© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

How Artwork Was Used to Obtain Unambiguous Empirical Evidence of Superdeterminism

Manuel S. Morales

Published Nov 15, 2024• 0 citations

Abstract

The United Nations has designated 2025 as the ‘International Year of Quantum Science and Technology’ in recognition of the 100-year anniversary of the theory of quantum mechanics. As with all fields of science, unbiased empirical evidence can establish if a scientific theory is valid or not. By repeating what had been done twice before, I developed a nonlocal no-go method, i.e., the Method of Everything, that tested without ambiguity physicist John S Bell’s superdeterminism loophole, thereby establishing that nonlocal cause predetermines local effects. This means that quantum mechanics is not a fundamental theory as currently recognized. It also means that Albert Einstein was correct about quantum mechanics being an incomplete theory. In the peer-reviewed Method of Everything manuscript, I presented unambiguous empirical evidence that confirmed local events are predetermined nonlocally. Therefore, the goal of this article is not to rehash what has already been published. Rather, I will review the manuscript by addressing how I used artwork as a mechanism to empirically confirm superdeterminism by leading the reader through the lessons I learned and the steps taken while also addressing why scientists, in general, could not make the same discovery. Moreover, I have provided an experiment for the entire human race to confirm and thus peer-review my findings for themselves by testing if the functions of motion are predetermined laws of nature. Accordingly, I discuss the ramifications of this discovery as well as how the findings can help to advance science.

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/zmpfy

Related papers

Why Non-Scientists Are Needed to Advance Science

Manuel S. Morales

A new empirical method has been developed to test superdeterminism, i.e., predetermined events. The successful results reveal that current scientific methods fail to account for the predetermined condition of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal variables that can only come-to-exist yet are necessary to conduct all local experiments. The discovery of nonlocal missing variables in scientific investigations explains why local methods yield false-positive and false-negative results. The unambiguous empirical evidence obtained has undergone peer review, has been published, and can be tested by the entire human race via the Final Selection Experiment. Because the evidence is universal and absolute, it paves the way for scientific research around the globe to adopt this new method for the advancement of science. However, scientists still require funding and peer acceptance. Thus, nonscientists who are free from peer pressure and scientific accolades and who have the authority to grant such funding will inadvertently be needed to advance science beyond peer bias.

•Feb 14, 2025•0 citations

Why Non-Scientists Are Needed to Advance Science

Manuel S. Morales

A new empirical method has been developed to test superdeterminism, i.e., predetermined events. [1] The successful results reveal that current scientific methods fail to account for the predetermined condition of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal variables that can only come-to-exist yet are necessary to conduct all local experiments. The discovery of nonlocal missing variables in scientific investigations explains why local methods yield false-positive and false-negative results. The unambiguous empirical evidence obtained has undergone peer review, has been published, and can be tested by the entire human race via the Final Selection Experiment. [2] The evidence is universal and absolute, which sets the stage for researchers worldwide to embrace this new method for the advancement of science. However, scientists still require funding and peer acceptance. Thus, nonscientists who are free from peer pressure and have the authority to grant such funding will inadvertently be needed to advance science beyond its current limitations.

•Jan 6, 2025•0 citations

Why Non-Scientists Are Needed to Advance Science

Manuel S. Morales

A new empirical method has been developed to test superdeterminism, i.e., predetermined events. The successful results reveal that current scientific methods fail to account for the predetermined condition of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal variables that can only come-to-exist yet are necessary to conduct all local experiments. The discovery of nonlocal missing variables in scientific investigations explains why local methods yield false-positive and false-negative results. The unambiguous empirical evidence obtained has undergone peer review, has been published, and can be tested by the entire human race via the Final Selection Experiment. Because the evidence is universal and absolute, it paves the way for scientific research around the globe to adopt this new method for the advancement of science. However, scientists still require funding and peer acceptance. Thus, nonscientists who are free from peer pressure and scientific accolades and who have the authority to grant such funding will inadvertently be needed to advance science beyond peer bias.

•Feb 10, 2025•0 citations

Method of Everything vs. Experimenter Bias of Loophole-Free Bell Experiments

Manuel S. Morales

Experimenter bias compromises the integrity and advancement of science especially when awarded as such. For example, the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded the loophole-free experiments that tested physicist John S. Bell’s inequality theorem. These experiments employed the logic of conducting local experiments to obtain local evidence to contradict local realistic theories of nature in order to validate quantum mechanics as a fundamental nonlocal theory. Be that as it may, there was one loophole that was wittingly not tested by the Nobel laureates. The notable exception was Bell’s “super-deterministic” loophole which was validated (2000) (2001) (2002) (2003) (2004) (2005) (2006) (2007) (2008) (2009) (2010) (2011) (2012) nonlocally thus compromising the subsequent Nobel Prize. More importantly, the discovery of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal hidden variables revealed why local scientific methods obtain false-positive and false-negative results. With knowledge of this fundamental omission, the inclusion of the nonlocal hidden variables in the local methods used in science can then advance it to be a complete study of nature.

•Sep 8, 2023•0 citations

Experimental test of nonlocal causality

Martin Ringbauer, Christina Giarmatzi, Rafael Chaves +3 more

Explaining observations in terms of cause-and-effect (causal) relations is central to empirical science. However, in his seminal 1964 work [1], John Bell showed that the correlations between entangled quantum systems cannot be explained in terms of, possibly hidden, cause and effect relations. After four decades of experimental effort, Bell's prediction has recently been confirmed in an unambiguous way by a series of loophole-free Bell-test experiments [2-4]. These experiments, however, cannot reveal where exactly quantum mechanics breaks with our classical notion of cause and effect. Specifically, Bell's theorem is based on the central assumptions of realism and local causality. Realism posits that physical systems have real, objective properties, independent of whether we observe them or not, and local causality assumes that causal influences cannot propagate faster than the speed of light.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC)•Jun 1, 2017•7 citations

The Method of Everything vs. Experimenter Bias of Loophole-Free Bell Experiments

Manuel S. Morales

Experimenter bias compromises the integrity and advancement of science, especially when awarded as such. For example, the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded for the loophole-free experiments that tested physicist John S. Bell's inequality theorem. These experiments employed the logic of conducting local experiments to obtain local evidence that contradicted local realistic theories of nature, thereby validating quantum mechanics as a fundamental non-local theory. However, there was one loophole that was wittingly not tested by the Nobel laureates. The notable exception was Bell's "super-deterministic" loophole, which was validated (2000) (2001) (2002) (2003) (2004) (2005) (2006) (2007) (2008) (2009) (2010) (2011) (2012) non-locally, thus compromising the subsequent Nobel Prize. More importantly, the discovery of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive non-local hidden variables revealed why local scientific methods obtain false-positive and false-negative results. With knowledge of this fundamental omission, the inclusion of the non-local hidden variables in the local methods used in science can then advance it to be a complete study of nature.

Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics•Jul 11, 2024•2 citations

The United Nations has designated 2025 as the ‘International Year of Quantum Science and Technology’ in recognition of the 100-year anniversary of the theory of quantum mechanics. As with all fields of science, unbiased empirical evidence can establish if a scientific theory is valid or not. By repeating what had been done twice before, I developed a nonlocal no-go method, i.e., the Method of Everything, that tested without ambiguity physicist John S Bell’s superdeterminism loophole, thereby establishing that nonlocal cause predetermines local effects. This means that quantum mechanics is not a fundamental theory as currently recognized. It also means that Albert Einstein was correct about quantum mechanics being an incomplete theory. In the peer-reviewed Method of Everything manuscript, I presented unambiguous empirical evidence that confirmed local events are predetermined nonlocally. Therefore, the goal of this article is not to rehash what has already been published. Rather, I will review the manuscript by addressing how I used artwork as a mechanism to empirically confirm superdeterminism by leading the reader through the lessons I learned and the steps taken while also addressing why scientists, in general, could not make the same discovery. Moreover, I have provided an experiment for the entire human race to confirm and thus peer-review my findings for themselves by testing if the functions of motion are predetermined laws of nature. Accordingly, I discuss the ramifications of this discovery as well as how the findings can help to advance science.

A new empirical method has been developed to test superdeterminism, i.e., predetermined events. The successful results reveal that current scientific methods fail to account for the predetermined condition of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal variables that can only come-to-exist yet are necessary to conduct all local experiments. The discovery of nonlocal missing variables in scientific investigations explains why local methods yield false-positive and false-negative results. The unambiguous empirical evidence obtained has undergone peer review, has been published, and can be tested by the entire human race via the Final Selection Experiment. Because the evidence is universal and absolute, it paves the way for scientific research around the globe to adopt this new method for the advancement of science. However, scientists still require funding and peer acceptance. Thus, nonscientists who are free from peer pressure and scientific accolades and who have the authority to grant such funding will inadvertently be needed to advance science beyond peer bias.

A new empirical method has been developed to test superdeterminism, i.e., predetermined events. [1] The successful results reveal that current scientific methods fail to account for the predetermined condition of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal variables that can only come-to-exist yet are necessary to conduct all local experiments. The discovery of nonlocal missing variables in scientific investigations explains why local methods yield false-positive and false-negative results. The unambiguous empirical evidence obtained has undergone peer review, has been published, and can be tested by the entire human race via the Final Selection Experiment. [2] The evidence is universal and absolute, which sets the stage for researchers worldwide to embrace this new method for the advancement of science. However, scientists still require funding and peer acceptance. Thus, nonscientists who are free from peer pressure and have the authority to grant such funding will inadvertently be needed to advance science beyond its current limitations.

A new empirical method has been developed to test superdeterminism, i.e., predetermined events. The successful results reveal that current scientific methods fail to account for the predetermined condition of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal variables that can only come-to-exist yet are necessary to conduct all local experiments. The discovery of nonlocal missing variables in scientific investigations explains why local methods yield false-positive and false-negative results. The unambiguous empirical evidence obtained has undergone peer review, has been published, and can be tested by the entire human race via the Final Selection Experiment. Because the evidence is universal and absolute, it paves the way for scientific research around the globe to adopt this new method for the advancement of science. However, scientists still require funding and peer acceptance. Thus, nonscientists who are free from peer pressure and scientific accolades and who have the authority to grant such funding will inadvertently be needed to advance science beyond peer bias.

Experimenter bias compromises the integrity and advancement of science especially when awarded as such. For example, the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded the loophole-free experiments that tested physicist John S. Bell’s inequality theorem. These experiments employed the logic of conducting local experiments to obtain local evidence to contradict local realistic theories of nature in order to validate quantum mechanics as a fundamental nonlocal theory. Be that as it may, there was one loophole that was wittingly not tested by the Nobel laureates. The notable exception was Bell’s “super-deterministic” loophole which was validated (2000) (2001) (2002) (2003) (2004) (2005) (2006) (2007) (2008) (2009) (2010) (2011) (2012) nonlocally thus compromising the subsequent Nobel Prize. More importantly, the discovery of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive nonlocal hidden variables revealed why local scientific methods obtain false-positive and false-negative results. With knowledge of this fundamental omission, the inclusion of the nonlocal hidden variables in the local methods used in science can then advance it to be a complete study of nature.

Explaining observations in terms of cause-and-effect (causal) relations is central to empirical science. However, in his seminal 1964 work [1], John Bell showed that the correlations between entangled quantum systems cannot be explained in terms of, possibly hidden, cause and effect relations. After four decades of experimental effort, Bell's prediction has recently been confirmed in an unambiguous way by a series of loophole-free Bell-test experiments [2-4]. These experiments, however, cannot reveal where exactly quantum mechanics breaks with our classical notion of cause and effect. Specifically, Bell's theorem is based on the central assumptions of realism and local causality. Realism posits that physical systems have real, objective properties, independent of whether we observe them or not, and local causality assumes that causal influences cannot propagate faster than the speed of light.

Experimenter bias compromises the integrity and advancement of science, especially when awarded as such. For example, the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded for the loophole-free experiments that tested physicist John S. Bell's inequality theorem. These experiments employed the logic of conducting local experiments to obtain local evidence that contradicted local realistic theories of nature, thereby validating quantum mechanics as a fundamental non-local theory. However, there was one loophole that was wittingly not tested by the Nobel laureates. The notable exception was Bell's "super-deterministic" loophole, which was validated (2000) (2001) (2002) (2003) (2004) (2005) (2006) (2007) (2008) (2009) (2010) (2011) (2012) non-locally, thus compromising the subsequent Nobel Prize. More importantly, the discovery of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive non-local hidden variables revealed why local scientific methods obtain false-positive and false-negative results. With knowledge of this fundamental omission, the inclusion of the non-local hidden variables in the local methods used in science can then advance it to be a complete study of nature.