Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

A glimpse of matrix mechanics via the harmonic oscillator

Elina Palmgren, Ricardo Karam

Published Dec 23, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a glimpse of the original formulation of quantum mechanics (a.k.a. matrix mechanics), as proposed by Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan in 1925, by showing how it solves the quantum harmonic oscillator. This presentation can shed light on the relationship between different formulations and give students a deeper understanding of quantum mechanics.

DOI
10.1119/5.0141573

Related papers

The 1925 revolution of matrix mechanics and how to celebrate it in modern quantum mechanics classes

J. Tran, Leanne Doughty, James K. Freericks

In 1925, Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan developed matrix mechanics as a strategy to solve quantum-mechanical problems. While finite-sized matrix formulations are commonly taught in quantum instruction, following the logic and detailed steps of the original matrix mechanics has become a lost art. In preparation for the 100th anniversary of the discovery of quantum mechanics, we present a modernized discussion of how matrix mechanics is formulated, how it is used to solve quantum-mechanical problems, and how it can be employed as the starting point for a postulate-based formulation of quantum-mechanics instruction. We focus on the harmonic oscillator to describe how quantum mechanics advanced from the Bohr–Sommerfeld quantization condition, to matrix mechanics, to the current abstract ladder-operator approach. We also describe a number of different activities that can be included in the quantum mechanics classroom to celebrate this centennial.

American Journal of Physics•Dec 23, 2024•4 citations

Quantum Mechanics in the Heisenberg (Matrix) Picture

Ana Marı́a Cetto, Luis de la Peña

Chapter 3 introduces the student to the matrix formulation of quantum mechanics, pioneered by Heisenberg in collaboration with Born and Jordan. It provides the basic formal elements of the Heisenberg description in terms of operators and their matrix representation, derives the Heisenberg inequality, and applies the formalism to the harmonic oscillator as a central and particularly simple quantum problem. It introduces the state vectors and their Hilbert space, and concludes with a brief discussion hinting at the physical significance of the replacement of classical continuous dynamical variables with operators as a manifestation of the coupling of the particle to the radiation field.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 18, 2025•0 citations

Quantum mechanics

Yutaka Toyozawa

Elements of quantum mechanics Quantum mechanics was discovered in 1925 through groping efforts to compromise two apparently contradictory pictures on the fundamental entities in nature. One was the wave picture for light which was later extended to matter by de Broglie, another was the corpuscular picture of matter which was later extended to light by Einstein. Schrödinger's wave equation came as a natural development of the first stream, while Heisenberg's matrix mechanics was presented as a unique proposal from the second stream. In spite of completely different appearances, the two theories proved, within a couple of years after their discoveries, to be equivalent. This is a most beautiful example that the physical reality exists independent of the mathematical framework formulated for its description. In this chapter, we will give a very brief review of the principles of quantum mechanics, 1–3 mainly with the harmonic oscillator as a model system for the following reasons. The first is historical: the electromagnetic wave, whose interaction with matter is the subject of this book, is a harmonic oscillator, a system which was for the first time subject to “quantization”, thus opening a way to the discovery of quantum mechanics. The second is technical: the harmonic oscillator is one of very few examples of analytically soluble problems in quantum mechanics. The third is pedagogical: the harmonic oscillator is a system best suited for realization of the equivalence of the two different pictures mentioned above and hence for a deeper understanding of the principles of quantum mechanics.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 9, 2003•0 citations

A centennial reappraisal of Heisenberg’s Quantum Mechanics with a perspective on Einstein’s Quantum Riddle.

T. C. Choy

Heisenberg's breakthrough in his July 1925 paper that set in motion the development of Quantum Mechanics through subsequent papers by Born, Jordan, Heisenberg and also Dirac (from 1925 to 1927) is reexamined through a modern lens. In this paper, we shall discuss some new perspectives on (i) what could be the guiding intuitions for his discoveries and (ii) the origin of the Born-Jordan-Heisenberg canonical quantization rule. From this vantage point we may get an insight into Einstein's Quantum Riddle (Lande1974,Sommerfeld1918,Born1926) and a possible glimpse of what might come next after the last 100 years of Heisenberg's quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2308.04199•WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jul 1, 2026•0 citations

The 1925 Born and Jordan paper “On quantum mechanics”

William A. Fedak, Jeffrey J. Prentis

The 1925 paper “On quantum mechanics” by M. Born and P. Jordan, and the sequel “On quantum mechanics II” by M. Born, W. Heisenberg, and P. Jordan, developed Heisenberg’s pioneering theory into the first complete formulation of quantum mechanics. The Born and Jordan paper is the subject of the present article. This paper introduced matrices to physicists. We discuss the original postulates of quantum mechanics, present the two-part discovery of the law of commutation, and clarify the origin of Heisenberg’s equation. We show how the 1925 proof of energy conservation and Bohr’s frequency condition served as the gold standard with which to measure the validity of the new quantum mechanics.

American Journal of Physics•Jan 12, 2009•47 citations

From matrix mechanics to quantum mechanics

Guido Bacciagaluppi, Antony Valentini

The report by Born and Heisenberg on ‘quantum mechanics’ may seem surprisingly difficult to the modern reader. This is partly because Born and Heisenberg are describing various stages of development of the theory that are quite different from today's quantum mechanics. Among these, it should be noted in particular that the theory developed by Heisenberg, Born and Jordan in the years 1925–6 and known today as matrix mechanics (Heisenberg 1925b [1], Born and Jordan 1925 [2], Born, Heisenberg and Jordan 1926 [4]) a differs from standard quantum mechanics in several important respects. At the same time, the interpretation of the theory (the topic of Section II of the report) also appears to have undergone important modifications, in particular regarding the notion of the state of a system. Initially, Born and Heisenberg insist on the notion that a system is always in a stationary state (performing quantum jumps between different stationary states). Then the notion of the wave function is introduced and related to probabilities for the stationary states. At a later stage, probabilistic notions (in particular, what one now calls transition probabilities) are extended to arbitrary observables, but it remains somewhat unclear whether the wave function itself should be regarded as a fundamental entity or merely as an effective one. This may reflect the different routes followed by Born and by Heisenberg in the development of their ideas. The common position presented by Born and Heisenberg emphasises the probabilistic aspect of the theory as fundamental, and the conclusion of the report expresses strong confidence in the resulting picture.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Oct 22, 2009•0 citations
In this paper, we provide a glimpse of the original formulation of quantum mechanics (a.k.a. matrix mechanics), as proposed by Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan in 1925, by showing how it solves the quantum harmonic oscillator. This presentation can shed light on the relationship between different formulations and give students a deeper understanding of quantum mechanics.
In 1925, Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan developed matrix mechanics as a strategy to solve quantum-mechanical problems. While finite-sized matrix formulations are commonly taught in quantum instruction, following the logic and detailed steps of the original matrix mechanics has become a lost art. In preparation for the 100th anniversary of the discovery of quantum mechanics, we present a modernized discussion of how matrix mechanics is formulated, how it is used to solve quantum-mechanical problems, and how it can be employed as the starting point for a postulate-based formulation of quantum-mechanics instruction. We focus on the harmonic oscillator to describe how quantum mechanics advanced from the Bohr–Sommerfeld quantization condition, to matrix mechanics, to the current abstract ladder-operator approach. We also describe a number of different activities that can be included in the quantum mechanics classroom to celebrate this centennial.
Chapter 3 introduces the student to the matrix formulation of quantum mechanics, pioneered by Heisenberg in collaboration with Born and Jordan. It provides the basic formal elements of the Heisenberg description in terms of operators and their matrix representation, derives the Heisenberg inequality, and applies the formalism to the harmonic oscillator as a central and particularly simple quantum problem. It introduces the state vectors and their Hilbert space, and concludes with a brief discussion hinting at the physical significance of the replacement of classical continuous dynamical variables with operators as a manifestation of the coupling of the particle to the radiation field.
Elements of quantum mechanics Quantum mechanics was discovered in 1925 through groping efforts to compromise two apparently contradictory pictures on the fundamental entities in nature. One was the wave picture for light which was later extended to matter by de Broglie, another was the corpuscular picture of matter which was later extended to light by Einstein. Schrödinger's wave equation came as a natural development of the first stream, while Heisenberg's matrix mechanics was presented as a unique proposal from the second stream. In spite of completely different appearances, the two theories proved, within a couple of years after their discoveries, to be equivalent. This is a most beautiful example that the physical reality exists independent of the mathematical framework formulated for its description. In this chapter, we will give a very brief review of the principles of quantum mechanics, 1–3 mainly with the harmonic oscillator as a model system for the following reasons. The first is historical: the electromagnetic wave, whose interaction with matter is the subject of this book, is a harmonic oscillator, a system which was for the first time subject to “quantization”, thus opening a way to the discovery of quantum mechanics. The second is technical: the harmonic oscillator is one of very few examples of analytically soluble problems in quantum mechanics. The third is pedagogical: the harmonic oscillator is a system best suited for realization of the equivalence of the two different pictures mentioned above and hence for a deeper understanding of the principles of quantum mechanics.
Heisenberg's breakthrough in his July 1925 paper that set in motion the development of Quantum Mechanics through subsequent papers by Born, Jordan, Heisenberg and also Dirac (from 1925 to 1927) is reexamined through a modern lens. In this paper, we shall discuss some new perspectives on (i) what could be the guiding intuitions for his discoveries and (ii) the origin of the Born-Jordan-Heisenberg canonical quantization rule. From this vantage point we may get an insight into Einstein's Quantum Riddle (Lande1974,Sommerfeld1918,Born1926) and a possible glimpse of what might come next after the last 100 years of Heisenberg's quantum mechanics.
The 1925 paper “On quantum mechanics” by M. Born and P. Jordan, and the sequel “On quantum mechanics II” by M. Born, W. Heisenberg, and P. Jordan, developed Heisenberg’s pioneering theory into the first complete formulation of quantum mechanics. The Born and Jordan paper is the subject of the present article. This paper introduced matrices to physicists. We discuss the original postulates of quantum mechanics, present the two-part discovery of the law of commutation, and clarify the origin of Heisenberg’s equation. We show how the 1925 proof of energy conservation and Bohr’s frequency condition served as the gold standard with which to measure the validity of the new quantum mechanics.
The report by Born and Heisenberg on ‘quantum mechanics’ may seem surprisingly difficult to the modern reader. This is partly because Born and Heisenberg are describing various stages of development of the theory that are quite different from today's quantum mechanics. Among these, it should be noted in particular that the theory developed by Heisenberg, Born and Jordan in the years 1925–6 and known today as matrix mechanics (Heisenberg 1925b [1], Born and Jordan 1925 [2], Born, Heisenberg and Jordan 1926 [4]) a differs from standard quantum mechanics in several important respects. At the same time, the interpretation of the theory (the topic of Section II of the report) also appears to have undergone important modifications, in particular regarding the notion of the state of a system. Initially, Born and Heisenberg insist on the notion that a system is always in a stationary state (performing quantum jumps between different stationary states). Then the notion of the wave function is introduced and related to probabilities for the stationary states. At a later stage, probabilistic notions (in particular, what one now calls transition probabilities) are extended to arbitrary observables, but it remains somewhat unclear whether the wave function itself should be regarded as a fundamental entity or merely as an effective one. This may reflect the different routes followed by Born and by Heisenberg in the development of their ideas. The common position presented by Born and Heisenberg emphasises the probabilistic aspect of the theory as fundamental, and the conclusion of the report expresses strong confidence in the resulting picture.