Abstract There is a quite unexpected connection between the classical pendulum— chaotic or otherwise—and quantum mechanics when it functions on a macroscopic scale, as happens in superconductors. More specifically, the connection arises through something known as the Josephson effect. It turns out that there is an exact correspondence between the dynamics of Josephson devices and the dynamics of the classical pendulum. To uncover this curious relationship, we first review some essential ideas about superconductors and superconducting devices. The Dutch physicist H. Kamerlingh Onnes , noted in an earlier chapter for his Ph.D. dissertation on the Foucault pendulum, made his mark in the world of science for great discoveries in low temperature physics. Three years after receiving his degree in 1879, Onnes ascended to the chair in experimental physics at the University of Leiden in Holland. His research interest was low temperature physics and, like others in England and on the continent, he worked to achieve ever lower temperatures through the liquefaction of gases.
Abstract There is a quite unexpected connection between the classical pendulum— chaotic or otherwise—and quantum mechanics when it functions on a macroscopic scale, as happens in superconductors. More specifically, the connection arises through something known as the Josephson effect. It turns out that there is an exact correspondence between the dynamics of Josephson devices and the dynamics of the classical pendulum. To uncover this curious relationship, we first review some essential ideas about superconductors and superconducting devices. The Dutch physicist H. Kamerlingh Onnes , noted in an earlier chapter for his Ph.D. dissertation on the Foucault pendulum, made his mark in the world of science for great discoveries in low temperature physics. Three years after receiving his degree in 1879, Onnes ascended to the chair in experimental physics at the University of Leiden in Holland. His research interest was low temperature physics and, like others in England and on the continent, he worked to achieve ever lower temperatures through the liquefaction of gases.
Good order is the foundation of all good things. E. Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France , 1790 Josephson effect Superconductivity: A crash course The transition from the theoretical description of hypothetical building blocks of a quantum coherent device to something which can be actually fabricated and controlled is made much easier by the existence of superconductivity . This phenomenon, roughly speaking, allows a macroscopic quantum coherent flow of electrons in a sufficiently cold piece of an appropriate material by establishing a specific long-range order among them. Due to this one can, for example, use macroscopically different states of a superconductor as quantum states of a qubit, with the obvious advantage over “microscopically quantum” systems (like actual atoms) from the point of view of control, measurement and, last but not least, fabrication of structures with the desired parameters and on the desired scale. The phenomenon of superconductivity – the history of its discovery, experimental manifestations, theoretical explanation, open questions, relevance to other branches of physics, and technological applications – requires a thorough treatment, which can be found in any number of books. For our purposes Tinkham (2004) will provide more than sufficient background. We will not wander into the field of exotic/high-temperature superconductors for two simple reasons: the quantum coherent behaviour of the kind we need to realize qubits or other quantum coherent devices has not yet been properly and/or routinely achieved in these systems; and the fabrication of such devices is not yet reliable enough or even feasible.
The Josephson effect is a privileged access to the macroscopic quantum nature of superconductors. We review some ideas and experimental techniques on macroscopic quantum decay phenomena occurring in Josephson structures. The attention is mainly addressed to intermediate levels of dissipation which characterize a large majority of low critical current Josephson devices and are therefore an avoidable consequence of nanotechnology applied more and more to Josephson devices. Phase diffusion phenomena take over thermal activation in some temperature ranges also affecting the transition to macroscopic quantum tunneling, enriching the phase diagram mostly defined by the Josephson energy, the temperature and the level of dissipation.
Superconducting circuits, photonic cavities, and tiny mechanical oscillators are versatile systems in which quantum dynamics can be observed and controlled. These various technologies can be combined, and the resulting “circuits” are often referred to as nano-electromechanical or optomechanical systems. In the context of quantum physics, such devices are referred to as “mesoscopic” because they contain a large number of atoms. This terminology distinguishes them from the “microscopic” systems of atom-optics, such as single ions [364] and atoms [545, 233, 26], and the spins of individual nuclei [412]. Nano-engineered systems provide an especially powerful arena for exploring quantum measurement and control because of their potential to realize complex circuits. In this chapter we explain how to treat these systems and describe in detail a common method used to measure them. Superconducting circuits The electrical circuits that we describe in this chapter are quite different from those that use normal conductors, such as copper wire at room temperature. Normal conductors are subject to strong dissipation and decoherence from the environment. As a result the dynamical degrees of freedom of the circuits, the currents and voltages, behave as classical variables. In superconducting circuits, the resistance, and thus the dissipation, is so small that the currents and voltages behave as quantum mechanical degrees of freedom. Of course, the current in a wire is actually composed of many elementary particles that each obey quantum mechanics. Why then should the current act like a single quantum degree of freedom? A mechanical analogy is useful here. Recall that even though a macroscopic pendulum is composed of many particles, when one talks about the motion of the pendulum one means the motion of the center-of-mass of its constituent particles. Since the center of mass is merely a linear combination of the coordinates of each particle, it is itself a valid quantum mechanical coordinate with a conjugate momentum. In a similar way the total current in a superconducting wire is a collective degree of freedom that obeys quantum mechanics.
Bose-Einstein condensation, superfluidity, and superconductivity are quantum mechanics made visible. They mark the boundary between the classical and the quantum worlds, and they show the macroscopic role of quantum mechanics in condensed matter. This book presents these phenomena in terms of particles, their positions, and their momenta, giving a concrete visualisation and description that is not possible with traditional wave functions. A single approach that bridges the classical-quantum divide provides new insight into the role of particle interactions in condensation, the nature of collisions in superfluid flow, and the physical form of Cooper pairs in high-temperature superconductors. High-temperature superconductivity is explored with quantum statistical mechanics, which links it to Bose-Einstein condensation. Identifying a new mechanism for Cooper pairing, this explains the differences between the low- and high-temperature superconducting regimes and the role of the molecular structure of the conductor. The new perspective offered by this book on Bose-Einstein condensation, superfluidity, and high-temperature superconductivity gives particle-based explanations as well as mathematical and computational methods for these macroscopic quantum phenomena so that readers understand the role of particle interactions and structure in the physics of these phenomena. This book will appeal to undergraduate and graduate students, lecturers, academics, and scientific researchers in the fields of Bose-Einstein condensation and condensates, superfluidity, and superconductivity. It will also be of interest to those working with thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, statistical physics, quantum mechanics, molecular dynamics, materials science, condensed matter physics, and theoretical chemistry. Key Features: · Explores Bose-Einstein condensation with new evidence for multiple condensed states and novel Monte Carlo simulations for interacting bosons · Establishes the thermodynamic nature of condensed bosons from an analysis of fountain pressure measurements, including that they carry energy and entropy, and the thermodynamic principle of superfluid flow · Derives equations of motion for condensed bosons, and performs molecular dynamics simulations of the viscosity with molecular trajectories that give rise to superfluidity · Identifies the mechanism for electron pairing in high-temperature superconductivity
The Nobel laureates of this year have devised an experiment to observe macroscopic quantum tunneling in an electrical circuit made of superconductors. This monumental discovery has sparked numerous innovations and ultimately earned the three pioneers the Nobel prize. Afterwards, superconducting circuits play a key role in the proliferation of quantum technology in the 21st century. Especially, in the heart of the 2nd quantum revolution, quantum information technology is based on the radical development of the quantum computers. Superconducting Josephson junction devices has been the most advanced technology that has been picked up by the global tech giants in quantum computing. I will briefly review how the superconducting quantum chips and the macroscopic quantum effect had led innovation in quantum technology afterwards.
It is widely believed that the microscopic, that is, atomic-scale or smaller, world is governed by quantum mechanics while the macroscopic world, where our direct and daily experiences reside, is governed by classical mechanics. But why? Why do we not observe quantum phenomena such as quantum tunneling and quantum superposition in the macroscopic world? Where is the boundary between the microscopic and macroscopic worlds when it comes to the governing physical principles? Macroscopic quantum phenomena were first examined theoretically by A. Leggett in the 1970s. This boldly audacious idea was experimentally demonstrated in a series of groundbreaking works on Josephson junctions by John Clarke, Michel Devoret, and John Martinis in 1985, that have been celebrated by the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics. The trio’s work spurred the development of various qubit types based on superconducting circuits, ultimately leading to the current advancement of superconducting quantum computers.