© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

Quantum resilient security proofs

Hélder Vieira de Freitas Maia Martins

Published Dec 21, 2024• 0 citations

Abstract

Recent developments in quantum computers pose an imminent threat to cryptography since many widely used cryptographic schemes will no longer be secure. This worrisome scenario motivated a growing interest in the field of post-quantum cryptography, which aims to design cryptosystems that are postquantum secure, i.e. secure against quantum-capable adversaries. While finding post-quantum computational hardness assumptions is pivotal to achieve this goal, an issue that is often overlooked is provable security. In fact, to prove that the post-quantum computational hardness necessarily implies post-quantum security of the derived cryptosystem, the reduction argument that establishes this implication also needs to be post-quantum. As such, many new methods have been devised in the last few years to handle this adaptation to the quantum setting. In particular, the quantum analogue of the Random Oracle Model has garnered special interest, as it is the foundation of many cryptographic schemes, from public-key encryption to digital signatures. It is also very problematic and usually the main culprit of the failure of security proofs when transitioning to the quantum setting. This work offers a comprehensive exposition on the most influential techniques developed in the last decade to enable or facilitate the construction of security proofs in the Quantum Random Oracle Model (QROM). Each presented technique offers an unique purpose and a solution to a problem provoked by the QROM, and, as such, as a whole, this works allows for an understanding of the most common strategies to construct these type of security proofs. This is accomplished by presenting and analyzing the security proof of three cryptographic schemes set in this model, which underlines the central role these techniques take in provable quantum security.

Related papers

A provable secure signature in the quantum random oracle model

Zhen Zhang, Huiyan Chen, Yufan Chen

With the development of quantum computation, quantum computers will break the almost classical cryptography. It is imminent to design post-quantum cryptography algorithm that could resist quantum adversaries. Lattice-based problem has been verified that could resist quantum attacks. Our goal is to design a signature and try to prove it is secure in the quantum random oracle model. Our new signature scheme is redesigned based on the signature proposed by Lyu, but that scheme only proved secure in the random oracle model. The difference between the two signature is that we introduce the middle-product operation. So our signature is based on middle-product LWE hard assumption, which enjoys a security proof from PL WE. Then we combine the secure chameleon hash function and our new scheme, prove that our new combined signature is still secure in the quantum random oracle model.

International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Information Security (ICBCTIS)•Jul 1, 2022•2 citations

Post-Quantum Cryptography from Quantum Stabilizer Decoding

Jonathan Z. Lu, Alexander Poremba, Yihui Quek +1 more

Post-quantum cryptography currently rests on a small number of hardness assumptions, posing significant risks should any one of them be compromised. This vulnerability motivates the search for new and cryptographically versatile assumptions that make a convincing case for quantum hardness. In this work, we argue that decoding random quantum stabilizer codes---a quantum analog of the well-studied LPN problem---is an excellent candidate. This task occupies a unique middle ground: it is inherently native to quantum computation, yet admits an equivalent formulation with purely classical input and output, as recently shown by Khesin et al. (STOC '26). We prove that the average-case hardness of quantum stabilizer decoding implies the core primitives of classical Cryptomania, including public-key encryption (PKE) and oblivious transfer (OT), as well as one-way functions. Our constructions are moreover practically efficient: our PKE scheme achieves essentially the same efficiency as state-of-the-art LPN-based PKE. We also provide substantial evidence that stabilizer decoding does not reduce to LPN, suggesting that the former problem constitutes a genuinely new post-quantum assumption. Our primary technical contributions are twofold. First, we give a reduction from random quantum stabilizer decoding to an average-case problem closely resembling LPN, but which is equipped with additional symplectic algebraic structure. While this structure is essential to the quantum nature of the problem, it raises significant barriers to cryptographic security reductions. Second, we develop a new suite of scrambling techniques for such structured linear spaces, and use them to produce rigorous security proofs for all of our constructions.

quant-pharXiv:2603.19110•Lecture notes in computer science•Mar 20, 2026•0 citations

Post-Quantum Cryptography: Computational-Hardness Assumptions and Beyond.

Thomas Attema, Nicole Gervasoni, Michiel Marcus +1 more

The advent of a full-scale quantum computer will severely impact most currently-used cryptographic systems. The most well-known aspect of this impact lies in the computational-hardness assumptions that underpin the security of most current public-key cryptographic systems: a quantum computer can factor integers and compute discrete logarithms in polynomial time, thereby breaking systems based on these problems. However, simply replacing these problems by other which are (believed to be) impervious even to a quantum computer does not completely solve the issue. Indeed, many security proofs of cryptographic systems are no longer valid in the presence of a quantum-capable attacker; while this does not automatically implies that the affected systems would be broken by a quantum computer, it does raises questions on the exact security guarantees that they can provide. This overview document aims to analyze all aspects of the impact of quantum computers on cryptographic, by providing an overview of current quantum-hard computational problems (and cryptographic systems based on them), and by presenting the security proofs that are affected by quantum-attackers, detailing what is the current status of research on the topic and what the expected effects on security are.

•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Post-Quantum Cryptography Beyond Computational Security

T. Attema, Nicole Gervasoni, M.J.H. Marcus +1 more

The advent of a full-scale quantum computer will severely impact most currently-used cryptographic systems.The most well-known aspect of this impact lies in the computational-hardness assumptions that underpin the security of most current public-key cryptographic systems: a quantum computer can factor integers and compute discrete logarithms in polynomial time, thereby breaking systems based on these problems.However, simply replacing these problems by other which are (believed to be) impervious even to a quantum computer does not completely solve the issue.Indeed, many security proofs of cryptographic systems are no longer valid in the presence of a quantum-capable attacker; while this does not automatically implies that the affected systems would be broken by a quantum computer, it does raises questions on the exact security guarantees that they can provide.This overview document aims to analyze all aspects of the impact of quantum computers on cryptographic, by providing an overview of current quantum-hard computational problems (and cryptographic systems based on them), and by presenting the security proofs that are affected by quantum-attackers, detailing what is the current status of research on the topic and what the expected effects on security are.

•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Post-quantum security of cryptographic transformations in the random oracle model

Huang, Y.

In cryptography, generic transformations are often used to strengthen simpler but weaker schemes, into more sophisticated and stronger ones. This thesis aims to establish rigorous, provable notions of security for various such transformations that are relevant in the scope of post-quantum cryptography. We achieve this via formal mathematical proofs, and in some cases, via proposing new security definitions, when existing ones are inadequate. Most analyses are treated in an idealized setting known as the random oracle model.

•Apr 3, 2026•0 citations

Post-Quantum Security of Block Cipher Constructions

Gorjan Alagic, Chen Bai, Christian Majenz +1 more

Block ciphers are versatile cryptographic ingredients that are used in a wide range of applications ranging from secure Internet communications to disk encryption. While post-quantum security of public-key cryptography has received significant attention, the case of symmetric-key cryptography (and block ciphers in particular) remains a largely unexplored topic. In this work, we set the foundations for a theory of post-quantum security for block ciphers and associated constructions. Leveraging our new techniques, we provide the first post-quantum security proofs for the key-length extension scheme FX, the tweakable block ciphers LRW and XEX, and most block cipher encryption and authentication modes. Our techniques can be used for security proofs in both the plain model and the quantum ideal cipher model. Our work takes significant initial steps in establishing a rigorous understanding of the post-quantum security of practical symmetric-key cryptography.

arXiv:2510.08725•Oct 9, 2025•0 citations

Recent developments in quantum computers pose an imminent threat to cryptography since many widely used cryptographic schemes will no longer be secure. This worrisome scenario motivated a growing interest in the field of post-quantum cryptography, which aims to design cryptosystems that are postquantum secure, i.e. secure against quantum-capable adversaries. While finding post-quantum computational hardness assumptions is pivotal to achieve this goal, an issue that is often overlooked is provable security. In fact, to prove that the post-quantum computational hardness necessarily implies post-quantum security of the derived cryptosystem, the reduction argument that establishes this implication also needs to be post-quantum. As such, many new methods have been devised in the last few years to handle this adaptation to the quantum setting. In particular, the quantum analogue of the Random Oracle Model has garnered special interest, as it is the foundation of many cryptographic schemes, from public-key encryption to digital signatures. It is also very problematic and usually the main culprit of the failure of security proofs when transitioning to the quantum setting. This work offers a comprehensive exposition on the most influential techniques developed in the last decade to enable or facilitate the construction of security proofs in the Quantum Random Oracle Model (QROM). Each presented technique offers an unique purpose and a solution to a problem provoked by the QROM, and, as such, as a whole, this works allows for an understanding of the most common strategies to construct these type of security proofs. This is accomplished by presenting and analyzing the security proof of three cryptographic schemes set in this model, which underlines the central role these techniques take in provable quantum security.

With the development of quantum computation, quantum computers will break the almost classical cryptography. It is imminent to design post-quantum cryptography algorithm that could resist quantum adversaries. Lattice-based problem has been verified that could resist quantum attacks. Our goal is to design a signature and try to prove it is secure in the quantum random oracle model. Our new signature scheme is redesigned based on the signature proposed by Lyu, but that scheme only proved secure in the random oracle model. The difference between the two signature is that we introduce the middle-product operation. So our signature is based on middle-product LWE hard assumption, which enjoys a security proof from PL WE. Then we combine the secure chameleon hash function and our new scheme, prove that our new combined signature is still secure in the quantum random oracle model.

Post-quantum cryptography currently rests on a small number of hardness assumptions, posing significant risks should any one of them be compromised. This vulnerability motivates the search for new and cryptographically versatile assumptions that make a convincing case for quantum hardness. In this work, we argue that decoding random quantum stabilizer codes---a quantum analog of the well-studied LPN problem---is an excellent candidate. This task occupies a unique middle ground: it is inherently native to quantum computation, yet admits an equivalent formulation with purely classical input and output, as recently shown by Khesin et al. (STOC '26). We prove that the average-case hardness of quantum stabilizer decoding implies the core primitives of classical Cryptomania, including public-key encryption (PKE) and oblivious transfer (OT), as well as one-way functions. Our constructions are moreover practically efficient: our PKE scheme achieves essentially the same efficiency as state-of-the-art LPN-based PKE. We also provide substantial evidence that stabilizer decoding does not reduce to LPN, suggesting that the former problem constitutes a genuinely new post-quantum assumption. Our primary technical contributions are twofold. First, we give a reduction from random quantum stabilizer decoding to an average-case problem closely resembling LPN, but which is equipped with additional symplectic algebraic structure. While this structure is essential to the quantum nature of the problem, it raises significant barriers to cryptographic security reductions. Second, we develop a new suite of scrambling techniques for such structured linear spaces, and use them to produce rigorous security proofs for all of our constructions.

The advent of a full-scale quantum computer will severely impact most currently-used cryptographic systems. The most well-known aspect of this impact lies in the computational-hardness assumptions that underpin the security of most current public-key cryptographic systems: a quantum computer can factor integers and compute discrete logarithms in polynomial time, thereby breaking systems based on these problems. However, simply replacing these problems by other which are (believed to be) impervious even to a quantum computer does not completely solve the issue. Indeed, many security proofs of cryptographic systems are no longer valid in the presence of a quantum-capable attacker; while this does not automatically implies that the affected systems would be broken by a quantum computer, it does raises questions on the exact security guarantees that they can provide. This overview document aims to analyze all aspects of the impact of quantum computers on cryptographic, by providing an overview of current quantum-hard computational problems (and cryptographic systems based on them), and by presenting the security proofs that are affected by quantum-attackers, detailing what is the current status of research on the topic and what the expected effects on security are.

The advent of a full-scale quantum computer will severely impact most currently-used cryptographic systems.The most well-known aspect of this impact lies in the computational-hardness assumptions that underpin the security of most current public-key cryptographic systems: a quantum computer can factor integers and compute discrete logarithms in polynomial time, thereby breaking systems based on these problems.However, simply replacing these problems by other which are (believed to be) impervious even to a quantum computer does not completely solve the issue.Indeed, many security proofs of cryptographic systems are no longer valid in the presence of a quantum-capable attacker; while this does not automatically implies that the affected systems would be broken by a quantum computer, it does raises questions on the exact security guarantees that they can provide.This overview document aims to analyze all aspects of the impact of quantum computers on cryptographic, by providing an overview of current quantum-hard computational problems (and cryptographic systems based on them), and by presenting the security proofs that are affected by quantum-attackers, detailing what is the current status of research on the topic and what the expected effects on security are.

In cryptography, generic transformations are often used to strengthen simpler but weaker schemes, into more sophisticated and stronger ones. This thesis aims to establish rigorous, provable notions of security for various such transformations that are relevant in the scope of post-quantum cryptography. We achieve this via formal mathematical proofs, and in some cases, via proposing new security definitions, when existing ones are inadequate. Most analyses are treated in an idealized setting known as the random oracle model.

Block ciphers are versatile cryptographic ingredients that are used in a wide range of applications ranging from secure Internet communications to disk encryption. While post-quantum security of public-key cryptography has received significant attention, the case of symmetric-key cryptography (and block ciphers in particular) remains a largely unexplored topic. In this work, we set the foundations for a theory of post-quantum security for block ciphers and associated constructions. Leveraging our new techniques, we provide the first post-quantum security proofs for the key-length extension scheme FX, the tweakable block ciphers LRW and XEX, and most block cipher encryption and authentication modes. Our techniques can be used for security proofs in both the plain model and the quantum ideal cipher model. Our work takes significant initial steps in establishing a rigorous understanding of the post-quantum security of practical symmetric-key cryptography.