Quantum-access security, where an attacker is granted superposition access to secret-keyed functionalities, is a fundamental security model and its study has inspired results in post-quantum security. We revisit, and fill a gap in, the quantum-access security analysis of the Lamport one-time signature scheme (OTS) in the quantum random oracle model (QROM) by Alagic et al.~(Eurocrypt 2020). We then go on to generalize the technique to the Winternitz OTS. Along the way, we develop a tool for the analysis of hash chains in the QROM based on the superposition oracle technique by Zhandry (Crypto 2019) which might be of independent interest.
Quantum-access security, where an attacker is granted superposition access to secret-keyed functionalities, is a fundamental security model and its study has inspired results in post-quantum security. We revisit, and fill a gap in, the quantum-access security analysis of the Lamport one-time signature scheme (OTS) in the quantum random oracle model (QROM) by Alagic et al.~(Eurocrypt 2020). We then go on to generalize the technique to the Winternitz OTS. Along the way, we develop a tool for the analysis of hash chains in the QROM based on the superposition oracle technique by Zhandry (Crypto 2019) which might be of independent interest.
The goal of this work is to provide a general security analysis tool, namely, the quantum random oracle (QRO), for facilitating the security analysis of quantum cryptographic protocols, especially protocols based on quantum one-way function. QRO is used to model quantum one-way function and different queries to QRO are used to model quantum attacks. A typical application of quantum one-way function is the quantum digital signature, whose progress has been hampered by the slow pace of the experimental realization. Alternatively, we use the QRO model to analyze the provable security of a quantum digital signature scheme and elaborate the analysis procedure. The QRO model differs from the prior quantum-accessible random oracle in that it can output quantum states as public keys and give responses to different queries. This tool can be a test bed for the cryptanalysis of more quantum cryptographic protocols based on the quantum one-way function.
Recently, NIST released the quantum cryptography standard, which includes three new encryption algorithms capable of effectively resisting attacks from quantum computers. Experts predict that quantum computers with the ability to break current encryption methods may emerge within the next decade. In particular, the advent of Shor’s algorithm [1] has rendered public-key encryption systems based on factoring and discrete logarithm problems vulnerable. Therefore, the release of the PQC (Post-Quantum Cryptography) standard is especially timely and significant. NIST encourages system administrators to begin integrating these standards into their systems immediately to ensure future security.Among these three new encryption algorithms, SLH-DSA (derived from SPHINCS+ [2]) is a stateless hash-based digital signature scheme. This innovative scheme is designed to provide robust security while maintaining efficiency. In the SLH-DSA signature scheme, the One-Time Signature (OTS) serves as its fundamental building block. This means that improving the OTS directly enhances the overall performance of the SLH-DSA scheme.Hash-based signature schemes are generally constructed using OTS schemes. The underlying OTS scheme plays a crucial role in determining the key size and signature size of hash-based signature schemes. We propose a novel signature scheme that allows partial key reuse while maintaining a minimum quantum security level of 128 bits. Compared to the popular Winternitz OTS scheme [3] [4] [5], our proposed signature scheme demonstrates superior performance in terms of key and signature sizes for the same number of signatures, while still preserving post-quantum security.
Recent developments in quantum computers pose an imminent threat to cryptography since many widely used cryptographic schemes will no longer be secure. This worrisome scenario motivated a growing interest in the field of post-quantum cryptography, which aims to design cryptosystems that are postquantum secure, i.e. secure against quantum-capable adversaries. While finding post-quantum computational hardness assumptions is pivotal to achieve this goal, an issue that is often overlooked is provable security. In fact, to prove that the post-quantum computational hardness necessarily implies post-quantum security of the derived cryptosystem, the reduction argument that establishes this implication also needs to be post-quantum. As such, many new methods have been devised in the last few years to handle this adaptation to the quantum setting. In particular, the quantum analogue of the Random Oracle Model has garnered special interest, as it is the foundation of many cryptographic schemes, from public-key encryption to digital signatures. It is also very problematic and usually the main culprit of the failure of security proofs when transitioning to the quantum setting. This work offers a comprehensive exposition on the most influential techniques developed in the last decade to enable or facilitate the construction of security proofs in the Quantum Random Oracle Model (QROM). Each presented technique offers an unique purpose and a solution to a problem provoked by the QROM, and, as such, as a whole, this works allows for an understanding of the most common strategies to construct these type of security proofs. This is accomplished by presenting and analyzing the security proof of three cryptographic schemes set in this model, which underlines the central role these techniques take in provable quantum security.
Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm and a few other efficient quantum algorithms break many clas-sical crypto-systems. In response, people proposed post-quantum cryptography based on computational problems that are believed hard even for quantum computers. However, security of these schemes against quantum attacks is elusive. This is because existing security analysis (almost) only deals with classical attackers and arguing security in the presence of quantum adversaries is challenging due to unique quan-tum features such as no-cloning. This work proposes a general framework to study which classical security proofs can be restored in the quantum setting. Basically, we split a security proof into (a sequence of) classical security reductions, and investigate what security reductions are “quantum-friendly”. We characterize sufficient conditions such that a classical reduction can be “lifted ” to the quantum setting. We then apply our lifting theorems to post-quantum signature schemes. We are able to show that the classical generic construction of hash-tree based signatures from one-way functions and and a more efficient variant proposed in [BDH11] carry over to the quantum setting. Namely, assuming existence of (classical) one-way functions that are resistant to efficient quantum inversion algorithms, there exists a quantum-secure signature scheme. We note that the scheme in [BDH11] is a promising (post-quantum) candidate to be implemented in practice and our result further justifies it. Actually, to obtain these results, we formalize a simple criteria, which is motivated by many classical proofs in the literature and is straightforward to check. This makes our lifting theorem easier to apply, and it should be useful elsewhere to prove quantum security of proposed post-quantum cryptographic schemes. Finally we demonstrate the generality of our framework by showing that several existing works (Full-Domain hash in the quantum random-oracle model [Zha12b] and the simple hybrid arguments framework in [HSS11]) can be reformulated under our unified framework. 1
Shor's quantum factoring algorithm and a few other efficient quantum algorithms break many classical crypto-systems. In response, people proposed post-quantum cryptography based on computational problems that are believed hard even for quantum computers. However, security of these schemes against \emph{quantum} attacks is elusive. This is because existing security analysis (almost) only deals with classical attackers and arguing security in the presence of quantum adversaries is challenging due to unique quantum features such as no-cloning. This work proposes a general framework to study which classical security proofs can be restored in the quantum setting. Basically, we split a security proof into (a sequence of) classical security reductions, and investigate what security reductions are "quantum-friendly". We characterize sufficient conditions such that a classical reduction can be "lifted" to the quantum setting. We then apply our lifting theorems to post-quantum signature schemes. We are able to show that the classical generic construction of hash-tree based signatures from one-way functions and and a more efficient variant proposed in~\cite{BDH11} carry over to the quantum setting. Namely, assuming existence of (classical) one-way functions that are resistant to efficient quantum inversion algorithms, there exists a quantum-secure signature scheme. We note that the scheme in~\cite{BDH11} is a promising (post-quantum) candidate to be implemented in practice and our result further justifies it. Finally we demonstrate the generality of our framework by showing that several existing works (Full-Domain hash in the quantum random-oracle model~\cite{Zha12ibe} and the simple hybrid arguments framework in~\cite{HSS11}) can be reformulated under our unified framework.
The Fiat-Shamir transformation is a famous technique to turn identification schemes into signature schemes. The derived scheme is provably secure in the random-oracle model against classical adversaries. Still, the technique has also been suggested to be used in connection with quantum-immune identification schemes, in order to get quantum-immune signature schemes. However, a recent paper by Boneh et al. (Asiacrypt 2011) has raised the issue that results in the random-oracle model may not be immediately applicable to quantum adversaries, because such adversaries should be allowed to query the random oracle in superposition. It has been unclear if the Fiat-Shamir technique is still secure in this quantum oracle model (QROM). Here, we discuss that giving proofs for the Fiat-Shamir transformation in the QROM is presumably hard. We show that there cannot be black-box extractors, as long as the underlying quantum-immune identification scheme is secure against active adversaries and the first message of the prover is independent of its witness. Most schemes are of this type. We then discuss that for some schemes one may be able to resurrect the Fiat-Shamir result in the QROM by modifying the underlying protocol first. We discuss in particular a version of the Lyubashevsky scheme which is provably secure in the QROM.