Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nature Physics

Reply to "Testing the reality of the quantum state"

Matthew F. Pusey, Jonathan Barrett, Terry Rudolph

Published Feb 28, 2014• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/nphys2875

Related papers

Testing the reality of the quantum state

Seyyed M. H. Halataei

Nature Physics•Feb 28, 2014•3 citations

Reconstructing Bohr’s Reply to EPR in Algebraic Quantum Theory

Masanao Ozawa, Yuichiro Kitajima

Halvorson and Clifton have given a mathematical reconstruction of Bohr's reply to Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR), and argued that this reply is dictated by the two requirements of classicality and objectivity for the description of experimental data, by proving consistency between their objectivity requirement and a contextualized version of the EPR reality criterion which had been introduced by Howard in his earlier analysis of Bohr's reply. In the present paper, we generalize the above consistency theorem, with a rather elementary proof, to a general formulation of EPR states applicable to both non-relativistic quantum mechanics and algebraic quantum field theory; and we clarify the elements of reality in EPR states in terms of Bohr's requirements of classicality and objectivity, in a general formulation of algebraic quantum theory.

•Aug 17, 2016•6 citations

On the reality of the quantum state

Matthew F. Pusey, Jonathan Barrett, Terry Rudolph

arXiv:1111.3328•Nature Physics•May 6, 2012•798 citations

Wells, Simbotin, and Gavrila Reply to Comment on "Physical Reality of Light-Induced States"

Jack C. Wells, I. Simbotin, Mihai Gavrila

•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

Reply to Comment on "State-independent experimental test of quantum contextuality in an indivisible system"

Chong Zu, Y. X. Wang, Deng, D. -L. +5 more

This is a reply to the comment from E. Amselem et al. on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 150401 (2012), arXiv:1207.0059).

arXiv:1302.0619•Feb 4, 2013•0 citations

Comments on quantum reality

Robert K. Clifton

American Journal of Physics•Dec 1, 1987•0 citations
Halvorson and Clifton have given a mathematical reconstruction of Bohr's reply to Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR), and argued that this reply is dictated by the two requirements of classicality and objectivity for the description of experimental data, by proving consistency between their objectivity requirement and a contextualized version of the EPR reality criterion which had been introduced by Howard in his earlier analysis of Bohr's reply. In the present paper, we generalize the above consistency theorem, with a rather elementary proof, to a general formulation of EPR states applicable to both non-relativistic quantum mechanics and algebraic quantum field theory; and we clarify the elements of reality in EPR states in terms of Bohr's requirements of classicality and objectivity, in a general formulation of algebraic quantum theory.