Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Weak Measurement

Andrew N. Jordan, Irfan A. Siddiqi

Published Feb 15, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In Chapter 4, we take a limit where the coupling of the measurement apparatus to the quantum system is very small, and in this limit, discuss weak measurements and weak values. The later involved a sequence of a weak and a strong measurement. Generalizations of these effects are discussed using the concepts in Chapter 3, and we discuss generalized eigenvalues of quantum observables that can exceed the eigenvalue range and reincorporate the concept of observables in generalized measurement theory.

DOI
10.1017/9781009103909.005

Related papers

Understanding Weak Values Without New Probability Theory

Riuji Mochizuki

The physical meaning of weak values and measurements can be completely understood with Born rule and the general probability theory. It is known that the weak value of an observable $\hat {A}$ with post-selection 〈F| may be out of the eigenvalue range of $\hat {A}$ . This is because the weak value of $\hat {A}$ with the post-selection is, in general, not the expectation value of $\hat {A}$ , but the expectation value of $\hat {A}| F\rangle \langle F|$ boosted by the post-selection.

arXiv:1604.02197•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jan 16, 2018•1 citation

Weak values and the quantum phase space

Allen Lobo, Carlos Alberto de Lima Ribeiro

We address the issue of how to properly treat, and in a more general setting, the concept of a weak value of a weak measurement in quantum mechanics. We show that for this purpose, one must take in account the effects of the measuring process on the entire phase space of the measuring system. By using coherent states, we go a step further than Jozsa in a recent paper and we present an example where the result of the measurement is symmetrical in the position and momentum observables and seems to be much better suited for quantum optical implementation.

arXiv:0903.4810•Physical Review A•Jul 23, 2009•20 citations

Measurement models and instruments

Teiko Heinosaari, Mário Ziman

Until now we have treated measurement apparatuses as devices taking quantum systems as their inputs and producing measurement outcomes as outputs. At this level of description, measurement apparatuses are fully described by observables, as discussed in Chapter 3. The measurement outcome distribution is determined by the particular input state and the observable describing the measurement device. In this chapter we explore a mathematical framework suitable for the description of measurement apparatuses for which, in addition to the measurement outcomes, the measured systems are available after the measurement is performed. In such cases we may try to obtain more information on the system by measuring some other observable, or, perhaps by filtering out some preferred output states we may use our measurement apparatus as a preparator. Clearly, in this kind of situation we need a description of measurement apparatuses that is more detailed than that of observables. Therefore, two more refined concepts, measurement models and instruments , will be investigated in this chapter. There is no customary name for a measurement model. As used here, it was first formalized in a general way by Ozawa [106], [107] who referred to the measurement process . A comprehensive general reference on quantum measurements is the monograph by Busch et al. [35], where measurement models are called premeasurements . Some other authors use the term indirect measurements . Three levels of description of measurements It is convenient to think of three levels of description when considering measurements.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 15, 2011•0 citations

Contextual Values of Observables in Quantum Measurements

Justin Dressel, Shantanu Agarwal, Andrew N. Jordan

We introduce contextual values as a generalization of the eigenvalues of an observable that takes into account both the system observable and a general measurement procedure. This technique leads to a natural definition of a general conditioned average that converges uniquely to the quantum weak value in the minimal disturbance limit. As such, we address the controversy in the literature regarding the theoretical consistency of the quantum weak value by providing a more general theoretical framework and giving several examples of how that framework relates to existing experimental and theoretical results.

arXiv:0911.4474•Physical Review Letters•Jun 15, 2010•111 citations

Measurement of a Weak Value

Randall G. Hulet, Nicholas W. M. Ritchie, J. G. Story

Abstract "Weak measurements" are measurements in which the coupling between the measuring device and the observable to be measured is so weak that the eigenvalues of the observable are not resolved. Under certain circumstances the corresponding eigenfunctions can be made to interfere, producing a measurement result which is outside the allowed range of the observable's eigenvalues. We present the first measurement of this so-called "weak value" using an optical experiment. In our experiment, the small displacement between the two orthogonally polarized components of a laser beam passed through a birefringence crystal is measured. We use a numerical simulation to show that this phenomenon may be practical for detecting and amplifying small effects.

Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Feb 1, 1997•0 citations

Mathematical Background

F. S. Levin

The quantities in physics that can be measured are conventionally denoted observables : entities that can be observed (directly or indirectly) and to which a value in appropriate units can be assigned. Examples include position, momentum, and energy. Unlike in classical physics, the concept of an observable in quantum theory possesses a significance beyond that of the measurable: to each observable there corresponds a unique operator in an abstract, linear vector space. These operators (and others) govern all aspects of quantum systems. Quantum operators act on abstract vectors in the linear space. Especially important are the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of these operators, in particular because some of the eigenvectors are the quantum states mentioned in the preceding chapters. Furthermore, for any operator that is the mathematical image of an observable, its eigenvalues constitute the entire set of values that measurement of the observable can yield . Finally, from the quantum states one can obtain the probabilities for the occurrence of events in the microscopic world, for example, the most likely value that measurement of an observable will yield. The concepts of operators and eigenvalue problems, as well as those of quantal probabilities, of Hermiticity, and of complete sets, were encountered and exemplified in the preceding chapter using the language of differential equations. While much of quantum mechanics could be presented in terms of this language alone, certain fundamental concepts (spin, for instance) cannot be, and it eventually becomes necessary to consider quantum mechanics as a theoretical framework embedded in that abstract linear vector space known as a Hilbert space.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 3, 2001•0 citations
In Chapter 4, we take a limit where the coupling of the measurement apparatus to the quantum system is very small, and in this limit, discuss weak measurements and weak values. The later involved a sequence of a weak and a strong measurement. Generalizations of these effects are discussed using the concepts in Chapter 3, and we discuss generalized eigenvalues of quantum observables that can exceed the eigenvalue range and reincorporate the concept of observables in generalized measurement theory.
The physical meaning of weak values and measurements can be completely understood with Born rule and the general probability theory. It is known that the weak value of an observable A^\hat {A}A^ with post-selection 〈F| may be out of the eigenvalue range of A^\hat {A}A^ . This is because the weak value of A^\hat {A}A^ with the post-selection is, in general, not the expectation value of A^\hat {A}A^ , but the expectation value of A^∣F⟩⟨F∣\hat {A}| F\rangle \langle F|A^∣F⟩⟨F∣ boosted by the post-selection.
We address the issue of how to properly treat, and in a more general setting, the concept of a weak value of a weak measurement in quantum mechanics. We show that for this purpose, one must take in account the effects of the measuring process on the entire phase space of the measuring system. By using coherent states, we go a step further than Jozsa in a recent paper and we present an example where the result of the measurement is symmetrical in the position and momentum observables and seems to be much better suited for quantum optical implementation.
Until now we have treated measurement apparatuses as devices taking quantum systems as their inputs and producing measurement outcomes as outputs. At this level of description, measurement apparatuses are fully described by observables, as discussed in Chapter 3. The measurement outcome distribution is determined by the particular input state and the observable describing the measurement device. In this chapter we explore a mathematical framework suitable for the description of measurement apparatuses for which, in addition to the measurement outcomes, the measured systems are available after the measurement is performed. In such cases we may try to obtain more information on the system by measuring some other observable, or, perhaps by filtering out some preferred output states we may use our measurement apparatus as a preparator. Clearly, in this kind of situation we need a description of measurement apparatuses that is more detailed than that of observables. Therefore, two more refined concepts, measurement models and instruments , will be investigated in this chapter. There is no customary name for a measurement model. As used here, it was first formalized in a general way by Ozawa [106], [107] who referred to the measurement process . A comprehensive general reference on quantum measurements is the monograph by Busch et al. [35], where measurement models are called premeasurements . Some other authors use the term indirect measurements . Three levels of description of measurements It is convenient to think of three levels of description when considering measurements.
We introduce contextual values as a generalization of the eigenvalues of an observable that takes into account both the system observable and a general measurement procedure. This technique leads to a natural definition of a general conditioned average that converges uniquely to the quantum weak value in the minimal disturbance limit. As such, we address the controversy in the literature regarding the theoretical consistency of the quantum weak value by providing a more general theoretical framework and giving several examples of how that framework relates to existing experimental and theoretical results.
Abstract "Weak measurements" are measurements in which the coupling between the measuring device and the observable to be measured is so weak that the eigenvalues of the observable are not resolved. Under certain circumstances the corresponding eigenfunctions can be made to interfere, producing a measurement result which is outside the allowed range of the observable's eigenvalues. We present the first measurement of this so-called "weak value" using an optical experiment. In our experiment, the small displacement between the two orthogonally polarized components of a laser beam passed through a birefringence crystal is measured. We use a numerical simulation to show that this phenomenon may be practical for detecting and amplifying small effects.
The quantities in physics that can be measured are conventionally denoted observables : entities that can be observed (directly or indirectly) and to which a value in appropriate units can be assigned. Examples include position, momentum, and energy. Unlike in classical physics, the concept of an observable in quantum theory possesses a significance beyond that of the measurable: to each observable there corresponds a unique operator in an abstract, linear vector space. These operators (and others) govern all aspects of quantum systems. Quantum operators act on abstract vectors in the linear space. Especially important are the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of these operators, in particular because some of the eigenvectors are the quantum states mentioned in the preceding chapters. Furthermore, for any operator that is the mathematical image of an observable, its eigenvalues constitute the entire set of values that measurement of the observable can yield . Finally, from the quantum states one can obtain the probabilities for the occurrence of events in the microscopic world, for example, the most likely value that measurement of an observable will yield. The concepts of operators and eigenvalue problems, as well as those of quantal probabilities, of Hermiticity, and of complete sets, were encountered and exemplified in the preceding chapter using the language of differential equations. While much of quantum mechanics could be presented in terms of this language alone, certain fundamental concepts (spin, for instance) cannot be, and it eventually becomes necessary to consider quantum mechanics as a theoretical framework embedded in that abstract linear vector space known as a Hilbert space.