© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

Physics and High Technology

Quantum in the Microscopic and Macroscopic Worlds

Mahn-Soo CHOI

Published Dec 23, 2025• 0 citations

Abstract

It is widely believed that the microscopic, that is, atomic-scale or smaller, world is governed by quantum mechanics while the macroscopic world, where our direct and daily experiences reside, is governed by classical mechanics. But why? Why do we not observe quantum phenomena such as quantum tunneling and quantum superposition in the macroscopic world? Where is the boundary between the microscopic and macroscopic worlds when it comes to the governing physical principles? Macroscopic quantum phenomena were first examined theoretically by A. Leggett in the 1970s. This boldly audacious idea was experimentally demonstrated in a series of groundbreaking works on Josephson junctions by John Clarke, Michel Devoret, and John Martinis in 1985, that have been celebrated by the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics. The trio’s work spurred the development of various qubit types based on superconducting circuits, ultimately leading to the current advancement of superconducting quantum computers.

DOI: 10.3938/phit.34.034

Related papers

A mecânica quântica em construção

Nelson Pinto-Neto

Quantum mechanics was developed in the early 20th century as a computational algorithm to organize and predict the strange results of a wide variety of experiments involving the microscopic world (molecules, atoms, elementary particles), which appeared random but had a predictable probabilistic distribution. Despite its overwhelming success, the conceptual foundations of this algorithm remain unclear and extremely controversial. How can we connect the microscopic world described by quantum mechanics with the macroscopic world of our daily experience? What is the role of observers in this connection? Why don't strange quantum phenomena occur on macroscopic scales? How can we explain the nonlocal nature of quantum phenomena? In this article I will present some attempts to answer these and other basic questions, which constitute different theories with completely different worldviews, commenting on their strengths and weaknesses. We will conclude that quantum theory is still under construction, as there is no consensual formulation. Its development is a fundamental problem in contemporary physics, and in thought in general.

Cadernos de Astronomia•Oct 29, 2025•0 citations

Nobel prize in physics 2025: Bringing quantum tunneling all the way up to the human scale

José Luis Lado

Quantum mechanics and quantum superpositions govern the microscopic world. However, when systems get bigger and bigger, eventually quantum tunneling becomes more and more elusive, until it becomes unobservable at human scales. Or so it was thought.

Europhysics news•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Entanglement And Coherence In Macroscopic Systems: Theoretical And Experimental Insights

Huma Saleem, Hassan Qureshi

Quantum entanglement and coherence, traditionally studied in microscopic systems, have recently been observed and manipulated in macroscopic platforms. These phenomena play a critical role in understanding the boundary between classical and quantum physics and in developing quantum technologies such as superconducting qubits, optomechanical resonators, and atomic ensembles. This article reviews theoretical models, numerical simulations, and experimental techniques used to probe entanglement and coherence in large-scale systems. Five thematic outlines are presented, with one outline including two graphs illustrating (i) time evolution of entanglement in a macroscopic oscillator system, and (ii) coherence decay under environmental coupling. Applications, limitations, and future directions are discussed to provide a comprehensive perspective.

Extensive journal of applied sciences•Jun 30, 2025•0 citations

Superconducting qubits

Alexandre M. Zagoskin, Alexandre Blais

From a physicist's standpoint, the most interesting part of quantum computing research may well be the possibility to probe the boundary between the quantum and the classical worlds. The more macroscopic are the structures involved, the better. So far, the most "macroscopic" qubit prototypes that have been studied in the laboratory are certain kinds of superconducting qubits. To get a feeling for how macroscopic these systems can be, the states of flux qubits which are brought in a quantum superposition corresponds to currents composed of as much as 10^5-10^6 electrons flowing in opposite directions in a superconducting loop. Non-superconducting qubits realized so far are all essentially microscopic.

arXiv:0805.0164•May 1, 2008•10 citations

From superconductivity to macroscopic quantum phenomena: a path marked by Nobel Prizes

Sebastián Bergeret

Is it possible to create a Schrödinger’s cat in a laboratory - that is, to make a macroscopic object obey the laws of quantum mechanics? The 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics recognizes experiments showing that this is indeed possible, using superconducting electrical circuits.

Europhysics news•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Demonstration of Realism Violation on a Macroscopic Scale

Kosuke Kakuyanagi, Yuichiro Matsuzaki, Hiraku Toida +3 more

In quantum mechanics, we can realize quantum superposition states, which cannot be understood by the usual common sense in our living world.In the microscopic world, such as that experienced by a single electron spin, superposition behavior has been experimentally confirmed.However, it is still controversial as to whether or not we can in principle observe such quantum phenomena in the macroscopic world.At NTT Basic Research Laboratories, we have experimentally tested such macroscopic quantum phenomena by using a macroscopic quantum device.

NTT technical review•Jul 1, 2017•3 citations

It is widely believed that the microscopic, that is, atomic-scale or smaller, world is governed by quantum mechanics while the macroscopic world, where our direct and daily experiences reside, is governed by classical mechanics. But why? Why do we not observe quantum phenomena such as quantum tunneling and quantum superposition in the macroscopic world? Where is the boundary between the microscopic and macroscopic worlds when it comes to the governing physical principles? Macroscopic quantum phenomena were first examined theoretically by A. Leggett in the 1970s. This boldly audacious idea was experimentally demonstrated in a series of groundbreaking works on Josephson junctions by John Clarke, Michel Devoret, and John Martinis in 1985, that have been celebrated by the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics. The trio’s work spurred the development of various qubit types based on superconducting circuits, ultimately leading to the current advancement of superconducting quantum computers.

Quantum mechanics was developed in the early 20th century as a computational algorithm to organize and predict the strange results of a wide variety of experiments involving the microscopic world (molecules, atoms, elementary particles), which appeared random but had a predictable probabilistic distribution. Despite its overwhelming success, the conceptual foundations of this algorithm remain unclear and extremely controversial. How can we connect the microscopic world described by quantum mechanics with the macroscopic world of our daily experience? What is the role of observers in this connection? Why don't strange quantum phenomena occur on macroscopic scales? How can we explain the nonlocal nature of quantum phenomena? In this article I will present some attempts to answer these and other basic questions, which constitute different theories with completely different worldviews, commenting on their strengths and weaknesses. We will conclude that quantum theory is still under construction, as there is no consensual formulation. Its development is a fundamental problem in contemporary physics, and in thought in general.

Quantum entanglement and coherence, traditionally studied in microscopic systems, have recently been observed and manipulated in macroscopic platforms. These phenomena play a critical role in understanding the boundary between classical and quantum physics and in developing quantum technologies such as superconducting qubits, optomechanical resonators, and atomic ensembles. This article reviews theoretical models, numerical simulations, and experimental techniques used to probe entanglement and coherence in large-scale systems. Five thematic outlines are presented, with one outline including two graphs illustrating (i) time evolution of entanglement in a macroscopic oscillator system, and (ii) coherence decay under environmental coupling. Applications, limitations, and future directions are discussed to provide a comprehensive perspective.

From a physicist's standpoint, the most interesting part of quantum computing research may well be the possibility to probe the boundary between the quantum and the classical worlds. The more macroscopic are the structures involved, the better. So far, the most "macroscopic" qubit prototypes that have been studied in the laboratory are certain kinds of superconducting qubits. To get a feeling for how macroscopic these systems can be, the states of flux qubits which are brought in a quantum superposition corresponds to currents composed of as much as 10^5-10^6 electrons flowing in opposite directions in a superconducting loop. Non-superconducting qubits realized so far are all essentially microscopic.

In quantum mechanics, we can realize quantum superposition states, which cannot be understood by the usual common sense in our living world.In the microscopic world, such as that experienced by a single electron spin, superposition behavior has been experimentally confirmed.However, it is still controversial as to whether or not we can in principle observe such quantum phenomena in the macroscopic world.At NTT Basic Research Laboratories, we have experimentally tested such macroscopic quantum phenomena by using a macroscopic quantum device.