Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Why Non-Scientists Are Needed to Advance Science

Manuel S. Morales

Published Feb 10, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A new empirical method has been developed to test superdeterminism, i.e., predetermined events. The successful results reveal that current scientific methods fail to account for the predetermined condition of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal variables that can only come-to-exist yet are necessary to conduct all local experiments. The discovery of nonlocal missing variables in scientific investigations explains why local methods yield false-positive and false-negative results. The unambiguous empirical evidence obtained has undergone peer review, has been published, and can be tested by the entire human race via the Final Selection Experiment. Because the evidence is universal and absolute, it paves the way for scientific research around the globe to adopt this new method for the advancement of science. However, scientists still require funding and peer acceptance. Thus, nonscientists who are free from peer pressure and scientific accolades and who have the authority to grant such funding will inadvertently be needed to advance science beyond peer bias.

DOI
10.31219/osf.io/uxzwv_v2

Related papers

Why Non-Scientists Are Needed to Advance Science

Manuel S. Morales

A new empirical method has been developed to test superdeterminism, i.e., predetermined events. The successful results reveal that current scientific methods fail to account for the predetermined condition of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal variables that can only come-to-exist yet are necessary to conduct all local experiments. The discovery of nonlocal missing variables in scientific investigations explains why local methods yield false-positive and false-negative results. The unambiguous empirical evidence obtained has undergone peer review, has been published, and can be tested by the entire human race via the Final Selection Experiment. Because the evidence is universal and absolute, it paves the way for scientific research around the globe to adopt this new method for the advancement of science. However, scientists still require funding and peer acceptance. Thus, nonscientists who are free from peer pressure and scientific accolades and who have the authority to grant such funding will inadvertently be needed to advance science beyond peer bias.

•Feb 14, 2025•0 citations

Why Non-Scientists Are Needed to Advance Science

Manuel S. Morales

A new empirical method has been developed to test superdeterminism, i.e., predetermined events. [1] The successful results reveal that current scientific methods fail to account for the predetermined condition of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal variables that can only come-to-exist yet are necessary to conduct all local experiments. The discovery of nonlocal missing variables in scientific investigations explains why local methods yield false-positive and false-negative results. The unambiguous empirical evidence obtained has undergone peer review, has been published, and can be tested by the entire human race via the Final Selection Experiment. [2] The evidence is universal and absolute, which sets the stage for researchers worldwide to embrace this new method for the advancement of science. However, scientists still require funding and peer acceptance. Thus, nonscientists who are free from peer pressure and have the authority to grant such funding will inadvertently be needed to advance science beyond its current limitations.

•Jan 6, 2025•0 citations

How Artwork Was Used to Obtain Unambiguous Empirical Evidence of Superdeterminism

Manuel S. Morales

The United Nations has designated 2025 as the ‘International Year of Quantum Science and Technology’ in recognition of the 100-year anniversary of the theory of quantum mechanics. As with all fields of science, unbiased empirical evidence can establish if a scientific theory is valid or not. By repeating what had been done twice before, I developed a nonlocal no-go method, i.e., the Method of Everything, that tested without ambiguity physicist John S Bell’s superdeterminism loophole, thereby establishing that nonlocal cause predetermines local effects. This means that quantum mechanics is not a fundamental theory as currently recognized. It also means that Albert Einstein was correct about quantum mechanics being an incomplete theory. In the peer-reviewed Method of Everything manuscript, I presented unambiguous empirical evidence that confirmed local events are predetermined nonlocally. Therefore, the goal of this article is not to rehash what has already been published. Rather, I will review the manuscript by addressing how I used artwork as a mechanism to empirically confirm superdeterminism by leading the reader through the lessons I learned and the steps taken while also addressing why scientists, in general, could not make the same discovery. Moreover, I have provided an experiment for the entire human race to confirm and thus peer-review my findings for themselves by testing if the functions of motion are predetermined laws of nature. Accordingly, I discuss the ramifications of this discovery as well as how the findings can help to advance science.

•Nov 15, 2024•0 citations

Method of Everything vs. Experimenter Bias of Loophole-Free Bell Experiments

Manuel S. Morales

Experimenter bias compromises the integrity and advancement of science especially when awarded as such. For example, the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded the loophole-free experiments that tested physicist John S. Bell’s inequality theorem. These experiments employed the logic of conducting local experiments to obtain local evidence to contradict local realistic theories of nature in order to validate quantum mechanics as a fundamental nonlocal theory. Be that as it may, there was one loophole that was wittingly not tested by the Nobel laureates. The notable exception was Bell’s “super-deterministic” loophole which was validated (2000) (2001) (2002) (2003) (2004) (2005) (2006) (2007) (2008) (2009) (2010) (2011) (2012) nonlocally thus compromising the subsequent Nobel Prize. More importantly, the discovery of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal hidden variables revealed why local scientific methods obtain false-positive and false-negative results. With knowledge of this fundamental omission, the inclusion of the nonlocal hidden variables in the local methods used in science can then advance it to be a complete study of nature.

•Sep 8, 2023•0 citations

The Method of Everything vs. Experimenter Bias of Loophole-Free Bell Experiments

Manuel S. Morales

Experimenter bias compromises the integrity and advancement of science, especially when awarded as such. For example, the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded for the loophole-free experiments that tested physicist John S. Bell's inequality theorem. These experiments employed the logic of conducting local experiments to obtain local evidence that contradicted local realistic theories of nature, thereby validating quantum mechanics as a fundamental non-local theory. However, there was one loophole that was wittingly not tested by the Nobel laureates. The notable exception was Bell's "super-deterministic" loophole, which was validated (2000) (2001) (2002) (2003) (2004) (2005) (2006) (2007) (2008) (2009) (2010) (2011) (2012) non-locally, thus compromising the subsequent Nobel Prize. More importantly, the discovery of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive non-local hidden variables revealed why local scientific methods obtain false-positive and false-negative results. With knowledge of this fundamental omission, the inclusion of the non-local hidden variables in the local methods used in science can then advance it to be a complete study of nature.

Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics•Jul 11, 2024•2 citations

Waves versus particles

Tony Hey, Patrick Walters

… I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman Science and experiment Science is a special kind of explanation of the things we see around us. It starts with a problem and curiosity. Something strikes the scientist as odd. It doesn't fit in with the usual explanation. Maybe harder thinking or more careful observation will resolve the problem. If it remains a puzzle, it stimulates the scientist's imagination. Perhaps a completely new way of looking at things is needed? Scientists are perpetually trying to find better explanations – better in the sense that any new explanation must not only explain the new puzzle, but also be consistent with all of the previous explanations that still work well. The hallmark of any scientific explanation or ‘theory’ is that it must be able to make successful predictions. In other words, any decent theory must be able to say what will happen in any given set of circumstances. Thus, any new theory will only become generally accepted by the scientific community if it is able not only to explain the observations that scientists have already made, but also to foretell the results of new, as yet unperformed, experiments. This rigorous testing of new scientific ideas is the key feature that distinguishes science from other fields of intellectual endeavour -such as history or even economics – or from a pseudoscience such as astrology.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Oct 23, 2003•0 citations
A new empirical method has been developed to test superdeterminism, i.e., predetermined events. The successful results reveal that current scientific methods fail to account for the predetermined condition of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal variables that can only come-to-exist yet are necessary to conduct all local experiments. The discovery of nonlocal missing variables in scientific investigations explains why local methods yield false-positive and false-negative results. The unambiguous empirical evidence obtained has undergone peer review, has been published, and can be tested by the entire human race via the Final Selection Experiment. Because the evidence is universal and absolute, it paves the way for scientific research around the globe to adopt this new method for the advancement of science. However, scientists still require funding and peer acceptance. Thus, nonscientists who are free from peer pressure and scientific accolades and who have the authority to grant such funding will inadvertently be needed to advance science beyond peer bias.
A new empirical method has been developed to test superdeterminism, i.e., predetermined events. The successful results reveal that current scientific methods fail to account for the predetermined condition of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal variables that can only come-to-exist yet are necessary to conduct all local experiments. The discovery of nonlocal missing variables in scientific investigations explains why local methods yield false-positive and false-negative results. The unambiguous empirical evidence obtained has undergone peer review, has been published, and can be tested by the entire human race via the Final Selection Experiment. Because the evidence is universal and absolute, it paves the way for scientific research around the globe to adopt this new method for the advancement of science. However, scientists still require funding and peer acceptance. Thus, nonscientists who are free from peer pressure and scientific accolades and who have the authority to grant such funding will inadvertently be needed to advance science beyond peer bias.
A new empirical method has been developed to test superdeterminism, i.e., predetermined events. [1] The successful results reveal that current scientific methods fail to account for the predetermined condition of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal variables that can only come-to-exist yet are necessary to conduct all local experiments. The discovery of nonlocal missing variables in scientific investigations explains why local methods yield false-positive and false-negative results. The unambiguous empirical evidence obtained has undergone peer review, has been published, and can be tested by the entire human race via the Final Selection Experiment. [2] The evidence is universal and absolute, which sets the stage for researchers worldwide to embrace this new method for the advancement of science. However, scientists still require funding and peer acceptance. Thus, nonscientists who are free from peer pressure and have the authority to grant such funding will inadvertently be needed to advance science beyond its current limitations.
The United Nations has designated 2025 as the ‘International Year of Quantum Science and Technology’ in recognition of the 100-year anniversary of the theory of quantum mechanics. As with all fields of science, unbiased empirical evidence can establish if a scientific theory is valid or not. By repeating what had been done twice before, I developed a nonlocal no-go method, i.e., the Method of Everything, that tested without ambiguity physicist John S Bell’s superdeterminism loophole, thereby establishing that nonlocal cause predetermines local effects. This means that quantum mechanics is not a fundamental theory as currently recognized. It also means that Albert Einstein was correct about quantum mechanics being an incomplete theory. In the peer-reviewed Method of Everything manuscript, I presented unambiguous empirical evidence that confirmed local events are predetermined nonlocally. Therefore, the goal of this article is not to rehash what has already been published. Rather, I will review the manuscript by addressing how I used artwork as a mechanism to empirically confirm superdeterminism by leading the reader through the lessons I learned and the steps taken while also addressing why scientists, in general, could not make the same discovery. Moreover, I have provided an experiment for the entire human race to confirm and thus peer-review my findings for themselves by testing if the functions of motion are predetermined laws of nature. Accordingly, I discuss the ramifications of this discovery as well as how the findings can help to advance science.
Experimenter bias compromises the integrity and advancement of science especially when awarded as such. For example, the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded the loophole-free experiments that tested physicist John S. Bell’s inequality theorem. These experiments employed the logic of conducting local experiments to obtain local evidence to contradict local realistic theories of nature in order to validate quantum mechanics as a fundamental nonlocal theory. Be that as it may, there was one loophole that was wittingly not tested by the Nobel laureates. The notable exception was Bell’s “super-deterministic” loophole which was validated (2000) (2001) (2002) (2003) (2004) (2005) (2006) (2007) (2008) (2009) (2010) (2011) (2012) nonlocally thus compromising the subsequent Nobel Prize. More importantly, the discovery of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal hidden variables revealed why local scientific methods obtain false-positive and false-negative results. With knowledge of this fundamental omission, the inclusion of the nonlocal hidden variables in the local methods used in science can then advance it to be a complete study of nature.
Experimenter bias compromises the integrity and advancement of science, especially when awarded as such. For example, the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded for the loophole-free experiments that tested physicist John S. Bell's inequality theorem. These experiments employed the logic of conducting local experiments to obtain local evidence that contradicted local realistic theories of nature, thereby validating quantum mechanics as a fundamental non-local theory. However, there was one loophole that was wittingly not tested by the Nobel laureates. The notable exception was Bell's "super-deterministic" loophole, which was validated (2000) (2001) (2002) (2003) (2004) (2005) (2006) (2007) (2008) (2009) (2010) (2011) (2012) non-locally, thus compromising the subsequent Nobel Prize. More importantly, the discovery of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive non-local hidden variables revealed why local scientific methods obtain false-positive and false-negative results. With knowledge of this fundamental omission, the inclusion of the non-local hidden variables in the local methods used in science can then advance it to be a complete study of nature.
… I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman Science and experiment Science is a special kind of explanation of the things we see around us. It starts with a problem and curiosity. Something strikes the scientist as odd. It doesn't fit in with the usual explanation. Maybe harder thinking or more careful observation will resolve the problem. If it remains a puzzle, it stimulates the scientist's imagination. Perhaps a completely new way of looking at things is needed? Scientists are perpetually trying to find better explanations – better in the sense that any new explanation must not only explain the new puzzle, but also be consistent with all of the previous explanations that still work well. The hallmark of any scientific explanation or ‘theory’ is that it must be able to make successful predictions. In other words, any decent theory must be able to say what will happen in any given set of circumstances. Thus, any new theory will only become generally accepted by the scientific community if it is able not only to explain the observations that scientists have already made, but also to foretell the results of new, as yet unperformed, experiments. This rigorous testing of new scientific ideas is the key feature that distinguishes science from other fields of intellectual endeavour -such as history or even economics – or from a pseudoscience such as astrology.