Reply to Folman’s Comment on my publication: A simple, practical experiment to investigate atomic wavefunction reduction within a Stern-Gerlach magnet.
Abstract For nearly one hundred years most quantum-mechanics texts have depicted a continuous, spin-direction superposition of the wavefunction of the silver atom traversing a Stern–Gerlach (S–G) magnet. But there are sound scientific arguments which deny that understanding. Schrodinger’s equation for that continuous wavefunction development cannot describe the transfer of energy from the magnetic field to that atom. Modern micro-fabrication techniques now make it possible to implement a simple, accessible experiment testing whether a spin superposition does continue in the magnet. Because the S–G experiment is the prototype for quantum measurement, that observation is crucial to implementing a realistic quantum theory of measurement.
Observation of two separated beam spots at a detection screen downstream of a Stern–Gerlach magnet does not, in fact, demonstrate that the wavefunction of a neutral spin one-half particle has remained in a spin superposition while traveling through that magnetic field. The wavefunction may have been reduced to just one spin-direction eigenfunction, as D. Bohm suggested, by immediate momentum and energy transfer with the magnet, rather than by subsequent, which-way determination at the screen. The same two beam spots at the detector screen will result. Einsteinian relativity, and the understanding of Schrödinger evolution applicability through a static potential, forbid continuation of a spin superposition through the Stern–Gerlach field. A calculation for single wavepacket development there conforms to observations from the Stern–Gerlach experiment. And several experiments corroborate immediate reduction to a single spin eigenfunction in the magnetic field. Additionally, Ramsey’s separated, oscillating fields observations, and related experiments, do not rebut this understanding.