Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1604.02197 · International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Understanding Weak Values Without New Probability Theory

Riuji Mochizuki

Published Jan 16, 2018• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The physical meaning of weak values and measurements can be completely understood with Born rule and the general probability theory. It is known that the weak value of an observable $\hat {A}$ with post-selection 〈F| may be out of the eigenvalue range of $\hat {A}$ . This is because the weak value of $\hat {A}$ with the post-selection is, in general, not the expectation value of $\hat {A}$ , but the expectation value of $\hat {A}| F\rangle \langle F|$ boosted by the post-selection.

DOI
10.1007/s10773-018-3662-1

Related papers

Understanding weak values without new physics

Riuji Mochizuki

The physical meaning of weak values and measurements can be completely understood within the framework of a conventional quantum mechanical approach. We should not expect the weak value of an observable $\hat A$ with post-selection $\langle F|$ within the eigenvalue range of $\hat A$ because it is not an expectation value of $\hat A$.

•Apr 7, 2016•0 citations

Weak value as a fundamental concept and uncertainty relation

Akio Hosoya

In the previous meeting I demonstrated that the contextual value of an observable coincides with the weak value of Aharonov and his colleagues on the basis of consistency of quantum mechanics with Kolmogorov's measure theory of probability and that this consistency also leads to Born's rule as the unique probability measure of events to be discovered by the post-selection. I would like to point out in the meeting of this year that the error and disturbance defined by Ozawa in his work on the Heisenberg uncertainty relation can be interpreted in terms of the weak value. This observation further strengthens the viewpoint that the weak value is the "true value" of an observable before measurement.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

WEAK MEASUREMENTS

J. G. Story, Nicholas W. M. Ritchie, Randall G. Hulet

A general description of weak measurements is presented. The “weak value” of an operator in pre- and post-selected systems is described both mathematically and using physical arguments. An optical experiment in which a measurement of a weak value has been realized is described. The possible use of pre- and post-selection as a means to amplify and detect weak effects is also discussed.

Modern Physics Letters B•Nov 10, 1991•11 citations

What Is a Quantum-Mechanical “Weak Value” the Value of?

B. E. Y. Svensson

A so called “weak value” of an observable in quantum mechanics (QM) may be obtained in a weak measurement + post-selection procedure on the QM system under study. Applied to number operators, it has been invoked in revisiting some QM paradoxes ( e.g. , the so called Three-Box Paradox and Hardy’s Paradox). This requires the weak value to be interpreted as a bona fide property of the system considered, a par with entities like operator mean values and eigenvalues. I question such an interpretation; it has no support in the basic axioms of quantum mechanics and it leads to unreasonable results in concrete situations.

arXiv:1301.4328•Foundations of Physics•Sep 4, 2013•27 citations

Does the post-selection amplify the information for parameter estimation?

Saki Tanaka, Naoki Yamamoto

It is known that the weak measurement can significantly amplify the mean of measurement results, sometimes out of the range limited in usual quantum measurement. This fact, as actively demonstrated recently in both theory and experiment, implies the possibility to estimate a very small parameter using the weak measurement technique. But does the weak measurement really bring about the increase of information for parameter estimation? This paper provides an answer to this question, in a general situation.

•Jun 11, 2013•1 citation

A simple proof that anomalous weak values require coherence

Rafael Wagner, Ernesto F. Galvão

The quantum mechanical weak value $A_w=\left\langle ϕ|A|ψ\right \rangle / \left\langle ϕ| ψ\right\rangle$ of an observable $A$ is a measurable quantity associated with an observable $A$ and pre- and post-selected states $\vertψ\rangle, \vert ϕ\rangle$. Much has been discussed about the meaning and metrological uses of anomalous weak values, lying outside of the range of eigenvalues of $A$. We present a simple proof that anomalous weak values require that the (possibly mixed) pre- and post- selection states have coherence in the eigenbasis of $A$. We also present conditions under which anomalous $A_w$ are witnesses of generalized contextuality, dispensing with the operational weak measurement set-up.

arXiv:2303.08700•Mar 15, 2023•1 citation
The physical meaning of weak values and measurements can be completely understood with Born rule and the general probability theory. It is known that the weak value of an observable A^\hat {A}A^ with post-selection 〈F| may be out of the eigenvalue range of A^\hat {A}A^ . This is because the weak value of A^\hat {A}A^ with the post-selection is, in general, not the expectation value of A^\hat {A}A^ , but the expectation value of A^∣F⟩⟨F∣\hat {A}| F\rangle \langle F|A^∣F⟩⟨F∣ boosted by the post-selection.
The physical meaning of weak values and measurements can be completely understood within the framework of a conventional quantum mechanical approach. We should not expect the weak value of an observable A^\hat AA^ with post-selection ⟨F∣\langle F|⟨F∣ within the eigenvalue range of A^\hat AA^ because it is not an expectation value of A^\hat AA^.
In the previous meeting I demonstrated that the contextual value of an observable coincides with the weak value of Aharonov and his colleagues on the basis of consistency of quantum mechanics with Kolmogorov's measure theory of probability and that this consistency also leads to Born's rule as the unique probability measure of events to be discovered by the post-selection. I would like to point out in the meeting of this year that the error and disturbance defined by Ozawa in his work on the Heisenberg uncertainty relation can be interpreted in terms of the weak value. This observation further strengthens the viewpoint that the weak value is the "true value" of an observable before measurement.
A so called “weak value” of an observable in quantum mechanics (QM) may be obtained in a weak measurement + post-selection procedure on the QM system under study. Applied to number operators, it has been invoked in revisiting some QM paradoxes ( e.g. , the so called Three-Box Paradox and Hardy’s Paradox). This requires the weak value to be interpreted as a bona fide property of the system considered, a par with entities like operator mean values and eigenvalues. I question such an interpretation; it has no support in the basic axioms of quantum mechanics and it leads to unreasonable results in concrete situations.
It is known that the weak measurement can significantly amplify the mean of measurement results, sometimes out of the range limited in usual quantum measurement. This fact, as actively demonstrated recently in both theory and experiment, implies the possibility to estimate a very small parameter using the weak measurement technique. But does the weak measurement really bring about the increase of information for parameter estimation? This paper provides an answer to this question, in a general situation.
The quantum mechanical weak value Aw=⟨ϕ∣A∣ψ⟩/⟨ϕ∣ψ⟩A_w=\left\langle ϕ|A|ψ\right \rangle / \left\langle ϕ| ψ\right\rangleAw​=⟨ϕ∣A∣ψ⟩/⟨ϕ∣ψ⟩ of an observable AAA is a measurable quantity associated with an observable AAA and pre- and post-selected states ∣ψ⟩,∣ϕ⟩\vertψ\rangle, \vert ϕ\rangle∣ψ⟩,∣ϕ⟩. Much has been discussed about the meaning and metrological uses of anomalous weak values, lying outside of the range of eigenvalues of AAA. We present a simple proof that anomalous weak values require that the (possibly mixed) pre- and post- selection states have coherence in the eigenbasis of AAA. We also present conditions under which anomalous AwA_wAw​ are witnesses of generalized contextuality, dispensing with the operational weak measurement set-up.