Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Comments on quantum reality

Robert K. Clifton

Published Dec 1, 1987• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1119/1.15286

Related papers

Physics and mathematical reality: comments on Aharonov et al, arXiv:1902.08798

Suresh Chandra Tiwari

Do we have two kinds of reality: physical and mathematical? What is the role of mathematics in physics? These fundamental questions have intrigued original and brilliant minds since ancient times. A recent article (Aharonov, Cohen and Oaknin, arXiv:1902.08798) offers a viewpoint on the use of abstract mathematics in quantum theory. They argue that, in some cases, it may result into a paradox focusing on an example in quantum mechanics regarding Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule. In this comment we discuss three issues: theory reduction and approximation, origin of a paradox, and the reality of time. It is pointed out that paradoxes appear even in mathematics; we explain them as the results of the acceptance of pure logical artifacts. In physics too, the impact of the so called quantum and relativity revolutions, have led to the emergence of counter-intuitive and mysterious notion of the physical reality. The most fundamental change has been on rejecting the reality of time. A radically new perspective that physics is the language of mathematics is suggested. The mathematical reality of the natural numbers manifests in the form of physical time.

arXiv:1906.05537•Jun 13, 2019•0 citations

Quantum Reality

Princeton University Press eBooks•Apr 13, 2021•0 citations

Quantum Reality

Harvard University Press eBooks•Feb 15, 2022•0 citations

Comments: John Wheeler (1911‐2008): Quantum theory poses reality's deepest mystery

Science News•May 24, 2008•49 citations

Comment on “Physical Reality of Light-Induced Atomic States”

Peter Schlagheck, Klaus Hornberger, Andreas Buchleitner

A Comment on the Letter by J. C. Wells, I. Simbotin, and M. Gavrila, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3479 (1998). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Physical Review Letters•Jan 18, 1999•9 citations

Quantum Reality

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•May 1, 2007•0 citations
Do we have two kinds of reality: physical and mathematical? What is the role of mathematics in physics? These fundamental questions have intrigued original and brilliant minds since ancient times. A recent article (Aharonov, Cohen and Oaknin, arXiv:1902.08798) offers a viewpoint on the use of abstract mathematics in quantum theory. They argue that, in some cases, it may result into a paradox focusing on an example in quantum mechanics regarding Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule. In this comment we discuss three issues: theory reduction and approximation, origin of a paradox, and the reality of time. It is pointed out that paradoxes appear even in mathematics; we explain them as the results of the acceptance of pure logical artifacts. In physics too, the impact of the so called quantum and relativity revolutions, have led to the emergence of counter-intuitive and mysterious notion of the physical reality. The most fundamental change has been on rejecting the reality of time. A radically new perspective that physics is the language of mathematics is suggested. The mathematical reality of the natural numbers manifests in the form of physical time.