Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Systems of several particles

Keith Hannabuss

Published Mar 20, 1997• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract One often wants to study systems, such as the helium atom of Sections 12.3 and 14.2, that contain more than one particle. We describe two-particle systems by a wave function, ψ (r1, r2), where r1 is the position of the first particle, and r2 that of the second. If we interchange the two particles, then the wave function becomes ψ (r2, r1). (16.1)

DOI
10.1093/oso/9780198537946.003.0016

Related papers

The collision between two electrons

N. F. Mott

Abstract It is well-known that the problem of the collision between two particles interacting according to the inverse square law is exactly soluble on the wave mechanics, and that the solution yields the same scattering laws as the classical theory. If, however, the two particles are identical, e.g., two electrons or two α-particles, this is not necessarily the case; for the wave functions used must be antisymmetrical or symmetrical in the co-ordinates of the two particles; and this may affect the scattering laws. In this paper we shall discuss the collision between two particles possessing spin, such as electrons, and also between two particles without spin, such as α-particles. Assuming an inverse square law force between the particles, and neglecting the actual spin forces, we shall deduce from the symmetry properties of the wave functions a scatter­ing law differing considerably from the classical. We shall also mention the various methods by which the effect could be observed, and give some experi­mental evidence in its favour. The application of the exclusion principle to collision problems has been discussed by the author in a previous paper. Suppose we wish to describe the motion of two particles interacting in any field of force. We obtain a solution w(r1 r2) of the wave equation, where r1 refers to the position of the first particle, and r2 to that of the second. If we did not use antisymmetrical wave functions, we should argue that the probability that the first particle should be at r1 and the second at r 2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2, and therefore the probability that one particle should be at r1 and the other at r2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2 + |w(r2 r1)|

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character•Jan 1, 1930•222 citations

N–Particle Systems

Şaki̇r Erkoç

After knowing the single particle analysis, one can easily extend the similar discussions for many-particle systems. Consider an N –particle system. The N –particles are described by a wave function ψ ( x 1 ,…,x n ) that is normalized such that

CRC Press eBooks•Jul 28, 2006•0 citations

On the theory of elastic collisions between electrons and hydrogen atoms

Leonardo Castillejo, Ian Colin Percival, M. J. Seaton

Abstract A hydrogen atom in the ground state scatters an electron with kinetic energy too small for inelastic collisions to occur. The wave function Ψ(r1; r2) of the system has boundary conditions at infinity which must be chosen to allow correctly for the possibilities of both direct and exchange scattering. The expansion Ψ = Σ ψ,(r1)Fy(r2) of the total wave function in y terms of a complete set of hydrogen atom wave functions ψy(r1) includes an integration over the continuous spectrum. It is si own that the integrand contains a singularity. The explicit form of this singularity and its connexion with the boundary conditions are examined in detail. The symmetrized functions Y* may be represented by expansions of the form Σ {ψy(r1) Gy±(r2) ±ψy(r2) y Gy±(r1)}, where the integrand in the continuous spectrum does not involve singularities. Finally, it is shown that because all the states ψy of the hydrogen atom are included in the expansion, the equation satisfied by F1, the coefficient of the ground state, contains a polarization potential which behaves like — a/2r4 for large r and is independent of the velocity of the incident electron.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Feb 9, 1960•159 citations

Many-Particle Systems

M.S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

The postulates of quantum mechanics and their consequences, which have been developed to describe a single particle, are still valid when applied to a system of N particles. The system can be described by a wave function Ψ which depends on the time and on the 3 N coordinates of all the particles: 10.1 Ψ = Ψ ( r → 1 , … r → i , … r → N , t ) = Ψ ( x 1 , y 1 , z 1 , … , x i , y i , z i , … x N , y N , z N , t ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn10_1_B.tif"/>

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2020•0 citations

Bosons and Fermions: Indistinguishable Particles with Intrinsic Spin

Duncan G. Steel

Abstract If we imagine a Hamiltonian, H^(r1,r2), describing two identical particles at positions r1 and r2 and then we interchange the particles, the Hamiltonian will be unaffected, i.e. H^(r1,r2)=H^(r2,r1). If we introduce an exchange operator P^r1,r2 such that P^r1,r2H^(r1,r2)=H^(r2,r1)P^r1,r2=H^(r1,r2)P^r1,r2, we see that they commute, or [P^r1,r2,H^(r1,r2)]=0. We know then that P^r1,r2andH^(r1,r2) have common eigenfunctions. We can then easily show that the eigenfunctions of the exchange operator must be either even or odd. Experiments show that odd exchange symmetry corresponds to half-integer spin particles called fermions, while even exchange symmetry corresponds to integer spin particles called bosons. The notes then discuss the implications of the new postulate and then presents the Heitler–London theory and the Heisenberg exchange Hamiltonian which has been so successful in predicting molecular structure.

•Apr 30, 2021•0 citations

The Schrödinger Equation in Three–Dimensions

Şaki̇r Erkoç

Consider an isolated two–body system (see Figure 7.1 ). The Hamiltonian representing the system is

CRC Press eBooks•Jul 28, 2006•0 citations
Abstract One often wants to study systems, such as the helium atom of Sections 12.3 and 14.2, that contain more than one particle. We describe two-particle systems by a wave function, ψ (r1, r2), where r1 is the position of the first particle, and r2 that of the second. If we interchange the two particles, then the wave function becomes ψ (r2, r1). (16.1)
Abstract It is well-known that the problem of the collision between two particles interacting according to the inverse square law is exactly soluble on the wave mechanics, and that the solution yields the same scattering laws as the classical theory. If, however, the two particles are identical, e.g., two electrons or two α-particles, this is not necessarily the case; for the wave functions used must be antisymmetrical or symmetrical in the co-ordinates of the two particles; and this may affect the scattering laws. In this paper we shall discuss the collision between two particles possessing spin, such as electrons, and also between two particles without spin, such as α-particles. Assuming an inverse square law force between the particles, and neglecting the actual spin forces, we shall deduce from the symmetry properties of the wave functions a scatter­ing law differing considerably from the classical. We shall also mention the various methods by which the effect could be observed, and give some experi­mental evidence in its favour. The application of the exclusion principle to collision problems has been discussed by the author in a previous paper. Suppose we wish to describe the motion of two particles interacting in any field of force. We obtain a solution w(r1 r2) of the wave equation, where r1 refers to the position of the first particle, and r2 to that of the second. If we did not use antisymmetrical wave functions, we should argue that the probability that the first particle should be at r1 and the second at r 2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2, and therefore the probability that one particle should be at r1 and the other at r2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2 + |w(r2 r1)|
Abstract A hydrogen atom in the ground state scatters an electron with kinetic energy too small for inelastic collisions to occur. The wave function Ψ(r1; r2) of the system has boundary conditions at infinity which must be chosen to allow correctly for the possibilities of both direct and exchange scattering. The expansion Ψ = Σ ψ,(r1)Fy(r2) of the total wave function in y terms of a complete set of hydrogen atom wave functions ψy(r1) includes an integration over the continuous spectrum. It is si own that the integrand contains a singularity. The explicit form of this singularity and its connexion with the boundary conditions are examined in detail. The symmetrized functions Y* may be represented by expansions of the form Σ {ψy(r1) Gy±(r2) ±ψy(r2) y Gy±(r1)}, where the integrand in the continuous spectrum does not involve singularities. Finally, it is shown that because all the states ψy of the hydrogen atom are included in the expansion, the equation satisfied by F1, the coefficient of the ground state, contains a polarization potential which behaves like — a/2r4 for large r and is independent of the velocity of the incident electron.
The postulates of quantum mechanics and their consequences, which have been developed to describe a single particle, are still valid when applied to a system of N particles. The system can be described by a wave function Ψ which depends on the time and on the 3 N coordinates of all the particles: 10.1 Ψ = Ψ ( r → 1 , … r → i , … r → N , t ) = Ψ ( x 1 , y 1 , z 1 , … , x i , y i , z i , … x N , y N , z N , t ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn10_1_B.tif"/>
Abstract If we imagine a Hamiltonian, H^(r1,r2), describing two identical particles at positions r1 and r2 and then we interchange the particles, the Hamiltonian will be unaffected, i.e. H^(r1,r2)=H^(r2,r1). If we introduce an exchange operator P^r1,r2 such that P^r1,r2H^(r1,r2)=H^(r2,r1)P^r1,r2=H^(r1,r2)P^r1,r2, we see that they commute, or [P^r1,r2,H^(r1,r2)]=0. We know then that P^r1,r2andH^(r1,r2) have common eigenfunctions. We can then easily show that the eigenfunctions of the exchange operator must be either even or odd. Experiments show that odd exchange symmetry corresponds to half-integer spin particles called fermions, while even exchange symmetry corresponds to integer spin particles called bosons. The notes then discuss the implications of the new postulate and then presents the Heitler–London theory and the Heisenberg exchange Hamiltonian which has been so successful in predicting molecular structure.