With the rapid advance in quantum computing, quantum security is now an indispensable property for any cryptographic system. In this paper, we study how to prove the security of a complex cryptographic system in the quantum random oracle model. We first give a variant of Zhandry’s compressed quantum random oracle (CStO), called compressed quantum random oracle with adaptive special points (CStOs). Then, we extend the on-line extraction technique of Don et al (EUROCRYPT’22) from CStO to CStOs. We also extend the random experiment technique of Liu and Zhandry (CRYPTO’19) for extracting the CStO query that witnesses the future adversarial output. With these preparations, a systematic security proof in the quantum random oracle model can start with a random CStO experiment (that extracts the witness for the future adversarial output) and then convert this game to one involving CStOs. Next, the on-line extraction technique for CStOs can be applied to extract the witness for any on-line commitment. With this strategy, we give a security proof of our recent compact multi-signature framework that is converted from any weakly secure linear ID scheme. We also prove the quantum security of our recent lattice realization of this linear ID scheme, by iteratively applying the weakly collapsing protocol technique of Liu and Zhandry (CRYPTO 2019). Combining these two results, we obtain the first quantum security proof for a compact multi-signature.
With the rapid advance in quantum computing, quantum security is now an indispensable property for any cryptographic system. In this paper, we study how to prove the security of a complex cryptographic system in the quantum random oracle model. We first give a variant of Zhandry’s compressed quantum random oracle (CStO), called compressed quantum random oracle with adaptive special points (CStOs). Then, we extend the on-line extraction technique of Don et al (EUROCRYPT’22) from CStO to CStOs. We also extend the random experiment technique of Liu and Zhandry (CRYPTO’19) for extracting the CStO query that witnesses the future adversarial output. With these preparations, a systematic security proof in the quantum random oracle model can start with a random CStO experiment (that extracts the witness for the future adversarial output) and then convert this game to one involving CStOs. Next, the on-line extraction technique for CStOs can be applied to extract the witness for any on-line commitment. With this strategy, we give a security proof of our recent compact multi-signature framework that is converted from any weakly secure linear ID scheme. We also prove the quantum security of our recent lattice realization of this linear ID scheme, by iteratively applying the weakly collapsing protocol technique of Liu and Zhandry (CRYPTO 2019). Combining these two results, we obtain the first quantum security proof for a compact multi-signature.
We give the first proof of security for an identity-based encryption scheme in the quantum random oracle model. This is the first proof of security for any scheme in this model that requires no additional assumptions. Our techniques are quite general and we use them to obtain security proofs for two random oracle hierarchical identity-based encryption schemes and a random oracle signature scheme, all of which have previously resisted quantum security proofs, even using additional assumptions. We also explain how to remove the extra assumptions from prior quantum random oracle model proofs. We accomplish these results by developing new tools for arguing that quantum algorithms cannot distinguish between two oracle distributions. Using a particular class of oracle distributions, so called semi-constant distributions, we argue that the aforementioned cryptosystems are secure against quantum adversaries.
With the development of quantum computation, quantum computers will break the almost classical cryptography. It is imminent to design post-quantum cryptography algorithm that could resist quantum adversaries. Lattice-based problem has been verified that could resist quantum attacks. Our goal is to design a signature and try to prove it is secure in the quantum random oracle model. Our new signature scheme is redesigned based on the signature proposed by Lyu, but that scheme only proved secure in the random oracle model. The difference between the two signature is that we introduce the middle-product operation. So our signature is based on middle-product LWE hard assumption, which enjoys a security proof from PL WE. Then we combine the secure chameleon hash function and our new scheme, prove that our new combined signature is still secure in the quantum random oracle model.
We prove near-optimal lower bounds for preprocessing attacks on quantum cryptography in the random oracle model. Specifically, we show that a T-query adversary with S qubits of non-uniform advice can recover a random key k from the n-qubit binary phase state ∣ψk⟩∝∑xR(k,x)∣x⟩ with probability at most O(NT2+ST) for N=2n. In contrast, the best known bound for post-quantum one-way functions is O(NT2+ST), with a trivial attack at S=N. This demonstrates a new advantage of quantum cryptography over classical cryptography: n qubits of communication suffice for security against preprocessing attacks with space up to N2 rather than N. Our methodology is simple: express the optimal preprocessing attack as the operator norm of a random matrix, and bound this value in expectation over the random oracle via the trace-moment method. These trace moments have a natural interpretation using compressed oracles [Zhandry, Crypto 2019], which we then analyze. This can be viewed as a simplification and generalization of the approach of Liu [Eurocrypt 2023] for proving the security of post-quantum cryptography against preprocessing attacks. We also prove the following results: (1) We tighten Liu's analysis of post-quantum PRGs in QROM, achieving a distinguishing advantage bound of O(NT2+NST). (2) For unitary synthesis, we extend the one-query lower bound of Lombardi-Ma-Wright [STOC 2024] to hold against adversaries that can make one arbitrary function query along with polynomially many (adaptive) queries to the random oracle, either before or after the function query. This also interprets the original LMW24 result in terms of compressed oracles. (3) Finally, we prove a tight O(NS) bound for the pseudorandomness of random binary phase states against space S distinguishers.
Recent developments in quantum computers pose an imminent threat to cryptography since many widely used cryptographic schemes will no longer be secure. This worrisome scenario motivated a growing interest in the field of post-quantum cryptography, which aims to design cryptosystems that are postquantum secure, i.e. secure against quantum-capable adversaries. While finding post-quantum computational hardness assumptions is pivotal to achieve this goal, an issue that is often overlooked is provable security. In fact, to prove that the post-quantum computational hardness necessarily implies post-quantum security of the derived cryptosystem, the reduction argument that establishes this implication also needs to be post-quantum. As such, many new methods have been devised in the last few years to handle this adaptation to the quantum setting. In particular, the quantum analogue of the Random Oracle Model has garnered special interest, as it is the foundation of many cryptographic schemes, from public-key encryption to digital signatures. It is also very problematic and usually the main culprit of the failure of security proofs when transitioning to the quantum setting. This work offers a comprehensive exposition on the most influential techniques developed in the last decade to enable or facilitate the construction of security proofs in the Quantum Random Oracle Model (QROM). Each presented technique offers an unique purpose and a solution to a problem provoked by the QROM, and, as such, as a whole, this works allows for an understanding of the most common strategies to construct these type of security proofs. This is accomplished by presenting and analyzing the security proof of three cryptographic schemes set in this model, which underlines the central role these techniques take in provable quantum security.
Quantum-access security, where an attacker is granted superposition access to secret-keyed functionalities, is a fundamental security model and its study has inspired results in post-quantum security. We revisit, and fill a gap in, the quantum-access security analysis of the Lamport one-time signature scheme (OTS) in the quantum random oracle model (QROM) by Alagic et al.~(Eurocrypt 2020). We then go on to generalize the technique to the Winternitz OTS. Along the way, we develop a tool for the analysis of hash chains in the QROM based on the superposition oracle technique by Zhandry (Crypto 2019) which might be of independent interest.
In his seminal work on recording quantum queries [Crypto 2019], Zhandry studied interactions between quantum query algorithms and the quantum oracle corresponding to random functions. Zhandry presented a framework for interpreting various states in the quantum space of the oracle as databases of the knowledge acquired by the algorithm and used that interpretation to provide security proofs in post-quantum cryptography. In this paper, we introduce a similar interpretation for the case when the oracle corresponds to random permutations instead of random functions. Because both random functions and random permutations are highly significant in security proofs, we hope that the present framework will find applications in quantum cryptography. Additionally, we show how this framework can be used to prove that the success probability for a k-query quantum algorithm that attempts to invert a random N-element permutation is at most O(k^2/N).