is impossible to generate anything from the interference point of size 0. Interference to generate stripes is impractical. (10) Quantum indivisibility is mutually exclusive with the principle of interference. (11) The polarization characteristic unique to light cannot be absent in interference conditions. (12) The phenomenon of "observation can tamper with results" is known through observation, which means that this phenomenon is tampered with by observation. (13) Similar to driving a car, light is refracted by turning the beam toward the side that slows down first. (14) The generation of a wavelet source at the point of contact is a general and fundamental law of waves, which is categorically rejected by light waves. (15) It is an objective astronomical phenomenon that binary star systems orbiting each other do not produce Doppler effect. This phenomenon cannot prove that the speed of light is constant, but can only be regarded as evidence that all celestial bodies cannot produce Doppler effect, that is, redshift is a distortion of another astronomical phenomenon. The absorption spectrum of hydrogen is not radiation but a filtering feature, and it is impossible to produce Doppler effect. The redshift cannot turn light into circular magnetic lines. Hubble's law without the Doppler effect has no basis. (16) The principle that allows light to travel properly through transparent objects is opposed to opaque ones. (17) A double-slit test with "lights that have collapsed into particles" could bring Schrodinger's cat back to life.
Abstract The double slit test, as it is known, results in a series of alternating streaks of light and dark, presumed to be caused by interfering light waves. Careful comparison of experimental results and mathematical models reveals that the plausible theory of light-wave interference contains many fatal flaws. For example, the mathematical model does not have a mechanism for regularly producing multiple dark streaks. In practice, the spot where the dark streaks should appear is the brightest spot. Since only the electron radiates photons outward as it lowers its energy and returns to its ground state, the photon waves generated in the slit (possibly a vacuum) are of unknown origin. When light waves interfere with each other, photons can be infinitely subdivided and multiplied; After the head of the photon reaches the screen, the rest of the photon can still participate in interference; The effects of reflected light waves that most satisfy the interference conditions are not shown in the fringe. The important influence of polarization direction is not considered in the interference condition. In the causality test, the photon that has collapsed into a particle should be retested with a double slit test. In the causality test, the photon that has collapsed into a particle should be retested with a double slit test. The phenomenon of "observation determines outcome" has also been observed. When the phase is shifted π or the signal is reversed, it becomes a negative wave that cancels itself out. The transmittance of light waves through a double-slit device should not be so weak. As a fundamental physical property, waves must have bandwidth, but light and quantum only have a single frequency, which does not conform to the Fourier transform principle that waves must follow. Light waves in optical fiber communication must produce modulation effect, which has not been shown in reality. If the light waves from different slits interfere with each other, a mask similar to a two-slit device will not allow the lithographer to work properly. A photon whose size is much smaller than the wave length does not represent the whole wave but only represents a sample of the wave, but the corresponding physical properties are not shown. A pair of stars orbiting each other without changing color only proves that redshift is impossible but not that the speed of light is constant. Due to the late birth of radio technology, many physical properties of electromagnetic waves were not included in the light and matter waves proposed earlier. The results of the double slit test only prove that the simple quantum particle model is incorrect but do not provide evidence that the wave model is correct.