Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Comment on ‘‘Paradox in the classical treatment of the Stern–Gerlach experiment’’

Sardar Singh, N. K. Sharma

Published Mar 1, 1984• 12 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1119/1.13710

Related papers

Interpretation of the Stern‐Gerlach experiment by means of classical physics

Juris Grēve

Physics Essays•Sep 2, 2016•1 citation

A New Approach to the Measurement and Schrödinger' Cat Paradox : Supports from Stern-Gerlach Experiment

Jungwon Lee

과학철학•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Some comments on the historical paper by H. Schmidt-Böcking “The Stern-Gerlach experiment re-examined by an experimenter” (EPN 50/3 pp. 15-19)

J. Vigué

Some comments on the historical paper by H. Schmidt-Bo ¨cking "The Stern-

Europhysics news•Sep 1, 2019•1 citation

Concerning S. Singh and N. Sharma: ‘‘Comment on ‘Paradox in the classical treatment of the Stern–Gerlach experiment’ ’’

Preben Alstrøm

American Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 1984•4 citations

Paradox in the classical treatment of the Stern–Gerlach experiment

Preben Alstrøm, Poul Georg Hjorth, R. D. Mattuck

Most textbook authors assume that the force on a magnetic moment sent into a Stern–Gerlach apparatus, is exclusively in the direction of the magnetic field. Hence they conclude that classically one should expect a continuous distribution of particles along a line in the field direction, on a screen placed behind the apparatus. However, it is easily shown that, because the divergence of the field is zero, there is in fact an equally large force transverse to the field direction. This would lead to an isotropic distribution of particles on the screen, in contradiction to the above conclusion. The paradox is resolved by taking into account the torque on the magnetic moment. This produces a rapid precession about the field direction, causing the transverse force to average out and thus giving the usual textbook result.

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1982•26 citations

The Stern-Gerlach experiment revisited

H. Schmidt‐Böcking, Lothar Ph. H. Schmidt, Hans Jürgen Lüdde +3 more

arXiv:1609.09311•The European Physical Journal H•Oct 25, 2016•49 citations
Most textbook authors assume that the force on a magnetic moment sent into a Stern–Gerlach apparatus, is exclusively in the direction of the magnetic field. Hence they conclude that classically one should expect a continuous distribution of particles along a line in the field direction, on a screen placed behind the apparatus. However, it is easily shown that, because the divergence of the field is zero, there is in fact an equally large force transverse to the field direction. This would lead to an isotropic distribution of particles on the screen, in contradiction to the above conclusion. The paradox is resolved by taking into account the torque on the magnetic moment. This produces a rapid precession about the field direction, causing the transverse force to average out and thus giving the usual textbook result.